• As food becomes more of a commodity, it is essential that you assert your dominance. Your weaker siblings will understand - after all, only one member of your brood is needed to pass on the blood of you lineage.

    Or, just like, buy in bulk.
    That works too.
    As food becomes more of a commodity, it is essential that you assert your dominance. Your weaker siblings will understand - after all, only one member of your brood is needed to pass on the blood of you lineage. Or, just like, buy in bulk. That works too.
    1
    31 0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Napoleon
    Did Nostradamus predict the rise of Napoleon? He wrote: “PAU, NAY, LORON will be more of fire than of the blood, to swim in the praise, the great one to flee to the confluence. He will refuse entry to the Piuses, the deprived ones, and the Durance will keep them imprisoned.” If you rearrange the capitalized letters, you get Napualon Roy, French for Napoleon the King. The line about fire and blood could possibly refer to his non-noble lineage.


    Napoleon Did Nostradamus predict the rise of Napoleon? He wrote: “PAU, NAY, LORON will be more of fire than of the blood, to swim in the praise, the great one to flee to the confluence. He will refuse entry to the Piuses, the deprived ones, and the Durance will keep them imprisoned.” If you rearrange the capitalized letters, you get Napualon Roy, French for Napoleon the King. The line about fire and blood could possibly refer to his non-noble lineage.
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • (Disclaimer: I'm a nobody. I have no credentials. Therefore, do a little research yourself and show me something if you wish to discuss. Guess what. You have been lied to. Dumb fucking questions exist and your lying if you don't believe it)a
    https://www.etymonline.com/word/liberal
    Few things to point out. I see a lot of people using the word "liberial" and thought that I don't know enough about it to comment. After about 10 minutes of looking into it, these are a couple of things that seemed interesting to me given our current scope and ideas of people killing other people that are labeled something and how powerful language is and why it does matter what you say and how words are used.

    1. Educated myself a bit on some language information. It only came from one source and I don't care. It seems good to me and I'm not your fucking teacher and you don't pay me. https://aeon.co/essays/why-is-the-english-spelling-system-so-weird-and-inconsistent

    2. That the english language didn't return to written script until 14th century.

    3. The word "liberial" had its origins in French and Latin and mans something vastly different in the context at which we use it to describe others opinions and thoughts. At this time, all lasting language text were written and pronounced by those of nobility, lineage, money, religion, (Create narrative)

    4. It wasn't until the church got a hold of the word and used it against the people so that the whigs would keep power in britain. It wasn't until the elites and the church got together to take down what can, and is described as "free thought" and connected individuals to these parties to demonize the very idea. Hence the modern word in the political sense "liberial" is born and is carrying the baggage ever since.

    5. How can one have free thought and free speech at the same time? How is this being exploited? Lack of knowledge? A non caring? Has killing really become the option? Seems to me that it is one in the same. The same people that have created the modern term of liberial, is doing the same thing now a days. And many of us are falling victim to the media power move. ITS THE SAME FUCKING PEOPLE.

    Don't tell me how to live and I won't tell you how to live.





    English began its return as a written language in the 14th century. Over generations, it had crept back in among the nobility, as well as the clergy, although French and Latin were still the languages of educated and official pursuits.

    Liberal was used 16c.-17c. as a term of reproach with the meaning "free from restraint in speech or action." The Enlightenment revived it in a positive sense "free from prejudice, tolerant, not bigoted or narrow," which emerged 1776-88

    In 19c. often theological rather than political, opposed to orthodox, used of Unitarians, Universalists, etc. For educational use, see

    This is conjectured to be from PIE *leudh-ero-, which probably originally meant "belonging to the people," though the precise semantic development is obscure; but compare frank (adj.). This was a suffixed form of the base *leudh- (2) "people" (source also of Old Church Slavonic ljudu, Lithuanian liaudis, Old English leod, German Leute "nation, people;" Old High German liut "person, people").
    Who hath indeed, most like a liberal villain,
    Confess'd the vile encounters they have had
    A thousand times in secret.
    ["Much Ado," IV.1.93]
    (Disclaimer: I'm a nobody. I have no credentials. Therefore, do a little research yourself and show me something if you wish to discuss. Guess what. You have been lied to. Dumb fucking questions exist and your lying if you don't believe it)a https://www.etymonline.com/word/liberal Few things to point out. I see a lot of people using the word "liberial" and thought that I don't know enough about it to comment. After about 10 minutes of looking into it, these are a couple of things that seemed interesting to me given our current scope and ideas of people killing other people that are labeled something and how powerful language is and why it does matter what you say and how words are used. 1. Educated myself a bit on some language information. It only came from one source and I don't care. It seems good to me and I'm not your fucking teacher and you don't pay me. https://aeon.co/essays/why-is-the-english-spelling-system-so-weird-and-inconsistent 2. That the english language didn't return to written script until 14th century. 3. The word "liberial" had its origins in French and Latin and mans something vastly different in the context at which we use it to describe others opinions and thoughts. At this time, all lasting language text were written and pronounced by those of nobility, lineage, money, religion, (Create narrative) 4. It wasn't until the church got a hold of the word and used it against the people so that the whigs would keep power in britain. It wasn't until the elites and the church got together to take down what can, and is described as "free thought" and connected individuals to these parties to demonize the very idea. Hence the modern word in the political sense "liberial" is born and is carrying the baggage ever since. 5. How can one have free thought and free speech at the same time? How is this being exploited? Lack of knowledge? A non caring? Has killing really become the option? Seems to me that it is one in the same. The same people that have created the modern term of liberial, is doing the same thing now a days. And many of us are falling victim to the media power move. ITS THE SAME FUCKING PEOPLE. Don't tell me how to live and I won't tell you how to live. English began its return as a written language in the 14th century. Over generations, it had crept back in among the nobility, as well as the clergy, although French and Latin were still the languages of educated and official pursuits. Liberal was used 16c.-17c. as a term of reproach with the meaning "free from restraint in speech or action." The Enlightenment revived it in a positive sense "free from prejudice, tolerant, not bigoted or narrow," which emerged 1776-88 In 19c. often theological rather than political, opposed to orthodox, used of Unitarians, Universalists, etc. For educational use, see This is conjectured to be from PIE *leudh-ero-, which probably originally meant "belonging to the people," though the precise semantic development is obscure; but compare frank (adj.). This was a suffixed form of the base *leudh- (2) "people" (source also of Old Church Slavonic ljudu, Lithuanian liaudis, Old English leod, German Leute "nation, people;" Old High German liut "person, people"). Who hath indeed, most like a liberal villain, Confess'd the vile encounters they have had A thousand times in secret. ["Much Ado," IV.1.93]
    WWW.ETYMONLINE.COM
    liberal | Origin and meaning of liberal by Online Etymology Dictionary
    LIBERAL Meaning: "generous," also "nobly born, noble, free;" from late 14c. as "selfless, magnanimous, admirable;" from… See definitions of liberal.
    2
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Buckle up friends, we are heading back to mask'sville shortly, the excuses are flooding the front line, kids will have to mask up for school, 😠 the 4G-5G caused symptoms along with the vaccine death tole / carnage, is the variant boogyman, used for the new lockdown bullshit reason, we're going backwards, as govt usual! Well now there is more reason to stay away from the covaxxed if, the CDC of disinformation was telling the truth!

    CDC of disinformation!

    Page 17

    "Delta variant vaccine breakthrough cases may be as transmissible as unvaccinated cases ▪ Breakthrough cases reported to national passive surveillance have lower Ct values by 3 cycles (~10-fold increase in viral load) for Delta (Ct=18, n=19) compared with Alpha (Ct=21, n=207) and other lineages (Ct=21, n=251) ▪ Barnstable County, MA, outbreak: No difference in mean Ct values in vaccinated and unvaccinated cases [median among vaccinated (n=80): 21.9; unvaccinated (n=65): 21.5] "

    https://context-cdn.washingtonpost.com/notes/prod/default/documents/54f57708-a529-4a33-9a44-b66d719070d9/note/7335c3ab-06ee-4121-aaff-a11904e68462.#page=1

    By the way, this virus was never isolated, therefore it doesn't actually exist, and if that is so, you certainly can't make a vaccine for something you simply don't have!

    CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel

    Page 40, not page 39 (as in meme) the rest is correct!

    "The analytical sensitivity of the rRT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019- nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted,"

    CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel

    https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

    Well, sounds like another reason to stay away from the covaccinated, if? the FDA / CDC were actually telling the truth, yeah like after all their BS this is the truth!!!! It's not the virus we have to worry about, it's our cult govt that is the virus!

    Buckle up friends, we are heading back to mask'sville shortly, the excuses are flooding the front line, kids will have to mask up for school, 😠 the 4G-5G caused symptoms along with the vaccine death tole / carnage, is the variant boogyman, used for the new lockdown bullshit reason, we're going backwards, as govt usual! Well now there is more reason to stay away from the covaxxed if, the CDC of disinformation was telling the truth! CDC of disinformation! Page 17 "Delta variant vaccine breakthrough cases may be as transmissible as unvaccinated cases ▪ Breakthrough cases reported to national passive surveillance have lower Ct values by 3 cycles (~10-fold increase in viral load) for Delta (Ct=18, n=19) compared with Alpha (Ct=21, n=207) and other lineages (Ct=21, n=251) ▪ Barnstable County, MA, outbreak: No difference in mean Ct values in vaccinated and unvaccinated cases [median among vaccinated (n=80): 21.9; unvaccinated (n=65): 21.5] " https://context-cdn.washingtonpost.com/notes/prod/default/documents/54f57708-a529-4a33-9a44-b66d719070d9/note/7335c3ab-06ee-4121-aaff-a11904e68462.#page=1 By the way, this virus was never isolated, therefore it doesn't actually exist, and if that is so, you certainly can't make a vaccine for something you simply don't have! CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel Page 40, not page 39 (as in meme) the rest is correct! "The analytical sensitivity of the rRT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019- nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted," CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download Well, sounds like another reason to stay away from the covaccinated, if? the FDA / CDC were actually telling the truth, yeah like after all their BS this is the truth!!!! It's not the virus we have to worry about, it's our cult govt that is the virus!
    0 Comments 1 Shares
  • They're so proud...uh-huh. Whatever, I hope their pride keeps them warm on nights where there should be grandchildren keeping them company and such.
    Door's closed on this lineage.
    They're so proud...uh-huh. Whatever, I hope their pride keeps them warm on nights where there should be grandchildren keeping them company and such. Door's closed on this lineage.
    And Jamie Lee Curtis and her husband are actually proud of this. What a shame, I used to respect her so much!
    PS – Someone should buy her new “daughter” a one-way plane ticket to the Middle East!
    https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/jamie-lee-curtis-reveals-25-year-old-child-transgender-152626690.html?.tsrc=fp_deeplink
    WWW.YAHOO.COM
    Jamie Lee Curtis reveals her 25-year-old child is transgender
    The Halloween actress, 62, shared in an interview with "AARP Magazine" that she and her husband “have watched in wonder and pride as our son became our daughter Ruby."
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • 3)
    This is matched up with the example of Eli the high priest and his sons, also priests. He admonished his sons for their depredations, which cause the congregants themselves to sin, but they did not repent. They ignored him and kept up their arrogant sinning ways. He did not discipline his sons properly to keep them straight under his teachings; and as a result, the Lord told him through a prophet that his lineage would be cut off from the Levitical priesthood. Many would be slaughtered by the Philistines. Worse yet, the Ark of the Covenant would be held hostage by the invading armies of Philistine. When that happened, that caused Eli to drop off his chair, breaking his neck, and he died. His sons Hophni and Phinehas died. His pregnant daughter-in-law was devastated by the news of the deaths of her family members, which cause her to go into labor. She died after giving birth to Phineas’s first child, Ichabod. Tragedy struck Israel and its inhabitants because of the sins of her people and the lawlessness of her leaders.
    1 Samuel 2:12-36, 4:1-22.
    Action and reaction. Cause and effect. Boomerang. God will not allow His name to go long offended.
    God is no respecter of persons. David, a man of God, knew that; but his tolerance of sin in his family was like that of Eli. Maybe he forgot, maybe he didn't, but God didn't lose David. However, he sent prophets to his house after the affair with Bathsheba and then his committing the murder of her husband Urias. Nathan the prophet said to David that the sword would not depart from his house.
    Antinomianism, or lawlessness, or serial iniquity is a very serious matter. It teaches that there are no consequences for sin. It teaches that one does not have to repent from sin. It teaches that we are loved by God, accepted by God, cherished by God and that He knows our hearts. All of this is true – YES, IT IS TRUE. But God wants us to repent and become holy, because He is holy. But now people are learning to say no to repentance, instead of saying no to sin by way of God’s lovely grace.
    This was also epitomized by a movement in the 1970s as the "love gospel" movement. The love gospel was yet another teaching of lawlessness where people would practice their Christianity by loving one another but not admonishing each other when they sinning. Alberto Rivera, former Jesuit priest and born-again Christian, said the love gospel was about accepting everyone into the churches but not caring about how they were living. No holiness encouragement, no repentance for sins, no teaching about sanctification by the Holy Spirit, not using His grace, or anything like that.
    And the lawlessness teaching came up again in a reality show about a group of church ministers who, although they did good works, did not give proper credit to Jesus Christ. Taking the credit away from God for good to come from serving Him and His people is no small matter.
    Because of this antinomian teaching, because of hypergrace, because of compromising with sin, because of living lawlessly, because of embracing iniquity according to Romans 1:20-32, because of refusing to repent by instruction of some – NOT ALL -- preachers and teachers and other church leaders who themselves are compromised by sin and abominations, there will be a lot of very upset people who want to get into heaven but can’t. Because there is unrepented or unforgiven sin in their lives. Jesus was not messing around when He said not everyone is going to heaven because of unrepented or unforgiven sin – unrepented or unforgiven sin destroys our communications with God, it destroys our relationship with God.
    When Jesus comes to rapture the church, and I have sin, I will not be in heaven. We don't know when Jesus will return. This is why I must be ready. If I offend someone, I apologize to them. If I was offended by someone, I forgive them. The keys of the kingdom, binding and loosing are powerful. Christianity=repentance. Many Christians will not enter heaven not only because of unrepentance, but also because of unforgiveness. As long as we are living and breathing still, we need to forgive others or we will not be forgiven.
    Mat 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
    Mat 7:22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
    Mat 7:23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
    3) This is matched up with the example of Eli the high priest and his sons, also priests. He admonished his sons for their depredations, which cause the congregants themselves to sin, but they did not repent. They ignored him and kept up their arrogant sinning ways. He did not discipline his sons properly to keep them straight under his teachings; and as a result, the Lord told him through a prophet that his lineage would be cut off from the Levitical priesthood. Many would be slaughtered by the Philistines. Worse yet, the Ark of the Covenant would be held hostage by the invading armies of Philistine. When that happened, that caused Eli to drop off his chair, breaking his neck, and he died. His sons Hophni and Phinehas died. His pregnant daughter-in-law was devastated by the news of the deaths of her family members, which cause her to go into labor. She died after giving birth to Phineas’s first child, Ichabod. Tragedy struck Israel and its inhabitants because of the sins of her people and the lawlessness of her leaders. 1 Samuel 2:12-36, 4:1-22. Action and reaction. Cause and effect. Boomerang. God will not allow His name to go long offended. God is no respecter of persons. David, a man of God, knew that; but his tolerance of sin in his family was like that of Eli. Maybe he forgot, maybe he didn't, but God didn't lose David. However, he sent prophets to his house after the affair with Bathsheba and then his committing the murder of her husband Urias. Nathan the prophet said to David that the sword would not depart from his house. Antinomianism, or lawlessness, or serial iniquity is a very serious matter. It teaches that there are no consequences for sin. It teaches that one does not have to repent from sin. It teaches that we are loved by God, accepted by God, cherished by God and that He knows our hearts. All of this is true – YES, IT IS TRUE. But God wants us to repent and become holy, because He is holy. But now people are learning to say no to repentance, instead of saying no to sin by way of God’s lovely grace. This was also epitomized by a movement in the 1970s as the "love gospel" movement. The love gospel was yet another teaching of lawlessness where people would practice their Christianity by loving one another but not admonishing each other when they sinning. Alberto Rivera, former Jesuit priest and born-again Christian, said the love gospel was about accepting everyone into the churches but not caring about how they were living. No holiness encouragement, no repentance for sins, no teaching about sanctification by the Holy Spirit, not using His grace, or anything like that. And the lawlessness teaching came up again in a reality show about a group of church ministers who, although they did good works, did not give proper credit to Jesus Christ. Taking the credit away from God for good to come from serving Him and His people is no small matter. Because of this antinomian teaching, because of hypergrace, because of compromising with sin, because of living lawlessly, because of embracing iniquity according to Romans 1:20-32, because of refusing to repent by instruction of some – NOT ALL -- preachers and teachers and other church leaders who themselves are compromised by sin and abominations, there will be a lot of very upset people who want to get into heaven but can’t. Because there is unrepented or unforgiven sin in their lives. Jesus was not messing around when He said not everyone is going to heaven because of unrepented or unforgiven sin – unrepented or unforgiven sin destroys our communications with God, it destroys our relationship with God. When Jesus comes to rapture the church, and I have sin, I will not be in heaven. We don't know when Jesus will return. This is why I must be ready. If I offend someone, I apologize to them. If I was offended by someone, I forgive them. The keys of the kingdom, binding and loosing are powerful. Christianity=repentance. Many Christians will not enter heaven not only because of unrepentance, but also because of unforgiveness. As long as we are living and breathing still, we need to forgive others or we will not be forgiven. Mat 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Mat 7:22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? Mat 7:23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • He's very close to the mark but comes up a little short in his explanation.
    WHO ARE THE “SONS OF GOD” SPOKEN OF IN GENESIS 6? PART 2
    Bible Study / Daily Devotional
    Daily Devotions
    Average reading time is about 5 and a half minutes


    While the sons of God are not space invaders, the Bible does appear to teach that there is other life in the cosmos. It is clear in Scripture that Jesus made other planets: God “has in these last days spoken to us by His Son, whom He has appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the worlds” (Hebrews 1:2).

    Thousands of years ago, an intriguing meeting took place in heaven. “Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan came also among them” (Job 1:6). In attendance at this meeting are “sons of God,” as well as Satan, who says that he has come from Earth. The sons of God were there to represent their unfallen worlds in God’s universe. Satan was there to represent the earth.

    Originally, Adam had dominion over the Earth, but once he sinned, he forfeited his ruling to the enemy. Even Jesus referred to Satan as “the prince of this world” (John 12:31). In the Gospel of Luke, the genealogy of Jesus is traced all the way back to Adam. Notice what Luke says about this lineage: “the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God” (Luke 3:38, emphasis added).

    The difference between Seth and Adam is the bellybutton. Adam was created directly by the hand of God; Seth was born of Eve. Adam was the “son of God,” created to have dominion over Earth. Thus one definition for sons of God is those beings God Himself created to have dominion over the worlds He made. These beings were not born but were created directly by God.

    With that cleared up, let’s next talk about the second way the term “sons of God” is used.
    KEY BIBLE TEXTS
    And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. Genesis 6:1-2

    On the 6th day God created man and on the 7th he rested. Then he created Adam. The gardener. The 6th day men were hunter gatherers. Adam was created to tend to the garden of Eden. Cain the son of Adam went to the people that were created in the 6th day creation. After the fall of Adam, all mankind was punished and had to work by the sweat of their brow and their women to bare children. We have tried in vain through the years to return to our created state, Hunter gatherer, and gardener. Just look at history. When Christ returns we will become what God really intended for us to be! But only the ones that follow Christ in this life. The others are reserved for the fire!
    He's very close to the mark but comes up a little short in his explanation. WHO ARE THE “SONS OF GOD” SPOKEN OF IN GENESIS 6? PART 2 Bible Study / Daily Devotional Daily Devotions Average reading time is about 5 and a half minutes While the sons of God are not space invaders, the Bible does appear to teach that there is other life in the cosmos. It is clear in Scripture that Jesus made other planets: God “has in these last days spoken to us by His Son, whom He has appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the worlds” (Hebrews 1:2). Thousands of years ago, an intriguing meeting took place in heaven. “Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan came also among them” (Job 1:6). In attendance at this meeting are “sons of God,” as well as Satan, who says that he has come from Earth. The sons of God were there to represent their unfallen worlds in God’s universe. Satan was there to represent the earth. Originally, Adam had dominion over the Earth, but once he sinned, he forfeited his ruling to the enemy. Even Jesus referred to Satan as “the prince of this world” (John 12:31). In the Gospel of Luke, the genealogy of Jesus is traced all the way back to Adam. Notice what Luke says about this lineage: “the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God” (Luke 3:38, emphasis added). The difference between Seth and Adam is the bellybutton. Adam was created directly by the hand of God; Seth was born of Eve. Adam was the “son of God,” created to have dominion over Earth. Thus one definition for sons of God is those beings God Himself created to have dominion over the worlds He made. These beings were not born but were created directly by God. With that cleared up, let’s next talk about the second way the term “sons of God” is used. KEY BIBLE TEXTS And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. Genesis 6:1-2 On the 6th day God created man and on the 7th he rested. Then he created Adam. The gardener. The 6th day men were hunter gatherers. Adam was created to tend to the garden of Eden. Cain the son of Adam went to the people that were created in the 6th day creation. After the fall of Adam, all mankind was punished and had to work by the sweat of their brow and their women to bare children. We have tried in vain through the years to return to our created state, Hunter gatherer, and gardener. Just look at history. When Christ returns we will become what God really intended for us to be! But only the ones that follow Christ in this life. The others are reserved for the fire!
    0 Comments 1 Shares
  • Obama's lineage of slave ownership on his white mother's ancestors.
    Obama's lineage of slave ownership on his white mother's ancestors.
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/fauci-abstract-lineage.jpg
    https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/fauci-abstract-lineage.jpg
    0 Comments 0 Shares
Sponsored