It seems to be a really big issue with the Atheists..... They will claim "It requires no #Faith to be an #Atheist!" "We are simply saying that we don't believe YOUR explanation!" But actually.... It DOES require Faith! Because there is a large body of #Evidence supporting people's belief in the Most High... and they are choosing to disregard that evidence, in most cases, in favor of an explanation like.... ‘From Absolutely Nothing:’ The Logical Extension Of Atheism The logical conclusion of atheism is the belief that there was once Absolutely Nothing. For a very, very long time, Absolutely Nothing did absolutely nothing. But one day, without warning, Absolutely Nothing created Everything, for no apparent reason. It did this in a magical explosion which came from Absolutely Nothing. For a very long time after this, the Everything that came from Absolutely Nothing was completely dead. The Dead Everything just drifted around, randomly clumping together, eventually forming stars and planets, solar systems and galaxies, powerful black holes and beautiful gas nebulae. Absolutely Nothing taught it how to do this. On Earth, the Dead Everything formed itself into oceans and islands, stunningly beautiful mountain ranges, magnificent waterfalls, deep valleys, monumental glaciers and warm tropical beaches. Absolutely Nothing taught the Dead Everything that used to be nothing how to do this. But there was no life. Dead Everything was completely dead. Not a single living cell. Not a blade of grass. Not the smallest microbe in the ocean. Just dead, inanimate matter. But then another magical thing happened. One day, without warning, for no reason whatsoever, Dead Everything magically created living cells. We have no idea how Dead Everything did this, because we still can’t do this today, despite all our technology and the accumulated wisdom of our greatest scientific minds. The Dead Everything must have been extremely clever, probably because it was taught by Absolutely Nothing. We also don’t know why Dead Everything isn’t still creating living cells from dead matter today. Perhaps Absolutely Nothing originally told Dead Everything how to do it, but now Dead Everything has forgotten. Anyway, the magical living cells, created by Dead Everything had no intelligence of their own, yet they eventually formed themselves into grass and trees, fish and birds, insects and reptiles, and mammals of all shapes and sizes. Absolutely Nothing told the magical living cells how to do this. Absolutely Nothing did this by creating a highly complex biological coding, called DNA, that it placed inside every living cell. This is a coded set of instructions more complex than the most sophisticated computers mankind has ever built. Absolutely Nothing eventually gave every living cell a complete set of these instructions, involving literally billions of lines of specific biological code, telling each cell how to grow into all the different lifeforms that we see today. Absolutely Nothing told some living cells how to eventually grow into Atheists. Atheists believe in Absolutely Nothing. They have told the rest of us how Absolutely Nothing created Dead Everything in the beginning and how Absolutely Nothing then magically created the living world that we see around us today. We don’t know how Atheists learned about all this, since they weren’t there in the beginning when all of this supposedly happened. Perhaps Absolutely Nothing told them. Atheists have also told the rest of us that when we die, we go to Absolutely Nothing and turn into Absolutely Nothing ourselves. This is very exciting news! In the meantime, this understanding of our origins and eventual destiny gives us meaning and purpose. Since we now know that we came from Absolutely Nothing and will return to Absolutely Nothing, we can live our whole lives for Absolutely Nothing. Our ethics and morals are based upon Absolutely Nothing, and we serve Absolutely Nothing faithfully. Thank goodness for Atheism. Atheists. And they mock Christian beliefs! Anything you say...... **Smile and Nod** Personally.... I don't really care WHAT you believe! But when you attack my beliefs I feel the need to point out the flaws in your own

Another Jump in Astrophysics: Early Galaxies Challenging Dark Matter Models, The field of astrophysics has always been rife with surprising discoveries, and the latest findings from cutting-edge telescope data are no exception. Recent observations have cast doubt on some long-held assumptions about the formation of the early universe, leading scientists to question whether our current cosmological models, including the standard ΛCDM (Lambda Cold Dark Matter) model, truly represent the intricacies of cosmic evolution. A Glimpse into Early Galaxies Data from advanced telescopes, like the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), has shown that early galaxies, formed less than a billion years after the Big Bang, were much larger and more luminous than previously believed possible. According to traditional models, galaxies were expected to grow more gradually, accruing mass and light over billions of years. The revelation that such massive and bright galaxies existed so early in the universe’s history has prompted a reevaluation of the ΛCDM model. The Standard ΛCDM Model: A Quick Overview The ΛCDM model is a mathematical framework that has long been the backbone of Big Bang cosmology. It consists of three main components: A cosmological constant (Λ): This represents dark energy, an enigmatic force driving the accelerated expansion of the universe. Cold dark matter (CDM): Hypothetical matter that does not emit or interact with electromagnetic radiation, explaining the unseen mass that affects gravitational forces on large scales. Ordinary matter: The familiar atoms and particles that make up stars, planets, and everything else visible in the universe. This model is referred to as the standard model of cosmology because it is the simplest and most comprehensive framework that has so far provided a reasonable explanation for a wide range of astronomical observations, from the cosmic microwave background to the distribution of galaxies. Early Challenges and New Theories However, the discovery of unexpectedly large and bright early galaxies implies that our models might be missing key details about the dynamics of the early universe. If galaxies formed so rapidly after the Big Bang, alternative explanations may be necessary. These might include modifications to our understanding of gravitational interactions on cosmic scales or the introduction of new interactions between particles that do not fit into the current ΛCDM framework. Some astrophysicists are exploring models that propose dark matter behaves differently in the presence of extreme conditions, while others suggest entirely new mechanisms that accelerate the process of galaxy formation. These theories challenge the conventional narrative by suggesting that dark matter might not be a universal constant, or that additional factors, such as modified gravity theories, might come into play. The Future of Cosmological Exploration As these observations continue to be studied and debated, it is clear that our current cosmological models may need to be updated or expanded to align with this unexpected data. The insights gained from the JWST and similar telescopes will undoubtedly continue to push the boundaries of our understanding, leading to new theories that could redefine our comprehension of the universe’s origins and its early development. The journey of discovery is far from over, and the universe, as always, holds more mysteries yet to be revealed. Whether these findings lead to small adjustments in the ΛCDM model or prompt the development of entirely new paradigms, one thing is certain: astrophysics is entering an exciting new chapter.

Laniakea Supercluster, a massive galactic superstructure that contains our Milky Way. This supercluster spans over 500 million light-years and includes around 100,000 galaxies, dwarfing previous estimates of the size of our cosmic neighborhood. The mapping of Laniakea provided new insights into the forces that guide galaxy movements, showing how the distribution of matter on such vast scales influences the universe's dynamics.

WE ARE SCIENTISTS: Scientist Without Degree Possible? Based on the search results, it is possible to be a scientist without a degree. Here are some key points: In bioinformatics, many people working in the field did not have a degree in bioinformatics until recently, when degree programs were established. Self-study and learning by doing can be sufficient to become a bioinformaticist. In data science, it is possible to become a data scientist without a degree, as long as one has the necessary skills and can demonstrate their abilities through work and publications. In programming, one can learn by self-study and experience, as exemplified by the individual who taught themselves assembly language and went on to start a company and work at Microsoft. In astronomy, amateur astronomers have discovered comets and asteroids, and those with larger instruments have discovered supernovae in distant galaxies, demonstrating that non-degree holders can contribute to scientific discoveries. The scientific community values results and replicable experiments over formal education. As long as one’s work is well-documented and replicable, their credentials will not appear on the article, and their findings will be acknowledged. However, it’s important to note that: Without a degree, it may be more challenging to gain recognition and acceptance within the scientific community, particularly in fields with strong academic traditions. Self-study and learning by doing require significant dedication and effort, and may not provide the same level of formal training and mentorship as a degree program. In some fields, such as academia or research institutions, a degree may be a requirement for employment or funding. Ultimately, becoming a scientist without a degree requires a strong passion for learning, a willingness to put in the effort to develop necessary skills, and a focus on producing high-quality work that can be replicated and validated by others.

Robert Lea - The Euclid 'dark universe detective' telescope has revealed new images of the cosmos — and they are remarkable: https://www.space.com/euclid-space-telescope-new-images-may-23 #Euclid #SpaceTelescope #ESA #DarkEnergy #DarkMatter #EarlyReleaseObservations #DeepSky #Galaxies #GalaxyCluster #GravitationalLensing #Infrared #Cosmology #Astrophotography #Astronomy

Like most galaxies, the Milky Way harbors a supermassive Quasars, Stars remnants, and Missing Red Giants Stellar remnants, and Missing Red Giants in the galactic center are fascinating and dynamic events. In the space, which is densely populated with stars, the gravitational forces are incredibly strong, leading to close encounters and occasional explosion of stars. Massive stars in the galactic center are particularly prone the intense gravitational forces they experience. When these massive stars collide, the result can be the formation of even more massive stars, or sometimes, the formation of exotic objects such as Quasars or neutron stars. One intriguing aspect of stellar collisions in the galactic center is the production of collision remnants. These remnants can include unusual stellar objects like blue stragglers, which are stars that appear younger and bluer than their surroundings due to the merger of two or more stars , as massive stars can produce exotic phenomena such as X-ray binaries. The X-rays are produced by matter falling from one component, called the donor (usually a relatively normal star), where a compact object like a neutron star matter from a companion star. One puzzling observation in the galactic center is the apparent absence of red giants. Red giants are typically abundant in older stellar populations, but their numbers seem to be significantly lower in the galactic center. One possible explanation for this discrepancy is that red giants in the galactic center may be disrupted or destroyed by interactions with other stars, such as close encounters or collisions. Studying stellar remnants in the galactic center can provide valuable insights into the dynamics of dense stellar environments, the formation and evolution of massive stars, and the properties of exotic objects like neutron stars. It's an research that continues to uncover new mysteries about the universe's most extreme environments.

“An ancient star found in another galaxy with satellite and the Magellan Telescope, a team of scientists has found one of the oldest stars formed in a galaxy other than ours. The study, in addition to raising questions about the enrichment of elements in stars in the galaxies. Magellan Telescope has made a remarkable discovery. They found one of the oldest stars known to have formed in a galaxy other than our own. This star, which originated in the Large Magellanic Cloud, provides a unique perspective on the early element-forming processes in galaxies The Large Magellanic Cloud is a satellite galaxy that was once separate but fell into the Milky Way billions of years ago. The discovery of this ancient star is significant because it helps scientists understand how the universe evolved in regions outside our own galaxy. It also offers insights into the chemical enrichment of stars in galaxies, as these ancient stars preserve the elements near where they formed, providing a snapshot of the universe’s chemical composition billions of years ago This Discovery found the field of stellar archaeology, which aims to reconstruct how the earliest generations of stars changed the universe by studying the properties and elements they produced. The research paper detailing this discovery was published on, 2024 March 20 in Nature Astronomy.

Robert Lea - James Webb Space Telescope finds dwarf galaxies packed enough punch to reshape the entire early universe: https://www.space.com/james-webb-space-telescope-dwarf-galaxies-cosmic-evolution #DwarfGalaxy #JamesWebb #JWST #GravitationalLensing #Abell2744 #BigBangTheory #BigBang #Reionization #GeneralRelativity #Relativity #Cosmology #Astrophysics #Astronomy

"A new study suggests that in a mirror universe, the strange phenomenon makes up the bulk of all the mass. It doesn't interact with light or normal matter, influencing the motions of stars with different rules within galaxies and the growth of super-large structures in cosmic time, all in the same ballpark."

VATICAN "COSMOLOGY" IS DECEPTIVE ATTEMPT TO HIDE THE CREATOR FROM HUMANITY! "GLOBE" IS FAKE! Proverbs 18:13He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him. Thinking that you know the answer to a question, without first hearing all sides of the argument, is a fioolish thing! You have made up your mind without first seeing all evidence! Circle K corporation used to take their potential executive hires to lunch, and if the candidate salted and peppered his food, BEFORE TASTING IT, they would not hire the individual. This makes sense! Because this person has decided that his food needs seasoning, without tasting it first! That makes no sense whatsoever! Just because you have been brainwashed into believing something all of your life, does not mean that you should decide on it's truthfulness without first hearing the challenges to the subject! And the "earth being a sphere" has a LOT of unanswered challenges! Lots of questions have been posed which they cannot answer! For instance "Where's the "curvature?" Which is REQUIRED for their theoretical model to be true..... NOBODY in history has ever been able to demonstrate "curvature" to the earth! No scientist who ever lived could disprove the geocentric model, they chose their heliocentric THEORY on philosophical grounds alone! Their thinking being "We cannot be the center of creation" and that "We cannot created beings" so they opted to believe, going against all observations and evidence, to believe in a fairytale based on THEORY! “People need to be aware that there is a range of models that could explain the observations… For instance, I can construct you a spherically symmetrical universe with Earth at its center, and you cannot disprove it based on observations… You can only exclude it on philosophical grounds… What I want to bring into the open is the fact that we are using philosophical criteria in choosing our models. A lot of cosmology tries to hide that.” - George Ellis – W. Wayt Gibbs, “Profile: George F. R. Ellis,” Scientific American, October 1995, Vol. 273, No.4, p. 55 They CANNOT disprove it! what's that tell you? Quotes From Famous Scientists On Geocentrism "[W]e have[...] certainty regarding the stability of the Earth, situated in the center, and the motion of the sun around the Earth." - Galileo Galilei in letter to Francesco Rinuccini, March 29th, 1641 "[Redshifts] would imply that we occupy a unique position in the universe, analogous, in a sense, to the ancient conception of a central Earth[...] This hypothesis cannot be disproved" - Edwin Hubble in The Observational Approach to Cosmology "[A]ll this evidence that the universe looks the same whichever direction we look in might seem to suggest there is something special about our place in the universe. In particular, it might seem that if we observe all other galaxies to be moving away from us, then we must be at the center of the universe[...] We [reject] it only on grounds of modesty" - Stephen Hawking in A Brief History of Time "If the Earth were at the center of the universe, the attraction of the surrounding mass of stars would also produce redshifts wherever we looked! [This] theory seems quite consistent with our astronomical observations" - Paul Davies in Nature "I can construct you a spherically symmetrical universe with Earth at its center, and you cannot disprove it[...] A lot of cosmology tries to hide that." - George Ellis in Scientific American "The new results are either telling us that all of science is wrong and we're the center of the universe, or maybe the data is simply incorrect" - Lawrence Krauss, 2006 "[Without Dark Energy, Earth must be] literally at the center of the universe, which is, to say the least, unusual" - Lawrence Krauss, 2009 "I don't think [CMB maps] don't point toward a geocentric universe" - Max Tegmarck, 2011 MORE RELEVANT QUOTES "[R]ed shift in the spectra of quasars leads to yet another paradoxical result: namely, that the Earth is the center of the Universe." - Y.P. Varshni in Astrophysics and Space Science "Earth is indeed the center of the universe." - Y.P. Varshni in Astrophysics and Space Science "If the universe possesses a center, we must be very close to it" - Joseph Silk in The Big Bang: The Creation and Evolution of the Universe "The uniform distribution of [gamma-ray] burst arrival directions tells us that the distribution of gamma-ray-burst sources in space is a sphere or spherical shell, with us at the center" - Jonathan Katz in The Biggest Bangs: The Mystery of Gamma-Ray Bursts, the Most Violent Explosions in the Universe "To date, there has been no general way of determining [that] we live at a typical position in the Universe" - Chris Clarkson et al. in Physical Review Letters in 2008 https://www.bitchute.com/video/x9gdlkQCdnFb/