• WTFU AMERICA... SHUT DOWN AND DEFUND Planned Parenthood!
    A multi-billion dollar company that kills preborn children and sells their body parts should not receive a cent in taxpayer funding and should be shut down..
    WTFU AMERICA... SHUT DOWN AND DEFUND Planned Parenthood! A multi-billion dollar company that kills preborn children and sells their body parts should not receive a cent in taxpayer funding and should be shut down..
    Like
    1
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 120 Views 0
  • WHAT LIES BENEATH - EPHESIANS 5:11

    I NOW KNOW HOW THEY BUILT THE PYRAMIDS!
    Not the buts and bolts... but how the LABOR got done!

    The Pharaohs got themselves a printing press, and they printed up "Pharaoh bucks"
    then they convinced all of the people to trade with one another using their worthless
    Pharaoh bucks.

    Like the Federal Reserve does TODAY... They just kept printing those Pharaoh bucks!
    And they "paid" the workers with the worthless Pharaoh bucks, which costs them NOTHING, but made the entire society poor #Slaves

    They sat on their fat a**es, in their big houses, as YOU do all the work!
    They print you up some "Pharaoh bucks" and next thing you know you have the pyramids and over 1400 DUMBS worldwide!

    The "Dollar" is Phoenicians "money magic"
    And it must work pretty well too!

    It seems like every person on earth will do anything for some worthless paper!
    And they never seem to notice that they could END THEIR #SLAVERY simply by finding a better system of trade!

    You would not then be funding every Rich scumbag on earth, who produces NOTHING (With the exception of the "Pharaoh bucks")

    The entire WORLD has become the slaves of guys who print worthless paper!

    https://old.bitchute.com/video/2wimJQEJnlyg/
    WHAT LIES BENEATH - EPHESIANS 5:11 I NOW KNOW HOW THEY BUILT THE PYRAMIDS! Not the buts and bolts... but how the LABOR got done! The Pharaohs got themselves a printing press, and they printed up "Pharaoh bucks" then they convinced all of the people to trade with one another using their worthless Pharaoh bucks. Like the Federal Reserve does TODAY... They just kept printing those Pharaoh bucks! And they "paid" the workers with the worthless Pharaoh bucks, which costs them NOTHING, but made the entire society poor #Slaves They sat on their fat a**es, in their big houses, as YOU do all the work! They print you up some "Pharaoh bucks" and next thing you know you have the pyramids and over 1400 DUMBS worldwide! The "Dollar" is Phoenicians "money magic" And it must work pretty well too! It seems like every person on earth will do anything for some worthless paper! And they never seem to notice that they could END THEIR #SLAVERY simply by finding a better system of trade! You would not then be funding every Rich scumbag on earth, who produces NOTHING (With the exception of the "Pharaoh bucks") The entire WORLD has become the slaves of guys who print worthless paper! https://old.bitchute.com/video/2wimJQEJnlyg/
    OLD.BITCHUTE.COM
    What Lies Beneath - Ephesians 5:11
    The Sixth Seal: Terror "And I looked when He broke the sixth seal, and there was a great earthquake; and the sun became as black as sackcloth made of hair, and the whole moon became like blood; and the stars of the sky fell to the earth, as a fig tr…
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 239 Views
  • https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-12-19-national-defense-authorization-act-sails-through-congress.html National Defense Authorization Act sails through Congress with $895 billion for war and terror The 2025 NDAA passed in Congress with an $895 billion price tag, focusing on Pentagon funding.

    Total national security spending is projected by some experts to exceed $1.77 trillion, including debt interest and other spending.

    The bill includes pay raises for troops and funds for new military assets to counter China and other adversaries.

    Supplemental spending bills, like the $95 billion August package, further escalate military aid to Israel, Ukraine and Taiwan.

    Critics argue the NDAA prioritizes military spending over addressing domestic crises like homelessness and hunger.
    https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-12-19-national-defense-authorization-act-sails-through-congress.html National Defense Authorization Act sails through Congress with $895 billion for war and terror The 2025 NDAA passed in Congress with an $895 billion price tag, focusing on Pentagon funding. Total national security spending is projected by some experts to exceed $1.77 trillion, including debt interest and other spending. The bill includes pay raises for troops and funds for new military assets to counter China and other adversaries. Supplemental spending bills, like the $95 billion August package, further escalate military aid to Israel, Ukraine and Taiwan. Critics argue the NDAA prioritizes military spending over addressing domestic crises like homelessness and hunger.
    WWW.NATURALNEWS.COM
    National Defense Authorization Act sails through Congress with $895 billion for war and terror – NaturalNews.com
    The 2025 NDAA passed in Congress with an $895 billion price tag, focusing on Pentagon funding. Total national security spending is projected by some experts to exceed $1.77 trillion, including debt interest and other spending. The bill includes pay raises for troops and funds for new military assets to counter China and other adversaries. Supplemental […]
    Angry
    1
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 317 Views
  • If Congress does not pass a spending deal and President Biden does not sign it, government funding lapses at 12:01 a.m. Saturday. For the first time in decades, Washington is at an ungovernable impasse. The most likely scenario is for the Democrats to provide the Yes votes to rescue the spending in the bill. However, their price to push through such a bill would be steep - such as securing a commitment from Trump to abandon DOGE and Musk's promised future cuts to government.
    https://tippinsights.com/the-battle-to-reclaim-americas-fiscal-future-strikes-a-blow-to-beltway-banditry/
    If Congress does not pass a spending deal and President Biden does not sign it, government funding lapses at 12:01 a.m. Saturday. For the first time in decades, Washington is at an ungovernable impasse. The most likely scenario is for the Democrats to provide the Yes votes to rescue the spending in the bill. However, their price to push through such a bill would be steep - such as securing a commitment from Trump to abandon DOGE and Musk's promised future cuts to government. https://tippinsights.com/the-battle-to-reclaim-americas-fiscal-future-strikes-a-blow-to-beltway-banditry/
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 277 Views
  • Biden provided the Postal Service with funding to purchase 60,000 “Next Generation Delivery Vehicles” (NGDVs) from defense contractor Oshkosh. Oshkosh has never produced an electric truck and it is obvious why Biden avoided other more established EV manufacturers. Congress approved $3 billion to spend on this $10 billion project derived from the Inflation Reduction Act – the largest guise for climate spending in US history.
    Out of that $3 BILLION, only 93 vehicles have been delivered since 2022. Countless issues have been reported with these NGDVs from leaks to airbags. Worse, Oshkosh was never equipped to handle the production of 3,000 vehicles, and has stated that they have only been able to produce ONE truck per day. They are now working to refine their manufacturing to create 80 trucks per day. Again, there were other avenues and established factories.
    https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/climate/postal-truck-ev-fail-3b-govt-waste/
    Biden provided the Postal Service with funding to purchase 60,000 “Next Generation Delivery Vehicles” (NGDVs) from defense contractor Oshkosh. Oshkosh has never produced an electric truck and it is obvious why Biden avoided other more established EV manufacturers. Congress approved $3 billion to spend on this $10 billion project derived from the Inflation Reduction Act – the largest guise for climate spending in US history. Out of that $3 BILLION, only 93 vehicles have been delivered since 2022. Countless issues have been reported with these NGDVs from leaks to airbags. Worse, Oshkosh was never equipped to handle the production of 3,000 vehicles, and has stated that they have only been able to produce ONE truck per day. They are now working to refine their manufacturing to create 80 trucks per day. Again, there were other avenues and established factories. https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/climate/postal-truck-ev-fail-3b-govt-waste/
    WWW.ARMSTRONGECONOMICS.COM
    Postal Truck EV Fail – $3B Govt Waste
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k51TUicyHEY
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 341 Views
  • https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/breaking-house-votes-against-trump-endorsed-government-funding/
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/breaking-house-votes-against-trump-endorsed-government-funding/
    WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM
    BREAKING: House Votes Against Trump-Endorsed Government Funding Bill as Shutdown Looms | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson
    In a surprising turn of events, the House has voted down the critical government funding bill. Discover the implications of this decision and what it means for the nation.
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 135 Views
  • How Do We Escape the Panopticon?
    Since their inceptions, companies like Facebook and Google have received funding from the government to build and deploy the technology that sucks up our data. Allowing the awful chimera of public-private partnerships to control our communications has been our undoing. To note an important example, Palantir Technologies, founded by Peter Thiel, is a creation of the Central Intelligence Agency. Palantir works on top of the infrastructure created by Alphabet and Meta and gathers online activity in order to profile every U.S. citizen. Democracy in the U.S. has undergone an existential crisis, in large part due to the fact that no one has any privacy on the Internet and all of our scraped data is centrally controlled by a few actors. Citizens are both censored and afraid to speak.
    https://off-guardian.org/2024/12/19/how-do-we-escape-the-panopticon/
    How Do We Escape the Panopticon? Since their inceptions, companies like Facebook and Google have received funding from the government to build and deploy the technology that sucks up our data. Allowing the awful chimera of public-private partnerships to control our communications has been our undoing. To note an important example, Palantir Technologies, founded by Peter Thiel, is a creation of the Central Intelligence Agency. Palantir works on top of the infrastructure created by Alphabet and Meta and gathers online activity in order to profile every U.S. citizen. Democracy in the U.S. has undergone an existential crisis, in large part due to the fact that no one has any privacy on the Internet and all of our scraped data is centrally controlled by a few actors. Citizens are both censored and afraid to speak. https://off-guardian.org/2024/12/19/how-do-we-escape-the-panopticon/
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 361 Views
  • https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/12/17/chicago-democrat-mayor-removes-citizens-meeting-protesting-migrant-funding/
    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/12/17/chicago-democrat-mayor-removes-citizens-meeting-protesting-migrant-funding/
    WWW.BREITBART.COM
    VIDEO: Chicagoans Removed from Meeting for Protesting Migrant Funding
    Chicagoans were removed from a meeting after voicing disagreement with the Democrat mayor's proposed budget to give more funds to migrants.
    1 Commenti 0 condivisioni 219 Views
  • https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/whos-funding-radical-trump-hating-65-project-now/
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/whos-funding-radical-trump-hating-65-project-now/
    WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM
    Who's Funding the Radical Trump-Hating 65 Project? - Now We Know - VIDEO | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
    Uncover the shadowy funding behind the 65 Project and its radical agenda against conservative attorneys. Explore the connections that threaten our legal system and electoral integrity.
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 136 Views

  • Falsely Claiming to Be an Insurer Can be Criminal

    To Sue for Business Disparagement Evidence is Required

    Post 4951, Posted on December 17, 2024 by Barry Zalma

    Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/falsely-claiming-insurer-can-criminal-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-3bwrc, see the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4950 posts.

    See the full video at and at

    Plaintiff Route App, Inc.’s (“Route”) moved the USDC to Dismiss two counterclaims asserted by OrderProtection.com, Inc. (“OrderProtection”). In Route App, Inc. v. Orderprotection.Com, Inc.; Julian Wilson, et al, No. 2:23cv606 DAK, United States District Court, D. Utah (December 9, 2024) found no evidence supporting a claim of business disparagement or business defamation.

    BACKGROUND

    This case involves a dispute between Route, a post-purchase shipping insurance provider, and a competitor, OrderProtection. In its Complaint, Route alleges that OrderProtection and several of Route’s former employees misappropriated trade secrets to create a competing business. In response to Route’s Complaint, OrderProtection filed an Answer and Counterclaims, asserting four causes of action: (1) Unfair Competition in Violation of the Lanham Act; (2) Defamation Per Se/Defamation/Business Disparagement; (3) Tortious Interference with Existing and Prospective Economic Relations; and (4) Negligent Misrepresentation.

    The facts pertaining to OrderProtection’s claim for “Defamation/Defamation Per Se/Business Disparagement” are essentially that Route employees have allegedly told OrderProtection customers and potential customers that they should work with Route instead of OrderProtection because Route is a “legal insurance provider” and OrderProtection is not.

    OrderProtection argued that Route is not a licensed insurance company and that, at best, Route affiliates with an insurance producer to procure its own insurance coverage (which does not benefit customers or merchants). More importantly both Route and OrderProtection in essence both self-fund the warranty protection they provide, and thus a customer is no better off with Route’s protection package than with OrderProtection’s competitive offering.
    DISCUSSION

    Specifically, while OrderProtection’s Opposition Memorandum does not explicitly state that it conceded its defamation and defamation per se claims, OrderProtection never addresses Route’s argument that it could not properly maintain these causes of action in the context of this case.

    Even if OrderProtection had not conceded these claims, it failed to establish that these claims are viable in the context of this case. Further, OrderProtection made no argument that Utah law recognizes a “hybrid” cause of action for “Defamation Per Se/Defamation/Business Disparagement,” wherein a business disparagement claim may be analyzed using defamation or defamation per se case law rather than case law pertaining to a business disparagement claim.

    Business Disparagement

    The parties agree that to state a claim for business disparagement (sometimes called injurious falsehood), OrderProtection must allege (1) falsity of the statement made; (2) malice by the party making the statement; and (3) special damages. According to Route, while OrderProtection has made allegations of lost customers, it has not named specific individuals, nor has it alleged with particularity any financial losses, which is required under Rule 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

    The court declined to recognize a “business disparagement per se” cause of action in which special damages need not be alleged, and it declined to recognize a business disparagement claim that relies on a statement that is “false by implication,” which is a concept that has been recognized in defamation cases.

    Route’s Motion to Dismiss was granted and OrderProtection’s claims for defamation and defamation per se were dismissed with prejudice. Its claim for business disparagement was dismissed without prejudice, and OrderProtection may file a Motion for Leave to Amend by January 10, 2025, if it is able to allege a proper business disparagement claim, as discussed above.

    ZALMA OPINION

    Two businesses claiming to be issuers of insurance who were not licensed insurers claimed to be victims of disparagement by the other. Customers, because of the various claims shifted from one party to the other who, contrary to their claims, were self funding what they alleged was insurance of shipments of goods. The court in a Solomon-like decision ignored the fact that both claimed to be insurers when they were not and used the false claims to take over clients. Both lost and the court gave OrderProtection the attempt to state a business disparagement claim implying that the court did not believe OrderProtection would be able to plead a viable cause of action.

    The State of Utah Department of Insurance should consider this case.

    (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.

    Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.

    Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe

    Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg

    Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk
    Falsely Claiming to Be an Insurer Can be Criminal To Sue for Business Disparagement Evidence is Required Post 4951, Posted on December 17, 2024 by Barry Zalma Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/falsely-claiming-insurer-can-criminal-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-3bwrc, see the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4950 posts. See the full video at and at Plaintiff Route App, Inc.’s (“Route”) moved the USDC to Dismiss two counterclaims asserted by OrderProtection.com, Inc. (“OrderProtection”). In Route App, Inc. v. Orderprotection.Com, Inc.; Julian Wilson, et al, No. 2:23cv606 DAK, United States District Court, D. Utah (December 9, 2024) found no evidence supporting a claim of business disparagement or business defamation. BACKGROUND This case involves a dispute between Route, a post-purchase shipping insurance provider, and a competitor, OrderProtection. In its Complaint, Route alleges that OrderProtection and several of Route’s former employees misappropriated trade secrets to create a competing business. In response to Route’s Complaint, OrderProtection filed an Answer and Counterclaims, asserting four causes of action: (1) Unfair Competition in Violation of the Lanham Act; (2) Defamation Per Se/Defamation/Business Disparagement; (3) Tortious Interference with Existing and Prospective Economic Relations; and (4) Negligent Misrepresentation. The facts pertaining to OrderProtection’s claim for “Defamation/Defamation Per Se/Business Disparagement” are essentially that Route employees have allegedly told OrderProtection customers and potential customers that they should work with Route instead of OrderProtection because Route is a “legal insurance provider” and OrderProtection is not. OrderProtection argued that Route is not a licensed insurance company and that, at best, Route affiliates with an insurance producer to procure its own insurance coverage (which does not benefit customers or merchants). More importantly both Route and OrderProtection in essence both self-fund the warranty protection they provide, and thus a customer is no better off with Route’s protection package than with OrderProtection’s competitive offering. DISCUSSION Specifically, while OrderProtection’s Opposition Memorandum does not explicitly state that it conceded its defamation and defamation per se claims, OrderProtection never addresses Route’s argument that it could not properly maintain these causes of action in the context of this case. Even if OrderProtection had not conceded these claims, it failed to establish that these claims are viable in the context of this case. Further, OrderProtection made no argument that Utah law recognizes a “hybrid” cause of action for “Defamation Per Se/Defamation/Business Disparagement,” wherein a business disparagement claim may be analyzed using defamation or defamation per se case law rather than case law pertaining to a business disparagement claim. Business Disparagement The parties agree that to state a claim for business disparagement (sometimes called injurious falsehood), OrderProtection must allege (1) falsity of the statement made; (2) malice by the party making the statement; and (3) special damages. According to Route, while OrderProtection has made allegations of lost customers, it has not named specific individuals, nor has it alleged with particularity any financial losses, which is required under Rule 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The court declined to recognize a “business disparagement per se” cause of action in which special damages need not be alleged, and it declined to recognize a business disparagement claim that relies on a statement that is “false by implication,” which is a concept that has been recognized in defamation cases. Route’s Motion to Dismiss was granted and OrderProtection’s claims for defamation and defamation per se were dismissed with prejudice. Its claim for business disparagement was dismissed without prejudice, and OrderProtection may file a Motion for Leave to Amend by January 10, 2025, if it is able to allege a proper business disparagement claim, as discussed above. ZALMA OPINION Two businesses claiming to be issuers of insurance who were not licensed insurers claimed to be victims of disparagement by the other. Customers, because of the various claims shifted from one party to the other who, contrary to their claims, were self funding what they alleged was insurance of shipments of goods. The court in a Solomon-like decision ignored the fact that both claimed to be insurers when they were not and used the false claims to take over clients. Both lost and the court gave OrderProtection the attempt to state a business disparagement claim implying that the court did not believe OrderProtection would be able to plead a viable cause of action. The State of Utah Department of Insurance should consider this case. (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc. Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos. Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk
    WWW.LINKEDIN.COM
    Discover thousands of collaborative articles on 2500+ skills
    Discover 100 collaborative articles on domains such as Marketing, Public Administration, and Healthcare. Our expertly curated collection combines AI-generated content with insights and advice from industry experts, providing you with unique perspectives and up-to-date information on many skills and their applications.
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 1K Views
Pagine in Evidenza
Sponsorizzato

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here