• Appear for a Scheduled EUO or Lose

    Failure to Honor Conditions Precedent Voids Coverage in New York

    Post 4937

    Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/appear-scheduled-euo-lose-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-gvkec/, see the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4900 posts.

    State Farm contended that it is entitled to summary judgment because of the failure to appear for examination under oath (EUO) by multiple defendants. State Farm contended that timely notices were properly mailed to the Claimants who failed to appear.

    In State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Alford A. Smith, M.D., et al, 2024 NY Slip Op 33802(U), Index No. 155607/2020, Motion Seq. No. 003, Supreme Court, New York County, Appellate Division (October 24, 2024) court ruled in favor of State Farm.

    The Supreme Court of New York County ORDERED that the plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s (“State Farm/Plaintiff’), motion for summary judgment was GRANTED against defendants, Alford A. Smith, M.D., P.C., and the multiple other defendants who are doctors, chiropractors and other health services, (hereinafter collectively (“The Defendants”).

    FACTS

    The Supreme Court found that the EUO scheduling letters were timely requested and claimants failed to appear at that EUO. The documentary evidence showed that plaintiff sent the EUO scheduling letters to the claimants within 15 business days of receiving the prescribed verification forms as required by New York statute.

    FRAUD, FAILURE TO APPEAR FOR EUO & FAILURE TO SIGN TRANSCRIPT ARE BREACHES OF MATERIAL CONDITION PRECEDENT

    The Appellate Division upheld the Supreme Court’s ruling that the failure to appear for an EUO that was requested in a timely fashion by the insurer is a breach of a condition precedent to coverage and voids the policy ab initio. In addition, although claimant Griselda Torres unlike the other defendants, appeared for her EUO, Torres failed to return a subscribed copy of her EUO transcript.

    State Farm properly and effectively argued that appearing for and testifying at EUO and returning the transcripts of the EUO are conditions precedent to coverage and failure to sign and return the transcript warranted a denial of the claims.

    State Farm demonstrated in its motion and supporting evidence that multiple claimants breached a condition precedent to coverage by failing to appear for properly noticed EUOs on two separate occasions. Furthermore, claimant Griselda Torres’ failure to subscribe and return the transcript of her EUOsviolated a condition precedent to coverage and warranted denial of the claims.

    Moreover, there was nothing on the Court’s record to suggest that the scheduled EUOs were not justified, nor held at a place and time that was not reasonably convenient to the defendants.

    CONCLUSION

    State Farm’s motion seeking summary judgment in its favor was GRANTED as to THE multiple defendants and it was further ORDERED that any requested relief sought not expressly addressed herein has nonetheless been considered; and it was further ORDERED that the case shall continue against the remaining defendants; and it was further ORDERED that within 30 days of entry, plaintiff shall serve a copy of this decision/order upon the defendants with notice of entry.

    ZALMA OPINION

    The defendants in this case were doctors, physicians, chiropractors and other health care providers who billed State Farm for services provided to people who were injured in automobile accidents and assigned their rights to the providers who tried to collect their billings without complying with the EUO condition. They all lost their claims because they refused to appear except one defendant who appeared but failed to sign the transcript of the EUO and return it to State Farm. They all lost their claims and State Farm will continue its actions against many more defendants not subject to the motion.

    (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.

    Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.

    Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe

    Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg

    Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk
    Appear for a Scheduled EUO or Lose Failure to Honor Conditions Precedent Voids Coverage in New York Post 4937 Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/appear-scheduled-euo-lose-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-gvkec/, see the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4900 posts. State Farm contended that it is entitled to summary judgment because of the failure to appear for examination under oath (EUO) by multiple defendants. State Farm contended that timely notices were properly mailed to the Claimants who failed to appear. In State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Alford A. Smith, M.D., et al, 2024 NY Slip Op 33802(U), Index No. 155607/2020, Motion Seq. No. 003, Supreme Court, New York County, Appellate Division (October 24, 2024) court ruled in favor of State Farm. The Supreme Court of New York County ORDERED that the plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s (“State Farm/Plaintiff’), motion for summary judgment was GRANTED against defendants, Alford A. Smith, M.D., P.C., and the multiple other defendants who are doctors, chiropractors and other health services, (hereinafter collectively (“The Defendants”). FACTS The Supreme Court found that the EUO scheduling letters were timely requested and claimants failed to appear at that EUO. The documentary evidence showed that plaintiff sent the EUO scheduling letters to the claimants within 15 business days of receiving the prescribed verification forms as required by New York statute. FRAUD, FAILURE TO APPEAR FOR EUO & FAILURE TO SIGN TRANSCRIPT ARE BREACHES OF MATERIAL CONDITION PRECEDENT The Appellate Division upheld the Supreme Court’s ruling that the failure to appear for an EUO that was requested in a timely fashion by the insurer is a breach of a condition precedent to coverage and voids the policy ab initio. In addition, although claimant Griselda Torres unlike the other defendants, appeared for her EUO, Torres failed to return a subscribed copy of her EUO transcript. State Farm properly and effectively argued that appearing for and testifying at EUO and returning the transcripts of the EUO are conditions precedent to coverage and failure to sign and return the transcript warranted a denial of the claims. State Farm demonstrated in its motion and supporting evidence that multiple claimants breached a condition precedent to coverage by failing to appear for properly noticed EUOs on two separate occasions. Furthermore, claimant Griselda Torres’ failure to subscribe and return the transcript of her EUOsviolated a condition precedent to coverage and warranted denial of the claims. Moreover, there was nothing on the Court’s record to suggest that the scheduled EUOs were not justified, nor held at a place and time that was not reasonably convenient to the defendants. CONCLUSION State Farm’s motion seeking summary judgment in its favor was GRANTED as to THE multiple defendants and it was further ORDERED that any requested relief sought not expressly addressed herein has nonetheless been considered; and it was further ORDERED that the case shall continue against the remaining defendants; and it was further ORDERED that within 30 days of entry, plaintiff shall serve a copy of this decision/order upon the defendants with notice of entry. ZALMA OPINION The defendants in this case were doctors, physicians, chiropractors and other health care providers who billed State Farm for services provided to people who were injured in automobile accidents and assigned their rights to the providers who tried to collect their billings without complying with the EUO condition. They all lost their claims because they refused to appear except one defendant who appeared but failed to sign the transcript of the EUO and return it to State Farm. They all lost their claims and State Farm will continue its actions against many more defendants not subject to the motion. (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc. Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos. Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk
    0 Comments 0 Shares 241 Views
  • IMHO: ALL "DOCTORS" SHOULD LEAD, BY EXAMPLE",... THEY NEED TO TAKE THE SAME "MEDS, SURGERIES, AND "TREATMENTS" THAT THEY RECOMMEND.....

    https://media.gab.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=568,quality=100,fit=scale-down/system/media_attachments/files/168/675/721/original/7d5e55ebf10aa4c1.png
    IMHO: ALL "DOCTORS" SHOULD LEAD, BY EXAMPLE",... THEY NEED TO TAKE THE SAME "MEDS, SURGERIES, AND "TREATMENTS" THAT THEY RECOMMEND..... 💩💥 https://media.gab.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=568,quality=100,fit=scale-down/system/media_attachments/files/168/675/721/original/7d5e55ebf10aa4c1.png
    Like
    Love
    2
    0 Comments 0 Shares 154 Views
  • WATCH AND SHARE THIS VIDEO SERIES!!!
    It is a revealing look into the "medical industry"

    If you believe that doctors exists to keep you healthy....
    You better THINK AGAIN!

    CULT OF THE MEDICS
    https://www.cultofthemedics.com/chapters.html
    WATCH AND SHARE THIS VIDEO SERIES!!! It is a revealing look into the "medical industry" If you believe that doctors exists to keep you healthy.... You better THINK AGAIN! CULT OF THE MEDICS https://www.cultofthemedics.com/chapters.html
    0 Comments 0 Shares 256 Views

  • Permanent Punishment for Conviction for One Ounce of Cocaine Improper

    Government Overreach and Abuse Reversed

    Post 4927

    Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/permanent-punishment-conviction-one-ounce-cocaine-zalma-esq-cfe-geq1c, see the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4900 posts.

    After Recovery From Cocaine Abuse Dr. Regained License to Practice CMS Refused to Allow Dr. White to Bill Medicare for Services

    Dr. Stephen White challenged two unfavorable decisions made by the Secretary for the United States Department of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary”) that denied and revoked his Medicare enrollment. The decisions, rendered by the Appellate Division of the Departmental Appeals Board (“Board”), were based on Dr. White’s 2010 guilty plea and deferred prosecution for possession of less than 1 gram of cocaine, which occurred in Texas in 2007.

    In Stephen White, M.D. v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary for the United States Department of Health and Human Services, No. 2:19-CV-00037-SAB, United States District Court, E.D. Washington (October 28, 2024) the USDC applied entered a judgment reversing the decision of the Secretary [42 U.S.C. § 405(g).]

    SUMMARY JUDGMENT

    Summary judgment is appropriate if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact.

    BACKGROUND

    Dr. White is an orthopedic surgeon. In 2006 and 2007, he was arrested and charged with possession of cocaine in Texas. He was able to rehab and become clean of his problem with the drug. The Texas Medical Board revoked his license, but then monitored his recovery and compliance and allowed him to practice again.

    Dr. White had no violations for nine years following his arrest. He is currently practicing medicine in Washington state and is an enrolled Medicare supplier.

    The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) sustained the denial, finding that CMS had a legitimate basis because Dr. White was convicted of a felony offense. The Board affirmed the ALJ’s decision and Dr. White appealed that decision to the USDC.

    OVERVIEW OF MEDICARE PROGRAM

    The Medicare program provides health insurance benefits to people sixty-five years old or older and to eligible disabled persons. Suppliers, such as Dr. White, must be enrolled in the Medicare program and be granted billing privileges to be eligible to receive payment for care and services rendered to a Medicare-eligible beneficiary.

    DENIALS

    CMS may deny a supplier’s enrollment for any reason stated in federal statutes that allow that CMS may deny a provider’s or supplier’s enrollment in the Medicare program for the some of the following reasons: Felonies such as insurance fraud and similar crimes.

    REVOCATIONS

    The ALJ found CMS had a legitimate basis because White was convicted of a felony offense that CMS determined to be detrimental to the bests interest of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries.

    Dr. White’s presented equitable arguments to the ALJ that

    1 he self-reported and was not practicing;
    2 using his self-report to deny would encourage other physicians to not self-report,
    3 he has fully complied with the terms of the modified license, and
    eventually he was allowed to practice medicine without limitations.

    The Board affirmed the ALJ’s decision, upholding CMS’ denial of Dr. White’s Medicare enrollment and rejected Dr. White’s argument that the timing of the revocation action by CMS was clearly retaliatory and intended to apply pressure on Dr. White for additional monetary penalties.

    ANALYSIS

    The USDC found CMS’ decisions to deny Dr. White enrollment in Medicare and revoke his privileges, and the subsequent Board’s affirmations were arbitrary and capricious and not supported substantial evidence.

    CMS did not have a legitimate reason to deny enrollment or revoke because the record does not support CMS’ assertions that Dr. White’s 2010 conviction for simple possession of a small amount of cocaine was detrimental to the best interest of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries. The USDC understood the deference it owed to administrative agencies as they adjudicate numerous complex cases before them. Yet, a court may not simply act as a rubber stamp for agency decisions.

    Because CMS failed to provide a reasonable basis for denying Dr. White his enrollment in Medicare or revoking his Medicare privileges, the decision of the Secretary is reversed.

    ZALMA OPINION

    A doctor should never get involved or addicted to illegal substances like Cocaine. The Fact that a doctor self reports his involvement with the drug, was rehabilitated, clean for nine years, and practices medicine legally, does not pose a danger to Medicare as do those doctors who are arrested every year for fraud. The decision of Becerra, the ALJ and the Board was clearly retaliatory and abusive and the USDC had no choice but to reverse the Board and let the doctor continue to practice medicine and charge Medicare for his services. Overreach by the administrative agency was stopped by the court.

    (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.

    Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.

    Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe

    Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg

    Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk
    Permanent Punishment for Conviction for One Ounce of Cocaine Improper Government Overreach and Abuse Reversed Post 4927 Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/permanent-punishment-conviction-one-ounce-cocaine-zalma-esq-cfe-geq1c, see the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4900 posts. After Recovery From Cocaine Abuse Dr. Regained License to Practice CMS Refused to Allow Dr. White to Bill Medicare for Services Dr. Stephen White challenged two unfavorable decisions made by the Secretary for the United States Department of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary”) that denied and revoked his Medicare enrollment. The decisions, rendered by the Appellate Division of the Departmental Appeals Board (“Board”), were based on Dr. White’s 2010 guilty plea and deferred prosecution for possession of less than 1 gram of cocaine, which occurred in Texas in 2007. In Stephen White, M.D. v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary for the United States Department of Health and Human Services, No. 2:19-CV-00037-SAB, United States District Court, E.D. Washington (October 28, 2024) the USDC applied entered a judgment reversing the decision of the Secretary [42 U.S.C. § 405(g).] SUMMARY JUDGMENT Summary judgment is appropriate if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact. BACKGROUND Dr. White is an orthopedic surgeon. In 2006 and 2007, he was arrested and charged with possession of cocaine in Texas. He was able to rehab and become clean of his problem with the drug. The Texas Medical Board revoked his license, but then monitored his recovery and compliance and allowed him to practice again. Dr. White had no violations for nine years following his arrest. He is currently practicing medicine in Washington state and is an enrolled Medicare supplier. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) sustained the denial, finding that CMS had a legitimate basis because Dr. White was convicted of a felony offense. The Board affirmed the ALJ’s decision and Dr. White appealed that decision to the USDC. OVERVIEW OF MEDICARE PROGRAM The Medicare program provides health insurance benefits to people sixty-five years old or older and to eligible disabled persons. Suppliers, such as Dr. White, must be enrolled in the Medicare program and be granted billing privileges to be eligible to receive payment for care and services rendered to a Medicare-eligible beneficiary. DENIALS CMS may deny a supplier’s enrollment for any reason stated in federal statutes that allow that CMS may deny a provider’s or supplier’s enrollment in the Medicare program for the some of the following reasons: Felonies such as insurance fraud and similar crimes. REVOCATIONS The ALJ found CMS had a legitimate basis because White was convicted of a felony offense that CMS determined to be detrimental to the bests interest of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries. Dr. White’s presented equitable arguments to the ALJ that 1 he self-reported and was not practicing; 2 using his self-report to deny would encourage other physicians to not self-report, 3 he has fully complied with the terms of the modified license, and eventually he was allowed to practice medicine without limitations. The Board affirmed the ALJ’s decision, upholding CMS’ denial of Dr. White’s Medicare enrollment and rejected Dr. White’s argument that the timing of the revocation action by CMS was clearly retaliatory and intended to apply pressure on Dr. White for additional monetary penalties. ANALYSIS The USDC found CMS’ decisions to deny Dr. White enrollment in Medicare and revoke his privileges, and the subsequent Board’s affirmations were arbitrary and capricious and not supported substantial evidence. CMS did not have a legitimate reason to deny enrollment or revoke because the record does not support CMS’ assertions that Dr. White’s 2010 conviction for simple possession of a small amount of cocaine was detrimental to the best interest of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries. The USDC understood the deference it owed to administrative agencies as they adjudicate numerous complex cases before them. Yet, a court may not simply act as a rubber stamp for agency decisions. Because CMS failed to provide a reasonable basis for denying Dr. White his enrollment in Medicare or revoking his Medicare privileges, the decision of the Secretary is reversed. ZALMA OPINION A doctor should never get involved or addicted to illegal substances like Cocaine. The Fact that a doctor self reports his involvement with the drug, was rehabilitated, clean for nine years, and practices medicine legally, does not pose a danger to Medicare as do those doctors who are arrested every year for fraud. The decision of Becerra, the ALJ and the Board was clearly retaliatory and abusive and the USDC had no choice but to reverse the Board and let the doctor continue to practice medicine and charge Medicare for his services. Overreach by the administrative agency was stopped by the court. (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc. Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos. Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk
    WWW.LINKEDIN.COM
    Discover thousands of collaborative articles on 2500+ skills
    Discover 100 collaborative articles on domains such as Marketing, Public Administration, and Healthcare. Our expertly curated collection combines AI-generated content with insights and advice from industry experts, providing you with unique perspectives and up-to-date information on many skills and their applications.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 942 Views
  • Canada has initiated euthanasia for those injured by the COVID-19 vaccine. Ontario doctors have reportedly administered euthanasia to the first individual affected, and others may follow.
    Canada has initiated euthanasia for those injured by the COVID-19 vaccine. Ontario doctors have reportedly administered euthanasia to the first individual affected, and others may follow.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 195 Views
  • https://medforth.biz/activist-doctors-cannot-hide-the-facts-about-harmful-effects-of-transgender-interventions-much-longer/
    https://medforth.biz/activist-doctors-cannot-hide-the-facts-about-harmful-effects-of-transgender-interventions-much-longer/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 238 Views
  • And following THIS METHOD I'll guarantee you end up healthier
    than those twits going to the "Doctor"

    Is it just ME???
    Or have you noticed that everyone wearing a white coat
    is some sort of Butcher too?

    #freemasonic Butchers who wear white coats

    1.) Actual Butchers possibly NOT Freemasons, but who knows
    2.) Scientists who claim you live on a spinning ball & "Safe & Effective"
    3.) Doctors who claim to be "Baffled" by all of the people dropping dead
    4.) How about those Shrinks? Playing with people's minds / writing scripts

    The white coats are a symbol. Outwardly it's a "professional"

    Someone you have been brainwashed to trust! A "person of authority"
    I think it's another kind of symbol too. A Free masonic duality thing
    Almost a calling card. Representing the white side, the "good side of evil"

    On the opposite side of freemasonry you have the dreaded Black Coats!
    Well.... "Robes" actually. A bunch of morons in black dresses and make decisions for the rest of us AND about us!

    They create and enforce rules,
    THEY READ STUFF AND DECLARE IT'S MEANING FOR YOU

    Like the Constitutution, THEY TELL YOU what it means!
    We ALL know what is SAYS! But according to them,
    that is not WHAT IT MEANS

    And duality is now complete.

    So bring in the Blue Coats and enforce all of this madness on the People
    against their will, and you have America!

    They'll take 1/2 of your paycheck to pay for it too!

    And they'll get another piece of what you have left
    by taxing what you buy with it! Ahhhhhhh Freedom! you gotta love it
    And following THIS METHOD I'll guarantee you end up healthier than those twits going to the "Doctor" Is it just ME??? Or have you noticed that everyone wearing a white coat is some sort of Butcher too? #freemasonic Butchers who wear white coats 1.) Actual Butchers possibly NOT Freemasons, but who knows 2.) Scientists who claim you live on a spinning ball & "Safe & Effective" 3.) Doctors who claim to be "Baffled" by all of the people dropping dead 4.) How about those Shrinks? Playing with people's minds / writing scripts The white coats are a symbol. Outwardly it's a "professional" Someone you have been brainwashed to trust! A "person of authority" I think it's another kind of symbol too. A Free masonic duality thing Almost a calling card. Representing the white side, the "good side of evil" On the opposite side of freemasonry you have the dreaded Black Coats! Well.... "Robes" actually. A bunch of morons in black dresses and make decisions for the rest of us AND about us! They create and enforce rules, THEY READ STUFF AND DECLARE IT'S MEANING FOR YOU Like the Constitutution, THEY TELL YOU what it means! We ALL know what is SAYS! But according to them, that is not WHAT IT MEANS And duality is now complete. So bring in the Blue Coats and enforce all of this madness on the People against their will, and you have America! They'll take 1/2 of your paycheck to pay for it too! And they'll get another piece of what you have left by taxing what you buy with it! Ahhhhhhh Freedom! you gotta love it
    0 Comments 0 Shares 871 Views
  • The Taliban would have us believe that they are making efforts to train and employ female doctors but how do they propose to make that possible if they are banning women from receiving a formal education that men are being allowed to receive?
    https://www.christianpost.com/world/afghan-province-bans-women-from-seeing-male-doctors-reports.html?clickType=link-more-in-section
    The Taliban would have us believe that they are making efforts to train and employ female doctors but how do they propose to make that possible if they are banning women from receiving a formal education that men are being allowed to receive? https://www.christianpost.com/world/afghan-province-bans-women-from-seeing-male-doctors-reports.html?clickType=link-more-in-section
    WWW.CHRISTIANPOST.COM
    Afghan province bans women from seeing male doctors: reports
    A province in Taliban-controlled Afghanistan has allegedly passed a measure banning women from seeing male doctors, according to reports
    0 Comments 0 Shares 325 Views
  • Even though it's a LIE, because it's simply NOT TRUE....

    The #Schools will claim that

    "You MUST inject your children with this toxic, mind destroying concoction or we will not allow them into our brainwashing program"

    That's what #Schools are... Brainwashing centers

    Teaching children the LIES of #luciferian psychopaths like #Rockefeller, who supplies the textbooks BELOW COST
    (So that nobody else can get the contract) AND funds the "schools" so that they can control the curriculum

    Just like how they LIED about cv19 quackzines being mandatory, they lie about quackzines being "necessary to attend school"
    (NOT that I'd want my child to go there anyway)

    Rockefeller also started the #AMA, which controls the licenses of doctors, after he funded a huge #Propaganda campaign to smear natural healers (Doctors) as "Quacks)

    Rockefeller runs all of the medical schools
    Rockefeller started the "American Cancer Society" to hide the FACT that his "medicines" were the CAUSE of cancer!

    Rockefeller also controls most of big pharma ( Pharmakeia )

    The Father called us to be "Set Apart"
    NOT to fall in line like sheep to the slaughter!

    WHY would you allow people that worship Satan and hate YOU to inject your children with toxic chemicals, so that they may be allowed into the BRAINWASHING CENTER???

    I know that a lot of people don't recognize these things for what they are YET... but I'm hoping to remedy that!

    The Most High CREATED YOU IN HIS OWN IMAGE!
    You are PERFECT in every way!

    You do NOT need to be injected with anything to stay healthy!
    The injections ensure that YOU STAY SICK!

    Because the same people who make the injections also profit from your illness! Put your trust in the Most High!

    NEVER AGAIN INJECT TOXINS INTO
    YOURSELF OR YOUR CHILDREN!

    Have #faith in your Creator!
    He did not create anything defective
    Even though it's a LIE, because it's simply NOT TRUE.... The #Schools will claim that "You MUST inject your children with this toxic, mind destroying concoction or we will not allow them into our brainwashing program" That's what #Schools are... Brainwashing centers Teaching children the LIES of #luciferian psychopaths like #Rockefeller, who supplies the textbooks BELOW COST (So that nobody else can get the contract) AND funds the "schools" so that they can control the curriculum Just like how they LIED about cv19 quackzines being mandatory, they lie about quackzines being "necessary to attend school" (NOT that I'd want my child to go there anyway) Rockefeller also started the #AMA, which controls the licenses of doctors, after he funded a huge #Propaganda campaign to smear natural healers (Doctors) as "Quacks) Rockefeller runs all of the medical schools Rockefeller started the "American Cancer Society" to hide the FACT that his "medicines" were the CAUSE of cancer! Rockefeller also controls most of big pharma ( Pharmakeia ) The Father called us to be "Set Apart" NOT to fall in line like sheep to the slaughter! WHY would you allow people that worship Satan and hate YOU to inject your children with toxic chemicals, so that they may be allowed into the BRAINWASHING CENTER??? I know that a lot of people don't recognize these things for what they are YET... but I'm hoping to remedy that! The Most High CREATED YOU IN HIS OWN IMAGE! You are PERFECT in every way! You do NOT need to be injected with anything to stay healthy! The injections ensure that YOU STAY SICK! Because the same people who make the injections also profit from your illness! Put your trust in the Most High! NEVER AGAIN INJECT TOXINS INTO YOURSELF OR YOUR CHILDREN! Have #faith in your Creator! He did not create anything defective
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1K Views
  • TX pro-lifers score a judicial victory: Doctors not required to perform “emergency abortions” if they feel it to be murder.
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-doctors-do-not-need-to-perform-emergency-abortions-court-rules/ar-AA1mnCTp
    TX pro-lifers score a judicial victory: Doctors not required to perform “emergency abortions” if they feel it to be murder. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-doctors-do-not-need-to-perform-emergency-abortions-court-rules/ar-AA1mnCTp
    MSN
    0 Comments 0 Shares 369 Views
More Results
Sponsored

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here