• Fire Watch Services in Denver

    Welcome to Twin City Security-Denver, your trusted partner for customized, round-the-clock fire watch services in both commercial and residential locations. Our expertly-trained fire watch guards ensure your property and personnel are protected, keeping you in full compliance with the law.

    Visit our page at https://www.twincitysecuritydenver.com/security-services-denver/fire-watch-services-denver/
    Fire Watch Services in Denver Welcome to Twin City Security-Denver, your trusted partner for customized, round-the-clock fire watch services in both commercial and residential locations. Our expertly-trained fire watch guards ensure your property and personnel are protected, keeping you in full compliance with the law. Visit our page at https://www.twincitysecuritydenver.com/security-services-denver/fire-watch-services-denver/
    Like
    1
    0 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 222 Views
  • The Wizard of Oz…This is very interesting…
    The Straw Man represents that fictional ALL CAPS legal fiction —The PERSON. He wanted a brain but got a Certificate — The Birth Certificate.
    The Tin Man — The TIN (Taxpayer Identification Number). He was a robotic avatar, who worked tirelessly until his body literally froze up & stopped functioning. The heartless & emotionless robot creature who worked himself to death because he had no heart or soul.
    The Cowardly Lion was a bully, but was actually a true coward when someone stood up to him, like most bullies. He lacked true courage and in the end, the Wizard gave him an Official Recognition Award — Authority & Status.
    The Wizard of Oz used magic, smoke, flames & holograms, but all of it were tricks & illusions to push fear & compliance to make people do what he commanded. The truth is the Wizard has NO real power & only used illusions to create false power & authority.
    The Wicked Witch pushed fear through intimidation. She was after Toto and controlled the flying monkey police, the policy enforcers, the mischievous demons, which also represents the BAR Association who attack & control all the little people for the Great Crown Wizard, the crooked Bankers of Oz, obsessed with gold.
    In the field of poppies, they were not REAL humans, so drugs had no effect on them, but Dorothy was drugged.
    The Wizard of Oz was written at the time when Rockefeller & the Big Pharma began to take over medicine & education.
    The Crown was actually the largest drug dealer & after their take-over of drug distribution in China, they began to expand all around the world.
    Toto was what the Wicked Witch was really after. Toto in Latin means “in total”. Toto exposed the Wizard of Oz and had no fear, despite being very small compared to the Great Wizard, so no one noticed him.
    Toto pulled the curtain on the Wizard & his magical scams.
    ‘Curtain’ also means the End of an Act or scene! He pulled the curtain & started barking until others paid attention, hypothetically giving everyone the “Red Pill”.
    The curtain hid the corporate legal fiction & its false courts.
    So, no matter how small your bark is, it can be heard!
    Copied from Guy on X
    The Wizard of Oz…This is very interesting…🤔 The Straw Man represents that fictional ALL CAPS legal fiction —The PERSON. He wanted a brain but got a Certificate — The Birth Certificate. The Tin Man — The TIN (Taxpayer Identification Number). He was a robotic avatar, who worked tirelessly until his body literally froze up & stopped functioning. The heartless & emotionless robot creature who worked himself to death because he had no heart or soul. The Cowardly Lion was a bully, but was actually a true coward when someone stood up to him, like most bullies. He lacked true courage and in the end, the Wizard gave him an Official Recognition Award — Authority & Status. The Wizard of Oz used magic, smoke, flames & holograms, but all of it were tricks & illusions to push fear & compliance to make people do what he commanded. The truth is the Wizard has NO real power & only used illusions to create false power & authority. The Wicked Witch pushed fear through intimidation. She was after Toto and controlled the flying monkey police, the policy enforcers, the mischievous demons, which also represents the BAR Association who attack & control all the little people for the Great Crown Wizard, the crooked Bankers of Oz, obsessed with gold. In the field of poppies, they were not REAL humans, so drugs had no effect on them, but Dorothy was drugged. The Wizard of Oz was written at the time when Rockefeller & the Big Pharma began to take over medicine & education. The Crown was actually the largest drug dealer & after their take-over of drug distribution in China, they began to expand all around the world. Toto was what the Wicked Witch was really after. Toto in Latin means “in total”. Toto exposed the Wizard of Oz and had no fear, despite being very small compared to the Great Wizard, so no one noticed him. Toto pulled the curtain on the Wizard & his magical scams. ‘Curtain’ also means the End of an Act or scene! He pulled the curtain & started barking until others paid attention, hypothetically giving everyone the “Red Pill”. The curtain hid the corporate legal fiction & its false courts. So, no matter how small your bark is, it can be heard! Copied from Guy on X
    0 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 860 Views
  • 'Blade Runner' vigilante filmed 'frying some Ulez for breakfast' as cameras MELT
    https://www.gbnews.com/news/ulez-latest-blade-runner-vigilante-frying-ulez-cameras-video

    A pair of Ulez cameras have been targeted with heat guns and electric saws in new attacks by vigilante ‘Blade Runners’ demonstrating against the controversial scheme, new footage on social media shows.

    One video, posted on Monday, shows a heat gun attached to a telescopic pole being used to melt the glass on one of the cameras, which scan vehicles to check their compliance with the Ulez scheme.

    A voice in the video can be heard singing “frying some Ulez for breakfast… have some of that”, before saying “unlucky Mr Khan, here’s another one… gutted for you”.
    'Blade Runner' vigilante filmed 'frying some Ulez for breakfast' as cameras MELT https://www.gbnews.com/news/ulez-latest-blade-runner-vigilante-frying-ulez-cameras-video A pair of Ulez cameras have been targeted with heat guns and electric saws in new attacks by vigilante ‘Blade Runners’ demonstrating against the controversial scheme, new footage on social media shows. One video, posted on Monday, shows a heat gun attached to a telescopic pole being used to melt the glass on one of the cameras, which scan vehicles to check their compliance with the Ulez scheme. A voice in the video can be heard singing “frying some Ulez for breakfast… have some of that”, before saying “unlucky Mr Khan, here’s another one… gutted for you”.
    WWW.GBNEWS.COM
    'Blade Runner' vigilante filmed 'frying some Ulez for breakfast' as cameras MELT
    ‘Unlucky Mr Khan, here’s another one’, jabbed an onlooker
    0 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 816 Views
  • As a member of the Rockefeller Commission to investigate the CIA (set up by President Gerald Ford), Ronald Reagan joined in its unanimous recommendation that: "Presidents should refrain from directing the CIA to perform what are essentially internal security tasks. The CIA should resist any efforts, whatever their origin, to involve it again in such improper activities." The Commission, which included CIA collaborators, was only asking the President and the CIA to abide by the National Security Act of 1947. The Act prohibits the CIA from having "police, subpoena, law-enforcement powers, or internal security functions."

    On December 4, 1981, President Reagan signed Executive Order 12333 which, while purportedly in accord with the National Security Act of 1947, allows the CIA to engage tn police functions and domestic covert operations. Aptly described by the New York Times as the "Son of Operation CHAOS" the Executive Order was denounced by former FBI agent, Representative Don Edwards (D.-Ca.): "It still puts the CIA smack into secretly operating within the United States... it permits them to enter into arrangements with state and local police... and Americans overseas are wide open to surveillance, regardless of any connections to foreign governments or criminal activity."

    In addition to this major enhancement of CIA powers, the administration has initiated measures severely restricting news-gathering about government operations. According to the International Press Institute, these restrictions pose a "potentially serious loss of public accountability." More recently, it has been reported that Reagan is set to sign an executive order on the Freedom of Information Act which would all but exempt the CIA from compliance with requests for information. Certainly, these measures undermine U.S. democracy, but the full import of Reagan's CIA actions can perhaps best be understood by looking at recent history.
    As a member of the Rockefeller Commission to investigate the CIA (set up by President Gerald Ford), Ronald Reagan joined in its unanimous recommendation that: "Presidents should refrain from directing the CIA to perform what are essentially internal security tasks. The CIA should resist any efforts, whatever their origin, to involve it again in such improper activities." The Commission, which included CIA collaborators, was only asking the President and the CIA to abide by the National Security Act of 1947. The Act prohibits the CIA from having "police, subpoena, law-enforcement powers, or internal security functions." On December 4, 1981, President Reagan signed Executive Order 12333 which, while purportedly in accord with the National Security Act of 1947, allows the CIA to engage tn police functions and domestic covert operations. Aptly described by the New York Times as the "Son of Operation CHAOS" the Executive Order was denounced by former FBI agent, Representative Don Edwards (D.-Ca.): "It still puts the CIA smack into secretly operating within the United States... it permits them to enter into arrangements with state and local police... and Americans overseas are wide open to surveillance, regardless of any connections to foreign governments or criminal activity." In addition to this major enhancement of CIA powers, the administration has initiated measures severely restricting news-gathering about government operations. According to the International Press Institute, these restrictions pose a "potentially serious loss of public accountability." More recently, it has been reported that Reagan is set to sign an executive order on the Freedom of Information Act which would all but exempt the CIA from compliance with requests for information. Certainly, these measures undermine U.S. democracy, but the full import of Reagan's CIA actions can perhaps best be understood by looking at recent history.
    Like
    1
    0 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 2053 Views
  • A court in Germany has issued an injunction against the sale of certain chip models manufactured by Intel, following a legal dispute with a competitor. The injunction prohibits Intel from selling or distributing the specified chip models in Germany until the matter is resolved through litigation or settlement. This decision could impact Intel's business operations and reputation, as well as the supply chain of technology products that rely on their chips.

    The case highlights the importance of intellectual property rights and the potential consequences for companies that violate them. It also underscores the need for companies to carefully consider the legal implications of their actions and ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations. In this instance, Intel will need to address the concerns raised by the court and work towards a resolution that satisfies all parties involved.


    A court in Germany has issued an injunction against the sale of certain chip models manufactured by Intel, following a legal dispute with a competitor. The injunction prohibits Intel from selling or distributing the specified chip models in Germany until the matter is resolved through litigation or settlement. This decision could impact Intel's business operations and reputation, as well as the supply chain of technology products that rely on their chips. The case highlights the importance of intellectual property rights and the potential consequences for companies that violate them. It also underscores the need for companies to carefully consider the legal implications of their actions and ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations. In this instance, Intel will need to address the concerns raised by the court and work towards a resolution that satisfies all parties involved.
    0 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 1274 Views
  • https://waynedupree.com/2024/02/Surprising-Twist-in-Nevada-Primary-For-Nikki-Haley?utm_source=email&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_content=&utm_campaign=&utm_term=
    Nevada has both an election and a caucus. The Nevada presidential candidate is selected at the caucus. The election is just for show and nothing more.
    Preliminary results from a state-organized Nevada primary election show that, with two-thirds of the ballots tabulated, US presidential candidate Nikki Haley has the backing of slightly more than 30% of Republican voters who are registered voters.

    More than 60% of voters selected the "none of these candidates" option as front-runner Donald Trump was not included on the ballot. Even though “none of these candidates” won with a majority of votes, Haley was proclaimed the winner in compliance with state law. On Thursday night, the GOP will separately have a party caucus, where all 26 state delegates are anticipated to support Trump. The Republican leadership said it would stick with the caucus system for selecting nominees and rejected Nevada's 2021 plan to have primary elections for both parties.
    Though mostly symbolic, Nevadans' rejection of Haley's candidacy proved to be the most recent setback for the former governor of South Carolina. It was the first time a US presidential contender has ever lost to an unlisted opponent, and it was her third straight defeat in an early-state primary. Haley had placed second in New Hampshire and third in Iowa before. against February 24, she will take against Trump in her own state.
    https://waynedupree.com/2024/02/Surprising-Twist-in-Nevada-Primary-For-Nikki-Haley?utm_source=email&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_content=&utm_campaign=&utm_term= Nevada has both an election and a caucus. The Nevada presidential candidate is selected at the caucus. The election is just for show and nothing more. Preliminary results from a state-organized Nevada primary election show that, with two-thirds of the ballots tabulated, US presidential candidate Nikki Haley has the backing of slightly more than 30% of Republican voters who are registered voters. More than 60% of voters selected the "none of these candidates" option as front-runner Donald Trump was not included on the ballot. Even though “none of these candidates” won with a majority of votes, Haley was proclaimed the winner in compliance with state law. On Thursday night, the GOP will separately have a party caucus, where all 26 state delegates are anticipated to support Trump. The Republican leadership said it would stick with the caucus system for selecting nominees and rejected Nevada's 2021 plan to have primary elections for both parties. Though mostly symbolic, Nevadans' rejection of Haley's candidacy proved to be the most recent setback for the former governor of South Carolina. It was the first time a US presidential contender has ever lost to an unlisted opponent, and it was her third straight defeat in an early-state primary. Haley had placed second in New Hampshire and third in Iowa before. against February 24, she will take against Trump in her own state.
    WAYNEDUPREE.COM
    Surprising Twist in Nevada Primary: Nikki Haley Emerges as Winner Amidst Controversy
    Get the latest updates on the GOP caucus and primary election system in Nevada. Find out why some GOP supporters are puzzled by the two-track choice and the absence of Trump’s name on the ballot....
    0 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 1412 Views
  • Lt General Riley Explains How the EU is taking over the UK's Defence and Intelligence Capabilities
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkPNfR3Z5Yo
    Lt Gen Jonathon Riley outlines in detail why having control of our national defence is, as he puts it, ‘a catastrophic risk.’ He explains how the May government has sought to lock Britain into various EU structures created in order to establish control of Europe’s defence by the EU Commission – these structures include the European Defence Fund, the European Defence Agency and the Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) mechanism. He references both the Withdrawal Agreement and the Political Declaration which make it clear which treaty obligations the UK is tied in to. Lt Gen Riley explains the structure of the European Defence Fund and how it operates by ‘leveraging’ national resources (rather than having a central funding model) through policy compliance. He goes on to explain how the Coordinated Annual Review of Defence (CARD) works to strengthen EU control over national decision-making. N.B. Full UK Participation in CARD was agreed by Sir Alan Duncan MP on 19th November 2018, when has a Government Minister, despite the UK having voted to Leave the EU in June 2016. Lt Gen Riley then explains how the EU’s defence policy process has been designed to act not only as a power-grab for control over defence capabilities but also over defence industries. He goes on to explain how the pillars of the ‘European Defence Union’ operate together and how the specific terms in the Political Declaration relate to the UK being committed to this structure. Riley then references how the Withdrawal Agreement replaces the UK’s Treaty commitment under the Lisbon Treaty with a new agreement concerning defence and references the specific clauses within the Political Declaration which tie the UK to the EU Defence structure on an ongoing basis. Lt Gen Riley goes on to show illustrate examples of instances where Ministers and Members of Parliament have responded to questions on this subject with incorrect information and denials of what in fact is happening. One example of a letter states that ‘no such common EU defence powers can be handed from the UK to the EU without the approval of Parliament and a referendum on the issue’. However as Lt Gen Riley points out, there is no requirement for a referendum on simple issues like an extension of EU power over defence. The Lisbon Treaty states that a referendum is only required for the creation of a unified military, called ‘Common Defence’. This is highly misleading as the EU structures are designed to control national defence and intelligence capabilities from the centre, rather than abolish and replace them. As in many areas, the EU exerts its control not by removing functions from national governments but does so by tie-ing nation states to supranational agreements and policy structures. The effect is that he UK loses its independent control over its defence and intelligence capabilities. The UK has signed up to a huge power grab by the EU in the three years since the EU Referendum and extends these commitments if it agrees a Withdrawal Agreement (and therefore the Political Declaration) with the EU.

    Lt General Riley Explains How the EU is taking over the UK's Defence and Intelligence Capabilities https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkPNfR3Z5Yo Lt Gen Jonathon Riley outlines in detail why having control of our national defence is, as he puts it, ‘a catastrophic risk.’ He explains how the May government has sought to lock Britain into various EU structures created in order to establish control of Europe’s defence by the EU Commission – these structures include the European Defence Fund, the European Defence Agency and the Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) mechanism. He references both the Withdrawal Agreement and the Political Declaration which make it clear which treaty obligations the UK is tied in to. Lt Gen Riley explains the structure of the European Defence Fund and how it operates by ‘leveraging’ national resources (rather than having a central funding model) through policy compliance. He goes on to explain how the Coordinated Annual Review of Defence (CARD) works to strengthen EU control over national decision-making. N.B. Full UK Participation in CARD was agreed by Sir Alan Duncan MP on 19th November 2018, when has a Government Minister, despite the UK having voted to Leave the EU in June 2016. Lt Gen Riley then explains how the EU’s defence policy process has been designed to act not only as a power-grab for control over defence capabilities but also over defence industries. He goes on to explain how the pillars of the ‘European Defence Union’ operate together and how the specific terms in the Political Declaration relate to the UK being committed to this structure. Riley then references how the Withdrawal Agreement replaces the UK’s Treaty commitment under the Lisbon Treaty with a new agreement concerning defence and references the specific clauses within the Political Declaration which tie the UK to the EU Defence structure on an ongoing basis. Lt Gen Riley goes on to show illustrate examples of instances where Ministers and Members of Parliament have responded to questions on this subject with incorrect information and denials of what in fact is happening. One example of a letter states that ‘no such common EU defence powers can be handed from the UK to the EU without the approval of Parliament and a referendum on the issue’. However as Lt Gen Riley points out, there is no requirement for a referendum on simple issues like an extension of EU power over defence. The Lisbon Treaty states that a referendum is only required for the creation of a unified military, called ‘Common Defence’. This is highly misleading as the EU structures are designed to control national defence and intelligence capabilities from the centre, rather than abolish and replace them. As in many areas, the EU exerts its control not by removing functions from national governments but does so by tie-ing nation states to supranational agreements and policy structures. The effect is that he UK loses its independent control over its defence and intelligence capabilities. The UK has signed up to a huge power grab by the EU in the three years since the EU Referendum and extends these commitments if it agrees a Withdrawal Agreement (and therefore the Political Declaration) with the EU.
    0 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 1662 Views
  • Mass Non Compliance, A Trap Has Been Set For Those Who

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuaF1Nsd7KA
    Mass Non Compliance, A Trap Has Been Set For Those Who https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuaF1Nsd7KA
    Like
    Angry
    2
    0 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 488 Views
  • The Times We Live In Built from the Past (VIDEOS)

    SUMMARY: … The present day CCP-Virus (aka COVID), forced (primarily under bureaucratic mandates of take or else) experimental mRNA Jabs, conforming to Climate Hysteria (largely based on Elitist lies and manipulation), a CCP-style Social Credit Score to force population compliance…and so here a some videos showing a tyranny perspective…TAKE A LOOK: https://bit.ly/3NSbRim
    #TyrannyPrologue
    The Times We Live In Built from the Past (VIDEOS) SUMMARY: … The present day CCP-Virus (aka COVID), forced (primarily under bureaucratic mandates of take or else) experimental mRNA Jabs, conforming to Climate Hysteria (largely based on Elitist lies and manipulation), a CCP-style Social Credit Score to force population compliance…and so here a some videos showing a tyranny perspective…TAKE A LOOK: https://bit.ly/3NSbRim #TyrannyPrologue
    Love
    1
    0 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 3759 Views
Sponsorluk

We are now 100% funded for April. I am matching donations dollar for dollar this month. Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here