🚨🚨 From a friend **Please READ the following to the end … It will open your understanding of what the World as a whole suffered in the past four years … and Still Suffer …** **Their Plandemic Failed … but don’t worry … They Still Have PLAN B … starting in 2025 … that will last at least to 2030 …** **Unless We The People … ACT … Immediately …** ***“CDC Planned National Quarantine Camps”*** ***By Jeffrey A. Tucker November 7, 2024*** ***“The plan was to enforce this with a vaccine passport. It broke. Once the news leaked that the shot didn’t stop infection or transmission, the planners lost public support and the scheme collapsed.”*** ***“No matter how bad you think COVID-19 policies were, they were intended to be worse. Consider the vaccine passports alone.*** ***Six cities were locked down to include only the vaccinated in public indoor places. They were New York City, Boston, Chicago, New Orleans, Washington, D.C., and Seattle.*** ***The plan was to enforce this with a vaccine passport. It broke. Once the news leaked that the shot didn’t stop infection or transmission, the planners lost public support and the scheme collapsed.*** ***It was undoubtedly planned to be permanent and nationwide if not worldwide. Instead, the scheme had to be dialled back.*** ***Features of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) edicts did incredible damage. It imposed the rent moratorium. It decreed the ridiculous ‘six feet of distance’ and ‘mask mandates’.*** ***It forced Plexiglas as the interface for commercial transactions. It implied that mail-in balloting must be the norm, which probably flipped the election. It delayed the reopening as long as possible. It was sadistic.*** ***Even with all that, worse was planned. On July 26, 2020, with the George Floyd riots having finally settled down, the CDC issued a plan for establishing nationwide quarantine camps.*** ***People were to be isolated, given only food and some cleaning supplies. They would be banned from participating in any religious services.*** ***The plan included contingencies for preventing suicide. There were no provisions made for any legal appeals or even the right to legal counsel.*** ***The plan’s authors were unnamed but included 26 footnotes. It was completely official. The document was only removed on about March 26, 2023.*** ***During the entire intervening time, the plan survived on the CDC’s public site with little to no public notice or controversy.*** ***It was called ‘Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings’.*** ***‘This document presents considerations from the perspective of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) for implementing the shielding approach in humanitarian settings as outlined in guidance documents focused on camps, displaced populations and low-resource settings. …’*** ***‘This approach has never been documented and has raised questions and concerns among humanitarian partners who support response activities in these settings.’*** ***‘The purpose of this document is to highlight potential implementation challenges of the shielding approach from CDC’s perspective and guide thinking around implementation in the absence of empirical data.’*** ***‘Considerations are based on current evidence known about the transmission and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and may need to be revised as more information becomes available.’*** ***By the absence of empirical data, the meaning is: that nothing like this has ever been tried. The point of the document was to map out how it could be possible and alert authorities to possible pitfalls to be avoided.*** ***The meaning of ‘shielding’ is:*** ***‘To reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (‘high-risk’) and the general population (‘low-risk’).’*** ***‘High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or ‘green zones’ established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting. … They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.’*** ***In other words, this is what used to be concentration camps.*** ***Who are these people who would be rounded up? They are ‘older adults and people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions’. Who determines this? Public health authorities. The purpose?*** ***The CDC explains: ‘physically separating high-risk individuals from the general population’ allows authorities ‘to prioritize the use of the limited available resources’.*** ***This sounds a lot like condemning people to death in the name of protecting them.*** ***The model establishes three levels. First is the household level. Here high-risk people are physically isolated from other household members’.*** ***That alone is objectionable. Elders need people to take care of them. They need love and to be surrounded by family. The CDC should never imagine that it would intervene in households to force old people into separate places.*** ***The model jumps from households to the “neighborhood level.” Here we have the same approach: forced separation of those deemed vulnerable.*** ***From there, the model jumps again to the ‘camp/sector level’. Here it is different:*** ***‘A group of shelters such as schools, community buildings within a camp/sector (max 50 high-risk individuals per single green zone) where high-risk individuals are physically isolated together.’*** ***‘One entry point is used for exchange of food, supplies, etc. A meeting area is used for residents and visitors to interact while practicing physical distancing (2 meters). No movement into or outside the green zone.’*** ***Yes, you read that correctly. The CDC is here proposing concentration camps for the sick or anyone they deem to be in danger of medically significant consequences of infection.*** ***Further: ‘to minimize external contact, each green zone should include able-bodied high-risk individuals capable of caring for residents who have disabilities or are less mobile. Otherwise, designate low-risk individuals for these tasks, preferably who have recovered from confirmed COVID-19 and are assumed to be immune’.*** ***The plan says in passing, contradicting thousands of years of experience, ‘Currently, we do not know if prior infection confers immunity’.*** ***Therefore the only solution is to minimize all exposure throughout the whole population. Getting sick is criminalized.*** ***These camps require a ‘dedicated staff’ to:*** ***‘Monitor each green zone. Monitoring includes both adherence to protocols and potential adverse effects or outcomes due to isolation and stigma. It may be necessary to assign someone within the green zone, if feasible, to minimize movement in/out of green zones.’*** ***The people housed in these camps need to have good explanations of why they are denied even basic religious freedom.*** ***The report explains:*** ***‘Proactive planning ahead of time, including strong community engagement and risk communication is needed to better understand the issues and concerns of restricting individuals from participating in communal practices because they are being shielded. Failure to do so could lead to both interpersonal and communal violence.’*** ***Further, there must be some mechanisms to prohibit suicide: Additional stress and worry are common during any epidemic and may be more pronounced with COVID-19 due to the novelty of the disease and increased fear of infection, increased childcare responsibilities due to school closures and loss of livelihoods.*** ***Thus, in addition to the risk of stigmatization and feeling of isolation, this shielding approach may have an important psychological impact and may lead to significant emotional distress, exacerbate existing mental illness or contribute to anxiety, depression, helplessness, grief, substance abuse or thoughts of suicide among those who are separated or have been left behind.*** ***Shielded individuals with concurrent severe mental health conditions should not be left alone. There must be a caregiver allocated to them to prevent further protection risks such as neglect and abuse.*** ***The biggest risk, the document explains, is as follows: “While the shielding approach is not meant to be coercive, it may appear forced or be misunderstood in humanitarian settings.”*** ***It should go without saying but this ‘shielding’ approach suggested here has nothing to do with focused protection of the Great Barrington Declaration.*** ***Focused protection specifically says:*** ***‘Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home.’*** ***‘Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.’*** ***In four years of research, and encountering truly shocking documents and evidence of what happened in the COVID-19 years, this one certainly ranks up at the top of the list of totalitarian schemes for pathogenic control prior to vaccination. It is quite simply mind-blowing that such a scheme could ever be contemplated.*** ***Who wrote it? What kind of deep institutional pathology exists that enabled this to be contemplated?*** ***The CDC has 10,600 full-time employees and contractors and a budget of $11.5 billion. In light of this report, and everything else that has gone on there for four years, both numbers should be zero.”*** https://brownstone.org/articles/the-cdc-planned-quarantine-camps-nationwide/ **Here are some links to this article:** - ***“U.S. Developing Vaccine Passport System Using Complex Web of Big Tech Partnerships”*** https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/us-developing-vaccine-passport-system/ - ***"Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings*** ***Updated July 26, 2020"*** https://web.archive.org/web/20200728203549/https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/global-covid-19/shielding-approach-humanitarian.html

Bad Faith Set Up Fails Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/bad-faith-set-up-fails-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-jllxc, see the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4900 posts. Inadequate Information Made Refusal to Pay Policy Limits Not Bad Faith INADEQUATE MEDICAL AUTHORIZATION USED TO CAUSE INSURER TO REFUSE SETTLEMENT DEMAND Post 4930 Kara Flick appealed from the judgment after a jury rejected her claims for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Flick contends the judgment should be reversed due to juror misconduct. In KARA FLICK v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, B330507, California Court of Appeals, Second District, Sixth Division (November 5, 2024) the Court of Appeals resolved the dispute. FACTUAL HISTORY After sustaining injuries in an automobile accident caused by Francisco Reyes, Jr., Flick had her attorney send Reyes's insurer, the United Services Automobile Association (USAA), a letter explaining the severity of her injuries and an authorization for the release of her medical records. Flick's attorney followed up with a settlement demand two months later, requesting that USAA pay Flick the entirety of Reyes's $100,000 policy limit in exchange for a release of liability. Attached to the demand was a single medical record from Flick's neurologist. USAA investigated Flick's claim and determined it did not have sufficient information to accept or reject her demand. Flick then filed a personal injury lawsuit against Reyes. The jury found in her favor and awarded nearly $1.7 million in damages. Flick, with an assignment from the Reyes, sued USAA for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. TRIAL At trial, a USAA claims adjustor admitted that Reyes was fully at fault for the accident with Flick. Reyes could therefore be exposed to liability in excess of his policy limits-if Flick provided sufficient documentation to support her claim. USAA's expert on insurance claims handling and another of its claims service managers both agreed with the supervisor that Flick's authorization was invalid and inadequate to allow USAA to obtain Flick's medical records. USAA needed additional records before it could determine the value of Flick's claim. Those records could have included the medical bills Flick provided to her own insurance company, the multiple doctor's notes she had excusing her from work, or the thumb drive recording her purported speech problems, all of which were entered into evidence at her personal injury trial. Because they were not provided to USAA, it was "very difficult to place a value on" Flick's claim. Flick's expert testified that USAA's handling of the settlement demand "was clearly unreasonable." Flick also did not respond to USAA's requests for additional information. By a vote of nine to three, the jury found that Flick did not make a reasonable settlement demand of USAA and rejected her claims for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The trial court polled the jury, and each juror confirmed their vote. DISCUSSION The Court of Appeals concluded the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Flick's new trial motion. USAA successfully rebutted the presumption of prejudice by showing there is no reasonable probability that the juror, D.C.'s misconduct by not explaining he did not hear all of the adjuster's testimony, actually harmed Flick. Much of the adjustor's testimony consisted of facts regarding his communications with Flick's attorney - facts that were undisputed. What was disputed-whether Flick's settlement demand was reasonable-was the subject of other witness testimony, including USAA's expert on insurance claims handling, its supervising claims service manager, Flick's personal injury attorney, and her expert witness on insurance claims handling. What the admitted evidence showed was that D.C. confirmed multiple times that he voted that Flick did not make a reasonable settlement demand: Based on this record there was no reasonable probability that D.C.'s alleged juror misconduct actually harmed Flick. ZALMA OPINION The tort of bad faith arose from abuse by insurers on those they insured. Since its adoption in California about three quarters of a century ago, the abuse has been turned on to insurers. Ms. Flick's counsel placed a demand for settlement on USAA that it could not reasonably and in good faith to its insured, Reyes, because it was incomplete and inadequately supported and forced Flick and Reyes go through a trial where she received an uncollectible judgment against Reyes in hopes of a gigantic bad faith judgment. After much litigation and USAA spending a great deal to defend itself she received the $100,000 policy limit. USAA was punished but neither Flick nor her lawyers profited from the scheme or the appeal. (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc. Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos. Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk

**Coup: Harris Adviser Calls On Joe Biden to Resign And Make Kamala President Before Trump Sworn In** **"This is more than just a political stunt. It’s part of the Deep State's larger plan to launch a coup against the incoming Trump presidency while he is still President-elect," says Alex Jones**. **A former advisor to Kamala Harris called on Joe Biden to step down and allow Kamala to be president until Donald Trump is sworn in on January 20, 2025** **VP Harris’s former communications director Jamal** **Simmons made the bizarre suggestion on CNN’s “State of the Union” Sunday** **Joe Biden has been a phenomenal president. He’s lived up to so many of the** **promises he’s made. There’s one promise left that he could fulfill: being a transitional** **figure. He could resign the presidency in the next 30 days,** **make Kamala Harris the President of the United States,” Simmons said** [by Jamie White][]November 10th, 2024 6:41 PM https://www.infowars.com/posts/coup-harris-adviser-calls-on-joe-biden-to-resign-and-make-kamala-president-before-trump-sworn-in [LIVE]: https://www.infowars.com/show [Home]: https://www.infowars.com/ [News]: https://www.infowars.com/news [Podcasts]: https://www.infowars.com/radio-archive [Breaking News]: https://www.infowars.com/breaking-news [Social]: https://www.infowars.com/posts/the-big-tech-crackdown-is-accelerating-follow-infowars-on-these-growing-alternative-platforms [Watch Live]: https://www.infowars.com/show/ [Infowars Network]: https://www.infowars.com/show/network-feed [The Alex Jones Show]: https://www.infowars.com/show/the-alex-jones-show [The War Room with Owen Shroyer]: https://www.infowars.com/show/war-room [The American Journal]: https://www.infowars.com/show/american-journal [Banned.Video]: https://www.banned.video/ [Infowars Store]: https://infowarsstore.com/ [Archive]: https://archives.infowars.com/ [RSS]: https://www.infowars.com/rss.xml [Download Our App]: https://banned.video/watch?id=5e30b18752f35800179d840c [Terms of]: https://www.infowars.com/terms-of-service/ [DMCA]: https://www.infowars.com/dmca/ [Advertise]: https://www.infowars.com/advertise/ [Affiliates]: https://www.infowars.com/affiliates/ [Media]: https://www.infowars.com/media-inquiries/ [About]: https://www.infowars.com/about/ [by Jamie White]: https://www.infowars.com/author/jamie-white

Quantum Communication with ET https://youtu.be/ynRXJsgUwaI?si=PC-CmkGu-ZgPvYwT

Chinese agents hacked ‘many’ Canadian agencies, departments for years, stole ‘valuable’ intel! Canadian intelligence officials claim Chinese hackers ‘compromised’ at least 20 federal, provincial, territorial, municipal and Indigenous government networks in Canada, ‘collecting communications and other valuable information’ over the past five years. 🇨🇦 #NoMoreLiberalsAndNDP 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #SayingTheQuietPartOutLoud 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #resigntrudeau 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #JustSayNoMore 🇨🇦 https://www.rebelnews.com/chinese_agents_hacked_many_canadian_agencies_departments_for_years_stole_valuable_intel

Liberal-appointed senator slams CBC for cancelling local newscasts during pandemic! The Telecommunications Commission said it won’t revoke CBC's licence — regardless of any breach of rules — after a three-month shutdown from March to June 2020 was found to have been in breach of its broadcasting licence. 🇨🇦 #NoMoreLiberalsAndNDP 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #SayingTheQuietPartOutLoud 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #resigntrudeau 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #JustSayNoMore 🇨🇦 https://www.rebelnews.com/liberal_appointed_senator_slams_cbc_for_cancelling_local_newscasts_during_pandemic

Breaking: Major National Cybersecurity Exercise on Election Day; What??? https://jonrappoport.substack.com/p/major-national-cybersecurity-exercise-on-election-day?utm_source=cross-post&publication_id=806546&post_id=150556404&utm_campaign=702469&isFreemail=true&r=djel3&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email&fbclid=IwY2xjawGEvKlleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHRQwcZzj1A3wccWxJA4jGB4fjXq6MZsGsC_7cecB6F7chin66jlFsw16Eg_aem_ll2ZyTijFGbjAitWxFAeFw Background: “AFCEA [Armed Forces Communications & Electronics Association International] Atlanta [Chapter] Homeland Security Conference on Critical Infrastructure, November 6-7, 2024, with a large scale cybersecurity exercise on November 5, 2024” (link in footnote) —On Nov. 5, ELECTION DAY, there will be a special cybersecurity exercise at the Conference. Get this. The exercise is described as a large-scale interactive event, with participants from federal, state, county, city government agencies, academia, and industry. The exercise will simulate a cyber-attack on “critical infrastructure.” That’s right. It’s a so-called “Jack Voltaic”-type exercise, which was developed to test responses to attacks on large infrastructures. QUITE odd to schedule the exercise on Election Day.

Illusion of phishing success deception by techniques using entire Microsoft environments agaist skilled cyber criminals, as the World becomes increasingly interconnected that mimic legitimate communications in language, style, and tone.

Hurricane Helene dumped 40 trillion gallons of water. North Carolina is dealing with destruction I’ve never seen before. Why is Biden not mobilizing the US military to help more with this situation? He mobilizes for middle east and Europe, why not america? Kamala harris tried to make a mountain out of a mole hill. She publicly said Governor Run DeSantis was refusing to take her calls so she and the federal government can help with Hurricane Miltion. DeSantis pointed out he was busy actually managing the crisis, no one ever told him she called so he doesn’t even know if thats true and he’s never worked with a Vice President and he’s already been in communication with Biden and Trump and his whole team. Was Kamala trying to simultaneously look important and take a swipe at DeSantis? One of the hottest searches online right now is is the government manipulating the weather. I’m not ready to put on my full tinfoil hat just yet, but I know they can. But are they. Thoughts? Kamala recently sat down for an interview with 60 minutes, Bill Whitaker. I think it was the first time Kamala has faced hard questions and they didn’t even go as hard on her as they go on Trump. I thought she had many incoherent answers and avoided responsibility on questions about the border and inflation. How do you think she did? She was asked about how to make life more affordable and her economic policies. She used phrases like make billionaires pay their fair share. Teachers, Firefighters. Middle class. Whitaker asked how you pay for this. She then complains billionaires pay less taxes that teachers, fire fighters and middle class. Are these all memorized talking points but she didn’t stray from them at all. Bill Whitaker: “Was democracy best served by President Biden stepping down and basically handing you a nomination? You didn’t have to go through a primary process. You didn’t have to fight off other contenders. That’s not really the way our system was intended to work.” Kamala Harris: “President Biden made a decision that I think history is going to show is rare among leaders, which was to put country before self. And I am proud to have earned the support of the vast majority of delegates.” Former Democratic Rep. Peter Deutsch of Florida has publicly endorsed Trump and said it was mainly because Harris and Biden have made the world unsafe. Thoughts on that? The Inspector General has a report showing how involved the FBI was on January 6th from planted agents, to provokatuers, agents infiltrating groups and also the capitol. Horowitz says to congress the report is fully complete but waiting for it to pass top secret clearance. It won’t be out before the election. Is that time line on purpose and do you believe it exonorates Trump or they would have released it already? Rep Adam Schiff says Social Media needs to censor more leading up to the election. Hillary Clinton said social media needs to be censored more. Elon Musk said he believes if Kamala Harris wins she will do all in her power to shut down X. Why does the left hate free speech so much? Elon Musk said yesterday he would like to cut 80% of the federal work force and much of the budget to run a more effective and cost friendly government. Is the deep state panicked over this and how would this improve the country? Vince Coglianese https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkk65MIIl3o

Help protect free speech and the free lines of communication. Subscribe to UndergroundUSA.com today. https://thepostmillennial.com/hillary-clinton-calls-for-more-censorship-of-americans-on-social-media-or-we-lose-total-control #HillaryClinton #KamalaHarris #Clinton #Marxism #Tyrant #Censorship #Election2024