• Three quarters of Labours so called £20 billion black hole could be wiped out this year if they stopped foreign aid, that's another $14.5 billion they save every year. Then add the £750 million they are still paying the EU every year.

    UK spending on foreign aid
    15 February 2018
    For every hundred pounds that’s made in the UK, seventy pence goes towards foreign aid.

    Another way to say this is that the government has a target to spend 0.7% of the UK’s Gross National Income on overseas development aid each year. Gross National Income (GNI) is the UK’s annual output of goods and services, plus any income we get from abroad.
    https://fullfact.org/economy/uk-spending-foreign-aid/
    Three quarters of Labours so called £20 billion black hole could be wiped out this year if they stopped foreign aid, that's another $14.5 billion they save every year. Then add the £750 million they are still paying the EU every year. UK spending on foreign aid 15 February 2018 For every hundred pounds that’s made in the UK, seventy pence goes towards foreign aid. Another way to say this is that the government has a target to spend 0.7% of the UK’s Gross National Income on overseas development aid each year. Gross National Income (GNI) is the UK’s annual output of goods and services, plus any income we get from abroad. https://fullfact.org/economy/uk-spending-foreign-aid/
    FULLFACT.ORG
    UK spending on foreign aid - Full Fact
    For every hundred pounds that’s made in the UK, seventy pence goes overseas as foreign aid. Here's some basic facts and figures.
    0 Kommentare 0 Anteile 198 Ansichten
  • UK’s Winston Marshall Gives Nancy Pelosi a Proper Spanking at Oxford Union – Calls Out Joe Biden’s Dementia #ShareThisPost!

    UK’s Winston Marshall Gives Nancy Pelosi a Proper Spanking at Oxford Union – Calls Out Joe Biden’s Dementia #ShareThisPost!
    0 Kommentare 0 Anteile 739 Ansichten
  • https://www.sgtreport.com/2024/03/mhra-pfizer-and-uk-officials-accused-of-misconduct-fraud-and-gross-negligent-manslaughter-in-new-criminal-investigation/
    This is in the UK (for now). We need similar proceedings to happen here in the United States. On March 8, 2024, a new criminal investigation was launched against Pfizer, MHRA and UK officials. The investigating officer, Mark Sexton of the Acton Police Station in London, has charged UK officials with misconduct in public office, misfeasance in public office, fraud by false representation, corporate manslaughter and gross negligent manslaughter. Officer Sexton is backed by a team of lawyers, including Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss and Dr. Sam White.
    Under crime number 6029679/21, the investigation specifically seeks to hold accountable a member of the British Parliament, Sir Graham Stuart Brady, and a British doctor, Dame June Munro Raine, who serves as the Chief Executive Officer of the UK’s Medicine and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). This investigation is part of a much larger investigation that Officer Sexton submitted back in 2021. Three years ago, Officer Sexton submitted 1100 pages of evidence to Hammersmith Criminal Investigation Department, which was signed off by two detectives.
    Mark Sexton writes that the investigation is twenty-seven months in progress since the original crime report was released. He says, “They can’t whitewash this one because too many people know what’s going on and the excess deaths cannot be hidden or ignored any longer.” Excess deaths in the UK are driven by cardiovascular events that are tied to the covid-19 vaccine. The Metropolitan Police of Greater London, which is tasked with protecting members of the royal family, members of the government, and other public health officials, is trying to shut the case down. However, over 400 expert witnesses, whistleblowers and victims stand to testify against the criminal actions taken by pharmaceutical companies and government officials over the past four years. At least 40 world experts are prepared to give evidence of criminality. One of the expert witnesses is former biotech research executive, Dr. Michael Yeadon. Yeadon’s letter to Ben Bates of the UK metropolitan police is being shared widely. Yeadon is a former Vice President for Pfizer. For several years, Yeadon led Pfizer’s global research in the field of Allergic & Respiratory Disease Therapeutics, and knows how these interventions are made and what they are for.
    Yeadon lays out verifiable evidence that the covid-19 “vaccines” weren’t vaccines at all, but were intentionally formulated to cause mass harm and then unlawfully mandated on populations. He refutes the existence of an alleged “global pandemic” and documents the harms caused by government lockdowns and other restrictions that coerced populations to take part in a deadly experiment. The illusion of a pandemic was created by the misuse and abuse of a clinical diagnostic test called PCR. Governments funded PCR fraud and erected a web of deceitful financial incentives, encouraging hospital systems and laboratories to use high cycle thresholds on new PCR tests. This created a wave of artificial positives for an alleged disease that there was no symptom-specific diagnostics for. The illnesses that were presented in 2020 were not treated properly; therefore, the lack of early antiviral treatment, misdiagnoses, prescription error, ventilator-associated pneumonia and various forms of medical malfeasance and malpractice was behind the deaths observed in hospitals in 2020 and beyond.
    Yeadon writes, “The heart of this entire deception is the incorrect belief that PCR is nearly flawless and so a positive result means that a person ‘had covid.’ There is no such disease. Not one symptom is unique to the claimed new disease.”
    https://www.sgtreport.com/2024/03/mhra-pfizer-and-uk-officials-accused-of-misconduct-fraud-and-gross-negligent-manslaughter-in-new-criminal-investigation/ This is in the UK (for now). We need similar proceedings to happen here in the United States. On March 8, 2024, a new criminal investigation was launched against Pfizer, MHRA and UK officials. The investigating officer, Mark Sexton of the Acton Police Station in London, has charged UK officials with misconduct in public office, misfeasance in public office, fraud by false representation, corporate manslaughter and gross negligent manslaughter. Officer Sexton is backed by a team of lawyers, including Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss and Dr. Sam White. Under crime number 6029679/21, the investigation specifically seeks to hold accountable a member of the British Parliament, Sir Graham Stuart Brady, and a British doctor, Dame June Munro Raine, who serves as the Chief Executive Officer of the UK’s Medicine and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). This investigation is part of a much larger investigation that Officer Sexton submitted back in 2021. Three years ago, Officer Sexton submitted 1100 pages of evidence to Hammersmith Criminal Investigation Department, which was signed off by two detectives. Mark Sexton writes that the investigation is twenty-seven months in progress since the original crime report was released. He says, “They can’t whitewash this one because too many people know what’s going on and the excess deaths cannot be hidden or ignored any longer.” Excess deaths in the UK are driven by cardiovascular events that are tied to the covid-19 vaccine. The Metropolitan Police of Greater London, which is tasked with protecting members of the royal family, members of the government, and other public health officials, is trying to shut the case down. However, over 400 expert witnesses, whistleblowers and victims stand to testify against the criminal actions taken by pharmaceutical companies and government officials over the past four years. At least 40 world experts are prepared to give evidence of criminality. One of the expert witnesses is former biotech research executive, Dr. Michael Yeadon. Yeadon’s letter to Ben Bates of the UK metropolitan police is being shared widely. Yeadon is a former Vice President for Pfizer. For several years, Yeadon led Pfizer’s global research in the field of Allergic & Respiratory Disease Therapeutics, and knows how these interventions are made and what they are for. Yeadon lays out verifiable evidence that the covid-19 “vaccines” weren’t vaccines at all, but were intentionally formulated to cause mass harm and then unlawfully mandated on populations. He refutes the existence of an alleged “global pandemic” and documents the harms caused by government lockdowns and other restrictions that coerced populations to take part in a deadly experiment. The illusion of a pandemic was created by the misuse and abuse of a clinical diagnostic test called PCR. Governments funded PCR fraud and erected a web of deceitful financial incentives, encouraging hospital systems and laboratories to use high cycle thresholds on new PCR tests. This created a wave of artificial positives for an alleged disease that there was no symptom-specific diagnostics for. The illnesses that were presented in 2020 were not treated properly; therefore, the lack of early antiviral treatment, misdiagnoses, prescription error, ventilator-associated pneumonia and various forms of medical malfeasance and malpractice was behind the deaths observed in hospitals in 2020 and beyond. Yeadon writes, “The heart of this entire deception is the incorrect belief that PCR is nearly flawless and so a positive result means that a person ‘had covid.’ There is no such disease. Not one symptom is unique to the claimed new disease.”
    0 Kommentare 0 Anteile 6KB Ansichten
  • ulian Assange supporters gather en masse to protest. (1 min, 22 sec) Assange is too sick to attend his hearing today. This is his last UK legal challenge before being sent to the United States for trial after five years in the UK’s worst prison, facing 170 more years in the US.
    https://t.me/davidavocadowolfe/120778
    ulian Assange supporters gather en masse to protest. (1 min, 22 sec) Assange is too sick to attend his hearing today. This is his last UK legal challenge before being sent to the United States for trial after five years in the UK’s worst prison, facing 170 more years in the US. https://t.me/davidavocadowolfe/120778
    0 Kommentare 0 Anteile 577 Ansichten 0
  • Lt General Riley Explains How the EU is taking over the UK's Defence and Intelligence Capabilities
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkPNfR3Z5Yo
    Lt Gen Jonathon Riley outlines in detail why having control of our national defence is, as he puts it, ‘a catastrophic risk.’ He explains how the May government has sought to lock Britain into various EU structures created in order to establish control of Europe’s defence by the EU Commission – these structures include the European Defence Fund, the European Defence Agency and the Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) mechanism. He references both the Withdrawal Agreement and the Political Declaration which make it clear which treaty obligations the UK is tied in to. Lt Gen Riley explains the structure of the European Defence Fund and how it operates by ‘leveraging’ national resources (rather than having a central funding model) through policy compliance. He goes on to explain how the Coordinated Annual Review of Defence (CARD) works to strengthen EU control over national decision-making. N.B. Full UK Participation in CARD was agreed by Sir Alan Duncan MP on 19th November 2018, when has a Government Minister, despite the UK having voted to Leave the EU in June 2016. Lt Gen Riley then explains how the EU’s defence policy process has been designed to act not only as a power-grab for control over defence capabilities but also over defence industries. He goes on to explain how the pillars of the ‘European Defence Union’ operate together and how the specific terms in the Political Declaration relate to the UK being committed to this structure. Riley then references how the Withdrawal Agreement replaces the UK’s Treaty commitment under the Lisbon Treaty with a new agreement concerning defence and references the specific clauses within the Political Declaration which tie the UK to the EU Defence structure on an ongoing basis. Lt Gen Riley goes on to show illustrate examples of instances where Ministers and Members of Parliament have responded to questions on this subject with incorrect information and denials of what in fact is happening. One example of a letter states that ‘no such common EU defence powers can be handed from the UK to the EU without the approval of Parliament and a referendum on the issue’. However as Lt Gen Riley points out, there is no requirement for a referendum on simple issues like an extension of EU power over defence. The Lisbon Treaty states that a referendum is only required for the creation of a unified military, called ‘Common Defence’. This is highly misleading as the EU structures are designed to control national defence and intelligence capabilities from the centre, rather than abolish and replace them. As in many areas, the EU exerts its control not by removing functions from national governments but does so by tie-ing nation states to supranational agreements and policy structures. The effect is that he UK loses its independent control over its defence and intelligence capabilities. The UK has signed up to a huge power grab by the EU in the three years since the EU Referendum and extends these commitments if it agrees a Withdrawal Agreement (and therefore the Political Declaration) with the EU.

    Lt General Riley Explains How the EU is taking over the UK's Defence and Intelligence Capabilities https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkPNfR3Z5Yo Lt Gen Jonathon Riley outlines in detail why having control of our national defence is, as he puts it, ‘a catastrophic risk.’ He explains how the May government has sought to lock Britain into various EU structures created in order to establish control of Europe’s defence by the EU Commission – these structures include the European Defence Fund, the European Defence Agency and the Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) mechanism. He references both the Withdrawal Agreement and the Political Declaration which make it clear which treaty obligations the UK is tied in to. Lt Gen Riley explains the structure of the European Defence Fund and how it operates by ‘leveraging’ national resources (rather than having a central funding model) through policy compliance. He goes on to explain how the Coordinated Annual Review of Defence (CARD) works to strengthen EU control over national decision-making. N.B. Full UK Participation in CARD was agreed by Sir Alan Duncan MP on 19th November 2018, when has a Government Minister, despite the UK having voted to Leave the EU in June 2016. Lt Gen Riley then explains how the EU’s defence policy process has been designed to act not only as a power-grab for control over defence capabilities but also over defence industries. He goes on to explain how the pillars of the ‘European Defence Union’ operate together and how the specific terms in the Political Declaration relate to the UK being committed to this structure. Riley then references how the Withdrawal Agreement replaces the UK’s Treaty commitment under the Lisbon Treaty with a new agreement concerning defence and references the specific clauses within the Political Declaration which tie the UK to the EU Defence structure on an ongoing basis. Lt Gen Riley goes on to show illustrate examples of instances where Ministers and Members of Parliament have responded to questions on this subject with incorrect information and denials of what in fact is happening. One example of a letter states that ‘no such common EU defence powers can be handed from the UK to the EU without the approval of Parliament and a referendum on the issue’. However as Lt Gen Riley points out, there is no requirement for a referendum on simple issues like an extension of EU power over defence. The Lisbon Treaty states that a referendum is only required for the creation of a unified military, called ‘Common Defence’. This is highly misleading as the EU structures are designed to control national defence and intelligence capabilities from the centre, rather than abolish and replace them. As in many areas, the EU exerts its control not by removing functions from national governments but does so by tie-ing nation states to supranational agreements and policy structures. The effect is that he UK loses its independent control over its defence and intelligence capabilities. The UK has signed up to a huge power grab by the EU in the three years since the EU Referendum and extends these commitments if it agrees a Withdrawal Agreement (and therefore the Political Declaration) with the EU.
    0 Kommentare 0 Anteile 2KB Ansichten
  • Video: Broadcaster Clashes With Lockdown Shill Over UK’s Tyrannical COVID Policies

    https://www.infowars.com/posts/video-broadcaster-clashes-with-lockdown-shill-over-uks-tyrannical-covid-policies/
    Video: Broadcaster Clashes With Lockdown Shill Over UK’s Tyrannical COVID Policies https://www.infowars.com/posts/video-broadcaster-clashes-with-lockdown-shill-over-uks-tyrannical-covid-policies/
    WWW.INFOWARS.COM
    Video: Broadcaster Clashes With Lockdown Shill Over UK’s Tyrannical COVID Policies
    More people are waking up to the disastrous effects of the elites' COVID lockdowns despite media brainwashing.
    Like
    1
    0 Kommentare 0 Anteile 303 Ansichten
  • https://t.me/LizCrokinReport/1285
    I present to you Liz Truss — the UK’s new prime minister. This tweet is real, go see for yourself.
    https://t.me/LizCrokinReport/1285 I present to you Liz Truss — the UK’s new prime minister. This tweet is real, go see for yourself. 🍕
    0 Kommentare 0 Anteile 344 Ansichten
  • Either both Skripals were murdered by UK’s Government (presumably after 26 June 2019) in order to prevent UK’s guilt to be able to become known to the public, or else they had been given new identities and sent to New Zealand, as the UK rumor-mill has alleged. However, even if they are in another country, are they still in prison?
    https://southfront.org/the-skripals-are-either-imprisoned-or-murdered-by-uk/
    Either both Skripals were murdered by UK’s Government (presumably after 26 June 2019) in order to prevent UK’s guilt to be able to become known to the public, or else they had been given new identities and sent to New Zealand, as the UK rumor-mill has alleged. However, even if they are in another country, are they still in prison? https://southfront.org/the-skripals-are-either-imprisoned-or-murdered-by-uk/
    SOUTHFRONT.ORG
    The Skripals Are Either Imprisoned Or Murdered By UK
    Written by Eric Zuesse On 8 March 2018, the brilliant geostrategic analyst who anonymously writes the “Moon of Alabama” blog...
    0 Kommentare 0 Anteile 290 Ansichten
Gesponsert

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. đŸ„°

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here