2012 Presidential Records Case Seeking to Obtain Tapes from Bill Clinton Ruling Points to the Illegality of the Mar-a-Lago Raid with Court Established Legal Precedent
Judicial Watch sought to obtain audio tapes from Bill Clinton that were made while he was in office in 2012.
https://bit.ly/3pHygCG
The U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson, rejected the arguments stating that the tapes belonged to Mr. Clinton "even though they contained a broad range of presidential matters".
She asserted that:
- The National Archives and Records Administration had no power to “seize control of them” because Mr. Clinton had used his authority under the Presidential Records Act to declare the recordings part of his personal records.
Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch states:
- “What it highlights is that under the law, and the Justice Department’s prior legal positions, if Clinton had the tapes, they are presumably personal,”
Fitton also affirmed:
- The 2012 ruling against Judicial Watch involving the Clinton tapes establishes that the president, not the National Archives, has the authority to declare whether records are personal.
- The FBI never raided Hillary's residence to take possession of the server which she illegally had in her home.
Yet Trump, with the court affirmation of his liberty to establish possession of the records as personal under the Presidential Records Act as affirmed in the 2012 Judicial Watch case, was raided by the FBI for records they had no right to under the Presidential Records Act.
Judicial Watch is challenging this raid, as is Trump and by established precedent he has the legal capacity to successfully do so.
Unless, of course, the Justice System is as broken and corrupt as many believe it is. Then, only injustice reigns as many also believe does these days.
#mar-a-lago #trumpraid #biden #trump #judicialwatch #corruptcourts #fbi
2012 Presidential Records Case Seeking to Obtain Tapes from Bill Clinton Ruling Points to the Illegality of the Mar-a-Lago Raid with Court Established Legal Precedent
Judicial Watch sought to obtain audio tapes from Bill Clinton that were made while he was in office in 2012. https://bit.ly/3pHygCG
The U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson, rejected the arguments stating that the tapes belonged to Mr. Clinton "even though they contained a broad range of presidential matters".
She asserted that:
- The National Archives and Records Administration had no power to “seize control of them” because Mr. Clinton had used his authority under the Presidential Records Act to declare the recordings part of his personal records.
Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch states:
- “What it highlights is that under the law, and the Justice Department’s prior legal positions, if Clinton had the tapes, they are presumably personal,”
Fitton also affirmed:
- The 2012 ruling against Judicial Watch involving the Clinton tapes establishes that the president, not the National Archives, has the authority to declare whether records are personal.
- The FBI never raided Hillary's residence to take possession of the server which she illegally had in her home.
Yet Trump, with the court affirmation of his liberty to establish possession of the records as personal under the Presidential Records Act as affirmed in the 2012 Judicial Watch case, was raided by the FBI for records they had no right to under the Presidential Records Act.
Judicial Watch is challenging this raid, as is Trump and by established precedent he has the legal capacity to successfully do so.
Unless, of course, the Justice System is as broken and corrupt as many believe it is. Then, only injustice reigns as many also believe does these days.
#mar-a-lago #trumpraid #biden #trump #judicialwatch #corruptcourts #fbi
English
Arabic
Spanish
Portuguese
Deutsch
Turkish
Dutch
Italiano
Russian
Romaian
Portuguese (Brazil)
Greek