The interview does a good job at touching on #Section230. However, the basic issue is not addressed. Someone (anyone) develops a technical capability. Does having that capability grant the "Right of Use" to anyone who wants to use the capability? Is the "Owner" of that capability "Obligated" to use that capability themselves or to grant access to it to anyone who wants to use it? Social Media Platforms are the "Private Property" of the organization that created it. They "Grant" access to that "Property" free of charge (They demand "NO" exchange of value for value from the user). Since it is about providing a platform for "Opinion Speech" everyone thinks it is about their 1st Amendment Rights. Does ones right to express oneself include the right to a microphone they did not purchase? Government involvement in both private property rights and opinion speech is laced with all kinds of problems. Do we really want to institutionalize this? #FCC, #1A, #TrumpExecutiveOrder, #Twitter https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzokmbSXhhg&feature=youtu.be