George Soros Co-Instigated the NATO War Against Russia A 1993 document that has surfaced, written by George Soros, recommends NATO wage war against Russia using Eastern European populations. https://rumble.com/v61f3gt-george-soros-co-instigated-the-nato-war-against-russia.html

DOCUMENT SURFACES CONFIRMING THE THE PENTAGON WAS IN FACT CONTROLLING THE CONVID NARRATIVE ALL ALONG duh... https://old.bitchute.com/video/kZzFnFL6V4bw/

NGAD First Flights with NO Control Surfaces! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpXQopsBB_U&list=TLPQMDYxMjIwMjSZQEDkX-8gew&index=13

Elon Musk Announces Diddy and Epstein Client List Release on January 20. This is going to rock Hollywood. (The intertwined scandals surrounding figures like Diddy and Epstein represent the tip of a much larger iceberg—a chilling connection between local sex clubs, covert spy rings, and the exploitation of children. Beneath this surface lies a systemic rot, where social conditioning and unchecked power have allowed depravity to flourish in the shadows.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjrROc1Sqok “There are couples that seem never to argue. Their relationships are marked by enormous outward politeness; they say thank you a lot; they make each other cups of tea; they can look rather horrified when there’s a mention of a squabble in someone else’s life. It’s understandable if they’re privately a little pleased with themselves. But surface harmony isn’t, in reality, any reliable sign of health in love because it’s impossible to try to merge two lives without regularly encountering deep sources of incompatibility. A lack of arguments is more likely to be a sign that we have given up caring than a superhuman achievement of maturity.”

Absolutely it is! This is a fantastic documentary that could be 110% better if it's creators were aware of (Or did not hide) the FACT that the earth is an ENCLOSED SYSTEM, and is FLAT & STATIONARY! If you believe in what your bible tells you, I want you to open to PAGE 1, GENESIS 1, and read down to verse 10! YHWH "separated the waters from the waters." Genesis 6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. Genesis 7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. There are several misleading parts within this documentary, like when the man claims that during creation "We now have a water ball in space." WHERE IS THAT IN THE TEXT??? No folks, "space" does not exist, #NASA is a Satanic organization of deception, and the earth is FLAT and STATIONARY just like the bible tells you it is! COUNT THE NUMBER OF TIMES YOUR BIBLE SAYS "The earth shall not be moved" Go and count them! Count how many times your bible says the earth has "foundations." This documentary would be perfect if it told the TRUTH about our earth being a flat and stationary PLANE and the Sun, Moon, and stars are "Lights in the sky" (within the firmament) just like the bible tells us it is. I respect the creators of this documentary, they could just be brainwashed into believing in "Space" and all of that nonsense, just like the rest of us were! But I have found that Hollywood and "Science so-called" always uses deception in this area. There is no demonstrable "curvature" to the earth's surface. This ALONE proves without a shadow of a doubt that the earth is flat! Don't believe me? I challenge you to "Prove the #Globe" you believe in! That is what I tried to do, and is why now I know the TRUTH.... That there is no proof to the claim the earth is a sphere! It's all a Satanic LIE. It is likely "The great delusion" spoken of in your bible! Have a blessed day and READ YOUR BIBLE! Go check out Rob Skiba's "Testing the Globe" website, there is a lot of information there! Most importantly though... PRAISE YHWH and admire His perfect Creation! A living Testament to His greatness and power! Walk in His statutes and be humble! https://youtu.be/UM82qxxskZE

Video Resurfaces To Haunt Kamala Harris’ Campaign https://conservativebrief.com/video-kamala-86705/

The Wreck That Saved America From a Massive Radioactive Attack June 23, 1944. In the darkness of the mid-Atlantic, 850 nautical miles west of the Cape Verde Islands, the Japanese submarine I-52 slices through the water. The 356-foot vessel, commanded by Lieutenant Commander Kameo Uno, carries a cargo set to alter the course of the war. I-52's cavernous hold contains 2.2 tons of gold bars, payment for Nazi Germany's most advanced technology. More crucially, 1,700 pounds of uranium oxide lie in wait - the potential core of a dirty bomb. War secrets, cutting-edge radar equipment, and even an Enigma machine complete the precious cargo, all destined to unlock German military innovation. Near midnight, an American airman aboard a Grumman TBF-1C Avenger detects a surface contact on his half-functional radar. Lieutenant Commander Jesse D. Taylor, piloting the lead aircraft, responds immediately. Flares burst from his Avenger, bathing the ocean below in harsh light. Caught in the sudden illumination, I-52 plunges beneath the waves. Taylor dives, unleashing a barrage of depth charges that explode off the submarine's starboard side. As the crew of I-52 fights to control their descent, Taylor circles overhead, preparing to deploy one more weapon - a cutting-edge device to seal the submarine's fate… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KWZcM66rP0

Mercury, the closest planet to the Sun, has been heavily bombarded by meteorites throughout its history, similar to other rocky planets in our solar system. Its surface is covered with impact craters, some of which are quite large and ancient. Due to Mercury’s lack of a significant atmosphere, incoming meteorites do not burn up, resulting in frequent and intense impacts. Notable examples include: Caloris Basin: One of the largest known impact craters in the solar system, the Caloris Basin spans about 1,550 kilometers (960 miles). It was likely formed by an asteroid impact during Mercury's early history. Kuiper Crater: A relatively small but well-preserved crater, named after the astronomer Gerard Kuiper, is about 60 kilometers (37 miles) in diameter. Hokusai Crater: Another large crater on Mercury, measuring 114 kilometers (71 miles) in diameter, with bright rays of ejected material extending over much of the planet. Mercury's surface is thought to have experienced more impacts than Earth's, Mars', or Venus' due to its proximity to the Sun, which pulls in more meteoroids and comets. These impacts have significantly shaped the planet's geological history and surface evolution. Tonynetone

Interesting, but Immanuel Velikovsky had already offered an alternative that might explain this in the 1950s. That, he suggested, may have been an eruption from Saturn which led to a great rain on Earth... but if this were the case, would there not be more frozen water on the surface of the Moon? Surely it could not all have fallen on the Earth... or does this suggest that, at that moment in time, there was no Moon? Any hypothesis such as this (it is not a theory) tells us more about the limitations on (or indoctrination of) the thinking of the speaker than it does about a past reality. Astronomers seem to be obsessed with a surprisingly small repertoire of possible physical phenomena which do not take full account of what is actually available in the wider cosmos. Plus, if the Moon had already been orbiting the Earth when this alleged "collision" took place, it would have gone careering through the Solar System once Earth's gravitation field was disrupted... so, are they suggesting that afterwards, the Moon was somehow magically "recaptured"? Or was it simply not there yet, being captured during a later epoch? No matter how hard they try, the reformulation of hypotheses usually leads only to more contradictions down the line. The worst part, however, is that videos such as this function only as uncritical "repeaters" of pseudo-information - "pseudo" precisely because the "evidence" can only be indirect. These things are largely based on supposition, limited information and a pre-formed notion of how the universe works; the big surprise seems to be that, when you stand back and look at it, it seems to be based upon a surprisingly Newtonian, gravity-based model... and real "science" would be served better if they instead challenged the hypothesis. If "science" is merely a collection of unsupported hypotheses, we should not be surprised if the whole enterprise eventually collapses under the weight of contradictory evidence. Unfortunately, as I have said before, the trouble with this kind of hypothesis is that in our experience, time travels in only one direction, and we are not able to jump into a convenient time machine to travel back and confirm anything. What we have is only an "interpretation" through the rose-tinted lenses of the current dominant paradigm. https://www.facebook.com/reel/1779950362746428