FIRST BIDEN-HARRIS CBP ONE BUS CARRYING ILLEGAL ALIENS ARRIVES AT BORDER

"The first bus, sponsored by Biden-Harris’s CBP One app, arrived at the US border this week, where illegals from Central and South America will be admitted into the US. Under Mexico's new program, Secure Emerging Mobility Corridor, the bus arrived in Reynosa, Tamaulipas, Mexico — just across the border from McAllen, Texas. The program was unveiled after a meeting between Biden and the Mexican president.

"Illegals traveling to the US in the program get free transportation, meals, and security from the Mexico/Guatemala border to ports of entry in the US. There are 1,450 daily appointments available at several of ports of entry across the border. The CBP One smartphone app allows illegal aliens to schedule an appointment in the US to claim asylum and be released into the country permanently. More than 500,000 undocumented aliens enter under the CBP-One smartphone application yearly."

So, if those who want to protect our country's bedrock of the law applying equally to everyone want to help stop the lawlessness at the southern border - the lawlessness being facilitated by this program, I guess (and I am not advocating for, but making an observation) a knowledgeable "white hat-black hat" could drop a virus into the CBP One program to destroy it beyond repair.

After all, 1,450 entry appointments a day equates to 529,250 entries a year—and that is on top of those who didn't use the app and the "got aways."

Yeah, Kamala, the border is secure...NOT!

https://substack.com/profile/129788551-frank-salvato/note/c-69023653

#KamalaHarris #DebunkingKamala #Border #Illegals #Election2024

big tippers till close till TUE.
https://www.linkedin.com/pub/dir/Ram%C3%B3n/Castillon
YES hostess hot, waitress hot, and manager not a bad dupe for lorenzo, and we have a Ramon (but short and not bulky enough but ok)
what eye learned https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTvy8ab1NSo was we have a lot more stuff eye want in SPAIN.
and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Privately_held_companies_of_Germany
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Privately_held_companies_of_Spain https://www.crunchbase.com/hub/private-spain-companies
--side show approved https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Companies_based_in_New_Hampshire

https://ufile.io/te7shotc b/c of all the potential for security leaks connected to Neelam Patel and SIKHS at the world bank it's this location ONLY.

https://1737.blackbaudhosting.com/1737/Leadership-Development https://sou.edu/provost/

13 Sep, 12:57
Russia to see NATO’s permit to use long-range weapons as direct involvement in war

According to the Russian diplomat, such a scenario would cardinally change Moscow’s relations with Western countries
If NATO countries allow Ukraine to use their long-range weapons to strike deep into Russia, it will mean a direct war on Russia, Russia’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations Vasily Nebenzya said.

"Once a decision to lift restrictions is really made, it will mean that NATO countries begin a direct war on Russia from this very moment. In this case, naturally, we will be forced to make corresponding decisions with all potential consequences for the Western aggressors. And our Western colleagues won’t be able to dodge responsibility and shift the blame onto Kiev," he said at a meeting of the UN Security Council on Ukraine.

According to the Russian diplomat, such a scenario would cardinally change Moscow’s relations with Western countries.

The Daily Telegraph reported earlier that British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and US President Joe Biden during a meeting in Washington on Friday might touch upon the issue of granting Ukraine permission to use British long-range Storm Shadow missiles. The Guardian reported on September 11 that Starmer did not intend to speak publicly about granting Ukraine such a permit following his meeting with Biden. According to The Daily Telegraph, if the parties allow Ukraine to fire long-range missiles deep into Russian territory, they will probably announce this at the UN General Assembly in late September.

Earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin told the media that Ukraine was unable to strike deep into Russian territory without Western help because it needed intelligence from satellites and flight tasks to do so. The Russian leader noted that NATO countries were now not just debating about Kiev's possible use of Western long-range weapons. They are essentially deciding whether or not to get directly involved in the Ukrainian conflict. Putin pointed out that Moscow would make decisions based on the threats that would be posed to Russia.

After ex-vice president Dick Cheney announced that he would be voting for Kamala Harris, Donald Trump's aide Tulsi Gabbard said it will make the decision for the voters easier. Dick Cheney is responsible for whatever is wrong today in the Middle East and voting for Kamala Harris will be voting for Dick Cheney, Hillary Clinton and for war.
https://youtu.be/6KLHEp94Sfs?si=J7m6f2HM8NDwzSvR

Detailed Analysis: Why Arabs Lose Wars?
This video based by article is a personal account of U.S. Army Colonel Norvell DeAtkine's experience in dealing with Arab militaries for over 40 years.

This video provides an in-depth analysis of the performance of Arabic-speaking armies in the modern era, examining their struggles and challenges across various historical conflicts. It begins by exploring how Egyptian regular forces faced difficulties against Yemeni irregulars in the 1960s, a period marked by intense military strategy shifts in the Middle East. Similarly, Syrians managed to assert control in Lebanon during the mid-1970s, but only through the use of overwhelming weaponry and numbers, rather than tactical brilliance.

One of the most notable examples of ineffectiveness came from the Iraqis during the 1980s when they were pitted against an Iranian military deeply affected by revolutionary turmoil. Despite the disarray in Iran, the Iraqis failed to secure a decisive victory and could not win a three-decade-long war against the Kurds. The Arab military performance on both sides of the 1990 Kuwait war was similarly underwhelming, highlighting the mediocre combat history of the region's forces, especially when compared to the more formidable Allied Forces and Axis Powers of World War II.

This video seeks to uncover why this unimpressive record persists, delving into a myriad of factors—economic, ideological, and technical—that have historically hampered Arab armies. Yet, perhaps the most critical factor is cultural, encompassing certain societal attributes that inhibit these forces from producing an effective military presence on the battlefield. The insights you will hear are grounded in the personal experiences of Norville B. De Atkin, who spent nearly three decades in the Middle East as a U.S. military attaché and security assistance officer. Through his lens, we gain an understanding of how military tactics are developed and implemented—or, as often is the case, how they fall short—due to deeply ingrained cultural practices.

It's a well-established truth in military history that an army fights as it is trained. Atkin's firsthand observations of Arab military training reveal much about how these forces approach modern warfare and why they frequently struggle to meet the demands of strategic warfare. Despite nearly 25 years passing since his initial assessments, it appears that little has changed in the effectiveness of these armies, especially when compared to other global forces.

The video also critiques the problematic nature of incorporating culture into strategic assessments. Historically, this approach has led to wild distortions, as seen with the U.S. Army in the 1930s, which misjudged the Japanese national character, leading to incorrect assumptions about their technological capabilities. Hitler's underestimation of the United States as a "mongrel society" similarly backfired, showing the dangers of relying too heavily on cultural stereotypes in warfare. These examples underscore the risk of making assumptions about military abilities based on cultural attributes, which often leads to overconfidence or, conversely, underestimation of an adversary's capabilities.

The video also touches on the evolution of military subculture over time, noting how past performances can lead to erroneous conclusions about future conflicts. The dismal French performance in the 1870 Franco-Prussian War misled the German high command into overestimating the French Army's capabilities during World War I. Conversely, Israeli generals underestimated the Egyptian Army in 1973, based on their lackluster performance in the 1967 war. Such examples illustrate how combat history can be a double-edged sword, influencing strategic decisions in both positive and negative ways.

Furthermore, the video explores how cultural factors—such as the highly centralized command structures in Arab militaries—stifle initiative and flexibility. This rigid hierarchy often leads to a lack of combined arms operations, where cooperation between different military branches, such as naval battles and air warfare, is critical for success.

In Western forces like the U.S. military, NCOs play a vital role in bridging the gap between officers and enlisted soldiers, fostering a sense of unit cohesion and military innovation. However, in many Arabic-speaking armies, NCOs are either absent or non-functional, leading to a breakdown in discipline and effectiveness, particularly in the stress of combat. This lack of a professional NCO corps further exacerbates the challenges these armies face in executing military tactics and maintaining military history.

https://ourcountryourchoice.com/
https://rumble.com/v5egdx0-col.-macgregor-call-to-action.html
Led by CEO Douglas Macgregor, OUR COUNTRY OUR CHOICE (OCOC) will provide Americans the tools, information and skills necessary to proactively preserve and strengthen the security, prosperity, and moral fabric of our Great Nation. E-mail us [email protected]

Judicial Watch sues DHS for info about Secret Service protection for Trump
https://www.judicialwatch.org/judicial-watch-sues-dhs-for-info-about-secret-service-protection-for-trump/?utm_source=deployer&utm_medium=email&utm_content=&utm_campaign=tipsheet&utm_term=members

Conservative watchdog Judicial Watch on Tuesday announced that it sued the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for information regarding additional Secret Service protection requests for former President Donald Trump prior to the July 13 assassination attempt.

The DHS allegedly repeatedly denied requests for more protection for Trump over the past two years, including rejecting requests for magnetometers and more security at large Trump rallies, per the Washington Post.

The minister of the West Bank, Bezalel Smotrich, and the national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, under Netanyahu's leadership and with the army's participation, are doing everything they can to open another front in addition to the ones that are already aflame.
https://www.moonofalabama.org/2024/09/zionists-who-call-for-more-war-may-well-get-it-.html#more

When Social Security goes bankrupt.
God Bless America, God Save The Republic.
What happens when Social Security goes bankrupt https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/3147288/what-happens-when-social-security-goes-bankrupt/ via @dcexaminer