• RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE! Today, Fri, 4/26 from 7-8:00pm EST, Craig and Diane discuss the SCOTUS hears Trump's presidential immunity case; Biden's capital gains tax proposal; and Biden's latest 'climate change' regulations will crash the electric grid on https://rspradio1.com Click 'LISTEN LIVE.'
    RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE! Today, Fri, 4/26 from 7-8:00pm EST, Craig and Diane discuss the SCOTUS hears Trump's presidential immunity case; Biden's capital gains tax proposal; and Biden's latest 'climate change' regulations will crash the electric grid on https://rspradio1.com Click 'LISTEN LIVE.'
    0 Comments 0 Shares 20 Views
  • Sam Bankman-Fried sentenced to 25 years in prison, judge rips him as power-obsessed scammer
    675 views March 28, 2024

    A Manhattan judge ripped Sam Bankman-Fried as a “remorseless” scammer obsessed with political power as he sentenced the fallen crypto mogul to 25 years in prison Thursday — five months after he was found guilty of stealing more than $8 billion from customers of his now-bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange FTX.

    Judge Lewis Kaplan said the 32-year-old convicted fraudster “presented himself as the good guy” all in favor of “appropriate regulation of the crypto industry” — but it was just an “act.”

    “He did it because he wanted to be a hugely, hugely political influential person in this country,” Kaplan said, blasting him as “remorseless.”

    “He knew it was wrong, he knew it was criminal, he regrets that he made a very bad bet about the likelihood of being caught,” he continued, as Bankman-Fried stood in front of him with his hands clasped tightly at his waist.

    The disgraced crypto king was also ordered to pay more than $11 billion. Kaplan said his forfeited assets can be used to help fund the repayment.
    Sam Bankman-Fried sentenced to 25 years in prison, judge rips him as power-obsessed scammer 675 views March 28, 2024 A Manhattan judge ripped Sam Bankman-Fried as a “remorseless” scammer obsessed with political power as he sentenced the fallen crypto mogul to 25 years in prison Thursday — five months after he was found guilty of stealing more than $8 billion from customers of his now-bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange FTX. Judge Lewis Kaplan said the 32-year-old convicted fraudster “presented himself as the good guy” all in favor of “appropriate regulation of the crypto industry” — but it was just an “act.” “He did it because he wanted to be a hugely, hugely political influential person in this country,” Kaplan said, blasting him as “remorseless.” “He knew it was wrong, he knew it was criminal, he regrets that he made a very bad bet about the likelihood of being caught,” he continued, as Bankman-Fried stood in front of him with his hands clasped tightly at his waist. The disgraced crypto king was also ordered to pay more than $11 billion. Kaplan said his forfeited assets can be used to help fund the repayment.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 753 Views
  • Bill O’Reilley: “Donald Trump will remove almost all regulations so therefore just by that action the people will get some relief.” (1 min, 18 sec)
    https://t.me/davidavocadowolfe/123731
    Bill O’Reilley: “Donald Trump will remove almost all regulations so therefore just by that action the people will get some relief.” (1 min, 18 sec) https://t.me/davidavocadowolfe/123731
    0 Comments 0 Shares 132 Views 0
  • As regulations grows freedoms die.
    As regulations grows freedoms die.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 171 Views
  • "According to a recent Federal Reserve report, an international agreement reached in the 1990s mandates, need a new system banking regulations. These modifications aim to align national policies with globally established standards. Despite long-standing opposition from influential banking institutions, the proposed changes are expected to take effect by the end of the year. The reforms primarily focus on restricting banks' lending capabilities, ensuring they conform to universal guidelines. It is crucial for the Federal Reserve to have a strong leader who can resist pressure from powerful financial institutions and safeguard the stability of America's financial system."

    The integration of the international financial system has led to large, globally active firms operating within a system of national government and regulation. While there is no realistic prospect for a global banking regulator, the responsibility and authority for financial stability continue to rest with national or regional authorities. The challenge lies in effectively sharing oversight of these large firms among regulators. Varying forms of regulation across countries are reasonable, considering different economic circumstances, currencies, and levels of depth and development in banking and capital markets. Even between the United States and the European Union, legitimate differences exist within the broader convergence around minimum regulatory and supervisory standards developed at various forums.

    The financial crisis exposed vulnerabilities created by foreign banking operations, and the Basel Committee and national regulators were slow to respond to the expansion in scale and scope of the world’s largest banking organizations. Addressing these vulnerabilities requires thoughtful coordination and effective supervision of international activities by U.S. banking organizations.


    In summary, the Federal Reserve’s role in regulating international banking activities is critical, and strong leadership is essential to navigate the complexities of global financial systems and ensure stability.
    "According to a recent Federal Reserve report, an international agreement reached in the 1990s mandates, need a new system banking regulations. These modifications aim to align national policies with globally established standards. Despite long-standing opposition from influential banking institutions, the proposed changes are expected to take effect by the end of the year. The reforms primarily focus on restricting banks' lending capabilities, ensuring they conform to universal guidelines. It is crucial for the Federal Reserve to have a strong leader who can resist pressure from powerful financial institutions and safeguard the stability of America's financial system." The integration of the international financial system has led to large, globally active firms operating within a system of national government and regulation. While there is no realistic prospect for a global banking regulator, the responsibility and authority for financial stability continue to rest with national or regional authorities. The challenge lies in effectively sharing oversight of these large firms among regulators. Varying forms of regulation across countries are reasonable, considering different economic circumstances, currencies, and levels of depth and development in banking and capital markets. Even between the United States and the European Union, legitimate differences exist within the broader convergence around minimum regulatory and supervisory standards developed at various forums. The financial crisis exposed vulnerabilities created by foreign banking operations, and the Basel Committee and national regulators were slow to respond to the expansion in scale and scope of the world’s largest banking organizations. Addressing these vulnerabilities requires thoughtful coordination and effective supervision of international activities by U.S. banking organizations. In summary, the Federal Reserve’s role in regulating international banking activities is critical, and strong leadership is essential to navigate the complexities of global financial systems and ensure stability.
    1 Comments 0 Shares 1802 Views
  • United States Military Academy
    Investigate/inquire leaders into allegations of violations of policy, regulation or law, and issues of mismanagement, unethical behavior.
    United States Military Academy Investigate/inquire leaders into allegations of violations of policy, regulation or law, and issues of mismanagement, unethical behavior.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 368 Views
  • February 25, 2024, 11:15 a.m. CT

    We recognize that let many of our customers down.
    AT&T sent a letter to employees on network outage that occurred on February 22. The Large swathes of the U.S. Including San Francisco, Houston and Chicago.

    An incorrect process while working to expand our network, not a cyber attack.
    Making it right.

    Founding and Early Years (1877-1900):AT&T traces its roots back to the invention of the telephone by Alexander Graham Bell in 1876. Bell and his associates founded the Bell Telephone Company in 1877.

    In 1885, American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) was established as the long-distance division of Bell Telephone.
    AT&T became the dominant force in the U.S. telephone industry through the acquisition of regional telephone companies.


    Monopoly Era (1900-1984):By the early 20th century, AT&T had established a virtual monopoly over the telephone service in the United States.
    The company faced antitrust actions, leading to the Kingsbury Commitment in 1913, which allowed AT&T to maintain its monopoly but subjected it to some government regulation.
    AT&T's research arm, Bell Labs, became a major center for technological innovation during this period.

    Breakup of the Bell System (1984):In 1984, the U.S. Department of Justice, in an antitrust action, ordered the divestiture of AT&T's local telephone service operating companies. This breakup led to the creation of seven Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs).
    AT&T retained its long-distance services and equipment manufacturing, becoming a separate entity from the local telephone companies.

    Post-Divestiture Era (1984-2005):After the breakup, AT&T faced increased competition in the telecommunications industry.
    The company expanded into new areas, including computer manufacturing and financial services.
    In 1996, the Telecommunications Act was signed into law, further deregulating the industry and promoting competition.

    Rebranding and Mergers (2005 Onward):SBC Communications acquired AT&T Corp. in 2005, and the merged company adopted the name AT&T Inc.
    AT&T continued to grow through acquisitions, including the purchase of BellSouth in 2006.
    The company expanded its services beyond traditional telecommunication, entering the media and entertainment industry through acquisitions like DirecTV (2015) and Time Warner (2018).


    Recent Developments (2020s):As of my knowledge cutoff in January 2022, AT&T continued to evolve its business model, focusing on media and streaming services.
    The company launched HBO Max as its flagship streaming platform, offering a wide range of content.
    Ongoing developments in the industry and corporate strategies may have occurred since then.
    February 25, 2024, 11:15 a.m. CT We recognize that let many of our customers down. AT&T sent a letter to employees on network outage that occurred on February 22. The Large swathes of the U.S. Including San Francisco, Houston and Chicago. An incorrect process while working to expand our network, not a cyber attack. Making it right. Founding and Early Years (1877-1900):AT&T traces its roots back to the invention of the telephone by Alexander Graham Bell in 1876. Bell and his associates founded the Bell Telephone Company in 1877. In 1885, American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) was established as the long-distance division of Bell Telephone. AT&T became the dominant force in the U.S. telephone industry through the acquisition of regional telephone companies. Monopoly Era (1900-1984):By the early 20th century, AT&T had established a virtual monopoly over the telephone service in the United States. The company faced antitrust actions, leading to the Kingsbury Commitment in 1913, which allowed AT&T to maintain its monopoly but subjected it to some government regulation. AT&T's research arm, Bell Labs, became a major center for technological innovation during this period. Breakup of the Bell System (1984):In 1984, the U.S. Department of Justice, in an antitrust action, ordered the divestiture of AT&T's local telephone service operating companies. This breakup led to the creation of seven Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs). AT&T retained its long-distance services and equipment manufacturing, becoming a separate entity from the local telephone companies. Post-Divestiture Era (1984-2005):After the breakup, AT&T faced increased competition in the telecommunications industry. The company expanded into new areas, including computer manufacturing and financial services. In 1996, the Telecommunications Act was signed into law, further deregulating the industry and promoting competition. Rebranding and Mergers (2005 Onward):SBC Communications acquired AT&T Corp. in 2005, and the merged company adopted the name AT&T Inc. AT&T continued to grow through acquisitions, including the purchase of BellSouth in 2006. The company expanded its services beyond traditional telecommunication, entering the media and entertainment industry through acquisitions like DirecTV (2015) and Time Warner (2018). Recent Developments (2020s):As of my knowledge cutoff in January 2022, AT&T continued to evolve its business model, focusing on media and streaming services. The company launched HBO Max as its flagship streaming platform, offering a wide range of content. Ongoing developments in the industry and corporate strategies may have occurred since then.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2713 Views
  • https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/02/bidens-new-regulation-make-1-million-jobs-vanish/
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/02/bidens-new-regulation-make-1-million-jobs-vanish/
    WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM
    Biden's New Regulation Could Make Up to 1 Million Jobs Vanish, According to Manufacturing Leader
    The Biden administration's federal agencies are making life worse for American manufacturers, a top manufacturing leader says.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 186 Views
  • MichaelHendrickson
    more_horiz
    @MichaelHendrickson

    ·
    15m

    https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/businessmen-say-they-will-no-longer-invest-in-new-york-after-justice-engorons-trump-ruling-5590942?utm_source=Goodevening&src_src=Goodevening&utm_campaign=gv-02-20-2024&src_cmp=gv-02-20-2024&utm_medium=email&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAbKwqZx4f3dPH4rRd7zF5DLl7wk9AJCYDRKPekR6SH0Eg+ERURwIxEQ==

    Businessmen Say They Will No Longer Invest in New York After Justice Engoron’s Trump Ruling
    The justice’s finding that former President Donald Trump is liable for fraud has some investors taking their business elsewhere.

    Some real estate investors are losing interest in investing in the Big Apple after New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron’s staggering ruling last week in a civil fraud case against President Donald Trump.

    President Trump and Trump Organization executives were ordered on Feb. 16 to pay $355 million in fines, plus interest, after Justice Engoron found them liable for inflating the values of their assets to obtain better rates from lenders and insurers.

    The judge also barred the former president and his sons from managing their businesses in New York for three years.

    “I’m shocked at this. I can’t even understand or fathom the decision at all. There’s no rationale for it,” “Shark Tank” investor Kevin O’Leary told Fox Business on Feb. 19.

    The Canadian businessman, often called “Mr. Wonderful,” described New York as a “mega loser state” for business.

    “New York was already a loser state, like California’s a loser state,” he said. “There are many loser states because of policy, high taxes, uncompetitive regulation. It was already on the top of the list of being a loser state. I would never invest in New York now.”

    Instead, Mr. O’Leary said he would be looking to Oklahoma, North Dakota, and West Virginia for future investment opportunities.

    “Those are winner states. They don’t do things like this.”

    President Trump expressed appreciation for Mr. O’Leary’s comments in a post on his Truth Social platform.See less
    MichaelHendrickson more_horiz @MichaelHendrickson · 15m https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/businessmen-say-they-will-no-longer-invest-in-new-york-after-justice-engorons-trump-ruling-5590942?utm_source=Goodevening&src_src=Goodevening&utm_campaign=gv-02-20-2024&src_cmp=gv-02-20-2024&utm_medium=email&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAbKwqZx4f3dPH4rRd7zF5DLl7wk9AJCYDRKPekR6SH0Eg+ERURwIxEQ== Businessmen Say They Will No Longer Invest in New York After Justice Engoron’s Trump Ruling The justice’s finding that former President Donald Trump is liable for fraud has some investors taking their business elsewhere. Some real estate investors are losing interest in investing in the Big Apple after New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron’s staggering ruling last week in a civil fraud case against President Donald Trump. President Trump and Trump Organization executives were ordered on Feb. 16 to pay $355 million in fines, plus interest, after Justice Engoron found them liable for inflating the values of their assets to obtain better rates from lenders and insurers. The judge also barred the former president and his sons from managing their businesses in New York for three years. “I’m shocked at this. I can’t even understand or fathom the decision at all. There’s no rationale for it,” “Shark Tank” investor Kevin O’Leary told Fox Business on Feb. 19. The Canadian businessman, often called “Mr. Wonderful,” described New York as a “mega loser state” for business. “New York was already a loser state, like California’s a loser state,” he said. “There are many loser states because of policy, high taxes, uncompetitive regulation. It was already on the top of the list of being a loser state. I would never invest in New York now.” Instead, Mr. O’Leary said he would be looking to Oklahoma, North Dakota, and West Virginia for future investment opportunities. “Those are winner states. They don’t do things like this.” President Trump expressed appreciation for Mr. O’Leary’s comments in a post on his Truth Social platform.See less
    WWW.THEEPOCHTIMES.COM
    Businessmen Say They Will No Longer Invest in New York After Justice Engoron’s Trump Ruling
    The justice’s finding that former President Donald Trump is liable for fraud has some investors taking their business elsewhere.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1740 Views
Sponsored

We are, so far, 80% funded for April. I am matching donations dollar for dollar this month. Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here