USAA Punished for it Claims Handling Punitive Damages Should be Awarded With Caution and Within Narrow Limits Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/usaa-punished-claims-handling-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-nbp2c, see the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4950 posts. Posted on December 19, 2024 by Barry Zalma DISPUTE OVER HURRICANE DAMAGES RESULTS IN MAJOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES FOR BAD FAITH Although he Mississippi Supreme Court recognized the need to only award punitive damages with caution and within narrow limits, it did not limit its award in accordance with that maxim. After almost 19 years of litigation the last appeal resolved the various disputes. FACTS Hurricane Katrina destroyed Paul and Sylvia Minor’s home on August 29, 2005. The Minors had a homeowner’s insurance policy with United Services Automobile Association (USAA). The USAA policy covered damage caused by wind but excluded damage caused by storm surge or flood. The Minors reported their loss with USAA, which resulted in a years-long coverage dispute. USAA ultimately issued payments for damage it concluded was caused by wind but not for damage it concluded was caused by storm surge or flood. The Minors maintained that they suffered a total loss caused by wind and demanded that USAA pay the policy limits. The case proceeded to trial in 2013, and the jury awarded the Minors $1,547,293.37 in compensatory damages. In United Services Automobile Association v. Estate Of Sylvia F. Minor, Kathryn Minor and Stephen Minor, No. 2023-CA-00049-SCT, Supreme Court of Mississippi, En Banc (December 5, 2024) resolved the bad faith claims. The issue was ultimately presented to a jury. The jury awarded the Minors $10,000,000 in punitive damages and $457,858.89 in extra-contractual damages (solely attorneys’ fees). USAA appealed, raising several assignments of error. Trial To establish its bad faith claim, the Minor Estate introduced various USAA documents, including (1) portions of the USAA underwriting file; (2) the confidential email regarding (a) the engineer’s March 2006 findings and (b) Bergstrom’s conclusion that USAA would be responsible for paying for all the windows and the contents in rooms with windows; and (3) USAA’s letter to the Minors in June 2006 indicating the majority of damage was due to flooding. Punitive Damages Punitive damages are considered an ‘extraordinary remedy’ and should be awarded ‘with caution and within narrow limits.'” The Supreme Court found that the evidence presented at trial demonstrates a type of conduct for which punitive damages were designed. The Minor Estate provided sufficient proof that USAA acted in bad faith, with complete disregard for the Estate’s rights. Whether The $10 Million Punitive Damages Award Should Be Reversed Or, Alternatively, Reduced. USAA alternatively argues that the $10 million verdict should be reduced because it claims that the damages award is a 22:1 ratio and therefore unconstitutionally disproportionate to the extra-contractual damages awarded ($457,858.89). USAA relies on State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co. v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408, 425, 123 S.Ct. 1513, 1524, 155 L.Ed.2d 585 (2003), which states that “[s]ingle-digit multipliers are more likely to comport with due process.” USAA argued that a 1:1 ratio should apply to the damages award here. The Supreme Court found that punitive damages is less than seven times the amount of compensatory damages, which it concluded clearly falls within the guideline provided in Campbell. A punitive damages award not only serves as a deterrent, it also compensates the plaintiff for its public service in bringing the action. The Supreme Court found the trial court’s decision to force the Minor Estate to use nearly half of its award to pay attorneys’ fees does not adequately compensate the Estate for bringing this action against USAA for its bad faith conduct in handling the Minors’ insurance claim from 2005. Therefore, the Supreme Court concluded that the trial court erred by denying the Estate’s post-trial motion for attorneys’ fees. CONCLUSION In sum, the trial judge did not err as a matter of law by submitting the issue of punitive damages to jury, and the $10 million award of punitive damages is not unconstitutionally disproportionate. The Supreme Court affirmed the jury verdict awarding the Minor Estate $10 million in punitive damages and $457,858.89 in extra-contractual damages as to attorneys’ fees and reverse the judgment of the trial court and render attorneys’ fees on behalf of the Estate in the amount of $4,500,000, plus post-judgment interest at an annual rate of 4 percent from October 3, 2022, the date of judgment, until paid. ZALMA OPINION This case that dragged on through the courts of Mississippi for 19 years and resulted in compensatory damages based upon an interpretation finding coverage for the estate and that the insurer’s conduct was so egregious that the estate was entitled to tort damages plus punitive damages many times more than the compensatory damages. The Supreme Court astonishingly concluded that punitive damages were not limited to punishing the insurer but were payment to the estate for its action on behalf of everyone in the state of Mississippi and that they should not be required to pay their lawyers but that payment should come from the insurer as part of its punishment. The Supreme Court ignored the fact that as a result the estate must pay income taxes on the punishment damages since they are not designed to make the insured whole and punished each member and insured of USAA. In my opinion it’s time the courts of the USA do away with the tort of bad faith to avoid excessive judgments and allow contract disputes to be enlarged into a major amount of punishment for an insurer who rejected a claim based on interpretation of contract terms and the facts of a loss, like this case. In that regard see my book, It’s Time to Abolish The Tort of Bad Faith Available as a paperback here. Available as a Kindle book here. (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc. Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos. Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk

This entire bill was meant to sabotage Trump, and Mike Johnson went along with it. Mike Johnson not only needs to be removed from being Speaker, but he needs to be primaried and soundly defeated in 2 years.

Inadequate Litigant’s Cases Dismissed Plaintiff, by her Litigation Appears to Establish the Report for a Mental Health Evaluation Was Appropriate Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gECRyZ-f, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gs_4Bby9 and at https://lnkd.in/g67dDK8q, and https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4950 posts. Post 4950 In Samreen Riaz v. State Of California, et al., F087504, California Court of Appeals, Fifth District (December 2, 2024) the California Court of Appeals found itself asked to resolve suits against an individual and the state of California from an inadequate but excessively litigious plaintiff. FACTS Samreen Riaz was a licensed dentist – she lost her license to practice because of the facts underlying this case. According to her, there is an elaborate conspiracy to harass, stalk, threaten, and ultimately prevent her from testifying in a separate “whistleblower” case involving “OSHA and HIPPA Violations” at a medical facility. Riaz sued raising numerous claims against numerous individuals and government entities. The opposing parties challenged the complaint’s viability through demurrer and anti-SLAPP proceedings. The trial court sustained the demurrers and granted the anti-SLAPP motion, leaving Riaz with no viable claim. Riaz appealed. BACKGROUND The facts underlying this case involve four discrete events. First: Riaz sued a medical facility and suffered an alleged eye injury while attempting to testify in that case. Second: She sought treatment for that eye injury but was refused service and then sued that doctor in small claims court. Third: That doctor reported Riaz to the Dental Board of California which, in turn, initiated mental health competence proceedings against Riaz. Fourth: Riaz’s license to practice dentistry was revoked, and she filed the complaint at issue in this case. Initial Lawsuit Against Medical Facility Acting as a “whistleblower,” Riaz “disclosed … OSHA, Hippa, recruited patient, potential insurance fraud and anti-competent activities in the market” at a medical facility. After filing a lawsuit on that basis, Riaz claimed she suffered “organized harassment,” culminating in “permanent eye damage” after a sheriff-department employee pointed a finger in her face while attempting to enter the courthouse in her “whistleblower” case. Visiting Doctor for Eye Injury Riaz visited Dr. Cantrell to treat an eye injury. She claimed Cantrell became combative, refused to answer Riaz’s questions, and declined to treat Riaz. The next day, Riaz filed a complaint with the Medical Board of California. Several days later, she filed a small claims case against Cantrell, essentially alleging discrimination, negligence, and retaliation. A small claims judgment was eventually entered in Cantrell’s favor. Report to Dental Board Cantrell reported Riaz to the Dental Board. The Dental Board issued an order to Riaz to comply with a mental health examination “to evaluate her fitness to practice safely ….” (See Bus. &Prof. Code, § 820.) Riaz failed to comply with the order. Since Riaz continued to disobey the order, her license to practice dentistry was ultimately revoked. Instant Complaint and Judgment Riaz sued Cantrell, various government entities, and several individuals working for those entities (collectively, the State). The complaint alleged an elaborate conspiracy among all the defendants to injure Riaz, to intimidate her to prevent her from testifying, and to retaliate against her for the “whistleblower” case. The trial court sustained the demurrers and granted the anti-SLAPP motion resulting in total dismissal. DISCUSSION Did the trial court err in granting the anti-SLAPP motion? Did it err in sustaining the demurrers? The California Court of Appeals concluded the trial court did not err. Anti-SLAPP Motion In the anti-SLAPP motion, Cantrell argued his furnishing information to the Dental Board was protected activity and defeated claims “for discrimination, fraud, defamation, retaliation[,] and intentional infliction of emotional distress[.]” In opposition to the anti-SLAPP motion, Riaz claimed again Cantrell “made inaccurate, knowingly misleading statements to the [D]ental [B]oard to defame and harm [Riaz] based on disclosing patient information.” The trial court concluded furnishing those documents to the board constituted protected activity. ANALYSIS Litigation of an anti-SLAPP motion involves a two-step process. First, the moving defendant bears the burden of establishing that the challenged allegations or claims that arise from protected activity in which the defendant has engaged. Second, for each claim that does arise from protected activity, the plaintiff must show the claim has at least minimal merit. If the plaintiff cannot make this showing, the court will, and did, strike the claim. If there is no merit, the claim is stricken. The Court of Appeals noted that Riaz failed to adduce any evidence-including exhibits, declarations, judicial notice, and testimony-to substantiate her allegation Cantrell reported her to the Dental Board for retribution. She failed to adduce admissible evidence on the point. DEMURRERS Both Cantrell and the State filed demurrers to Riaz’s complaint.. Additional Background A small claims plaintiff is collaterally estopped from relitigating the same issue in superior court where the record is sufficiently clear to determine that the issue was litigated and decided against plaintiff in the small claims action. Governmental immunity is an affirmative defense properly raised by demurrer. Government Code section 821.6 immunizes public employees from liability for ‘instituting or prosecuting any judicial or administrative proceeding’ within the scope of their employment, even if the employees act ‘maliciously and without probable cause. Riaz alleged her claims arose in July 2022. Her written government claim was submitted in April 2023, more than six months later. Accordingly, the claims were barred, at least insofar as they stemmed from the section 820 order. CONCLUSION AND SUMMARY Riaz failed to allege colorable claims against either Cantrell or the State. The potential claims against Cantrell were either tried and resolved against her in small claims court or dismissed pursuant to the anti-SLAPP statute. The potential claims against the State were either barred for failure to timely present them under the Government Claims Act, or the State was immune under Government Code sections 821.6, 818.4, and 821.2. ZALMA OPINION It is axiomatic that a person who represents himself has a fool for a client. The litigation history, the multiple actions, and the lack of consistency and evidence, establish that Dr. Cantrell was correct when he advised the Dental Board that a mental health examination to evaluate her fitness to practice safely…” was correct. She refused to fulfill her obligation to the Dental Board to be evaluated because she was concerned she would not pass. This case is an abuse of Doctor Cantrell and the state and should have resulted in serious sanctions. (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc. Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos. Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk

The Ranger: The Guy With A Gun In A Knife Fight A lot of people are calling the Ranger the strongest class in the sport, and whilst this is a chunk of an exaggeration, there may be some reality to these claims. The Ranger has absurd ranged harm with bows in combination with their Perks, super vicinity-denial options with bear traps and Quick-Shot, and even innate restoration with Rations. An archer elegance with get entry to to infinite arrows in a sport in which both the protective and evasive alternatives are sparse is certainly terrifying. Everyone having guns in Escape from Tarkov was one thing, but this is completely distinctive. This is exactly why the Ranger works nicely in solo play. Even the most veteran Dark and Darker players still get hit by AI enemies from time to time, but the Ranger's combat loop basically gets rid of that threat. Plus, towards actual gamers, a nicely-placed Ranger can easily fight and win against a three-character squad unmarried-handedly. And, even though their combatants do manage to close the space, Rangers can use their innate movement speed and endure traps to outrun and frustrate their pursuers before finishing them off with a bolt as quickly as they permit their guards down. The Fighter: A True Swiss Army Knife Class Where Rangers are a brilliant solo elegance because of their overall utility in areas, ranged fight and pace, Fighters are properly solo instructions because of their widespread software in all areas. Fighters have proper health, true defense, desirable offense, appropriate survivability, top Perks, proper Skills, and are simply all-round pretty excellent. However, be aware how none of their aspects are described as 'notable' or 'outstanding'. Yes, Fighters are accurate at maximum things, however they may be not clearly the 'high-quality' at some thing in exchange. Their average melee damage is not as right as a Barbarian's, they may be no longer nearly as speedy as a Rogue or Ranger, and that they don't have access to Spells like a Cleric or Wizard does. But, for a solo player, a properly-geared Fighter (each in terms of armor and weapons) will provide them the overall maximum chance of survival against the odds. Now, Fighters can not without problems 1v3 an enemy group, but they will typically stay lengthy sufficient to try to and have the best risk of dwelling to try to escape if they can't. The Cleric: Tons Of Healing In A Game Where Healing Is Sparse And sooner or later, there are Clerics. In wellknown Clerics are excellent solo training for a lot of the identical motives Fighters are. Their offense isn't horrible, their defense is respectable, and that they also can use a protect. But, in which the Cleric excels solely is of their basic survivability and PvE software. Clerics have a mess of spells that deal damage to undead which include Holy Light and their Holy Purification Skill. Not simplest that, but they may be also able to maintain themselves alive plenty longer on common than every other elegance might by the usage of each Lesser Heal and Holy Light. That said, while Clerics are accurate for solo gamers, they still shine the brightest when in a crew due to the fact they are able to heal their harm sellers mid-combat and even revive teammates with a spell. But for anyone simply trying to play on their very own and survive towards enemy squads, a Cleric is a pretty good elegance desire. Why Not Barbarian Or Rogue? And ultimately, it need to be stated that each Barbarian and Rogue can work in solo play, they can even dominate in the proper hands. In fact, with how regularly players see Rogues jogging round by themselves, it'd appear peculiar not to have them on here. But, in phrases of their standard playstyle and available Skills/Perks, Barbarians and Rogues simply war more in solo vs squad play than the other instructions do. A Barbarian's slow interaction velocity, sluggish motion speed, and overall awkward weapon hitboxes make it hard to chase or break out enemy gamers. Meanwhile, the Rogue can sneak up on a player without difficulty or even melt them before they have a hazard to react relying on what number of stabs they get in, but in the event that they get hit even as soon as, they're essentially completed for. They're just lessons that shine so much extra in a group scenario that it would be a chunk silly to simplest use them in solo play. The Fighter in Dark in Darker is largely the Mario-type person in Super Smash Bros Ultimate of this recreation if that makes sense. It's the elegance alternative gamers select to analyze the game earlier than moving directly to the extra robotically unique training. Or, rather, they grow to be sticking with it and coming across the man or woman or class' internal complexities. It's the Ryu from Street Fighter or the Sol Badguy of Guilty Gear, just to provide a few different examples. But, as absolutely everyone who has 'principal'ed' any of those characters in fighting video games will say, just because it's the 'starter' man or woman does not mean that it's horrific, simple, or clean to grasp. So, allow's smash down the Fighter in Dark and Darker and pass over its standard construct. All servers of Dark and Darker Gold Coins on MMOexp.com.

SMHP: THE SATANIC PEDOPHILE POPE TURNS 88! HAPPY SATANIC SATURNALIA BABYLON! The mistake we ALL make is believing that these people are "like us" They are not. #Evil resides in their hearts Capable of things we cannot even imagine They live among us, sabotaging humanity every chance they get They are the Serpent's Seed And you will "Know them by their FRUITS" https://old.bitchute.com/video/kdJQWmWEIiAA/

Jeffrey Sachs: The Inevitable War With Iran, and Biden’s Attempts to Sabotage Trump... https://youtu.be/Ks0l_Zpt1xA?si=lJbt2FM2sFINuNFr

IT'S THAT TIME OF THE YEAR, WHEN SATANIC PEDOPHILES ARE STACKED UP LIKE CORDWOOD, AND "LIGHTED UP", DURING THE 12 DAYS OF "CHRISTMAS.... 🔥🌈💩💥 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/tim-walzs-minnesota-satanists-set-up-holiday-display/

Twitter thread … “Do you know how much your State sends to Israel annually? In 2023 the US signed a MOU w/Israel to guarantee $3.8 Billion in Federal aid per year til 2028, but how much does each of the 50 States pay Israel every year?? Alabama: $54.8M, Alaska: $972 K, Arizona $355 M, Arkansas $53.7 M, California: $1.68 B, Colorado: $54.4 M, Connecticut: $232 M, Delaware: $15.2 M Florida: $461.5 M, Georgia: $389.2 M, Hawaii: $11,950, Idaho: $11 M, Illinois: $216.4 M, Indiana: $171.4 M, Iowa: $42 M, Kansas: 23.1 M Kentucky: $103.1 M, Louisiana: $102.6, Maine: $8.5 M, Maryland: $52.9 M, Massachusetts: $197.3 M Michigan: $242 M, Minnesota: $119.5 M, Mississippi $47 M Missouri: $240.3 M, Montana: $7.4 M, Nebraska: $59 M, Nevada: $56.2 M, New Hampshire: $108 M, New Jersey: $403 M, New Mexico: $13.8 M, New York: $4.8 B North Carolina: $158 M, North Dakota: $6.9 M, Ohio: $241.9 M, Oklahoma $83.8 M, Oregon: $947.1 M, Pennsylvania: $263.6 M, Rhode Island: $13.5 M, South Carolina: $126 M South Dakota: $7.5 M, Tennessee: $81 M, Texas: $845 M, Utah: $56.8 M, Vermont: $17.5 M, Virginia: $76 M, Washington: $228 M, West Virginia: $126 M, Wisconsin: $115.3 M, Wyoming: $716 K Federally the US gives $3.8 Billion annually to Israel. The States' give a whopping $13.6 Billion annually sent to Israel. This means the grand total of funds coming from the US [Fed+States] is $17,400,000,000.00 [$17.4B]” More photos in comments https://x.com/dezzie_rezzie/status/182852273295212… _______________ RECEIPTS/SOURCES/LINKS U.S.-Israel Relations: States-to-State Cooperation HTTPS:/http://WWW.JEWISHVIRTUALLIBRARY.ORG/U-S-ISRAEL-COO… U.S. Aid to Israel in Four Charts https://www.cfr.org/article/us-aid-israel-four-cha… What Every American Should Know About U.S. Aid to Israel http://http://http://http://http://HTTPS://WWW.AJC… R.I. opposes discrimination against Israel https://www.providencejournal.com/story/opinion/20…

TOTAL PROOF THEY ARE LACING PRODUCTS WITH GRAPHENE https://old.bitchute.com/video/4hdsHGkW89jy/

https://thewashingtonstandard.com/somalis-drove-700-increase-in-minnesota-autism-providers/