USAA Punished for it Claims Handling Punitive Damages Should be Awarded With Caution and Within Narrow Limits Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/usaa-punished-claims-handling-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-nbp2c, see the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4950 posts. Posted on December 19, 2024 by Barry Zalma DISPUTE OVER HURRICANE DAMAGES RESULTS IN MAJOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES FOR BAD FAITH Although he Mississippi Supreme Court recognized the need to only award punitive damages with caution and within narrow limits, it did not limit its award in accordance with that maxim. After almost 19 years of litigation the last appeal resolved the various disputes. FACTS Hurricane Katrina destroyed Paul and Sylvia Minor’s home on August 29, 2005. The Minors had a homeowner’s insurance policy with United Services Automobile Association (USAA). The USAA policy covered damage caused by wind but excluded damage caused by storm surge or flood. The Minors reported their loss with USAA, which resulted in a years-long coverage dispute. USAA ultimately issued payments for damage it concluded was caused by wind but not for damage it concluded was caused by storm surge or flood. The Minors maintained that they suffered a total loss caused by wind and demanded that USAA pay the policy limits. The case proceeded to trial in 2013, and the jury awarded the Minors $1,547,293.37 in compensatory damages. In United Services Automobile Association v. Estate Of Sylvia F. Minor, Kathryn Minor and Stephen Minor, No. 2023-CA-00049-SCT, Supreme Court of Mississippi, En Banc (December 5, 2024) resolved the bad faith claims. The issue was ultimately presented to a jury. The jury awarded the Minors $10,000,000 in punitive damages and $457,858.89 in extra-contractual damages (solely attorneys’ fees). USAA appealed, raising several assignments of error. Trial To establish its bad faith claim, the Minor Estate introduced various USAA documents, including (1) portions of the USAA underwriting file; (2) the confidential email regarding (a) the engineer’s March 2006 findings and (b) Bergstrom’s conclusion that USAA would be responsible for paying for all the windows and the contents in rooms with windows; and (3) USAA’s letter to the Minors in June 2006 indicating the majority of damage was due to flooding. Punitive Damages Punitive damages are considered an ‘extraordinary remedy’ and should be awarded ‘with caution and within narrow limits.'” The Supreme Court found that the evidence presented at trial demonstrates a type of conduct for which punitive damages were designed. The Minor Estate provided sufficient proof that USAA acted in bad faith, with complete disregard for the Estate’s rights. Whether The $10 Million Punitive Damages Award Should Be Reversed Or, Alternatively, Reduced. USAA alternatively argues that the $10 million verdict should be reduced because it claims that the damages award is a 22:1 ratio and therefore unconstitutionally disproportionate to the extra-contractual damages awarded ($457,858.89). USAA relies on State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co. v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408, 425, 123 S.Ct. 1513, 1524, 155 L.Ed.2d 585 (2003), which states that “[s]ingle-digit multipliers are more likely to comport with due process.” USAA argued that a 1:1 ratio should apply to the damages award here. The Supreme Court found that punitive damages is less than seven times the amount of compensatory damages, which it concluded clearly falls within the guideline provided in Campbell. A punitive damages award not only serves as a deterrent, it also compensates the plaintiff for its public service in bringing the action. The Supreme Court found the trial court’s decision to force the Minor Estate to use nearly half of its award to pay attorneys’ fees does not adequately compensate the Estate for bringing this action against USAA for its bad faith conduct in handling the Minors’ insurance claim from 2005. Therefore, the Supreme Court concluded that the trial court erred by denying the Estate’s post-trial motion for attorneys’ fees. CONCLUSION In sum, the trial judge did not err as a matter of law by submitting the issue of punitive damages to jury, and the $10 million award of punitive damages is not unconstitutionally disproportionate. The Supreme Court affirmed the jury verdict awarding the Minor Estate $10 million in punitive damages and $457,858.89 in extra-contractual damages as to attorneys’ fees and reverse the judgment of the trial court and render attorneys’ fees on behalf of the Estate in the amount of $4,500,000, plus post-judgment interest at an annual rate of 4 percent from October 3, 2022, the date of judgment, until paid. ZALMA OPINION This case that dragged on through the courts of Mississippi for 19 years and resulted in compensatory damages based upon an interpretation finding coverage for the estate and that the insurer’s conduct was so egregious that the estate was entitled to tort damages plus punitive damages many times more than the compensatory damages. The Supreme Court astonishingly concluded that punitive damages were not limited to punishing the insurer but were payment to the estate for its action on behalf of everyone in the state of Mississippi and that they should not be required to pay their lawyers but that payment should come from the insurer as part of its punishment. The Supreme Court ignored the fact that as a result the estate must pay income taxes on the punishment damages since they are not designed to make the insured whole and punished each member and insured of USAA. In my opinion it’s time the courts of the USA do away with the tort of bad faith to avoid excessive judgments and allow contract disputes to be enlarged into a major amount of punishment for an insurer who rejected a claim based on interpretation of contract terms and the facts of a loss, like this case. In that regard see my book, It’s Time to Abolish The Tort of Bad Faith Available as a paperback here. Available as a Kindle book here. (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc. Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos. Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk

Report: Teen Wisconsin Christian School Shooting Suspect Linked To Satanic, Pedo & Accelerationist Groups https://www.infowars.com/posts/report-teen-wisconsin-christian-school-shooting-suspect-linked-to-satanic-pedo-accelerationist-groups

https://medforth.org/marchenerzahler-und-dummes-zeug-deutscher-bauingenieur-nach-beleidigung-der-linken-spd-ministerprasidentin-inhaftiert/

Falsely Claiming to Be an Insurer Can be Criminal To Sue for Business Disparagement Evidence is Required Post 4951, Posted on December 17, 2024 by Barry Zalma Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/falsely-claiming-insurer-can-criminal-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-3bwrc, see the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4950 posts. See the full video at and at Plaintiff Route App, Inc.’s (“Route”) moved the USDC to Dismiss two counterclaims asserted by OrderProtection.com, Inc. (“OrderProtection”). In Route App, Inc. v. Orderprotection.Com, Inc.; Julian Wilson, et al, No. 2:23cv606 DAK, United States District Court, D. Utah (December 9, 2024) found no evidence supporting a claim of business disparagement or business defamation. BACKGROUND This case involves a dispute between Route, a post-purchase shipping insurance provider, and a competitor, OrderProtection. In its Complaint, Route alleges that OrderProtection and several of Route’s former employees misappropriated trade secrets to create a competing business. In response to Route’s Complaint, OrderProtection filed an Answer and Counterclaims, asserting four causes of action: (1) Unfair Competition in Violation of the Lanham Act; (2) Defamation Per Se/Defamation/Business Disparagement; (3) Tortious Interference with Existing and Prospective Economic Relations; and (4) Negligent Misrepresentation. The facts pertaining to OrderProtection’s claim for “Defamation/Defamation Per Se/Business Disparagement” are essentially that Route employees have allegedly told OrderProtection customers and potential customers that they should work with Route instead of OrderProtection because Route is a “legal insurance provider” and OrderProtection is not. OrderProtection argued that Route is not a licensed insurance company and that, at best, Route affiliates with an insurance producer to procure its own insurance coverage (which does not benefit customers or merchants). More importantly both Route and OrderProtection in essence both self-fund the warranty protection they provide, and thus a customer is no better off with Route’s protection package than with OrderProtection’s competitive offering. DISCUSSION Specifically, while OrderProtection’s Opposition Memorandum does not explicitly state that it conceded its defamation and defamation per se claims, OrderProtection never addresses Route’s argument that it could not properly maintain these causes of action in the context of this case. Even if OrderProtection had not conceded these claims, it failed to establish that these claims are viable in the context of this case. Further, OrderProtection made no argument that Utah law recognizes a “hybrid” cause of action for “Defamation Per Se/Defamation/Business Disparagement,” wherein a business disparagement claim may be analyzed using defamation or defamation per se case law rather than case law pertaining to a business disparagement claim. Business Disparagement The parties agree that to state a claim for business disparagement (sometimes called injurious falsehood), OrderProtection must allege (1) falsity of the statement made; (2) malice by the party making the statement; and (3) special damages. According to Route, while OrderProtection has made allegations of lost customers, it has not named specific individuals, nor has it alleged with particularity any financial losses, which is required under Rule 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The court declined to recognize a “business disparagement per se” cause of action in which special damages need not be alleged, and it declined to recognize a business disparagement claim that relies on a statement that is “false by implication,” which is a concept that has been recognized in defamation cases. Route’s Motion to Dismiss was granted and OrderProtection’s claims for defamation and defamation per se were dismissed with prejudice. Its claim for business disparagement was dismissed without prejudice, and OrderProtection may file a Motion for Leave to Amend by January 10, 2025, if it is able to allege a proper business disparagement claim, as discussed above. ZALMA OPINION Two businesses claiming to be issuers of insurance who were not licensed insurers claimed to be victims of disparagement by the other. Customers, because of the various claims shifted from one party to the other who, contrary to their claims, were self funding what they alleged was insurance of shipments of goods. The court in a Solomon-like decision ignored the fact that both claimed to be insurers when they were not and used the false claims to take over clients. Both lost and the court gave OrderProtection the attempt to state a business disparagement claim implying that the court did not believe OrderProtection would be able to plead a viable cause of action. The State of Utah Department of Insurance should consider this case. (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc. Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos. Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk

12/19 LAST DAY! Now we are spinning off meye money EMPIRES and getting to 0 headcount, or as close to 0 as possible to accommodate the vast potential of AI. Example, a new entity being created and you can invest through https://www.paypal.com this NEW ENTITY is a FINTECH company that will specialize in neural networks that analyze economic press releases of central banks, for example https://www.cnbc.com/2024/12/17/us-treasurys-investors-look-to-economic-data-fed-rate-decision.html https://fred.stlouisfed.org/releases/calendar https://www.perplexity.ai/spaces t.ly/0rKAh t.ly/4DPRg https://community.wolfram.com/content?curTag=machine%20learning new mega player! https://www.piie.com/experts/senior-research-staff/adam-s-posen open+ 2hrs here https://mobimatter.com/blog/the-best-sports-bars-across-europe at 7 30am https://www.texasmonthly.com/travel/the-40-best-small-town-cafes/ https://boston.eater.com/maps/best-cafes-boston https://newyorkspork.com/best-coffee-nyc/ https://www.rebasplace.com/ 5-7pm https://rira.com/ https://www.fiftygrande.com/americas-essential-irish-pubs/ if OPEN YES https://www.theworlds50best.com/asia/en/list/1-50 https://www.paypal.com/us/hom This new entity is being lead by: https://rocketreach.co/carlo-zola-email_30447361 https://clustrmaps.com/person/Lindeman-8velle https://rocketreach.co/lorraine-bauer-email_43689863 https://rocketreach.co/steven-schneider-email_3045623 https://contactout.com/Kevin-Greene-83760898 https://pitchbook.com/profiles/person/36757-72P#overview https://www.franklintempleton.com/profiles/katrina-dudley https://rocketreach.co/brett-jackson-email_3045622 https://www.fastpeoplesearch.com/shauna-arata_id_G-5829685766076886043 https://www.whitepages.com/name/Charles-H-Choi/Oakton-VA/P63Ga4qBzr9 https://www.linkedin.com/in/jaymarkwood --- https://www.chatsworthgroup.com/contact-us/

Internet disruptions affect routine life, causing financial loss and online services. The outages are linked to the ongoing protests over University Students. internet disruptions have made it almost impossible to find responsable for what going on. After have common citizens damage on their every day work. Freelancers, small enterprises, and gig workers are particularly vulnerable. Economic Strain: Entire sectors, like e-commerce and digital market, are hindered, contributing to broader economic instability.

BREAKING: Mystery Drones Identified As Nuke Hunters! Intel Says WMD Detection Mission Underway! 157,054 views Dec 14, 2024 This was CONFIRMED to me by Dr. James Garrow, who is a retired CIA asset. In this EMERGENCY BROADCAST of RAW FEED, Gary Franchi reveals bombshell intelligence from a verified TOP SECRET source that changes everything we thought we knew about those mysterious drones. They're not foreign aircraft, they're not UFOs – they're part of a massive counter-terror operation hunting for a potential WMD on American soil. The Office of Global Access (OGA), a shadowy three-letter agency, has deployed these advanced surveillance assets for one terrifying purpose: detecting gamma rays linked to a possible dirty bomb or nuclear device hidden somewhere on the East or West coasts. The stakes couldn't be higher, and the government's silence speaks volumes. Patriots, this revelation comes directly from high-level sources with Special Access clearance. These aren't just random aircraft – they're sophisticated radiation detection platforms conducting a desperate search before it's too late. The reason this intel is leaking now? Our sources say time may be running out. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTKY0-q97qk

BREAKING: Mystery Drones Identified As Nuke Hunters! Intel Says WMD Detection Mission Underway! 157,054 views Dec 14, 2024 This was confirmed to me by Dr. James Garrow, who is a retired CIA asset. In this EMERGENCY BROADCAST of RAW FEED, Gary Franchi reveals bombshell intelligence from a verified TOP SECRET source that changes everything we thought we knew about those mysterious drones. They're not foreign aircraft, they're not UFOs – they're part of a massive counter-terror operation hunting for a potential WMD on American soil. The Office of Global Access (OGA), a shadowy three-letter agency, has deployed these advanced surveillance assets for one terrifying purpose: detecting gamma rays linked to a possible dirty bomb or nuclear device hidden somewhere on the East or West coasts. The stakes couldn't be higher, and the government's silence speaks volumes. Patriots, this revelation comes directly from high-level sources with Special Access clearance. These aren't just random aircraft – they're sophisticated radiation detection platforms conducting a desperate search before it's too late. The reason this intel is leaking now? Our sources say time may be running out. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTKY0-q97qk

THE UNTOLD TRUTH ABOUT PEARL HARBOR: HOW ITS LINKED TO UKRAINE, ISRAEL, SYRIA https://old.bitchute.com/video/oEXf6JpRMHaj/

https://medforth.org/ein-ministerprasident-von-sed-linke-gnaden/