• “At the NATO summit in Washington, which will be held from July 9 to 11, Ukraine will not be offered anything that would allow the country to move forward on the path to membership because of fears that the alliance could be drawn into a war with Russia.”
    While temporarily papering over this hairline fracture in NATO’s alliance, what is not getting shorter but is widening is another fissure over Ukraine, one that is even more pressing and dangerous: Ukraine’s use of NATO weapons on enemy targets in Russia.
    https://amgreatness.com/2024/06/01/natos-hairline-fissures-part-1-ukraine-membership/
    “At the NATO summit in Washington, which will be held from July 9 to 11, Ukraine will not be offered anything that would allow the country to move forward on the path to membership because of fears that the alliance could be drawn into a war with Russia.” While temporarily papering over this hairline fracture in NATO’s alliance, what is not getting shorter but is widening is another fissure over Ukraine, one that is even more pressing and dangerous: Ukraine’s use of NATO weapons on enemy targets in Russia. https://amgreatness.com/2024/06/01/natos-hairline-fissures-part-1-ukraine-membership/
    0 Commenti 2 condivisioni 23 Views
  • #JoeBiden’s New Judicial Nominee Should Be Disqualified For This Answer Alone - #fjb - https://thewashingtonstandard.com/bidens-new-judicial-nominee-should-be-disqualified-for-this-answer-alone/
    #JoeBiden’s New Judicial Nominee Should Be Disqualified For This Answer Alone - #fjb - https://thewashingtonstandard.com/bidens-new-judicial-nominee-should-be-disqualified-for-this-answer-alone/
    THEWASHINGTONSTANDARD.COM
    Biden's New Judicial Nominee Should Be Disqualified for This Answer Alone - The Washington Standard
    One of the most ridiculous features of our age of absurdity is that there is actually a controversy over what a woman is. But first Biden’s Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson refused back in 2022 to define what a woman is, offering the excuse that she was not a ...
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 15 Views
  • Why ‘Bad Faith’ Is A Bad #Movie - ‘Bad Faith’ is a #propaganda documentary from the #Religious Left, written and directed by a small-time movie producer who happens to be a film and television professor at a #Catholic college in #LosAngeles. The movie accuses Evangelical #Christian conservatives and #Republican Christians, from the 1980s to the present day, of waging a racist war against ‘American Democracy.’ https://thewashingtonstandard.com/why-bad-faith-is-a-bad-movie/
    Why ‘Bad Faith’ Is A Bad #Movie - ‘Bad Faith’ is a #propaganda documentary from the #Religious Left, written and directed by a small-time movie producer who happens to be a film and television professor at a #Catholic college in #LosAngeles. The movie accuses Evangelical #Christian conservatives and #Republican Christians, from the 1980s to the present day, of waging a racist war against ‘American Democracy.’ https://thewashingtonstandard.com/why-bad-faith-is-a-bad-movie/
    THEWASHINGTONSTANDARD.COM
    Why 'Bad Faith' Is A Bad Movie - The Washington Standard
    Did the founders create America as “one nation under God” or did they want Christian expression banned from the public square? A recent film seems to promote the latter idea. Dr. Ted Baehr’s Movieguide writes: “‘Bad Faith’ is a propaganda documentary from the Religious Left, written and directed by a small-time movie ...
    Like
    1
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 89 Views
  • https://www.globalresearch.ca/every-escalation-washington-closer-defeat-ukraine/5859109
    https://www.globalresearch.ca/every-escalation-washington-closer-defeat-ukraine/5859109
    WWW.GLOBALRESEARCH.CA
    Every Escalation Brings Washington Closer to Defeat in Ukraine. “not winning” versus “losing” a war.
    In the case of Ukraine, “not winning” means that President Zelensky and his handlers in Washington choose to pursue a negotiated settlement
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 39 Views
  • #Hawaii
    #Maui Fire Department Battalion Chief Charged With Child Sex Crimes - And just what happened to all those children that went missing in Maui following the directed energy weapon assault on the island? Nevertheless, the Maui Fire Department battalion chief has been charged with #sexualassault of a minor. - https://thewashingtonstandard.com/maui-fire-department-battalion-chief-charged-with-child-sex-crimes/
    #Hawaii #Maui Fire Department Battalion Chief Charged With Child Sex Crimes - And just what happened to all those children that went missing in Maui following the directed energy weapon assault on the island? Nevertheless, the Maui Fire Department battalion chief has been charged with #sexualassault of a minor. - https://thewashingtonstandard.com/maui-fire-department-battalion-chief-charged-with-child-sex-crimes/
    THEWASHINGTONSTANDARD.COM
    Maui Fire Department Battalion Chief Charged With Child Sex Crimes - The Washington Standard
    And just what happened to all those children that went missing in Maui following the directed energy weapon assault on the island? Nevertheless, the Maui Fire Department battalion chief has been charged with sexual assault of a minor. Here’s the report: KITV reported: MAUI COUNTY, Hawaii (Island News) — A ...
    Like
    Angry
    2
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 65 Views
  • Judicial Watch Statement on the Trump Verdict
    https://www.judicialwatch.org/trump-verdict/

    (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton made the following statement regarding the unprecedented prosecution of President Donald Trump by Democrats in New York:

    Pure corruption. Judicial Watch denounces this absurd verdict and Soviet-style criminal proceeding that has so abused President Trump. What just happened to Trump up in New York is criminal.

    The guilty verdict against Trump is no surprise considering the rigged, kangaroo court proceedings run by a biased, conflicted judge and an unethical, politicized Democratic Party prosecution team. Today is a terrible day for the rule of law that will go down in infamy. This whole process is compromised, and this verdict should be overturned in an emergency fashion.

    The evidence shows that Trump committed no crimes, and this is a prosecution about “nothing.” This and other Democratic Party-political prosecutions of Trump are an abomination under law and are destabilizing to our nation.

    Judicial Watch will continue to expose in court the truth about these attacks on the rule of law, free and fair elections, and the U.S. Constitution. In the meantime, our elections have officially been compromised by this politicized prosecution.

    Judicial Watch has several Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits related to the prosecutorial abuse targeting Trump:

    In March 2024, Judicial Watch filed a Georgia Open Records Act lawsuit against District Attorney Fani Willis and Fulton County, Georgia, for records of any communication Willis and the county had with Special Counsel Jack Smith and the House January 6 Committee. The lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of Fulton County after Willis and the county denied having any responsive records.

    In February 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice asked a federal court to allow the agency to keep secret the names of top staffers working in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office that is targeting former President Donald Trump and other Americans.

    (Before his appointment to investigate and prosecute Trump, Specia Counsel Jack Smith previously was at the center of several controversial issues, the IRS scandal among them. In 2014, a Judicial Watch investigation revealed that top IRS officials had been in communication with Jack Smith’s then-Public Integrity Section about a plan to launch criminal investigations into conservative tax-exempt groups. Read more here.)

    In January 2024, Judicial Watch filed lawsuit against Fulton County, Georgia, for records regarding the hiring of Nathan Wade as a special prosecutor by District Attorney Fani Willis. Wade was hired to pursue unprecedented criminal investigations and prosecutions against former President Trump and others over the 2020 election disputes.

    In October 2023, Judicial Watch sued the DOJ for records and communications between the Office of U.S. Special Counsel Jack Smith and the Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney’s office regarding requests/receipt of federal funding/assistance in the investigation of former President Trump and his 18 codefendants in the Fulton County indictment of August 14, 2023. To date, the DOJ is refusing to confirm or deny the existence of records, claiming that to do so would interfere with enforcement proceedings. Judicial Watch’s litigation challenging this is continuing.

    Through the New York Freedom of Information Law, in July 2023, Judicial Watch received the engagement letter showing New York County District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg paid $900 per hour for partners and $500 per hour for associates to the Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher law firm for the purpose of suing Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) in an effort to shut down the House Judiciary Committee’s oversight investigation into Bragg’s unprecedented indictment of former President Donald Trump.
    Judicial Watch Statement on the Trump Verdict https://www.judicialwatch.org/trump-verdict/ (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton made the following statement regarding the unprecedented prosecution of President Donald Trump by Democrats in New York: Pure corruption. Judicial Watch denounces this absurd verdict and Soviet-style criminal proceeding that has so abused President Trump. What just happened to Trump up in New York is criminal. The guilty verdict against Trump is no surprise considering the rigged, kangaroo court proceedings run by a biased, conflicted judge and an unethical, politicized Democratic Party prosecution team. Today is a terrible day for the rule of law that will go down in infamy. This whole process is compromised, and this verdict should be overturned in an emergency fashion. The evidence shows that Trump committed no crimes, and this is a prosecution about “nothing.” This and other Democratic Party-political prosecutions of Trump are an abomination under law and are destabilizing to our nation. Judicial Watch will continue to expose in court the truth about these attacks on the rule of law, free and fair elections, and the U.S. Constitution. In the meantime, our elections have officially been compromised by this politicized prosecution. Judicial Watch has several Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits related to the prosecutorial abuse targeting Trump: In March 2024, Judicial Watch filed a Georgia Open Records Act lawsuit against District Attorney Fani Willis and Fulton County, Georgia, for records of any communication Willis and the county had with Special Counsel Jack Smith and the House January 6 Committee. The lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of Fulton County after Willis and the county denied having any responsive records. In February 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice asked a federal court to allow the agency to keep secret the names of top staffers working in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office that is targeting former President Donald Trump and other Americans. (Before his appointment to investigate and prosecute Trump, Specia Counsel Jack Smith previously was at the center of several controversial issues, the IRS scandal among them. In 2014, a Judicial Watch investigation revealed that top IRS officials had been in communication with Jack Smith’s then-Public Integrity Section about a plan to launch criminal investigations into conservative tax-exempt groups. Read more here.) In January 2024, Judicial Watch filed lawsuit against Fulton County, Georgia, for records regarding the hiring of Nathan Wade as a special prosecutor by District Attorney Fani Willis. Wade was hired to pursue unprecedented criminal investigations and prosecutions against former President Trump and others over the 2020 election disputes. In October 2023, Judicial Watch sued the DOJ for records and communications between the Office of U.S. Special Counsel Jack Smith and the Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney’s office regarding requests/receipt of federal funding/assistance in the investigation of former President Trump and his 18 codefendants in the Fulton County indictment of August 14, 2023. To date, the DOJ is refusing to confirm or deny the existence of records, claiming that to do so would interfere with enforcement proceedings. Judicial Watch’s litigation challenging this is continuing. Through the New York Freedom of Information Law, in July 2023, Judicial Watch received the engagement letter showing New York County District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg paid $900 per hour for partners and $500 per hour for associates to the Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher law firm for the purpose of suing Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) in an effort to shut down the House Judiciary Committee’s oversight investigation into Bragg’s unprecedented indictment of former President Donald Trump.
    WWW.JUDICIALWATCH.ORG
    Judicial Watch Statement on the Trump Verdict - Judicial Watch
    (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton made the following statement regarding the unprecedented prosecution of President Donald Trump by Democrats in New York:
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 210 Views
  • Dr. #RonPaul - The #DonaldTrump Trial & Our Injustice System https://thewashingtonstandard.com/the-trump-trial-our-injustice-system/
    Dr. #RonPaul - The #DonaldTrump Trial & Our Injustice System https://thewashingtonstandard.com/the-trump-trial-our-injustice-system/
    THEWASHINGTONSTANDARD.COM
    The Trump Trial & Our Injustice System - The Washington Standard
    I’ve long criticized our current US justice system – on all levels – as becoming much more about political justice than blind justice. The bizarre trial and conviction of former President Donald Trump last week on 34 felonies only reinforces my concerns. The New York District Attorney, Soros-backed Alvin Bragg, ...
    Like
    1
    0 Commenti 1 condivisioni 81 Views
  • https://thewashingtonstandard.com/kate-shemirani-mark-steele-energy-weapons-on-the-streets-video/
    https://thewashingtonstandard.com/kate-shemirani-mark-steele-energy-weapons-on-the-streets-video/
    THEWASHINGTONSTANDARD.COM
    Kate Shemirani & Mark Steele: Energy Weapons On The Streets (Video) - The Washington Standard
    Nurse and nutritionist Kate Shemirani and weapons expert Mark Steele join me in this episode to warn the public of the energy weapons being deployed in London, England… and if they are being deployed there, they are probably in a city near you as well. This is informative and a ...
    Like
    1
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 65 Views
  • https://thewashingtonstandard.com/climate-change-modified-mrna-jabs-on-the-horizon-for-animals-humans/
    https://thewashingtonstandard.com/climate-change-modified-mrna-jabs-on-the-horizon-for-animals-humans/
    THEWASHINGTONSTANDARD.COM
    Climate Change Modified mRNA Jabs On The Horizon For Animals & Humans - The Washington Standard
    Who can forget some of the old Hollywood, before it became Hollyweird, classic black and white films depicting “mad scientists” working on their next “creation” to unleash upon mankind to cause all manner of inflictions? Unfortunately, today, you don’t have to remember these types of films because you are living ...
    Like
    1
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 99 Views
  • https://thewashingtonstandard.com/the-case-against-technofascism-when-big-tech-companies-censor-speech-2/
    https://thewashingtonstandard.com/the-case-against-technofascism-when-big-tech-companies-censor-speech-2/
    THEWASHINGTONSTANDARD.COM
    The Case Against Technofascism: When Big Tech Companies Censor Speech - The Washington Standard
    Social media platforms censor in two primary ways. First, the platforms “remove[] posts that violate [their] terms of service or community standards.” NetChoice, LLC v. Att’y Gen. Fla., 34 F.4th 1196, 1204 (11th Cir. 2022). Second, the platforms can also “arrange[] available content by choosing how to prioritize and display ...
    Like
    2
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 64 Views
Pagine in Evidenza
Sponsorizzato

After a successful May, we are now funded 54% for June. Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here