• The 'Other' Trinity: America's Three Constitutions

    As the Democrats in Congress mull over the idea of increasing the size of the Supreme Court (the Constitution does not specify the number of justices) or of ending the filibuster (nowhere mentioned in the Constitution), it may be useful to think about the American political system in a broader way. A political majority has the legal right to change the number of Supreme Court justices, but there are other important factors than the letter of the Constitution. I want to briefly describe the three American “constitutions”: first, the actual written Constitution, ratified in 1787 and amended just 27 times over 234 years; second, what might be called the “small-c” constitution, the set of norms, habits and procedures that are not enumerated in the written Constitution but have achieved a deep rootedness in American civic life; and third, the ways the American people actually “constitute” their lives, more often outside the realm of civics, but which have to be taken into account by anyone wishing to lead or shape American life.
    We the people - the Big "C" constitution
    The Big "C" Constitution.(Shutterstock)
    The Formal Constitution

    The formal 1787 Constitution needs little description. There it is, 4,534 words, encapsulating the civic intentions of 55 white men who deliberated, debated, argued, and above all compromised for 115 days at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, windows closed, to hammer out “a more perfect union” for 3.9 million Americans, one in five a slave. No women were present, no African Americans free or enslaved, no Native Americans, no Jews or Muslims. The delegates, called by Jefferson an “assembly of demigods,” were all white privileged men. The Constitution established a new, stronger national government for the United States. It created two houses in Congress, and established minimum eligibility requirements for the president and for senators and members of the House of Representatives. It enumerated the powers of each of the three branches of government. It set procedures for ratifying a treaty, presidential vetoes of Congressional legislation, and the manner in which a veto could be overturned by a two-thirds vote in both houses. With, as they said in the 18th century, a long train of et ceteras.
    The small-c constitution is the set of norms, habits, and procedures that are not enumerated in the written Constitution but have achieved a deep rootedness in American civic life
    The “Small-c” Constitution


    The capital-C constitution was a general recipe for a new national government, but it did not descend into particulars on many important questions. It did not create a presidential cabinet, for example, but some such entity is hinted at in Article 2, Section 2, which says the president “may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices.” George Washington established a four-member cabinet (State, War, Treasury, and Attorney General) a few months into his first term, and though some presidents have made much greater use of their cabinets than others, no subsequent president has dared to dispense with this American institution, now numbering 24 members. The capital-C Constitution did not authorize the Supreme Court to determine which laws were constitutional and which violated provisions of the Constitution (judicial review). Chief Justice John Marshall single-handedly instituted judicial review in 1803 in the famous case Marbury v. Madison, when he decided, without explicit Constitutional authority, that one clause of the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional and therefore void, and declared, in what amounts to a judicial declaration of independence, “It is emphatically the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is.” Thus, one of the central bulwarks of American civic life was not established in the capital-C Constitution, but it has achieved not just quasi-constitutional status in the United States but is so deeply rooted and uniformly accepted that nothing could possibly displace it now.
    Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall_by_Henry_Inman,1832
    A 1932 portrait of the fourth Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall.(Shutterstock)
    The Constitution requires the president to advise Congress on the state of the union from time to time, but the annual ritual of the president riding up to Capitol Hill to address a joint session of Congress, with an endless series of standing ovations, special guests in the gallery, the Supreme Court justices all sitting in the front row, the joint chiefs of staff present and accounted for, belongs to the small-c constitution. Although Washington and John Adams delivered their annual messages personally before Congress, Thomas Jefferson broke that precedent before it could get deeply rooted in American civic life, because he thought it smelled of monarchy, and it wasn’t until Woodrow Wilson (1913) that the modern habit (now something of a political circus) was initiated, and rarely avoided since.

    Perhaps more to the point for the politics of 2021, the capital-C Constitution does not specify the number of Supreme Court justices. Congress gets to set the number through routine legislation. It could be nine, 19, or 90, and it has been set at six, five, seven, nine, and 10 in the course of American history. If the Democrats today forced through a court-packing bill raising the number of justices to 12, for example, they would not be violating the capital-C Constitution, which is silent on this question, but they would be violating what turns out to be a very deeply rooted and seemingly sacrosanct provision of the small-c constitution. This alone illustrates the immense power of the unratified small-c constitution. Even the Democrats who wish to reshape the balance of the Supreme Court by creating new positions they can fill with progressive justices sense that they are tiptoeing around a very important American taboo, as Franklin Roosevelt discovered in 1937, when he tried to raise the number of justices so that he could install individuals who would not strike down key provisions of the New Deal.
    New Deal and the campaign to pack the Supreme Court
    A political cartoon from 1937 illustrates the dust up around Franklin Roosevelt's effort to raise the number of Supreme Court justices in order to protect key provisions of the New Deal.
    The 'Other' Trinity: America's Three Constitutions As the Democrats in Congress mull over the idea of increasing the size of the Supreme Court (the Constitution does not specify the number of justices) or of ending the filibuster (nowhere mentioned in the Constitution), it may be useful to think about the American political system in a broader way. A political majority has the legal right to change the number of Supreme Court justices, but there are other important factors than the letter of the Constitution. I want to briefly describe the three American “constitutions”: first, the actual written Constitution, ratified in 1787 and amended just 27 times over 234 years; second, what might be called the “small-c” constitution, the set of norms, habits and procedures that are not enumerated in the written Constitution but have achieved a deep rootedness in American civic life; and third, the ways the American people actually “constitute” their lives, more often outside the realm of civics, but which have to be taken into account by anyone wishing to lead or shape American life. We the people - the Big "C" constitution The Big "C" Constitution.(Shutterstock) The Formal Constitution The formal 1787 Constitution needs little description. There it is, 4,534 words, encapsulating the civic intentions of 55 white men who deliberated, debated, argued, and above all compromised for 115 days at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, windows closed, to hammer out “a more perfect union” for 3.9 million Americans, one in five a slave. No women were present, no African Americans free or enslaved, no Native Americans, no Jews or Muslims. The delegates, called by Jefferson an “assembly of demigods,” were all white privileged men. The Constitution established a new, stronger national government for the United States. It created two houses in Congress, and established minimum eligibility requirements for the president and for senators and members of the House of Representatives. It enumerated the powers of each of the three branches of government. It set procedures for ratifying a treaty, presidential vetoes of Congressional legislation, and the manner in which a veto could be overturned by a two-thirds vote in both houses. With, as they said in the 18th century, a long train of et ceteras. The small-c constitution is the set of norms, habits, and procedures that are not enumerated in the written Constitution but have achieved a deep rootedness in American civic life The “Small-c” Constitution The capital-C constitution was a general recipe for a new national government, but it did not descend into particulars on many important questions. It did not create a presidential cabinet, for example, but some such entity is hinted at in Article 2, Section 2, which says the president “may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices.” George Washington established a four-member cabinet (State, War, Treasury, and Attorney General) a few months into his first term, and though some presidents have made much greater use of their cabinets than others, no subsequent president has dared to dispense with this American institution, now numbering 24 members. The capital-C Constitution did not authorize the Supreme Court to determine which laws were constitutional and which violated provisions of the Constitution (judicial review). Chief Justice John Marshall single-handedly instituted judicial review in 1803 in the famous case Marbury v. Madison, when he decided, without explicit Constitutional authority, that one clause of the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional and therefore void, and declared, in what amounts to a judicial declaration of independence, “It is emphatically the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is.” Thus, one of the central bulwarks of American civic life was not established in the capital-C Constitution, but it has achieved not just quasi-constitutional status in the United States but is so deeply rooted and uniformly accepted that nothing could possibly displace it now. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall_by_Henry_Inman,1832 A 1932 portrait of the fourth Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall.(Shutterstock) The Constitution requires the president to advise Congress on the state of the union from time to time, but the annual ritual of the president riding up to Capitol Hill to address a joint session of Congress, with an endless series of standing ovations, special guests in the gallery, the Supreme Court justices all sitting in the front row, the joint chiefs of staff present and accounted for, belongs to the small-c constitution. Although Washington and John Adams delivered their annual messages personally before Congress, Thomas Jefferson broke that precedent before it could get deeply rooted in American civic life, because he thought it smelled of monarchy, and it wasn’t until Woodrow Wilson (1913) that the modern habit (now something of a political circus) was initiated, and rarely avoided since. Perhaps more to the point for the politics of 2021, the capital-C Constitution does not specify the number of Supreme Court justices. Congress gets to set the number through routine legislation. It could be nine, 19, or 90, and it has been set at six, five, seven, nine, and 10 in the course of American history. If the Democrats today forced through a court-packing bill raising the number of justices to 12, for example, they would not be violating the capital-C Constitution, which is silent on this question, but they would be violating what turns out to be a very deeply rooted and seemingly sacrosanct provision of the small-c constitution. This alone illustrates the immense power of the unratified small-c constitution. Even the Democrats who wish to reshape the balance of the Supreme Court by creating new positions they can fill with progressive justices sense that they are tiptoeing around a very important American taboo, as Franklin Roosevelt discovered in 1937, when he tried to raise the number of justices so that he could install individuals who would not strike down key provisions of the New Deal. New Deal and the campaign to pack the Supreme Court A political cartoon from 1937 illustrates the dust up around Franklin Roosevelt's effort to raise the number of Supreme Court justices in order to protect key provisions of the New Deal.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 195 Views
  • Look over your bills our members are getting all of their debt paid off. If your name is in all caps on your bill Credit cards IRS debt will all be gone.
    READ the following: The Organic Act of 1871 was repealed in 1874. And, strangely enough, the end result of creating a second
    Municipal Corporation operating within the District of Columbia, achieved in 1877, was totally legal.
    That said, the more important thing is that as of July 27th, 2023, we, average Americans, are back under
    International Land Law. The American General Public is being recognized by the courts again, and our
    remedies due under the respective Constitutions are being honored again.
    This has been a long time coming. Six generations of Americans have suffered and been unable to assert
    their Constitutional Guarantees in courts that they paid for.
    The courts are obligated to hear and provide remedy under the Constitution(s) --- if you are a member of the
    General Public.
    The big question is --- are you? A member of the American General Public?
    If you are like most Americans, you assume that you are part of the "General Public" and you will wrinkle your
    forehead in consternation, wondering what else you would be?
    So listen carefully:
    You've been "registered" as a British Territorial U.S. Citizen and misidentified. Then, that "person" has been
    declared legally dead and a cestui que vie ESTATE trust has been created in your name.
    Your identity has been stolen, you've been declared legally dead, and all that is left of you is a public trust
    named after you.
    The American "you" has long since disappeared, whereabouts unknown.
    So you have been treated as a stateless beggar in your own country, suspected of being an "Enemy
    Combatant" and dependent on the mercy of foreign corporate tribunals and the "discretion" of individual
    judges.
    But come back through the door, prove your provenance as an American, claim back your lawful identity,
    inhabit your lawful jurisdiction on the land and soil of your birth state, join your State Assembly, and guess
    what?
    You are still owed everything you were ever owed. That includes the entire suite of guarantees provided by
    Article IV of all three Federal Constitutions.
    Take a moment to read Article IV and look up any unfamiliar words or concepts. This is where the protection
    of your "persons" --- including your Lawful Person --- is provided for. This is what sets you free from bills of
    attainder, mask mandates, etc., etc.
    Look over your bills our members are getting all of their debt paid off. If your name is in all caps on your bill Credit cards IRS debt will all be gone. READ the following: The Organic Act of 1871 was repealed in 1874. And, strangely enough, the end result of creating a second Municipal Corporation operating within the District of Columbia, achieved in 1877, was totally legal. That said, the more important thing is that as of July 27th, 2023, we, average Americans, are back under International Land Law. The American General Public is being recognized by the courts again, and our remedies due under the respective Constitutions are being honored again. This has been a long time coming. Six generations of Americans have suffered and been unable to assert their Constitutional Guarantees in courts that they paid for. The courts are obligated to hear and provide remedy under the Constitution(s) --- if you are a member of the General Public. The big question is --- are you? A member of the American General Public? If you are like most Americans, you assume that you are part of the "General Public" and you will wrinkle your forehead in consternation, wondering what else you would be? So listen carefully: You've been "registered" as a British Territorial U.S. Citizen and misidentified. Then, that "person" has been declared legally dead and a cestui que vie ESTATE trust has been created in your name. Your identity has been stolen, you've been declared legally dead, and all that is left of you is a public trust named after you. The American "you" has long since disappeared, whereabouts unknown. So you have been treated as a stateless beggar in your own country, suspected of being an "Enemy Combatant" and dependent on the mercy of foreign corporate tribunals and the "discretion" of individual judges. But come back through the door, prove your provenance as an American, claim back your lawful identity, inhabit your lawful jurisdiction on the land and soil of your birth state, join your State Assembly, and guess what? You are still owed everything you were ever owed. That includes the entire suite of guarantees provided by Article IV of all three Federal Constitutions. Take a moment to read Article IV and look up any unfamiliar words or concepts. This is where the protection of your "persons" --- including your Lawful Person --- is provided for. This is what sets you free from bills of attainder, mask mandates, etc., etc.
    Love
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 172 Views
  • September 25, 1789 – The first Congress of the United States approves 12 amendments to the U.S. Constitution, and sends them to the states for ratification. The amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, were designed to protect the basic rights of U.S. citizens, guaranteeing the freedom of speech, press, assembly, and exercise of religion; the right to fair legal procedure and to bear arms; and that powers not delegated to the federal government were reserved for the states and the people. Influenced by the English Bill of Rights of 1689, the Bill of Rights was also drawn from Virginia’s Declaration of Rights, drafted by George Mason in 1776. Mason, a native Virginian, was a lifelong champion of individual liberties, and in 1787 he attended the Constitutional Convention and criticized the final document for lacking constitutional protection of basic political rights. In the ratification process that followed, Mason and other critics agreed to approve the Constitution in exchange for the assurance that amendments would immediately be adopted. In December 1791, Virginia became the 10th of 14 states to approve 10 of the 12 amendments, thus giving the Bill of Rights the two-thirds majority of state ratification necessary to make it legal. Of the two amendments not ratified, the first concerned the population system of representation, while the second prohibited laws varying the payment of congressional members from taking effect until an election intervened. The first of these two amendments was never ratified, while the second was finally ratified more than 200 years later, in 1992.
    September 25, 1789 – The first Congress of the United States approves 12 amendments to the U.S. Constitution, and sends them to the states for ratification. The amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, were designed to protect the basic rights of U.S. citizens, guaranteeing the freedom of speech, press, assembly, and exercise of religion; the right to fair legal procedure and to bear arms; and that powers not delegated to the federal government were reserved for the states and the people. Influenced by the English Bill of Rights of 1689, the Bill of Rights was also drawn from Virginia’s Declaration of Rights, drafted by George Mason in 1776. Mason, a native Virginian, was a lifelong champion of individual liberties, and in 1787 he attended the Constitutional Convention and criticized the final document for lacking constitutional protection of basic political rights. In the ratification process that followed, Mason and other critics agreed to approve the Constitution in exchange for the assurance that amendments would immediately be adopted. In December 1791, Virginia became the 10th of 14 states to approve 10 of the 12 amendments, thus giving the Bill of Rights the two-thirds majority of state ratification necessary to make it legal. Of the two amendments not ratified, the first concerned the population system of representation, while the second prohibited laws varying the payment of congressional members from taking effect until an election intervened. The first of these two amendments was never ratified, while the second was finally ratified more than 200 years later, in 1992.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 287 Views
  • It's unconstitutional for non-violent offenders? That's discriminatory. That ruling is unconstitutional in itself. Anything that is discriminatory against any group of people is unconstitutional at its very basis. Then there's the very basis of the line in the Second Amendment that states "shall not be infringed".
    It's unconstitutional for non-violent offenders? That's discriminatory. That ruling is unconstitutional in itself. Anything that is discriminatory against any group of people is unconstitutional at its very basis. Then there's the very basis of the line in the Second Amendment that states "shall not be infringed".
    THERELOAD.COM
    Federal Appeals Court Rules Second Amendment Protects Non-Violent Felon’s Gun Rights
    The federal government can not bar a Pennsylvania man from owning guns for life over his food stamp fraud conviction.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 142 Views
  • All around the country, people are challenging the unconstitutional laws and Amendments that the Uniparty (the Democrats, Republicans, Leftists, RINOs, DINOs, and the DS) put into place. This holds true for the unconstitutional Amendment stating that no Felon shall be able to own firearms.

    The rights in the constitution are God-Given to EVERYONE. Everyone has the right to self-defense. Take that away, and America becomes like the UK and the rest of Europe.
    All around the country, people are challenging the unconstitutional laws and Amendments that the Uniparty (the Democrats, Republicans, Leftists, RINOs, DINOs, and the DS) put into place. This holds true for the unconstitutional Amendment stating that no Felon shall be able to own firearms. The rights in the constitution are God-Given to EVERYONE. Everyone has the right to self-defense. Take that away, and America becomes like the UK and the rest of Europe.
    THERELOAD.COM
    Tenth Circuit Upholds Federal Gun Ban for Non-Violent Felons
    Convicted felons can be deprived of their right to own firearms whether or not they were convicted for a violent offense, a federal appeals court has ruled.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 304 Views
  • JUST A REMINDER
    THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS A
    CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC
    NOT
    A DEMOCRACY
    DONT LET THE COMMUNIST DEMOCRATS-TEACHER UNIONS-ACADEMIA-TELEVISION-HOLLYWOOD AND MOST OF THE POLITICIANS TELL YOU ANY DIFFERENT.
    NEXT TIME SOMEONE SAYS WE ARE A DEMOCRACY
    ASK THEM TO FIND THAT WORD IN OUR CONSTITUTION
    "IT IS NO WHERE TO BE FOUND"!!

    GHST FREEDOM IN AMERICA RADIO
    STREAMING 24/7
    To listen to our daily streaming shows click on the following link https://zeno.fm/radio/GHST-RADIO-FREE-AMERICA/


    WE ARE LOOKING FOR ONE MAYBE TWO CONSERVATIVE PODCASTERS THAT HAVE ESTABLISHED PODCAST -EITHER DAILY SHOWS OR WEEKLY. CONTACT STATION MANGER
    USE THIS E-MAIL ADDRESS and please type word podcaster in subject line of email
    [email protected]
    JUST A REMINDER THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC NOT A DEMOCRACY DONT LET THE COMMUNIST DEMOCRATS-TEACHER UNIONS-ACADEMIA-TELEVISION-HOLLYWOOD AND MOST OF THE POLITICIANS TELL YOU ANY DIFFERENT. NEXT TIME SOMEONE SAYS WE ARE A DEMOCRACY ASK THEM TO FIND THAT WORD IN OUR CONSTITUTION "IT IS NO WHERE TO BE FOUND"!! GHST FREEDOM IN AMERICA RADIO STREAMING 24/7 To listen to our daily streaming shows click on the following link https://zeno.fm/radio/GHST-RADIO-FREE-AMERICA/ WE ARE LOOKING FOR ONE MAYBE TWO CONSERVATIVE PODCASTERS THAT HAVE ESTABLISHED PODCAST -EITHER DAILY SHOWS OR WEEKLY. CONTACT STATION MANGER USE THIS E-MAIL ADDRESS and please type word podcaster in subject line of email [email protected]
    0 Comments 0 Shares 303 Views
  • COURT DECIDES COPS CAN MAKE UP CHARGES AFTER THEY ARREST YOU

    Just one more example of the #Courts and the #Police wiping their ass with the #Constitution! And that is because YOU do not have any Constitutional rights!

    As long as you are a "Citizen" of the #Corporation of the United States you're a #Slave and have NO INALIENABLE HUMAN RIGHTS whatsoever!

    It's why you MUST step out of their system of Admiralty Law and Slavery!

    Rescind ALL CONTRACTS with the corporation of the United States!
    STOP declaring yourself a "citizen" of the United States!

    And declare your SOVEREIGNTY as a FREE MAN or WOMAN!
    The corporation of the United States has ZERO AUTHORITY over you
    unless you "Consent" to giving them such!

    The entire model this country is built upon is VOLUNTARY!
    If you "Consent" then you become "Chattel Property" ( A SLAVE )with no rights

    If you do not consent, and you learn the LAW, and how to remove yourself from their #Fraud based #Jurisdiction, then they have no authority over you!

    You must DECLARE YOUR STATUS!
    And you must KNOW how to do it!

    Check out David Straight, Ron Gibson, the Justinian Deception, and "EternallyAware" on YouTube! The People's Lawyer UK is another good one!

    Also WATCH AND SHARE "The Occult Art of Law"
    They give you BREAD & CIRCUSES to distract you so that
    YOU WILL NEVER LEARN THIS INFORMATION ON HOW THEY ENSLAVED YOU!

    How they got you to VOLUNTEER to be their slave!
    The entire system is a Satanic one, where ritual and magick are used to blind and deceive you. You ARE "Dead in the Water" under Admiralty Law!

    Return to the LAND of the Living!

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/aJLD3Seo1IA/
    COURT DECIDES COPS CAN MAKE UP CHARGES AFTER THEY ARREST YOU Just one more example of the #Courts and the #Police wiping their ass with the #Constitution! And that is because YOU do not have any Constitutional rights! As long as you are a "Citizen" of the #Corporation of the United States you're a #Slave and have NO INALIENABLE HUMAN RIGHTS whatsoever! It's why you MUST step out of their system of Admiralty Law and Slavery! Rescind ALL CONTRACTS with the corporation of the United States! STOP declaring yourself a "citizen" of the United States! And declare your SOVEREIGNTY as a FREE MAN or WOMAN! The corporation of the United States has ZERO AUTHORITY over you unless you "Consent" to giving them such! The entire model this country is built upon is VOLUNTARY! If you "Consent" then you become "Chattel Property" ( A SLAVE )with no rights If you do not consent, and you learn the LAW, and how to remove yourself from their #Fraud based #Jurisdiction, then they have no authority over you! You must DECLARE YOUR STATUS! And you must KNOW how to do it! Check out David Straight, Ron Gibson, the Justinian Deception, and "EternallyAware" on YouTube! The People's Lawyer UK is another good one! Also WATCH AND SHARE "The Occult Art of Law" They give you BREAD & CIRCUSES to distract you so that YOU WILL NEVER LEARN THIS INFORMATION ON HOW THEY ENSLAVED YOU! How they got you to VOLUNTEER to be their slave! The entire system is a Satanic one, where ritual and magick are used to blind and deceive you. You ARE "Dead in the Water" under Admiralty Law! Return to the LAND of the Living! https://www.bitchute.com/video/aJLD3Seo1IA/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 428 Views
  • Unhinged Cop Fired After This Video - Update and BodyCam

    VIDEO OF THE DAY HANDS DOWN!
    This video demonstrates that #Police ignore the law completely, and arrest / detain people based on their pathetic EGO and "Feelings"

    They TRIED to arrest this man, and DID ARREST HIM for several hours, KNOWINGLY infringing upon his Natural & Constitutional Rights in a punitive manner, BECAUSE HE DEMANDED RESPECT FROM A TYRANT!

    While I'm NOT a fan of his nail polish.....
    This guy has a pretty valid point!

    #Police seem to THINK that they are your "Masters" and that they have control over you when you have committed NO CRIME!

    Sorry piggies.... It don't work like that!
    The #FourthAmendment is pretty f*cking clear is it not?

    And #SCOTUS violated the #Constitution when they created "Terry vs Ohio" which UNLAWFULLY ALLOWS POLICE TO DETAIN PEOPLE AND THEN SEARCH THEM...
    When they are not guilty of a crime or even suspected of a crime!

    Terry vs Ohio wipes it's ass with the Constitution!
    Just like the illegitimate SCOTUS did when it passed this BS precedent!
    This should have been struck down / Reversed LONG AGO! But it hasn't!

    It's a blatant violation of your Inalienable Human Rights!

    These officers should ALL be PROSECUTED under
    18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Rights AND
    18 U.S.C. § 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law....

    Because THAT IS WHAT YOU DO WHEN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS INFRINGE UPON YOUR INALIENABLE HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER THE "COLOR OF LAW"

    WHY do we never see this happening?
    Because it requires a #Corrupt "Federal Prosecutor" to file the charges!
    THERE ARE NO HONEST ONES!

    So the system MUST BE CHANGED so that CITIZENS can file these charges!
    Not only against Police, but against Judges and Politicians too!

    We need a COMMON LAW #COURT in America, where everyday Americans act as "Judge, Jury, Prosecutor, Executioner / Jailer"

    NO #BAR Association scumbags required!
    And this COMMON LAW COURT is where #Government needs to be tried for their crimes! No more "Investigating themselves" and "Prosecuting Themselves"

    We need every day, regular, non-government AMERICANS running these courts!
    A court where actual #Justice can be served! ON GOVERNMENT!

    Because the bottom line is that "government" in this country is just the MAFIA!
    They break all the laws they want, fail to prosecute themselves and their friends, as they drop the hammer on ANYONE who tries to expose them or stands in their way!

    We have had ENOUGH!
    It is time to rectify the situation!

    https://youtu.be/iyK0DhaIlTU
    Unhinged Cop Fired After This Video - Update and BodyCam VIDEO OF THE DAY HANDS DOWN! This video demonstrates that #Police ignore the law completely, and arrest / detain people based on their pathetic EGO and "Feelings" They TRIED to arrest this man, and DID ARREST HIM for several hours, KNOWINGLY infringing upon his Natural & Constitutional Rights in a punitive manner, BECAUSE HE DEMANDED RESPECT FROM A TYRANT! While I'm NOT a fan of his nail polish..... This guy has a pretty valid point! #Police seem to THINK that they are your "Masters" and that they have control over you when you have committed NO CRIME! Sorry piggies.... It don't work like that! The #FourthAmendment is pretty f*cking clear is it not? And #SCOTUS violated the #Constitution when they created "Terry vs Ohio" which UNLAWFULLY ALLOWS POLICE TO DETAIN PEOPLE AND THEN SEARCH THEM... When they are not guilty of a crime or even suspected of a crime! Terry vs Ohio wipes it's ass with the Constitution! Just like the illegitimate SCOTUS did when it passed this BS precedent! This should have been struck down / Reversed LONG AGO! But it hasn't! It's a blatant violation of your Inalienable Human Rights! These officers should ALL be PROSECUTED under 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Rights AND 18 U.S.C. § 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law.... Because THAT IS WHAT YOU DO WHEN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS INFRINGE UPON YOUR INALIENABLE HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER THE "COLOR OF LAW" WHY do we never see this happening? Because it requires a #Corrupt "Federal Prosecutor" to file the charges! THERE ARE NO HONEST ONES! So the system MUST BE CHANGED so that CITIZENS can file these charges! Not only against Police, but against Judges and Politicians too! We need a COMMON LAW #COURT in America, where everyday Americans act as "Judge, Jury, Prosecutor, Executioner / Jailer" NO #BAR Association scumbags required! And this COMMON LAW COURT is where #Government needs to be tried for their crimes! No more "Investigating themselves" and "Prosecuting Themselves" We need every day, regular, non-government AMERICANS running these courts! A court where actual #Justice can be served! ON GOVERNMENT! Because the bottom line is that "government" in this country is just the MAFIA! They break all the laws they want, fail to prosecute themselves and their friends, as they drop the hammer on ANYONE who tries to expose them or stands in their way! We have had ENOUGH! It is time to rectify the situation! https://youtu.be/iyK0DhaIlTU
    0 Comments 0 Shares 529 Views
  • It would not surprise me to see #Police selling their a** in return for some ID!

    They are #Corporate whores, who violate the rights of Americans DAILY!
    Not "a few bad apples" but ALL OF THEM!

    And it will continue as long as YOU tolerate it!

    People are MURDERED by police for refusing to allow them to trample their Constitutionally guaranteed rights, and it happens a LOT!

    It's time for it to STOP!
    It's time for these Police to be held accountable and sent to prison!

    Police have no more rights than anyone else!
    When they harm someone they MUST BE held personally liable!

    This is why EVERY ONE OF THEM needs to be REQUIRED BY LAW
    to carry Liability Insurance to protect taxpayers from the endless lawsuits AND to see they are held responsible for their own actions!

    When they get too many successful lawsuits against them, the insurance company WILL cancel their policy, leaving them unable to ever work as a LEO again!

    THIS is how you hold Police ACCOUNTABLE!
    Because, in case you have not noticed....
    They won't do it themselves!

    I install WINDOWS and don't shoot anyone.....
    And I'm REQUIRED to carry a 1 million dollar general liability policy!

    I don't think asking that Police do the same is unreasonable!
    PLUS... They "Investigate THEMSELVES" and always find "no wrongdoing"
    Also unacceptable!

    Until YOU and I are allowed to "Investigate OURSELVES" and get back to the #Court with the crimes we are charged with committing, this is NOT acceptable!

    The two-tiered injustice system must be changed NOW!
    It would not surprise me to see #Police selling their a** in return for some ID! They are #Corporate whores, who violate the rights of Americans DAILY! Not "a few bad apples" but ALL OF THEM! And it will continue as long as YOU tolerate it! People are MURDERED by police for refusing to allow them to trample their Constitutionally guaranteed rights, and it happens a LOT! It's time for it to STOP! It's time for these Police to be held accountable and sent to prison! Police have no more rights than anyone else! When they harm someone they MUST BE held personally liable! This is why EVERY ONE OF THEM needs to be REQUIRED BY LAW to carry Liability Insurance to protect taxpayers from the endless lawsuits AND to see they are held responsible for their own actions! When they get too many successful lawsuits against them, the insurance company WILL cancel their policy, leaving them unable to ever work as a LEO again! THIS is how you hold Police ACCOUNTABLE! Because, in case you have not noticed.... They won't do it themselves! I install WINDOWS and don't shoot anyone..... And I'm REQUIRED to carry a 1 million dollar general liability policy! I don't think asking that Police do the same is unreasonable! PLUS... They "Investigate THEMSELVES" and always find "no wrongdoing" Also unacceptable! Until YOU and I are allowed to "Investigate OURSELVES" and get back to the #Court with the crimes we are charged with committing, this is NOT acceptable! The two-tiered injustice system must be changed NOW!
    Haha
    1
    1 Comments 0 Shares 439 Views
  • With video. Orwellian California Democrat/Marxists tried to overturn the First Amendment and ban free speech, but a judge said not so fast... Now they're trying something else just as Orwellian.

    https://conservativefiringline.com/health-freedom-victory-california-legislature-quietly-scraps-medical-misinformation-law-ab-2098-after-judge-obliterates-its-constitutionality-video/
    With video. Orwellian California Democrat/Marxists tried to overturn the First Amendment and ban free speech, but a judge said not so fast... Now they're trying something else just as Orwellian. https://conservativefiringline.com/health-freedom-victory-california-legislature-quietly-scraps-medical-misinformation-law-ab-2098-after-judge-obliterates-its-constitutionality-video/
    CONSERVATIVEFIRINGLINE.COM
    HEALTH FREEDOM VICTORY: California Legislature Quietly Scraps “Medical Misinformation” Law AB 2098 After Judge Obliterates Its Constitutionality (Video) ⋆ Conservative Firing Line
    Assembly Bill 2098, that was passed last year in California and signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom, has been quietly struck from the books after Judge Danielle Forrest obliterated the arguments put forth by its supporters.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 378 Views
More Results
Sponsored