Tune in Weekdays at 11am CST to watch The Alex Jones Show

I am republishing an excellent article written by someone who goes by the name "BlueApples" on the ZeroHedge News site today. BlueApples comments on the recent revelation that George Soros is a contributor of funding some of the pro-Palestinian groups on College Campuses, and how this revelation has led to outcries among the Conservative Zionists, which actually strengthens the Pro-Israel lobby with goals that are similar to the goals of Soros, which is to eliminate Free Speech and the First Amendment. Excerpt: "It should come as no surprise that the pro-Palestinian protests across college campuses nationwide have been exposed as another agitprop operation funded by none other than George Soros. In the eyes of the right wing of the American political spectrum, that revelation has essentially validated their criticism that these protests are little more than a vehicle for the Cultural Marxist agenda Soros and his acolytes espouse. However, evidence to that point has been sparse as the protests have all but entirely been consistent in their adamant opposition to the US' support of Israel's war in Gaza and haven't deviated into anything like outspokenness explicitly against presidential candidate Donald Trump like previous instances of Soros-orchestrated social justice protests have. Perhaps the hubris of the "I told you so" moment that came when Soros' was exposed as the architect of the co-opting these protests has done exactly what the social engineer desired. By provoking the reactionary response against these college protests, Soros has seemingly further fortified the pro-Israel lobby's position by manipulating America's right wing into aligning with it and in doing so exposing its hypocrisy over the issues of free speech and free assembly as a means of anti-establishment activism. In the wake of that clearly concerted effort to police free speech to quash any defiance against the powers that be who were behind the pandemic, America's right maligned how the Bill Of Rights had seemingly been desecrated so that the ruling elite could advance their agenda without resistance. While they were right to hold that position, it's taken less than 4 years to memoryhole how the political establishment executes that modus operandi. Now, the same demographic of the electorate that previously held the rights imbued into Americans under the First Amendment as sacred has been manipulated into throwing them out the window. In response to college protests against Israel's war in Gaza, the mainstream American right has become the embodiment of everything they stood against in 2020 by embracing calls to deny protesters their First Amendment rights in support of the neocon axis' self-proclaimed greatest ally: Israel. In doing so, the political faction of the country that was supposedly against the establishment in Washington DC has been assimilated back into it. By doing its bidding as such, the political establishment behind the deep state, permanent Washington, globalism, and whatever other supranational incarnation it takes to undermine the national sovereignty of the United States has regained control of the right."

Manufactured crisis being used to take YOUR rights!

Will citizens of the world stand up against globalism?

The fraudulent globalist agenda to profit off world depopulation https://gregreese.substack.com/ James Roguski on SubStack has been reporting on the so-called WHO Pandemic Treaty and it’s history. He has shown that it’s entire history is fraudulent and relies upon the people’s silence. On June 14th 1948, President Truman signed a joint resolution to sign onto the WHO constitution. Section two states that three US delegates would be chosen by the President and confirmed by the US Senate. But the Biden administration has sent US delegates who have not been confirmed. Which makes them fraudulent. Section five states that “in adopting this joint resolution, the Congress does so with the understanding that nothing in the Constitution of the World Health Organization in any manner commits the United States to enact any specific legislative program regarding any matters referred to in said Constitution.” And so the US is not lawfully compelled by the WHO. On July 25th 1969, the 22nd annual World Health Assembly adopted the International Health Regulations “to ensure the maximum security against the international spread of diseases.” But did so without a senate vote. “The way they did that was with what they call the silence procedure. A bunch of unnamed bureaucrats agreed to that document. They gave a nine month period for the leaders of all of the parties to reject it. And if no one rejected it on the first day of January 1971, it became legally binding. So any amendments go by that same adoption procedure. So in 2005, they made substantial changes. And for the last 18 or 19 years, we've been working off of the International Health Regulations as they were amended in 2005. I challenge anybody to look through the Federal Register or the Senate records to see if the Senate has ever given their consent, you know, two thirds, either in 1948 and 1969, 2005 or in 2022” ~ James Roguski On September 30th of 2022, ninety-four nations submitted more than 300 proposed amendments to the Pandemic Treaty. These documents were withheld from the public, and when James Roguski acquired copies, he discovered the reason for this was that the disputes were all based upon corrupt world leaders of smaller nations wanting a bigger piece of the action from the US after realizing the billions of dollars being made by pharmaceutical companies. “This is organized crime. And the big crime bosses are being faced by a bunch of little crime bosses who want in on the deal. They want to be able to manufacture the drugs in their own country so that they can control it, and, you know, inflict it upon their own population while basically profiting from the next pandemic.” ~ James Roguski And the proposed amendments to the 2005 IHR will bring this tyranny to its full potential. They want to create an International Health Regulations Authority. They want the authority to declare a pandemic based on the mere potential for disease. They want the authority to compel new vaccines and quarantine for those who are not even sick. And they want to authorize surveillance and censorship to enforce their fraud. They also want to give nations the authority to quarantine and vaccinate foreign travelers at their own discretion. “They want to add strengthening language to enable nations to quarantine international travelers as appropriate. That is not an attack on national sovereignty. That is a ridiculous strengthening of national sovereignty that would enable each nation to abuse the rights and freedoms of foreign travelers. The local tyrants that abused your rights over the last four and a half years didn't need any amendments or didn't need any treaty to do what they did over the last four and a half years. So the core battle is still local.” ~ James Roguski You can find these documents at stopthetreaty.org and rejecttheamendments.com. They view our silence as consent, so we must stand against them and speak out.

I have been warning our readers for the past few years that the Government has the ability to track you through your vehicle if you own a later-model vehicle that is connected to the Internet. But today, we now know that this is not just a theory, but that it actually has been happening, as two U.S. Senators have discovered that eight automakers will give up users' location data to police without requiring a court-issued warrant. We already knew that these car companies tracked and stored this data, as last September I published a report published by the Mozilla Foundation on every brand of car sold in the U.S. and reported: "All 25 car brands we researched earned our *Privacy Not Included warning label — making cars the official worst category of products for privacy that we have ever reviewed." They concluded that your car spies on you more than your cell phone and smart home devices. This announcement by the Senators follows other recent announcements that the government has passed legislation that new cars in the future must be outfitted with a "kill" switch that allows law enforcement to disable your vehicle.

You've heard all the pro-gun control lobby's arguments. Now, review the anti-gun control arguments.

(The Center Square) – Twenty-six states sued the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives on Wednesday arguing a new federal rule it's implementing targets lawful gun owners and is

Tune in Weekdays at 11am CST to watch The Alex Jones Show

Almost everything people learn about how the constitution is supposed to be enforced is wrong.