BUSTED by My Client's Dash Cam | Officer Fired | Lawsuit Just Settled | Final Update! More scumbags with badges that NEVER face accountability! And they certainly NEVER face the #Criminal charges they DESERVE! We have FEDERAL LAW that REQUIRES these criminals are prosecuted! Unfortunately... we also have #Criminals in every #Prosecutor's office affice across the country too, and they are COMPLICIT in these crimes by failing to prosecute these criminals AS REQUIRED BY LAW! I'm talking about 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Rights and 18 U.S.C. § 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law of course.... And not only are these criminals with badges REQUIRED BY LAW to be prosecuted under these statutes, but the PROSECUTORS who aid and abett their crimes by failing to prosecute these legitimate cases are also GUILTY UNDER THE SAME STATUTES! And it's high time we call these criminals out on their BS! Let me remind of what exactly these statutes say... 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Rights Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in the United States in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States or because of his or her having exercised such a right. Unlike most conspiracy statutes, §241 does not require, as an element, the commission of an overt act. The offense is always a felony, even if the underlying conduct would not, on its own, establish a felony violation of another criminal civil rights statute. It is punishable by up to ten years imprisonment unless the government proves an aggravating factor (such as that the offense involved kidnapping aggravated sexual abuse, or resulted in death) in which case it may be punished by up to life imprisonment and, if death results, may be eligible for the death penalty. Section 241 is used in Law Enforcement Misconduct and Hate Crime Prosecutions. It was historically used, before conspiracy-specific trafficking statutes were adopted, in Human Trafficking prosecutions. 18 U.S.C. § 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law This provision makes it a crime for someone acting under color of law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. It is not necessary that the offense be motivated by racial bias or by any other animus. Defendants act under color of law when they wield power vested by a government entity. Those prosecuted under the statute typically include police officers, sheriff’s deputies, and prison guards. However other government actors, such as judges, district attorneys, other public officials, and public school employees can also act under color of law and can be prosecuted under this statute. Section 242 does not criminalize any particular type of abusive conduct. Instead, it incorporates by reference rights defined by the Constitution, federal statutes, and interpretive case law. Cases charged by federal prosecutors most often involve physical or sexual assaults. The Department has also prosecuted public officials for thefts, false arrests, evidence-planting, and failing to protect someone in custody from constitutional violations committed by others. A violation of the statute is a misdemeanor, unless prosecutors prove one of the statutory aggravating factors such as a bodily injury, use of a dangerous weapon, kidnapping, aggravated sexual abuse, death resulting, or attempt to kill, in which case there are graduated penalties up to and including life in prison or death. If charged in conjunction with 18 U.S.C. § 250, as noted below, all sexual assaults under color of law are felonies. https://youtu.be/69PX152RApI

Radical left crisis actors advertisement circulating facebook.

One in three adults living in the United States has at least three, and oftentimes more, risk factors that contribute to CKM. Every major organ in the body is affected by it, including the heart, brain, kidney and liver, with the worst damage occurring in blood vessels, heart muscle and the cardiovascular system. https://newstarget.com/2024-05-16-90percent-population-heart-syndrome-spike-protein-damage.html

I See Dead People https://imgflip.com/i/8pypgw Unlawful Suppression of Evidence Coupled With Premeditated Perjury is a Capital Offense if it Results in Death So far, 5 have died in captivity. Unlawful Suppression of Evidence Unlike lawful suppression of evidence proposed by a defendant, an unlawful suppression of evidence is made by a prosecutor who improperly or intentionally hides or withholds evidence. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/suppression_of_evidence Perjury Resulting in Death 18 U.S. Code § 3592 - Mitigating and aggravating factors to be considered in determining whether a sentence of death is justified https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3592 See also: US Federal Statute for Perjury 1743. Perjury -- Overview Of 18 U.S.C. §1621 And 1623 Violations 18 U.S. Code § 3592 - Mitigating and aggravating factors to be considered in determining whether a sentence of death is justified

Even this should be taken into account for the Middle East. It’s a must to “see, hear & comprehend” the actions of actors not having your best interest . By closing the danger remains high. “A need to know” is real. JPL

STOP TALKING AND DO SOMETHING... WE ALL KNOW IT'S SOROS FUNDED TERRORIST... These radical campus protests threatening violence against Jews are anything but organic. It appears global elites are funding these hateful protests & tent cities. @GOPoversight will now follow the money trail, expose it, & hold bad actors funding this hate accountable.

So the instant communication makes it easy to expose their hoaxes and crimes, so now the deep state actors want to make it illegal to question their narratives. See how that works?

A FALSE POLICE REPORT WOULD HAVE SENT HIM TO PRISON FOR YEARS - BUT THEN THIS HAPPENED Systemic #Evil by costume wearing #Criminals The attempt to send an innocent man (Like this one) to PRISON by these badge wearing psychopaths should be dealt with MORE HARSHLY than in any other case! This #Police Officer should be EXECUT3D under 18 U.S.C. § 241 & 242 And ANY #Prosecutor failing to charge that officer should be charged for aiding and abetting the #Crime! Conspiracy Against Rights & Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in the United States in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States or because of his or her having exercised such a right. Unlike most conspiracy statutes, §241 does not require, as an element, the commission of an overt act. The offense is always a felony, even if the underlying conduct would not, on its own, establish a felony violation of another criminal civil rights statute. It is punishable by up to ten years imprisonment unless the government proves an aggravating factor (such as that the offense involved kidnapping aggravated sexual abuse, or resulted in death) in which case it may be punished by up to life imprisonment and, if death results, may be eligible for the death penalty. Section 241 is used in Law Enforcement Misconduct and Hate Crime Prosecutions. It was historically used, before conspiracy-specific trafficking statutes were adopted, in Human Trafficking prosecutions. This provision makes it a crime for someone acting under color of law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. It is not necessary that the offense be motivated by racial bias or by any other animus. Defendants act under color of law when they wield power vested by a government entity. Those prosecuted under the statute typically include police officers, sheriff’s deputies, and prison guards. However other government actors, such as judges, district attorneys, other public officials, and public school employees can also act under color of law and can be prosecuted under this statute. Section 242 does not criminalize any particular type of abusive conduct. Instead, it incorporates by reference rights defined by the Constitution, federal statutes, and interpretive case law. Cases charged by federal prosecutors most often involve physical or sexual assaults. The Department has also prosecuted public officials for thefts, false arrests, evidence-planting, and failing to protect someone in custody from constitutional violations committed by others. A violation of the statute is a misdemeanor, unless prosecutors prove one of the statutory aggravating factors such as a bodily injury, use of a dangerous weapon, kidnapping, aggravated sexual abuse, death resulting, or attempt to kill, in which case there are graduated penalties up to and including life in prison or death. If charged in conjunction with 18 U.S.C. § 250, as noted below, all sexual assaults under color of law are felonies. https://www.bitchute.com/video/92EQFw8JCY8/

Useful Idiots There's something odd about those campus tent encampments. Almost all the tents are identical - same design, same size, same fresh-out-of-the-box appearance. Which suggests that rather than an organic process, whereby students would bring a variety of individual tents, someone or some organization has supplied them and organized the event. I think it would be instructive if we can determine who that someone is. As IF we don't know it is most likely Nazi/Communist collaborator George Soros! Because rather than spontaneous demonstrations, these are choreographed events by hidden actors - and the students, sincere though they may be, are merely manipulated props. (Useful Idiots)

California faces significant challenges when it comes to housing costs Housing Costs and Homelessness in California California faces significant challenges when it comes to housing costs and homelessness. Home values and rents in the state are among the most expensive in the nation, leading to a high rate of homelessness. Californians are increasingly concerned about these issues, with more than a third saying they have considered leaving the state due to housing costs High Housing Costs and Rent Increases The housing crisis in California is not limited to specific regions but is a statewide challenge. While cities like San Diego, San Francisco, and Los Angeles have some of the toughest rental markets in the country, other cities like Sacramento and Fresno have also experienced significant rent increases Many low-income families in the Central Valley spend more than 30% of their income on rent, leading to financial strain . Additionally, California ranks worst in the nation in terms of renter overcrowding Impact on Homelessness The lack of access to affordable housing has a direct impact on homelessness in California. The state has a shortage of nearly 1 million units affordable to extremely low-income renters alone As a result, 1.6 million renter households spend more than half of their income on housing. Homelessness is a complex issue, but the high housing costs and lack of affordable options contribute significantly to the problem Other Factors Contributing to Homelessness While expensive housing is a major factor, other issues also contribute to homelessness in California. These include income inequality, poverty rates, racial discrimination in rental housing, and over representation in the criminal justice and child welfare systems Eviction protections and emergency rental assistance have been implemented to address the issue, but challenges remain. Conclusion The high housing costs and rents in California, coupled with a shortage of affordable housing, contribute to the state's homelessness crisis. The impact is felt statewide, with many low-income families struggling to afford housing and experiencing overcrowding. Addressing these issues requires a multifaceted approach that includes increasing the supply of affordable housing, addressing income inequality, and providing support services to those experiencing homelessness.