• DOJ Refuses to Prosecute Merrick Garland After House Voted to Hold Him in Contempt https://www.infowars.com/posts/doj-refuses-to-prosecute-merrick-garland-after-house-voted-to-hold-him-in-contempt/
    DOJ Refuses to Prosecute Merrick Garland After House Voted to Hold Him in Contempt https://www.infowars.com/posts/doj-refuses-to-prosecute-merrick-garland-after-house-voted-to-hold-him-in-contempt/
    Like
    Angry
    2
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 94 Views
  • Yo "Trailer Park Jill". Check Dis Out.

    Football Season is right around the Corner.

    Just in time before the Election and the Fans are Dying to let the World know again what they think about The OBiden Administration, "Dementia Joe" and his Corrupt DOJ.
    https://youtu.be/W-Dar70Lz9k
    Yo "Trailer Park Jill". Check Dis Out. Football Season is right around the Corner. Just in time before the Election and the Fans are Dying to let the World know again what they think about The OBiden Administration, "Dementia Joe" and his Corrupt DOJ. https://youtu.be/W-Dar70Lz9k
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 97 Views
  • WHEN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY “SEES, HEARS & COMPREHENDS” THE PROBLEMS WITH THE FBI, DOJ, IRS & ADMINISTRATION,
    AND THE
    FBI, DOJ, IRS & ADMINSTRATION IS BLIND , DEAF & DUMB TO THE PROBLEMS OF THE COUNTRY,

    ‘HOUSTON, WE HAVE A PROBLEM”
    WHEN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY “SEES, HEARS & COMPREHENDS” THE PROBLEMS WITH THE FBI, DOJ, IRS & ADMINISTRATION, AND THE FBI, DOJ, IRS & ADMINSTRATION IS BLIND , DEAF & DUMB TO THE PROBLEMS OF THE COUNTRY, ‘HOUSTON, WE HAVE A PROBLEM”
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 73 Views
  • The decision, especially on the Trump Immunity case, may have the biggest impact. Many people thought that the Supreme Court would remand it and instruct the district court to parse what is and what is not an official act. If the Supreme Court was going to do that, it would have a quick decision. This opens the door to two possibilities.
    (1) The court will state that Trump has virtually absolute immunity. That is probably the wisest decision that would wipe out all cases against Trump. If this is NOT done, then there will be a very dangerous precedent, and you can bet that denying that immunity to Trump can then be used against Biden and even Obama if he intervenes in the current election. Granting virtual absolute immunity will save the USA from weaponizing the DOJ and transforming the nation into a banana republic. You can bet WHATEVER they have done to Trump, the other side will do to Biden et al.
    (2) The Special Prosecutor has NO jurisdiction to do what he is doing. He was not appointed by Congress nor confirmed. He was a special appointment by the DOJ, and he actually does not even fall under prosecutorial immunity himself. That would be a valid decision that would end the Washington and Florida cases.
    https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/supreme-court-bombshell-decisions-due-june-13th/
    The decision, especially on the Trump Immunity case, may have the biggest impact. Many people thought that the Supreme Court would remand it and instruct the district court to parse what is and what is not an official act. If the Supreme Court was going to do that, it would have a quick decision. This opens the door to two possibilities. (1) The court will state that Trump has virtually absolute immunity. That is probably the wisest decision that would wipe out all cases against Trump. If this is NOT done, then there will be a very dangerous precedent, and you can bet that denying that immunity to Trump can then be used against Biden and even Obama if he intervenes in the current election. Granting virtual absolute immunity will save the USA from weaponizing the DOJ and transforming the nation into a banana republic. You can bet WHATEVER they have done to Trump, the other side will do to Biden et al. (2) The Special Prosecutor has NO jurisdiction to do what he is doing. He was not appointed by Congress nor confirmed. He was a special appointment by the DOJ, and he actually does not even fall under prosecutorial immunity himself. That would be a valid decision that would end the Washington and Florida cases. https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/supreme-court-bombshell-decisions-due-june-13th/
    WWW.ARMSTRONGECONOMICS.COM
    Supreme Court Bombshell Decisions Due June 13th
    The Supreme Court has 28 decisions still remaining, and there are a lot of really important cases that will shape history. The next opinion day will be June
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 418 Views
  • MUST-WATCH: Gaetz Corners Garland, Massie Unleashes Legal Armageddon on Corrupt Trump Case
    https://rumble.com/v4zvjs5-must-watch-gaetz-corners-garland-massie-unleashes-legal-armageddon-on-corru.html
    In this explosive special report, we dive into the heated confrontation between Rep. Matt Gaetz and Attorney General Merrick Garland over the controversial connections surrounding Judge Merchan and DOJ official Matthew Colangelo in the Trump prosecution. Gaetz grills Garland on Colangelo's suspicious move from the DOJ to DA Bragg's office, insinuating a politically motivated effort to "get Trump." Meanwhile, Rep. Thomas Massie drops a bombshell, questioning the very legality of Jack Smith's Special Counsel appointment and submitting a powerful amicus brief by former AG Edwin Meese challenging its constitutionality. As Judge Cannon opens the door for this debate in the courtroom, the fireworks are just beginning. We'll explore the shocking details, the potential legal ramifications, and what this means for the future of the Trump case and the integrity of our justice system. You won't want to miss my final thought on this developing story. Like and subscribe for more hard-hitting reports that the mainstream media won't touch. Get ready for a jaw-dropping expose that could change everything.
    MUST-WATCH: Gaetz Corners Garland, Massie Unleashes Legal Armageddon on Corrupt Trump Case https://rumble.com/v4zvjs5-must-watch-gaetz-corners-garland-massie-unleashes-legal-armageddon-on-corru.html In this explosive special report, we dive into the heated confrontation between Rep. Matt Gaetz and Attorney General Merrick Garland over the controversial connections surrounding Judge Merchan and DOJ official Matthew Colangelo in the Trump prosecution. Gaetz grills Garland on Colangelo's suspicious move from the DOJ to DA Bragg's office, insinuating a politically motivated effort to "get Trump." Meanwhile, Rep. Thomas Massie drops a bombshell, questioning the very legality of Jack Smith's Special Counsel appointment and submitting a powerful amicus brief by former AG Edwin Meese challenging its constitutionality. As Judge Cannon opens the door for this debate in the courtroom, the fireworks are just beginning. We'll explore the shocking details, the potential legal ramifications, and what this means for the future of the Trump case and the integrity of our justice system. You won't want to miss my final thought on this developing story. Like and subscribe for more hard-hitting reports that the mainstream media won't touch. Get ready for a jaw-dropping expose that could change everything.
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 436 Views
  • Democrats say it's a conspiracy theory to suggest Biden's DOJ is coordinating the unprecedented lawfare assault against Donald Trump.
    So will Merrick Garland dispel the rumors by proving the DOJ did NOT collude with Alvin Bragg, Fani Willis, and Letitia James?
    Democrats say it's a conspiracy theory to suggest Biden's DOJ is coordinating the unprecedented lawfare assault against Donald Trump. So will Merrick Garland dispel the rumors by proving the DOJ did NOT collude with Alvin Bragg, Fani Willis, and Letitia James?
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 174 Views 1
  • Judicial Watch Statement on the Trump Verdict
    https://www.judicialwatch.org/trump-verdict/

    (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton made the following statement regarding the unprecedented prosecution of President Donald Trump by Democrats in New York:

    Pure corruption. Judicial Watch denounces this absurd verdict and Soviet-style criminal proceeding that has so abused President Trump. What just happened to Trump up in New York is criminal.

    The guilty verdict against Trump is no surprise considering the rigged, kangaroo court proceedings run by a biased, conflicted judge and an unethical, politicized Democratic Party prosecution team. Today is a terrible day for the rule of law that will go down in infamy. This whole process is compromised, and this verdict should be overturned in an emergency fashion.

    The evidence shows that Trump committed no crimes, and this is a prosecution about “nothing.” This and other Democratic Party-political prosecutions of Trump are an abomination under law and are destabilizing to our nation.

    Judicial Watch will continue to expose in court the truth about these attacks on the rule of law, free and fair elections, and the U.S. Constitution. In the meantime, our elections have officially been compromised by this politicized prosecution.

    Judicial Watch has several Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits related to the prosecutorial abuse targeting Trump:

    In March 2024, Judicial Watch filed a Georgia Open Records Act lawsuit against District Attorney Fani Willis and Fulton County, Georgia, for records of any communication Willis and the county had with Special Counsel Jack Smith and the House January 6 Committee. The lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of Fulton County after Willis and the county denied having any responsive records.

    In February 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice asked a federal court to allow the agency to keep secret the names of top staffers working in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office that is targeting former President Donald Trump and other Americans.

    (Before his appointment to investigate and prosecute Trump, Specia Counsel Jack Smith previously was at the center of several controversial issues, the IRS scandal among them. In 2014, a Judicial Watch investigation revealed that top IRS officials had been in communication with Jack Smith’s then-Public Integrity Section about a plan to launch criminal investigations into conservative tax-exempt groups. Read more here.)

    In January 2024, Judicial Watch filed lawsuit against Fulton County, Georgia, for records regarding the hiring of Nathan Wade as a special prosecutor by District Attorney Fani Willis. Wade was hired to pursue unprecedented criminal investigations and prosecutions against former President Trump and others over the 2020 election disputes.

    In October 2023, Judicial Watch sued the DOJ for records and communications between the Office of U.S. Special Counsel Jack Smith and the Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney’s office regarding requests/receipt of federal funding/assistance in the investigation of former President Trump and his 18 codefendants in the Fulton County indictment of August 14, 2023. To date, the DOJ is refusing to confirm or deny the existence of records, claiming that to do so would interfere with enforcement proceedings. Judicial Watch’s litigation challenging this is continuing.

    Through the New York Freedom of Information Law, in July 2023, Judicial Watch received the engagement letter showing New York County District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg paid $900 per hour for partners and $500 per hour for associates to the Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher law firm for the purpose of suing Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) in an effort to shut down the House Judiciary Committee’s oversight investigation into Bragg’s unprecedented indictment of former President Donald Trump.
    Judicial Watch Statement on the Trump Verdict https://www.judicialwatch.org/trump-verdict/ (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton made the following statement regarding the unprecedented prosecution of President Donald Trump by Democrats in New York: Pure corruption. Judicial Watch denounces this absurd verdict and Soviet-style criminal proceeding that has so abused President Trump. What just happened to Trump up in New York is criminal. The guilty verdict against Trump is no surprise considering the rigged, kangaroo court proceedings run by a biased, conflicted judge and an unethical, politicized Democratic Party prosecution team. Today is a terrible day for the rule of law that will go down in infamy. This whole process is compromised, and this verdict should be overturned in an emergency fashion. The evidence shows that Trump committed no crimes, and this is a prosecution about “nothing.” This and other Democratic Party-political prosecutions of Trump are an abomination under law and are destabilizing to our nation. Judicial Watch will continue to expose in court the truth about these attacks on the rule of law, free and fair elections, and the U.S. Constitution. In the meantime, our elections have officially been compromised by this politicized prosecution. Judicial Watch has several Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits related to the prosecutorial abuse targeting Trump: In March 2024, Judicial Watch filed a Georgia Open Records Act lawsuit against District Attorney Fani Willis and Fulton County, Georgia, for records of any communication Willis and the county had with Special Counsel Jack Smith and the House January 6 Committee. The lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of Fulton County after Willis and the county denied having any responsive records. In February 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice asked a federal court to allow the agency to keep secret the names of top staffers working in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office that is targeting former President Donald Trump and other Americans. (Before his appointment to investigate and prosecute Trump, Specia Counsel Jack Smith previously was at the center of several controversial issues, the IRS scandal among them. In 2014, a Judicial Watch investigation revealed that top IRS officials had been in communication with Jack Smith’s then-Public Integrity Section about a plan to launch criminal investigations into conservative tax-exempt groups. Read more here.) In January 2024, Judicial Watch filed lawsuit against Fulton County, Georgia, for records regarding the hiring of Nathan Wade as a special prosecutor by District Attorney Fani Willis. Wade was hired to pursue unprecedented criminal investigations and prosecutions against former President Trump and others over the 2020 election disputes. In October 2023, Judicial Watch sued the DOJ for records and communications between the Office of U.S. Special Counsel Jack Smith and the Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney’s office regarding requests/receipt of federal funding/assistance in the investigation of former President Trump and his 18 codefendants in the Fulton County indictment of August 14, 2023. To date, the DOJ is refusing to confirm or deny the existence of records, claiming that to do so would interfere with enforcement proceedings. Judicial Watch’s litigation challenging this is continuing. Through the New York Freedom of Information Law, in July 2023, Judicial Watch received the engagement letter showing New York County District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg paid $900 per hour for partners and $500 per hour for associates to the Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher law firm for the purpose of suing Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) in an effort to shut down the House Judiciary Committee’s oversight investigation into Bragg’s unprecedented indictment of former President Donald Trump.
    WWW.JUDICIALWATCH.ORG
    Judicial Watch Statement on the Trump Verdict - Judicial Watch
    (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton made the following statement regarding the unprecedented prosecution of President Donald Trump by Democrats in New York:
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 791 Views
  • What? DOJ Won’t Release Biden Special Counsel Audio, Concerned Deepfakes Would Be Spread

    https://www.infowars.com/posts/what-doj-wont-release-biden-special-counsel-audio-concerned-deepfakes-would-be-spread/
    What? DOJ Won’t Release Biden Special Counsel Audio, Concerned Deepfakes Would Be Spread https://www.infowars.com/posts/what-doj-wont-release-biden-special-counsel-audio-concerned-deepfakes-would-be-spread/
    Like
    Haha
    2
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 141 Views
  • What is the number three at DOJ doing in New York?
    What is the number three at DOJ doing in New York?
    Like
    1
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 70 Views 2
  • HAS ANYONE RECIEVED AN ANSWER TO TH E QUESTION
    “ ATTN: POTUS: ‘WHAT IS YOUR PLAN NOW?
    SINCE YOUR PLAN TO GET -TRUMP IS COMPLETED?
    Please forward all answers verifiable to the country of origin, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CITIZENRY AT LARGE.
    ATTN: MSM PLEASE DISREGARD, NOTHING TO SEE HEAR OR COMPREHEND IN THIS POST.
    ATTN: DOJ, DISREGARD NOTHING TO SEE HEAR OF COMPREHEND IN THIS POST.
    ATTN: IRS, DISREGARD POST, NOTHING TO INVESTIGATE.
    ATTN: MILITARY DEI-SOFTIES, GET COLORING BOOKS AND CRAYONS FROM COMMANDING OFFICER.
    ATTN: ALL FOREIGN NATIONS PLANNING SOMETHING NEW, ‘DON’T’ (PEACE WITH WEEKNESS)
    ATTN: FUTURE POTUS DONALD J. TRUMP
    PLEASE HURRY, OUR TIME IS RUNNING OUT.
    HAS ANYONE RECIEVED AN ANSWER TO TH E QUESTION “ ATTN: POTUS: ‘WHAT IS YOUR PLAN NOW? SINCE YOUR PLAN TO GET -TRUMP IS COMPLETED? Please forward all answers verifiable to the country of origin, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CITIZENRY AT LARGE. ATTN: MSM PLEASE DISREGARD, NOTHING TO SEE HEAR OR COMPREHEND IN THIS POST. ATTN: DOJ, DISREGARD NOTHING TO SEE HEAR OF COMPREHEND IN THIS POST. ATTN: IRS, DISREGARD POST, NOTHING TO INVESTIGATE. ATTN: MILITARY DEI-SOFTIES, GET COLORING BOOKS AND CRAYONS FROM COMMANDING OFFICER. ATTN: ALL FOREIGN NATIONS PLANNING SOMETHING NEW, ‘DON’T’ (PEACE WITH WEEKNESS) ATTN: FUTURE POTUS DONALD J. TRUMP PLEASE HURRY, OUR TIME IS RUNNING OUT.
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 415 Views
Resultados de la búsqueda
Patrocinados

After a successful May, we are now funded 54% for June. Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here