• If you had the chance to tell the Trump White House what changes to make first, what would you say?
    It turns out you do have that chance!
    Last night I was contacted by Dan Scavino, White House Deputy Chief of staff and asked that very question. In full transparency, I believe it was more of a small mass text mailing but I do believe they are sincere in hearing what I (we) think.
    I was told that: “ Listen, every time you made your voice heard, you pushed us one step closer to making history.” And the message said “President Trump hears you; he’s all about delivering on real promises.”
    My response was as follows:

    “1. We need to see the J-6 political prisoners released and have their records cleansed!
    2. We need to see the evil doers held accountable for their deeds. This would include but not be limited to the persons that stole the election, the persons that allowed the steal to take place.
    3. This would also include all persons that enabled the Covid 19 scam, the lying about the efficacy and safety of the covid vax.
    4. This would also include all those that committed lawfare.
    5. We need to immediately clear all 16 Michigan electors such as my friends Meshawn Maddock and Marian Sheridan of any charges, etc.
    6. We need to seek out, expose and prosecute all persons that have contributed to on going election fraud such as we seen where the Dems continue to count fake ballots for up to two weeks after election day.
    7. We severely need help adjudicate the enormous fraud committed here in Michigan by Governor Gretchen Whitmer, SOS Jocelyn Benson and AG Dana Nessel.
    The Michigan Executive Branch is Corrupt! ______________________

    Michigan Governor, Gretchen Whitmer, corruption evidence:
    (drive.google.com/file/d/19MflA1…)
    (drive.google.com/file/d/1T29ZLK…)
    (drive.google.com/file/d/16WM5R-…)

    Michigan Secretary Of State, Jocelyn Benson, corruption evidence:
    (drive.google.com/file/d/1hf4hkN…)
    (drive.google.com/file/d/1PGHeLK…)
    (drive.google.com/file/d/1VvdHRF…)

    Michigan Attorney General, Dana Nessel corruption evidence:
    (drive.google.com/file/d/1-MNG_5…)
    (drive.google.com/file/d/1LX5pOg…)
    Clearly Justice must begin and continue until completion!”

    So, now I ask you; What would you like to see Trump accomplish first?
    Let’s make sure that the Trump Whitehouse continues to listen to us!
    Bob Cushman
    11-23-24
    @pjcolbeck @PattyLovesTruth @gatewaypundit @HawleyMO @Jim_Jordan @JudiciaryGOP @SpeakerJohnson @CLewandowski_ @elonmusk @MIGOP @JudicialWatch @America1stLegal @LaraLeaTrump @StephenM @realDonaldTrump @EricTrump @DonaldJTrumpJr @JDVance @RobertKennedyJr @NicoleShanahan @TrueTheVote @LauraLoomer @MeshawnMaddock @matthewmaddock @KristinaKaramo @danscavino_000

    https://x.com/BobCushman1776/status/1860343334830588396?t=v7lHPA8X2l5CFJ_tNcFSUA&s=19
    If you had the chance to tell the Trump White House what changes to make first, what would you say? It turns out you do have that chance! Last night I was contacted by Dan Scavino, White House Deputy Chief of staff and asked that very question. In full transparency, I believe it was more of a small mass text mailing but I do believe they are sincere in hearing what I (we) think. I was told that: “ Listen, every time you made your voice heard, you pushed us one step closer to making history.” And the message said “President Trump hears you; he’s all about delivering on real promises.” My response was as follows: “1. We need to see the J-6 political prisoners released and have their records cleansed! 2. We need to see the evil doers held accountable for their deeds. This would include but not be limited to the persons that stole the election, the persons that allowed the steal to take place. 3. This would also include all persons that enabled the Covid 19 scam, the lying about the efficacy and safety of the covid vax. 4. This would also include all those that committed lawfare. 5. We need to immediately clear all 16 Michigan electors such as my friends Meshawn Maddock and Marian Sheridan of any charges, etc. 6. We need to seek out, expose and prosecute all persons that have contributed to on going election fraud such as we seen where the Dems continue to count fake ballots for up to two weeks after election day. 7. We severely need help adjudicate the enormous fraud committed here in Michigan by Governor Gretchen Whitmer, SOS Jocelyn Benson and AG Dana Nessel. The Michigan Executive Branch is Corrupt! ______________________ Michigan Governor, Gretchen Whitmer, corruption evidence: (drive.google.com/file/d/19MflA1…) (drive.google.com/file/d/1T29ZLK…) (drive.google.com/file/d/16WM5R-…) Michigan Secretary Of State, Jocelyn Benson, corruption evidence: (drive.google.com/file/d/1hf4hkN…) (drive.google.com/file/d/1PGHeLK…) (drive.google.com/file/d/1VvdHRF…) Michigan Attorney General, Dana Nessel corruption evidence: (drive.google.com/file/d/1-MNG_5…) (drive.google.com/file/d/1LX5pOg…) Clearly Justice must begin and continue until completion!” So, now I ask you; What would you like to see Trump accomplish first? Let’s make sure that the Trump Whitehouse continues to listen to us! Bob Cushman 11-23-24 @pjcolbeck @PattyLovesTruth @gatewaypundit @HawleyMO @Jim_Jordan @JudiciaryGOP @SpeakerJohnson @CLewandowski_ @elonmusk @MIGOP @JudicialWatch @America1stLegal @LaraLeaTrump @StephenM @realDonaldTrump @EricTrump @DonaldJTrumpJr @JDVance @RobertKennedyJr @NicoleShanahan @TrueTheVote @LauraLoomer @MeshawnMaddock @matthewmaddock @KristinaKaramo @danscavino_000 https://x.com/BobCushman1776/status/1860343334830588396?t=v7lHPA8X2l5CFJ_tNcFSUA&s=19
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 1KB Visualizações
  • Judicial Watch Election Fraud Report Line | Judicial Watch - https://www.judicialwatch.org/judicial-watch-election-fraud-report-line-2
    Judicial Watch Election Fraud Report Line | Judicial Watch - https://www.judicialwatch.org/judicial-watch-election-fraud-report-line-2
    Like
    1
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 159 Visualizações
  • Judicial Watch Election Fraud Report Line
    https://www.judicialwatch.org/judicial-watch-election-fraud-report-line-2/
    Judicial Watch Election Fraud Report Line https://www.judicialwatch.org/judicial-watch-election-fraud-report-line-2/
    Like
    1
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 143 Visualizações
  • Judicial Watch Files Class Action Lawsuit over Reparations
    https://www.judicialwatch.org/reparations/?utm_source=deployer&utm_medium=email&utm_content=&utm_campaign=weekly+update&utm_term=members
    (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it filed a class action lawsuit against Evanston, Illinois, on behalf of six individuals over the city’s use of race as an eligibility requirement for a reparations program which makes $25,000 payments to black residents and descendants of black residents who lived in Evanston between the years 1919 and 1969. The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division (Flinn et al. v Evanston (No. 1:24-cv-04269)).

    Judicial Watch Files Class Action Lawsuit over Reparations https://www.judicialwatch.org/reparations/?utm_source=deployer&utm_medium=email&utm_content=&utm_campaign=weekly+update&utm_term=members (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it filed a class action lawsuit against Evanston, Illinois, on behalf of six individuals over the city’s use of race as an eligibility requirement for a reparations program which makes $25,000 payments to black residents and descendants of black residents who lived in Evanston between the years 1919 and 1969. The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division (Flinn et al. v Evanston (No. 1:24-cv-04269)).
    WWW.JUDICIALWATCH.ORG
    Judicial Watch Files Class Action Lawsuit over Reparations - Judicial Watch
    (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it filed a class action lawsuit against Evanston, Illinois on behalf of six residents over the city’s use of race as an eligibility requirement for a reparations program which makes $25,000 payments to black residents and descendants of black residents who say they experienced housing discrimination between the years 1919 and 1969. (Margot Flinn, Carol Johnson, Stasys Neimanas, Barbara Regard, Henry Regard, and Stephen Weiland v. City of Evanston (No. )). The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 689 Visualizações
  • Judicial Watch: Biden-Harris State Dept Records Detail Targeting of Tucker Carlson over Putin Interview
    https://www.judicialwatch.org/tucker-carlson-putin-interview/?utm_source=deployer&utm_medium=email&utm_content=&utm_campaign=tipsheet&utm_term=members

    (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it received 105 pages and 211 pages of heavily redacted records from the U.S. State Department in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit that show officials in the Biden State Department exchanging an article comparing Tucker Carlson’s February 2024 interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin to Adolph Hitler’s handing out copies of Mein Kampf to newlyweds in Germany in the 1930s.

    Judicial Watch filed the lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia after the State Department failed to comply with a February 7, 2024, FOIA request (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:24-cv-00840)) for:

    All (2024) emails and diplomatic notes sent to and from the following officials referencing “Tucker Carlson:” Secretary of State Antony Blinken, Deputy Secretary Victoria Nuland, Assistant Secretary James O’Brien, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary Yuri Kim, Deputy Assistant Secretary Sonata Coulter, Deputy Assistant Secretary Gabriel Escobar, Deputy Assistant Secretary Joshua Huck, Deputy Assistant Secretary Douglas Jones, Deputy Assistant Secretary Jacqueline Ramos, and/or Deputy Assistant Secretary Christopher W. Smith.
    Judicial Watch: Biden-Harris State Dept Records Detail Targeting of Tucker Carlson over Putin Interview https://www.judicialwatch.org/tucker-carlson-putin-interview/?utm_source=deployer&utm_medium=email&utm_content=&utm_campaign=tipsheet&utm_term=members (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it received 105 pages and 211 pages of heavily redacted records from the U.S. State Department in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit that show officials in the Biden State Department exchanging an article comparing Tucker Carlson’s February 2024 interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin to Adolph Hitler’s handing out copies of Mein Kampf to newlyweds in Germany in the 1930s. Judicial Watch filed the lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia after the State Department failed to comply with a February 7, 2024, FOIA request (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:24-cv-00840)) for: All (2024) emails and diplomatic notes sent to and from the following officials referencing “Tucker Carlson:” Secretary of State Antony Blinken, Deputy Secretary Victoria Nuland, Assistant Secretary James O’Brien, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary Yuri Kim, Deputy Assistant Secretary Sonata Coulter, Deputy Assistant Secretary Gabriel Escobar, Deputy Assistant Secretary Joshua Huck, Deputy Assistant Secretary Douglas Jones, Deputy Assistant Secretary Jacqueline Ramos, and/or Deputy Assistant Secretary Christopher W. Smith.
    WWW.JUDICIALWATCH.ORG
    Judicial Watch: Biden-Harris State Dept Records Detail Targeting of Tucker Carlson over Putin Interview - Judicial Watch
    (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it received 105 pages and 211 pages of heavily redacted records from the U.S. State Department in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit that show officials in the Biden State Department exchanging an article comparing Tucker Carlson’s February 2024 interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin to Adolph Hitler’s handing out copies of Mein Kampf to newlyweds in Germany in the 1930s.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 1KB Visualizações
  • Judicial Watch sues DHS for info about Secret Service protection for Trump
    https://www.judicialwatch.org/judicial-watch-sues-dhs-for-info-about-secret-service-protection-for-trump/?utm_source=deployer&utm_medium=email&utm_content=&utm_campaign=tipsheet&utm_term=members

    Conservative watchdog Judicial Watch on Tuesday announced that it sued the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for information regarding additional Secret Service protection requests for former President Donald Trump prior to the July 13 assassination attempt.

    The DHS allegedly repeatedly denied requests for more protection for Trump over the past two years, including rejecting requests for magnetometers and more security at large Trump rallies, per the Washington Post.
    Judicial Watch sues DHS for info about Secret Service protection for Trump https://www.judicialwatch.org/judicial-watch-sues-dhs-for-info-about-secret-service-protection-for-trump/?utm_source=deployer&utm_medium=email&utm_content=&utm_campaign=tipsheet&utm_term=members Conservative watchdog Judicial Watch on Tuesday announced that it sued the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for information regarding additional Secret Service protection requests for former President Donald Trump prior to the July 13 assassination attempt. The DHS allegedly repeatedly denied requests for more protection for Trump over the past two years, including rejecting requests for magnetometers and more security at large Trump rallies, per the Washington Post.
    WWW.JUDICIALWATCH.ORG
    Judicial Watch sues DHS for info about Secret Service protection for Trump - Judicial Watch
    “The Biden-Harris Secret Service lied about denying President Trump increased protection requests and is now trying to cover up that deadly scandal,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement shared with Just The News. “The Biden-Harris administration has yet to release one record about the Trump assassination attempt under FOIA – which is why Judicial Watch is now in federal court.”
    Like
    1
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 479 Visualizações
  • Judicial Watch: FBI Refuses to Release Trump Assassination Records

    https://www.judicialwatch.org/trump-assassination-records/
    Judicial Watch: FBI Refuses to Release Trump Assassination Records https://www.judicialwatch.org/trump-assassination-records/
    WWW.JUDICIALWATCH.ORG
    Judicial Watch: FBI Refuses to Release Trump Assassination Records - Judicial Watch
    (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) withheld information on a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for information about its coordination with the U.S. Secret Service regarding the July 13 Butler, PA, rally at which former President Trump was shot.
    Like
    Angry
    3
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 420 Visualizações
  • Judicial Watch Statement on the Trump Verdict
    https://www.judicialwatch.org/trump-verdict/

    (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton made the following statement regarding the unprecedented prosecution of President Donald Trump by Democrats in New York:

    Pure corruption. Judicial Watch denounces this absurd verdict and Soviet-style criminal proceeding that has so abused President Trump. What just happened to Trump up in New York is criminal.

    The guilty verdict against Trump is no surprise considering the rigged, kangaroo court proceedings run by a biased, conflicted judge and an unethical, politicized Democratic Party prosecution team. Today is a terrible day for the rule of law that will go down in infamy. This whole process is compromised, and this verdict should be overturned in an emergency fashion.

    The evidence shows that Trump committed no crimes, and this is a prosecution about “nothing.” This and other Democratic Party-political prosecutions of Trump are an abomination under law and are destabilizing to our nation.

    Judicial Watch will continue to expose in court the truth about these attacks on the rule of law, free and fair elections, and the U.S. Constitution. In the meantime, our elections have officially been compromised by this politicized prosecution.

    Judicial Watch has several Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits related to the prosecutorial abuse targeting Trump:

    In March 2024, Judicial Watch filed a Georgia Open Records Act lawsuit against District Attorney Fani Willis and Fulton County, Georgia, for records of any communication Willis and the county had with Special Counsel Jack Smith and the House January 6 Committee. The lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of Fulton County after Willis and the county denied having any responsive records.

    In February 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice asked a federal court to allow the agency to keep secret the names of top staffers working in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office that is targeting former President Donald Trump and other Americans.

    (Before his appointment to investigate and prosecute Trump, Specia Counsel Jack Smith previously was at the center of several controversial issues, the IRS scandal among them. In 2014, a Judicial Watch investigation revealed that top IRS officials had been in communication with Jack Smith’s then-Public Integrity Section about a plan to launch criminal investigations into conservative tax-exempt groups. Read more here.)

    In January 2024, Judicial Watch filed lawsuit against Fulton County, Georgia, for records regarding the hiring of Nathan Wade as a special prosecutor by District Attorney Fani Willis. Wade was hired to pursue unprecedented criminal investigations and prosecutions against former President Trump and others over the 2020 election disputes.

    In October 2023, Judicial Watch sued the DOJ for records and communications between the Office of U.S. Special Counsel Jack Smith and the Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney’s office regarding requests/receipt of federal funding/assistance in the investigation of former President Trump and his 18 codefendants in the Fulton County indictment of August 14, 2023. To date, the DOJ is refusing to confirm or deny the existence of records, claiming that to do so would interfere with enforcement proceedings. Judicial Watch’s litigation challenging this is continuing.

    Through the New York Freedom of Information Law, in July 2023, Judicial Watch received the engagement letter showing New York County District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg paid $900 per hour for partners and $500 per hour for associates to the Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher law firm for the purpose of suing Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) in an effort to shut down the House Judiciary Committee’s oversight investigation into Bragg’s unprecedented indictment of former President Donald Trump.
    Judicial Watch Statement on the Trump Verdict https://www.judicialwatch.org/trump-verdict/ (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton made the following statement regarding the unprecedented prosecution of President Donald Trump by Democrats in New York: Pure corruption. Judicial Watch denounces this absurd verdict and Soviet-style criminal proceeding that has so abused President Trump. What just happened to Trump up in New York is criminal. The guilty verdict against Trump is no surprise considering the rigged, kangaroo court proceedings run by a biased, conflicted judge and an unethical, politicized Democratic Party prosecution team. Today is a terrible day for the rule of law that will go down in infamy. This whole process is compromised, and this verdict should be overturned in an emergency fashion. The evidence shows that Trump committed no crimes, and this is a prosecution about “nothing.” This and other Democratic Party-political prosecutions of Trump are an abomination under law and are destabilizing to our nation. Judicial Watch will continue to expose in court the truth about these attacks on the rule of law, free and fair elections, and the U.S. Constitution. In the meantime, our elections have officially been compromised by this politicized prosecution. Judicial Watch has several Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits related to the prosecutorial abuse targeting Trump: In March 2024, Judicial Watch filed a Georgia Open Records Act lawsuit against District Attorney Fani Willis and Fulton County, Georgia, for records of any communication Willis and the county had with Special Counsel Jack Smith and the House January 6 Committee. The lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of Fulton County after Willis and the county denied having any responsive records. In February 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice asked a federal court to allow the agency to keep secret the names of top staffers working in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office that is targeting former President Donald Trump and other Americans. (Before his appointment to investigate and prosecute Trump, Specia Counsel Jack Smith previously was at the center of several controversial issues, the IRS scandal among them. In 2014, a Judicial Watch investigation revealed that top IRS officials had been in communication with Jack Smith’s then-Public Integrity Section about a plan to launch criminal investigations into conservative tax-exempt groups. Read more here.) In January 2024, Judicial Watch filed lawsuit against Fulton County, Georgia, for records regarding the hiring of Nathan Wade as a special prosecutor by District Attorney Fani Willis. Wade was hired to pursue unprecedented criminal investigations and prosecutions against former President Trump and others over the 2020 election disputes. In October 2023, Judicial Watch sued the DOJ for records and communications between the Office of U.S. Special Counsel Jack Smith and the Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney’s office regarding requests/receipt of federal funding/assistance in the investigation of former President Trump and his 18 codefendants in the Fulton County indictment of August 14, 2023. To date, the DOJ is refusing to confirm or deny the existence of records, claiming that to do so would interfere with enforcement proceedings. Judicial Watch’s litigation challenging this is continuing. Through the New York Freedom of Information Law, in July 2023, Judicial Watch received the engagement letter showing New York County District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg paid $900 per hour for partners and $500 per hour for associates to the Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher law firm for the purpose of suing Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) in an effort to shut down the House Judiciary Committee’s oversight investigation into Bragg’s unprecedented indictment of former President Donald Trump.
    WWW.JUDICIALWATCH.ORG
    Judicial Watch Statement on the Trump Verdict - Judicial Watch
    (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton made the following statement regarding the unprecedented prosecution of President Donald Trump by Democrats in New York:
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 2KB Visualizações
  • Fitton w/Lou Dobbs: The "Grand Conspiracy" against Trump—AND our Elections! ​

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXo54Wy1SnQ&t=6s
    Judicial Watch President @TomFitton appeared on @LouDobbsTonight to discuss the various legal cases against former President Trump, and more! SUPPORT OUR WORK https://www.judicialwatch.org/donate/... VISIT OUR WEBSITE http://www.judicialwatch.org

    Fitton w/Lou Dobbs: The "Grand Conspiracy" against Trump—AND our Elections! ​ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXo54Wy1SnQ&t=6s Judicial Watch President @TomFitton appeared on @LouDobbsTonight to discuss the various legal cases against former President Trump, and more! SUPPORT OUR WORK https://www.judicialwatch.org/donate/... VISIT OUR WEBSITE http://www.judicialwatch.org
    Like
    1
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 885 Visualizações
  • NPR is an arm of the SOROS WOKE cancer in our country and you pay for it. https://www.judicialwatch.org/nprs-new-ceo/?utm_source=deployer&utm_medium=email&utm_content=&utm_campaign=tipsheet&utm_term=members
    NPR is an arm of the SOROS WOKE cancer in our country and you pay for it. https://www.judicialwatch.org/nprs-new-ceo/?utm_source=deployer&utm_medium=email&utm_content=&utm_campaign=tipsheet&utm_term=members
    WWW.JUDICIALWATCH.ORG
    NPR’s New CEO Sits on Board of Soros-Funded Activist Group that Pushes for Censorship - Judicial Watch
    In a grim indicator of how news will be covered on taxpayer dime, the new head of the government-funded National Public Radio (NPR) is on the board of a leftwing activist organization called Center for Democracy and Technology that pushes for censorship and receives funding from George Soros’ Open Society Foundations. Her name is Katherine Maher, a former Wikimedia Foundation CEO, with liberal views publicly expressed throughout the years in her social media posts. In 2018, she called former President Donald Trump a racist in a post that has since been deleted, according to a mainstream newspaper report. A couple of years ago Maher shared a photo of herself in a “President Biden” campaign hat. In a 2021 video clip the new NPR chief describes the First Amendment as the top challenge in the fight against disinformation, a fictitious crisis created by the Biden administration to control information.
    Like
    2
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 509 Visualizações
Páginas impulsionada
Patrocinado

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here