• https://www.breitbart.com/2024-election/2024/06/25/congressional-report-cia-interfered-2020-election-colluded-biden-campaign-discredit-hunter-laptop-story/
    https://www.breitbart.com/2024-election/2024/06/25/congressional-report-cia-interfered-2020-election-colluded-biden-campaign-discredit-hunter-laptop-story/
    WWW.BREITBART.COM
    Congressional Report: CIA Interfered in 2020 Election, Conspired to Discredit Hunter Biden Laptop Story
    The CIA interfered in the 2020 election by colluding with the Biden campaign to discredit the Hunter Biden laptop story.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 10 Views
  • Biden acts like a dementia patient on the world stage, and desperate and delusional liberals think they can just use their Big Tech connections to scrub it entirely, like it never happens. It’s not surprising this would be their go-to tactic considering how well it worked for them during the pandemic and the run-up to the 2020 election when they managed to get the Hunter Biden laptop story buried, despite it being 100% true.
    https://newstarget.com/2024-06-19-tech-giants-censor-clips-biden-dementia.html
    Biden acts like a dementia patient on the world stage, and desperate and delusional liberals think they can just use their Big Tech connections to scrub it entirely, like it never happens. It’s not surprising this would be their go-to tactic considering how well it worked for them during the pandemic and the run-up to the 2020 election when they managed to get the Hunter Biden laptop story buried, despite it being 100% true. https://newstarget.com/2024-06-19-tech-giants-censor-clips-biden-dementia.html
    NEWSTARGET.COM
    White House calls on tech giants to censor all video clips of Joe Biden behaving like a dementia patient, claiming such videos are “fakes”
    Joe Biden’s displays of mental incompetence have become so egregious that his team is now calling on Big Tech firms to censor video clips in which his confusion is on full display. During a parachute display and skydiving demonstration at the G7 summit in Southern Italy last week, he can be seen wandering off from […]
    0 Comments 0 Shares 381 Views
  • They are trying to lock up Tina Peters for proving that the 2020 election was stolen.. Part 2
    They are trying to lock up Tina Peters for proving that the 2020 election was stolen.. Part 2
    0 Comments 1 Shares 101 Views 0
  • They are trying to lock up Tina Peters for proving that the 2020 election was stolen..
    They are trying to lock up Tina Peters for proving that the 2020 election was stolen..
    0 Comments 0 Shares 85 Views 0
  • Judicial Watch Statement on the Trump Verdict
    https://www.judicialwatch.org/trump-verdict/

    (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton made the following statement regarding the unprecedented prosecution of President Donald Trump by Democrats in New York:

    Pure corruption. Judicial Watch denounces this absurd verdict and Soviet-style criminal proceeding that has so abused President Trump. What just happened to Trump up in New York is criminal.

    The guilty verdict against Trump is no surprise considering the rigged, kangaroo court proceedings run by a biased, conflicted judge and an unethical, politicized Democratic Party prosecution team. Today is a terrible day for the rule of law that will go down in infamy. This whole process is compromised, and this verdict should be overturned in an emergency fashion.

    The evidence shows that Trump committed no crimes, and this is a prosecution about “nothing.” This and other Democratic Party-political prosecutions of Trump are an abomination under law and are destabilizing to our nation.

    Judicial Watch will continue to expose in court the truth about these attacks on the rule of law, free and fair elections, and the U.S. Constitution. In the meantime, our elections have officially been compromised by this politicized prosecution.

    Judicial Watch has several Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits related to the prosecutorial abuse targeting Trump:

    In March 2024, Judicial Watch filed a Georgia Open Records Act lawsuit against District Attorney Fani Willis and Fulton County, Georgia, for records of any communication Willis and the county had with Special Counsel Jack Smith and the House January 6 Committee. The lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of Fulton County after Willis and the county denied having any responsive records.

    In February 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice asked a federal court to allow the agency to keep secret the names of top staffers working in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office that is targeting former President Donald Trump and other Americans.

    (Before his appointment to investigate and prosecute Trump, Specia Counsel Jack Smith previously was at the center of several controversial issues, the IRS scandal among them. In 2014, a Judicial Watch investigation revealed that top IRS officials had been in communication with Jack Smith’s then-Public Integrity Section about a plan to launch criminal investigations into conservative tax-exempt groups. Read more here.)

    In January 2024, Judicial Watch filed lawsuit against Fulton County, Georgia, for records regarding the hiring of Nathan Wade as a special prosecutor by District Attorney Fani Willis. Wade was hired to pursue unprecedented criminal investigations and prosecutions against former President Trump and others over the 2020 election disputes.

    In October 2023, Judicial Watch sued the DOJ for records and communications between the Office of U.S. Special Counsel Jack Smith and the Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney’s office regarding requests/receipt of federal funding/assistance in the investigation of former President Trump and his 18 codefendants in the Fulton County indictment of August 14, 2023. To date, the DOJ is refusing to confirm or deny the existence of records, claiming that to do so would interfere with enforcement proceedings. Judicial Watch’s litigation challenging this is continuing.

    Through the New York Freedom of Information Law, in July 2023, Judicial Watch received the engagement letter showing New York County District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg paid $900 per hour for partners and $500 per hour for associates to the Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher law firm for the purpose of suing Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) in an effort to shut down the House Judiciary Committee’s oversight investigation into Bragg’s unprecedented indictment of former President Donald Trump.
    Judicial Watch Statement on the Trump Verdict https://www.judicialwatch.org/trump-verdict/ (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton made the following statement regarding the unprecedented prosecution of President Donald Trump by Democrats in New York: Pure corruption. Judicial Watch denounces this absurd verdict and Soviet-style criminal proceeding that has so abused President Trump. What just happened to Trump up in New York is criminal. The guilty verdict against Trump is no surprise considering the rigged, kangaroo court proceedings run by a biased, conflicted judge and an unethical, politicized Democratic Party prosecution team. Today is a terrible day for the rule of law that will go down in infamy. This whole process is compromised, and this verdict should be overturned in an emergency fashion. The evidence shows that Trump committed no crimes, and this is a prosecution about “nothing.” This and other Democratic Party-political prosecutions of Trump are an abomination under law and are destabilizing to our nation. Judicial Watch will continue to expose in court the truth about these attacks on the rule of law, free and fair elections, and the U.S. Constitution. In the meantime, our elections have officially been compromised by this politicized prosecution. Judicial Watch has several Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits related to the prosecutorial abuse targeting Trump: In March 2024, Judicial Watch filed a Georgia Open Records Act lawsuit against District Attorney Fani Willis and Fulton County, Georgia, for records of any communication Willis and the county had with Special Counsel Jack Smith and the House January 6 Committee. The lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of Fulton County after Willis and the county denied having any responsive records. In February 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice asked a federal court to allow the agency to keep secret the names of top staffers working in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office that is targeting former President Donald Trump and other Americans. (Before his appointment to investigate and prosecute Trump, Specia Counsel Jack Smith previously was at the center of several controversial issues, the IRS scandal among them. In 2014, a Judicial Watch investigation revealed that top IRS officials had been in communication with Jack Smith’s then-Public Integrity Section about a plan to launch criminal investigations into conservative tax-exempt groups. Read more here.) In January 2024, Judicial Watch filed lawsuit against Fulton County, Georgia, for records regarding the hiring of Nathan Wade as a special prosecutor by District Attorney Fani Willis. Wade was hired to pursue unprecedented criminal investigations and prosecutions against former President Trump and others over the 2020 election disputes. In October 2023, Judicial Watch sued the DOJ for records and communications between the Office of U.S. Special Counsel Jack Smith and the Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney’s office regarding requests/receipt of federal funding/assistance in the investigation of former President Trump and his 18 codefendants in the Fulton County indictment of August 14, 2023. To date, the DOJ is refusing to confirm or deny the existence of records, claiming that to do so would interfere with enforcement proceedings. Judicial Watch’s litigation challenging this is continuing. Through the New York Freedom of Information Law, in July 2023, Judicial Watch received the engagement letter showing New York County District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg paid $900 per hour for partners and $500 per hour for associates to the Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher law firm for the purpose of suing Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) in an effort to shut down the House Judiciary Committee’s oversight investigation into Bragg’s unprecedented indictment of former President Donald Trump.
    WWW.JUDICIALWATCH.ORG
    Judicial Watch Statement on the Trump Verdict - Judicial Watch
    (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton made the following statement regarding the unprecedented prosecution of President Donald Trump by Democrats in New York:
    0 Comments 0 Shares 983 Views
  • Three Liberal Supreme Court Justices Recused themselves from a Case Involving Overturning the 2020 Election —— Is it a Big Deal?
    Despite the hype… No.
    BACKSTORY
    • 2021, Roland Brunson filed a massive lawsuit against hundreds of members of Congress.
    —— The lawsuit claimed they violated their oaths of office by not investigating allegations of election fraud before certifying.
    https://rumble.com/v4z7teh-three-supreme-court-justices-recused-themselves-from-a-case-re-a-case-to-ov.html
    Three Liberal Supreme Court Justices Recused themselves from a Case Involving Overturning the 2020 Election —— Is it a Big Deal? Despite the hype… No. 🔴 BACKSTORY • 2021, Roland Brunson filed a massive lawsuit against hundreds of members of Congress. —— The lawsuit claimed they violated their oaths of office by not investigating allegations of election fraud before certifying. https://rumble.com/v4z7teh-three-supreme-court-justices-recused-themselves-from-a-case-re-a-case-to-ov.html
    0 Comments 0 Shares 362 Views
  • https://www.ntd.com/three-liberal-supreme-court-justices-recuse-themselves-in-lawsuit-over-2020-election-case_996062.html
    https://www.ntd.com/three-liberal-supreme-court-justices-recuse-themselves-in-lawsuit-over-2020-election-case_996062.html
    WWW.NTD.COM
    3 Liberal Supreme Court Justices Recuse Themselves in Lawsuit Over 2020 Election Case
    In a rare move, all three liberal Supreme Court justices recused themselves on May 28 from a case involving a lawsuit filed against them for rejecting a previous lawsuit that sought to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. In the case, the Supreme Court turned away a longshot bid by Raland J. Brunson […]
    0 Comments 0 Shares 189 Views
  • THE 2020 ELECTION WAS STOLEN, WE THE PEOPLE KNOW THIS NO MATTER HOW MANY PEOPLE THE SOROS BOUGHT DA'S ARREST...

    Two officials with Arizona attorney general's office served notice of his indictment in the Arizona 'fake electors' case, accusing him and other's of trying to overturn the 2020 election result in the case.
    'The mayor was completely unfazed and even laughed as he was handed the papers and drove away,' said an outraged attendee.
    THE 2020 ELECTION WAS STOLEN, WE THE PEOPLE KNOW THIS NO MATTER HOW MANY PEOPLE THE SOROS BOUGHT DA'S ARREST... Two officials with Arizona attorney general's office served notice of his indictment in the Arizona 'fake electors' case, accusing him and other's of trying to overturn the 2020 election result in the case. 'The mayor was completely unfazed and even laughed as he was handed the papers and drove away,' said an outraged attendee.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 497 Views 0
  • Watch: General Flynn Exposes Biden Political Attacks & 2020 Election Fraud With Chris Cuomo

    https://www.infowars.com/posts/watch-general-flynn-exposes-biden-political-attacks-2020-election-fraud-with-chris-cuomo/
    Watch: General Flynn Exposes Biden Political Attacks & 2020 Election Fraud With Chris Cuomo https://www.infowars.com/posts/watch-general-flynn-exposes-biden-political-attacks-2020-election-fraud-with-chris-cuomo/
    Like
    1
    1 Comments 1 Shares 363 Views
Sponsored

After a successful May, we are now funded 54% for June. Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here