OK, so... I went digging throughout the last 2 days. Yes, it took that long to find ONE so-called study into VAIDS (I found ONE study that sites were quoting, but it wasn't even studying VAIDS!), it wasn't comprehensive. Nor was the sample size, at 51, not large enough to make a visible difference. The study wasn't even done by a reputable university. Or published by a reputable journal. It's the sample size primarily that brings the study into question. And the study didn't sample adults, it only sampled children.
Does it confirm VAIDS? Not only NO, but HELL NO. Too small of a sample size at 51, and it only sampled children.
So, VAIDS is debunked for the time being.
Does it confirm VAIDS? Not only NO, but HELL NO. Too small of a sample size at 51, and it only sampled children.
So, VAIDS is debunked for the time being.
OK, so... I went digging throughout the last 2 days. Yes, it took that long to find ONE so-called study into VAIDS (I found ONE study that sites were quoting, but it wasn't even studying VAIDS!), it wasn't comprehensive. Nor was the sample size, at 51, not large enough to make a visible difference. The study wasn't even done by a reputable university. Or published by a reputable journal. It's the sample size primarily that brings the study into question. And the study didn't sample adults, it only sampled children.
Does it confirm VAIDS? Not only NO, but HELL NO. Too small of a sample size at 51, and it only sampled children.
So, VAIDS is debunked for the time being.