How many EUA's does it take to rescind the EUA's? The reason there are all these Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA) solutions is because there is a created 'Perception' that there is no 'Therapy' for COVID-19. Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine have been attacked and disavowed because they are a 'Therapy' solution that is sold generically. EUA's allow the traditional safety studies to be bypassed. It is a cost savings for the pharmaceuticals. They can get product to market without the traditional safety protocols and trial regimes. The EUA also provides liability protection. Thus violating the 1st Amendment "to petition the government for a redress of grievances". Translated: Identifying 'safe' therapy for COVID-19 should effectively rescind the EUA's. Historically. FDA has pulled every drug that has resulted in up to 25 deaths. Why are the mRNA gene therapy drugs still available under EUA? Shouldn't a physician still need to approve the use of these gene therapy's given how dangerous they are? It is EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION. Not general public use. From the linked FDA website: During a public health emergency, the FDA can use its Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) authority to allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products, to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases when certain criteria are met, including that there are NO ADEQUATE, APPROVED, 'AND' AVAILABLE ALTERNATIVES. Also Note: "UNAPPROVED medical products, or UNAPPROVED uses of approved medical products, to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases" Why hasn't Ivermectin or Hydroxychoroquine been granted an EUA for COVID-19? https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19-emergency-use-authorizations-medical-devices/faqs-emergency-use-authorizations-euas-medical-devices-during-covid-19-pandemic #Vaccines, #Mandates, #EUA, #Invermectin, #Hydroxychloroquine