https://www.intelligence.gov/index.php/ic-on-the-record-database/results/1008-release-of-documents-related-to-the-temporary-retention,-use,-and-disclosure-of-unlawful-fisa- September 11, 2020 https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/120919-examination.pdf https://www.fisc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/FISC%20Declassifed%20Order%2016-1182%2017-52%2017-375%2017-679%20%20200123.pdf Specifically, 50 U.S.C. § 1809(a)(2) and 1827(a)(2) criminalizes the intentional use and disclosure of information acquired by unauthorized electronic surveillance or physical search that was conducted under the color of a FISA authorization. In prior opinions, however, the FISC recognized a limited exception to the language of 50 U.S.C. § 1809(a)(2), for “actions that are necessary to mitigate or prevent the very harms at which [this section] is addressed,” such as instances where use or disclosure may be “necessary to avoid similar instances of overcollections.” ODNI previously reviewed and released to the public these earlier FISC decisions, which are available here and here . https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/EFF-FOIA-Jan-31-Doc-10.pdf https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/EFF-FOIA-Jan-31-Doc-11.pdf https://twitter.com/CBS_Herridge/status/1306313553616556036 Catherine Herridge Sep 16 #FISA Recently released opinion from FISA court contains noteworthy disclosures. It lays out ground rules for using information from “unlawful" surveillance @carterwpage for FOIA, civil litigation by Page, IG + Durham. "The government acknowledges that there were material omissions + the Court has found violations of the government's duty of candor in ALL FOUR (my emphasis) applications." All 4 fisa warrants had violations. If any evidence gathered during that surveillance was used for any of mueller's convictions, those convictions should be overturned.