AS I EXPLAINED IN THE INTRODUCTION TO THE OTHER VIDEO, PREVIOUS TO THIS ONE, THE CENSORSHIP MACHINE TRIES TO FIND NEW WAYS TO BLOCK THE SPREAD OF CERTAIN MATERIAL, EVEN IN SITES THAT PERMIT A WIDER DEGREE OF FREE EXPRESSION, JUST LIKE 'X' (FORMERLY TWITTER) NOW OWNED BY ELON MUSK AND OPEN TO AN ALMOST UNLIMITED FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION NEVER SEEN BEFORE IN THAT PLATFORM. IT USED TO BE THAT CERTAIN MATERIALS WERE SUBJECTED TO "FACT CHECKERS", WITH NOTES DECLARING CERTAIN POST AS 'FALSE INFORMATION OR FAKE NEWS' AND REFERRING THE READERS TO SOURCES OF "REAL", "ACCURATE", AND "OBJECTIVE" INFORMATION LIKE 'CNN', 'THE NEW YORK TIMES', 'AP' OR GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. THE OLD 'FACT CHECKERS' ON 'X' (TWITTER), HAVE BEEN REPLACED WITH "READERS ADDED CONTENT". IT IS BASICALLY THE SAME WITH A DIFFERENT NAME. A NOTE UNDER A POST TRYING TO DEBUNK OR DENY THE VERACITY OF THE INFORMATION AND THEY REFER THE READERS TO THE "GOOD SOURCES", JUST LIKE THE FACT CHECKERS USED TO DO. THIS METHOD IS VERY EFFECTIVE TO STOP THE SPREAD OF INFORMATION, SINCE ONCE THE READER SEES THOSE NOTES, HE/SHE REFRAINS FROM REPOSTING IT, IN FACT, STOPPING THAT INFORMATION RIGHT THERE. THAT WAS THE CASE WITH THIS POST AND VIDEO OF A FORMER STUDENT OF KAMALA HARRIS RUNNING MATE, CLAIMING HE WAS SEXUALLY ASSAULTED BY TIM WALZ IN 1997. THE "READERS ADDED CONTENT" DESCRIBES THE VIDEO AS DONE BY 'AI' AND REFERS THE READERS TO GOVERNMENT SOURCES FOR TRUTHFUL INFORMATION. I DON'T KNOW WHAT REALLY HAPPENED TO THE GUY OR HOW THE VIDEO WAS DONE BUT IF THE READERS REALLY WANT TO QUESTION THE INFORMATION AND POST A DIFFERENT VERSION OF THE FACTS, LET THE READERS DO IT. WE DO NOT NEED NOTES POSTED BY GOVERNMENT ABOUT WHAT TO BELIEVE OR WHAT TO THINK. WATCH IT AND JUDGE FOR YOURSELF WITHOUT CENSORS INTERFERENCE.