• https://www.sgtreport.com/2024/03/mhra-pfizer-and-uk-officials-accused-of-misconduct-fraud-and-gross-negligent-manslaughter-in-new-criminal-investigation/
    This is in the UK (for now). We need similar proceedings to happen here in the United States. On March 8, 2024, a new criminal investigation was launched against Pfizer, MHRA and UK officials. The investigating officer, Mark Sexton of the Acton Police Station in London, has charged UK officials with misconduct in public office, misfeasance in public office, fraud by false representation, corporate manslaughter and gross negligent manslaughter. Officer Sexton is backed by a team of lawyers, including Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss and Dr. Sam White.
    Under crime number 6029679/21, the investigation specifically seeks to hold accountable a member of the British Parliament, Sir Graham Stuart Brady, and a British doctor, Dame June Munro Raine, who serves as the Chief Executive Officer of the UK’s Medicine and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). This investigation is part of a much larger investigation that Officer Sexton submitted back in 2021. Three years ago, Officer Sexton submitted 1100 pages of evidence to Hammersmith Criminal Investigation Department, which was signed off by two detectives.
    Mark Sexton writes that the investigation is twenty-seven months in progress since the original crime report was released. He says, “They can’t whitewash this one because too many people know what’s going on and the excess deaths cannot be hidden or ignored any longer.” Excess deaths in the UK are driven by cardiovascular events that are tied to the covid-19 vaccine. The Metropolitan Police of Greater London, which is tasked with protecting members of the royal family, members of the government, and other public health officials, is trying to shut the case down. However, over 400 expert witnesses, whistleblowers and victims stand to testify against the criminal actions taken by pharmaceutical companies and government officials over the past four years. At least 40 world experts are prepared to give evidence of criminality. One of the expert witnesses is former biotech research executive, Dr. Michael Yeadon. Yeadon’s letter to Ben Bates of the UK metropolitan police is being shared widely. Yeadon is a former Vice President for Pfizer. For several years, Yeadon led Pfizer’s global research in the field of Allergic & Respiratory Disease Therapeutics, and knows how these interventions are made and what they are for.
    Yeadon lays out verifiable evidence that the covid-19 “vaccines” weren’t vaccines at all, but were intentionally formulated to cause mass harm and then unlawfully mandated on populations. He refutes the existence of an alleged “global pandemic” and documents the harms caused by government lockdowns and other restrictions that coerced populations to take part in a deadly experiment. The illusion of a pandemic was created by the misuse and abuse of a clinical diagnostic test called PCR. Governments funded PCR fraud and erected a web of deceitful financial incentives, encouraging hospital systems and laboratories to use high cycle thresholds on new PCR tests. This created a wave of artificial positives for an alleged disease that there was no symptom-specific diagnostics for. The illnesses that were presented in 2020 were not treated properly; therefore, the lack of early antiviral treatment, misdiagnoses, prescription error, ventilator-associated pneumonia and various forms of medical malfeasance and malpractice was behind the deaths observed in hospitals in 2020 and beyond.
    Yeadon writes, “The heart of this entire deception is the incorrect belief that PCR is nearly flawless and so a positive result means that a person ‘had covid.’ There is no such disease. Not one symptom is unique to the claimed new disease.”
    https://www.sgtreport.com/2024/03/mhra-pfizer-and-uk-officials-accused-of-misconduct-fraud-and-gross-negligent-manslaughter-in-new-criminal-investigation/ This is in the UK (for now). We need similar proceedings to happen here in the United States. On March 8, 2024, a new criminal investigation was launched against Pfizer, MHRA and UK officials. The investigating officer, Mark Sexton of the Acton Police Station in London, has charged UK officials with misconduct in public office, misfeasance in public office, fraud by false representation, corporate manslaughter and gross negligent manslaughter. Officer Sexton is backed by a team of lawyers, including Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss and Dr. Sam White. Under crime number 6029679/21, the investigation specifically seeks to hold accountable a member of the British Parliament, Sir Graham Stuart Brady, and a British doctor, Dame June Munro Raine, who serves as the Chief Executive Officer of the UK’s Medicine and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). This investigation is part of a much larger investigation that Officer Sexton submitted back in 2021. Three years ago, Officer Sexton submitted 1100 pages of evidence to Hammersmith Criminal Investigation Department, which was signed off by two detectives. Mark Sexton writes that the investigation is twenty-seven months in progress since the original crime report was released. He says, “They can’t whitewash this one because too many people know what’s going on and the excess deaths cannot be hidden or ignored any longer.” Excess deaths in the UK are driven by cardiovascular events that are tied to the covid-19 vaccine. The Metropolitan Police of Greater London, which is tasked with protecting members of the royal family, members of the government, and other public health officials, is trying to shut the case down. However, over 400 expert witnesses, whistleblowers and victims stand to testify against the criminal actions taken by pharmaceutical companies and government officials over the past four years. At least 40 world experts are prepared to give evidence of criminality. One of the expert witnesses is former biotech research executive, Dr. Michael Yeadon. Yeadon’s letter to Ben Bates of the UK metropolitan police is being shared widely. Yeadon is a former Vice President for Pfizer. For several years, Yeadon led Pfizer’s global research in the field of Allergic & Respiratory Disease Therapeutics, and knows how these interventions are made and what they are for. Yeadon lays out verifiable evidence that the covid-19 “vaccines” weren’t vaccines at all, but were intentionally formulated to cause mass harm and then unlawfully mandated on populations. He refutes the existence of an alleged “global pandemic” and documents the harms caused by government lockdowns and other restrictions that coerced populations to take part in a deadly experiment. The illusion of a pandemic was created by the misuse and abuse of a clinical diagnostic test called PCR. Governments funded PCR fraud and erected a web of deceitful financial incentives, encouraging hospital systems and laboratories to use high cycle thresholds on new PCR tests. This created a wave of artificial positives for an alleged disease that there was no symptom-specific diagnostics for. The illnesses that were presented in 2020 were not treated properly; therefore, the lack of early antiviral treatment, misdiagnoses, prescription error, ventilator-associated pneumonia and various forms of medical malfeasance and malpractice was behind the deaths observed in hospitals in 2020 and beyond. Yeadon writes, “The heart of this entire deception is the incorrect belief that PCR is nearly flawless and so a positive result means that a person ‘had covid.’ There is no such disease. Not one symptom is unique to the claimed new disease.”
    0 Comments 0 Shares 865 Views
  • As a member of the Rockefeller Commission to investigate the CIA (set up by President Gerald Ford), Ronald Reagan joined in its unanimous recommendation that: "Presidents should refrain from directing the CIA to perform what are essentially internal security tasks. The CIA should resist any efforts, whatever their origin, to involve it again in such improper activities." The Commission, which included CIA collaborators, was only asking the President and the CIA to abide by the National Security Act of 1947. The Act prohibits the CIA from having "police, subpoena, law-enforcement powers, or internal security functions."

    On December 4, 1981, President Reagan signed Executive Order 12333 which, while purportedly in accord with the National Security Act of 1947, allows the CIA to engage tn police functions and domestic covert operations. Aptly described by the New York Times as the "Son of Operation CHAOS" the Executive Order was denounced by former FBI agent, Representative Don Edwards (D.-Ca.): "It still puts the CIA smack into secretly operating within the United States... it permits them to enter into arrangements with state and local police... and Americans overseas are wide open to surveillance, regardless of any connections to foreign governments or criminal activity."

    In addition to this major enhancement of CIA powers, the administration has initiated measures severely restricting news-gathering about government operations. According to the International Press Institute, these restrictions pose a "potentially serious loss of public accountability." More recently, it has been reported that Reagan is set to sign an executive order on the Freedom of Information Act which would all but exempt the CIA from compliance with requests for information. Certainly, these measures undermine U.S. democracy, but the full import of Reagan's CIA actions can perhaps best be understood by looking at recent history.
    As a member of the Rockefeller Commission to investigate the CIA (set up by President Gerald Ford), Ronald Reagan joined in its unanimous recommendation that: "Presidents should refrain from directing the CIA to perform what are essentially internal security tasks. The CIA should resist any efforts, whatever their origin, to involve it again in such improper activities." The Commission, which included CIA collaborators, was only asking the President and the CIA to abide by the National Security Act of 1947. The Act prohibits the CIA from having "police, subpoena, law-enforcement powers, or internal security functions." On December 4, 1981, President Reagan signed Executive Order 12333 which, while purportedly in accord with the National Security Act of 1947, allows the CIA to engage tn police functions and domestic covert operations. Aptly described by the New York Times as the "Son of Operation CHAOS" the Executive Order was denounced by former FBI agent, Representative Don Edwards (D.-Ca.): "It still puts the CIA smack into secretly operating within the United States... it permits them to enter into arrangements with state and local police... and Americans overseas are wide open to surveillance, regardless of any connections to foreign governments or criminal activity." In addition to this major enhancement of CIA powers, the administration has initiated measures severely restricting news-gathering about government operations. According to the International Press Institute, these restrictions pose a "potentially serious loss of public accountability." More recently, it has been reported that Reagan is set to sign an executive order on the Freedom of Information Act which would all but exempt the CIA from compliance with requests for information. Certainly, these measures undermine U.S. democracy, but the full import of Reagan's CIA actions can perhaps best be understood by looking at recent history.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1395 Views
  • German approve the partial legalization of cannabis in the country
    On February 23rd, 2024, German approve the partial legalization of cannabis in the country. The voting breakdown and the parties involved. If Germany passes in the parliament the cannabis bill, it would join the growing ranks of European countries 407 parliamentarians voted in favor of the legislation put forward by the ruling.

    On February 23rd, 2024, the German Bundestag took a significant step by approving the partial legalization of cannabis in the country. Here’s a breakdown of the voting and the parties involved:

    407 parliamentarians voted in favor of the legislation, which was put forward by the ruling coalition. This coalition comprises the following parties:

    Social Democratic Party (SPD): is a center-left party.

    Free Democratic Party (FDP): A business-focused liberal party.

    Greens: An environmentalist party.

    226 lawmakers rejected the bill, while four MPs abstained from voting.

    The new law aims to facilitate the responsible use of cannabis by allowing limited legal possession and cultivation of the drug, subject to numerous rules and restrictions. However, opinions in Germany remain divided, with approximately 47% of respondents expressing some level of support for the legislation, while 42% are somewhat or completely against it.

    If Germany successfully passes this cannabis bill in parliament, it will join other European countries that have either legalized or decriminalized cannabis usage. For instance:

    The Netherlands is well-known for its cannabis-tolerant approach, with coffee shops allowing possession of up to 5 grams of cannabis (though cultivation, sale, and possession remain illegal).

    Malta has relatively tolerant laws, permitting adults to carry up to 7 grams of cannabis and grow up to four plants at home.

    Luxembourg allows public possession of cannabis and cultivation of up to four plants.

    Portugal treats cannabis consumption and small amounts as an administrative offense.

    Spain permits private consumption of up to 100 grams but prohibits public use.

    Several EU countries allow medical use of marijuana and related products.
    German approve the partial legalization of cannabis in the country On February 23rd, 2024, German approve the partial legalization of cannabis in the country. The voting breakdown and the parties involved. If Germany passes in the parliament the cannabis bill, it would join the growing ranks of European countries 407 parliamentarians voted in favor of the legislation put forward by the ruling. On February 23rd, 2024, the German Bundestag took a significant step by approving the partial legalization of cannabis in the country. Here’s a breakdown of the voting and the parties involved: 407 parliamentarians voted in favor of the legislation, which was put forward by the ruling coalition. This coalition comprises the following parties: Social Democratic Party (SPD): is a center-left party. Free Democratic Party (FDP): A business-focused liberal party. Greens: An environmentalist party. 226 lawmakers rejected the bill, while four MPs abstained from voting. The new law aims to facilitate the responsible use of cannabis by allowing limited legal possession and cultivation of the drug, subject to numerous rules and restrictions. However, opinions in Germany remain divided, with approximately 47% of respondents expressing some level of support for the legislation, while 42% are somewhat or completely against it. If Germany successfully passes this cannabis bill in parliament, it will join other European countries that have either legalized or decriminalized cannabis usage. For instance: The Netherlands is well-known for its cannabis-tolerant approach, with coffee shops allowing possession of up to 5 grams of cannabis (though cultivation, sale, and possession remain illegal). Malta has relatively tolerant laws, permitting adults to carry up to 7 grams of cannabis and grow up to four plants at home. Luxembourg allows public possession of cannabis and cultivation of up to four plants. Portugal treats cannabis consumption and small amounts as an administrative offense. Spain permits private consumption of up to 100 grams but prohibits public use. Several EU countries allow medical use of marijuana and related products.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1327 Views
  • A friend's Facebook profile was flagged and has restrictions on his account for two pictures he posted in his stories. One was a meme that used a picture of Hunter Biden from his own laptop, and the other was a real photo of the trans shooter manifesto that shot up that Christian school of little kids. Liberals are such hypocrites!

    Do with that what you will.
    https://imgflip.com/i/8gpb5h
    A friend's Facebook profile was flagged and has restrictions on his account for two pictures he posted in his stories. One was a meme that used a picture of Hunter Biden from his own laptop, and the other was a real photo of the trans shooter manifesto that shot up that Christian school of little kids. Liberals are such hypocrites! Do with that what you will. 🤷 https://imgflip.com/i/8gpb5h
    0 Comments 0 Shares 677 Views
  • Lake-Effect Snow from Great Lakes Reaches Unprecedented Low in Mid-February


    The Great Lakes region is known for its abundant snowfall during the winter months, with lake-effect snow contributing significantly to the overall snowpack. However, this year has been different, with coverage of the lakes reaching a historic low in mid-February snowfall during the winter months, with lake-effect snow contributing significantly to the overall snowpack. However, this year, the ice coverage on the lakes has reached an unprecedented low in mid-February, with the average temperature across the Great Lakes basin being 36°F (2°C) above normal in January.

    The decreased ice coverage has potential consequences for the region's ecosystems and economy

    The lack of ice cover can be attributed to warmer-than-usual temperatures in the region, which have prevented the formation of new ice and caused existing ice to melt earlier than usual. In fact, the average temperature across the Great Lakes basin was 36°F (2°C) above normal in January, making it the warmest January on record.

    While some may welcome the absence of ice, it has significant implications for the environment and local communities. Ice plays an important role in regulating water levels, supporting fish populations, and providing habitat for wildlife. Additionally, the lack of ice cover can lead to increased evaporation, potentially affecting water supplies and shipping operations.

    The decrease in ice coverage also impacts recreational activities such as ice fishing, snowmobiling, and skiing, which are popular pastimes in the region. Many businesses that rely on these activities have suffered losses due to the unseasonably warm weather.

    However, not everyone is disappointed by the lack of ice. Shippers and cargo operators are benefiting from the open waters, as they can navigate the lakes more easily without having to worry about ice restrictions.

    Despite the current conditions, it's important to note that ice coverage can fluctuate rapidly, and there's still a possibility of ice forming later in the season. The NOAA forecast suggests that ice coverage could rebound slightly in the coming weeks, but it's unlikely to reach historical averages.

    In conclusion, while the unprecedented low ice coverage on the Great Lakes may bring some benefits to certain industries, it raises concerns about the long-term effects of climate change on the region's ecosystems and economy. As temperatures continue to rise, it's essential to monitor the situation closely and take steps to mitigate any negative consequences.

    Lake-Effect Snow from Great Lakes Reaches Unprecedented Low in Mid-February The Great Lakes region is known for its abundant snowfall during the winter months, with lake-effect snow contributing significantly to the overall snowpack. However, this year has been different, with coverage of the lakes reaching a historic low in mid-February snowfall during the winter months, with lake-effect snow contributing significantly to the overall snowpack. However, this year, the ice coverage on the lakes has reached an unprecedented low in mid-February, with the average temperature across the Great Lakes basin being 36°F (2°C) above normal in January. The decreased ice coverage has potential consequences for the region's ecosystems and economy The lack of ice cover can be attributed to warmer-than-usual temperatures in the region, which have prevented the formation of new ice and caused existing ice to melt earlier than usual. In fact, the average temperature across the Great Lakes basin was 36°F (2°C) above normal in January, making it the warmest January on record. While some may welcome the absence of ice, it has significant implications for the environment and local communities. Ice plays an important role in regulating water levels, supporting fish populations, and providing habitat for wildlife. Additionally, the lack of ice cover can lead to increased evaporation, potentially affecting water supplies and shipping operations. The decrease in ice coverage also impacts recreational activities such as ice fishing, snowmobiling, and skiing, which are popular pastimes in the region. Many businesses that rely on these activities have suffered losses due to the unseasonably warm weather. However, not everyone is disappointed by the lack of ice. Shippers and cargo operators are benefiting from the open waters, as they can navigate the lakes more easily without having to worry about ice restrictions. Despite the current conditions, it's important to note that ice coverage can fluctuate rapidly, and there's still a possibility of ice forming later in the season. The NOAA forecast suggests that ice coverage could rebound slightly in the coming weeks, but it's unlikely to reach historical averages. In conclusion, while the unprecedented low ice coverage on the Great Lakes may bring some benefits to certain industries, it raises concerns about the long-term effects of climate change on the region's ecosystems and economy. As temperatures continue to rise, it's essential to monitor the situation closely and take steps to mitigate any negative consequences.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1717 Views
  • @Weiss_Drache
    Considering the Hatch Act most of congress should be in prison awaiting trial then execution.
    They specifically exempted themselves because most would have hanged otherwise.

    Except for the President and Vice President, all federal civilian executive branch employees are covered by the Hatch Act, including employees of the U.S. Postal Service. Even part-time employees are covered by the Act, and all employees continue to be covered while on annual leave, sick leave, leave without pay, or furlough. However, employees who work on an occasional or irregular basis, or who are special government employees, as defined in title 18 U.S.C. § 202(a), are subject to the restrictions only when they are engaged in government business. Federal employees fall within two categories under the Hatch Act, Further Restricted and Less Restricted.​

    Then see the original 13th Amendment. From 1812, 12 of 13 states ratified the Amendment.

    "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."
    @Weiss_Drache Considering the Hatch Act most of congress should be in prison awaiting trial then execution. They specifically exempted themselves because most would have hanged otherwise. Except for the President and Vice President, all federal civilian executive branch employees are covered by the Hatch Act, including employees of the U.S. Postal Service. Even part-time employees are covered by the Act, and all employees continue to be covered while on annual leave, sick leave, leave without pay, or furlough. However, employees who work on an occasional or irregular basis, or who are special government employees, as defined in title 18 U.S.C. § 202(a), are subject to the restrictions only when they are engaged in government business. Federal employees fall within two categories under the Hatch Act, Further Restricted and Less Restricted.​ Then see the original 13th Amendment. From 1812, 12 of 13 states ratified the Amendment. "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."
    0 Comments 0 Shares 747 Views
  • https://medforth.biz/taliban-imposes-sharia-restrictions-on-single-afghan-women-bars-access-to-employment-travel-healthcare-if-unmarried-or-have-no-male-guardian/
    https://medforth.biz/taliban-imposes-sharia-restrictions-on-single-afghan-women-bars-access-to-employment-travel-healthcare-if-unmarried-or-have-no-male-guardian/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 664 Views
  • https://medforth.biz/taliban-imposes-sharia-restrictions-on-single-afghan-women-bars-access-to-employment-travel-healthcare-if-unmarried-or-have-no-male-guardian/
    https://medforth.biz/taliban-imposes-sharia-restrictions-on-single-afghan-women-bars-access-to-employment-travel-healthcare-if-unmarried-or-have-no-male-guardian/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 646 Views
  • https://medforth.biz/transgender-disc-golfer-wins-settlement-forcing-professional-association-to-drop-new-restrictions-on-male-participation-in-womens-categories/
    https://medforth.biz/transgender-disc-golfer-wins-settlement-forcing-professional-association-to-drop-new-restrictions-on-male-participation-in-womens-categories/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 844 Views
  • https://medforth.biz/transgender-disc-golfer-wins-settlement-forcing-professional-association-to-drop-new-restrictions-on-male-participation-in-womens-categories/
    https://medforth.biz/transgender-disc-golfer-wins-settlement-forcing-professional-association-to-drop-new-restrictions-on-male-participation-in-womens-categories/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 935 Views
More Results