Today is Election Day! Tonight from 7pm EST until a winner is hopefully declared, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori present Election Night Coverage with results as they come in. Listen to it on https://rspradio1.com Click LISTEN LIVE.

This is MSNBC Giving its Viewers a Green Light to Kill Trump and his Supporters In its coverage of Donald Trump’s recent rally at Madison Square Garden in New York City, MSNBC openly compared it to a Nazi rally from 85 years ago when those in support of Adolph Hitler similarly packed the stadium in what was then called a “pro-America” rally. “That jamboree happening right now – you see it there on your screen – in that place is particularly chilling because in 1939, more than 20,000 supporters of a different fascist leader, Adolph Hitler, packed the Garden for a so-called ‘pro-America’ rally, a rally where speakers voiced antisemitic rhetoric from a stage draped with Nazi banners,” the MSNBC host said over a livestream of Trump supporters filling the venue. “When a Jewish protester rushed the stage, The Associated Press reported, “Instantly, a dozen or more Storm Troopers set upon him, knocking him down and beating him as he held his head in his arms … Most of his clothing was torn from his body. Later, he was booked for disorderly conduct.” Trump is perhaps the greatest ally Israel has ever had; hence the lies of the radical left wing and their biased rhetoric. Don't ask me to "stand down" on my rhetoric against them. There are 2 kinds of people in this life. You are either evil or good. There is no middle ground. If your deeds show you are inherently evil, you have forfeited your right to live. If you threaten me, my family, or those I support politically; you have given me license to put you down like the rabid animals you have displayed yourselves to be. https://rumble.com/v5ls682-this-is-msnbc-giving-its-viewers-a-green-light-to-kiii-trump-and-his-suppor.html

https://www.rebelnews.com/offside_rugby_gender_bender_wants_to_silence_rebel_news_coverage_of_his_behaviour

Who’s on First & in What Percentage Application of Diverse “Other Insurance” Clauses Insurers Protected Insured and Litigated Their Differences Post 4920 Two insurance companies- Gemini and Zurich- asked the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal to determine what share of a $2 million settlement each is required to pay. The district court entered judgment for Gemini, ordering that Zurich pay $500,000 plus prejudgment interest. Both parties appealed, with Gemini seeking another $500,000 and Zurich challenging the award of prejudgment interest. In Gemini Insurance Company v. Zurich American Insurance Company, No. 22-13495, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit (October 23, 2024) the competing “other insurance clauses” were resolved. FACTS After the death of Josue Vallejo, who was struck by a tractor-trailer operated by an employee of FSR Trucking, Inc two of three insurers disputed what proportion of the settlement each should pay. Zurich insured FSR, through its coverage of Commercial, for $1 million. Gemini also insured FSR for $3 million. The Vallejo claim settled for $3 million, of which Gemini contributed $2 million. Ryder’s insurance company, which is not a party to this appeal, contributed the other $1 million. Gemini and Zurich agree that they each owe a share of the $2 million, but dispute how much each one must pay. Under Gemini’s theory, they each owe $1 million. Under Zurich’s theory, they each owe their pro rata share, which is $500,000 for Zurich and $1.5 million for Gemini. The different theories of coverage turn on the application of the two policies’ “other insurance” clauses, which generally function to apportion coverage when there is overlapping insurance. Gemini argues that its policy is excess to Zurich’s, while Zurich argues that the policies attach at the same level and thus trigger pro rata contribution. Gemini sued Zurich for a declaratory judgment in its favor and an award of $1 million plus interest under claims of contractual subrogation or equitable subrogation/contribution. Zurich tendered $500,000 to Gemini to satisfy its pro rata share. Gemini, however, continued to litigate for the other $500,000 plus interest on the entire amount. Gemini appealed the District Court’s ruling in favor of Zurich and sought to obtain the other $500,000. ANALYSIS In Florida, where more than one insurer’s policy provides coverage for a loss, as the parties agree is the case here, it is appropriate to review the insurance contracts to see if the documents address the ‘ranking’ or contribution of other insurers. The Other Insurance Clauses Gemini’s “other insurance” clause provides: “This insurance is excess over and shall not contribute with any of the other insurance, whether primary, excess, contingent or on any other basis. This condition will not apply to insurance specifically written as excess over this policy.” Zurich’s “other insurance” clause is slightly different. “When this Coverage Form and any other Coverage Form or policy covers on the same basis, either excess or primary, we will pay only our share. Our share is the proportion that the Limit of Insurance of our Coverage Form bears to the total of the limits of all the Coverage Forms and policies covering on the same basis. Interpretation of the “Other Insurance” Clauses Where two insurance policies contain excess insurance clauses the clauses are deemed mutually repugnant and both insurers become primary and share the loss on a pro rata basis in accordance with their policy limits. Zurich argued, and the district court agreed, that both policies contain excess clauses such as pro rata contribution results. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals sided with Gemini because when two policies containing conflicting “other insurance” or excess [uninsured/underinsured motorist] clauses. In sum an “other insurance” clause containing the phrase “we will pay the proportion of damages payable as excess” means that the clause was pro rata, even though it also characterized itself as an excess clause. Moreover, the Eleventh Circuit concluded both policies were primary. The Eleventh Circuit reversed the district court’s resolution of the cross-motions for summary judgment with regard to the amount of contribution and remanded the case for entry of judgment in favor of Gemini for the principal amount of $1,000,000, with the understanding that Zurich has already paid half of that sum. Upon entry of the amended final judgment on remand, Gemini will be the prevailing party. When a verdict liquidates damages on a plaintiff’s out-of-pocket, pecuniary losses, plaintiff is entitled, as a matter of law, to prejudgment interest at the statutory rate from the date of that loss. The Eleventh Circuit reversed the district court’s resolution of the cross-motions for summary judgment and remanded for the court to enter judgment in favor of Gemini in the principal amount of $1,000,000 understanding that Zurich has already paid $500,000. It also affirmed the award of prejudgment interest on the first $500,000 and direct the court to award Gemini prejudgment interest on the second $500,000 from February 7, 2019, until the date of the amended final judgment. ZALMA OPINION The three insurers of the defendant did the right thing by protecting the insured and then resolving their dispute over the share owed in court. Although insurance companies, generally, should not sue each other. “Other Insurance” clauses invariably raise disputes between insurers and often cause hardship to the insured. In this case Gemini, Zurich and an unnamed insurer put up the $3 million to settle and then Gemini and Zurich sued to clarify who owed what. The Eleventh Circuit found that the District Court was wrong because interpreting the competing “other insurance” clauses should have resulted in a finding that both Gemini and Zurich were primary insurers and each owed $1 million of the settlement and Zurich owed Gemini $500,000 plus interest. (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc. Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos. Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk

Judicial Watch sues Oregon to force state to remove ineligible voters from voter rolls https://justthenews.com/nation/states/judicial-watch-sues-oregon-force-state-remove-ineligible-voters-voter-roll The lawsuit targets Oregon Secretary of State LaVonne Griffin-Valade, and claims the state has the "highest known inactive registration rate of any state in the nation," according to Judicial Watch. Conservative watchdog Judicial Watch on Wednesday announced a lawsuit against the state of Oregon, that would force it to remove ineligible voters from its voter rolls, as mandated by the National Voter Registration Act. The voting act requires states to make a "reasonable effort" to remove voters who have either died or changed residences from their voter rolls. The voters are removed if they fail to respond to address confirmation notices, and do not vote in two consecutive federal general elections. The lawsuit targets Oregon Secretary of State LaVonne Griffin-Valade, and claims the state has the "highest known inactive registration rate of any state in the nation," according to a Judicial Watch news release. The lawsuit alleges that 29 of the state's 36 counties have removed few or no voter registrations, and that the state has registration rates exceeding 100%. “Dirty voter rolls can mean dirty elections,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement. “Oregon has among the dirtiest voting rolls in America and needs to clean them up ASAP!” Judicial Watch has led other efforts to clean up voter rolls in New York, California, Pennsylvania, Colorado, North Carolina, Kentucky and Ohio. Altogether the efforts have resulted in the purging of up to four million ineligible voters, the group said. Misty Severi is an evening news reporter for Just The News. You can follow her on X for more coverage.

MSNBC DISAPPEARS SEGMENT CRITICIZING NETWORK’S COVERAGE! W/ JOSE VEGA & SCOTT RITTER #Israel is #Evil and committing #Genocide! PERIOD! Attacking children CANNOT be considered "Self Defense" https://old.bitchute.com/video/omwNX2gzmZY/?list=subscriptions

WALZ SAID HE WAS IN HONG KONG DURING THE TIANANMEN SQUARE MASSACRE. HE WAS IN NEBRASKA. "News reports show Walz touring a National Guard storeroom in Alliance, Nebraska, in May 1989. They indicate that Walz did not leave the United States until August of that year, at least two months after the student protests ended with the Tiananmen Square massacre." It is insane that truth has become optional—and an option rarely employed—to the Harris-Walz campaign. In any other election, the litany of exaggerations and lies flowing out of Kamala Harris's and Tim Walz's mouths would have sunk them in the polls. But the mainstream media has decided that the truth simply doesn't matter anymore, as exhibited by the false coverage of Walz being in China during the Tiananmen Square massacre by The New York Times, CBS News, and NPR. If the Harris-Walz campaign and the mainstream media can't tell the simple truth—a simple, verifiable truth—what else are they willing to lie about? We can't have these miscreants in power. They must be sent to the ash heap of political history in November. https://substack.com/profile/129788551-frank-salvato/note/c-71036255 #TimWalz #KamalaHarris #China #CCP #TiananmenSquare #Lies #Election2024

WALZ SAID HE WAS IN HONG KONG DURING THE TIANANMEN SQUARE MASSACRE. HE WAS IN NEBRASKA. "[N]ews reports show Walz touring a National Guard storeroom in Alliance, Nebraska, in May 1989. They indicate that Walz did not leave the United States until August of that year, at least two months after the student protests ended with the Tiananmen Square massacre." It is insane that truth has become optional—and an option rarely employed—to the Harris-Walz campaign. In any other election, the litany of exaggerations and lies flowing out of Kamala Harris's and Tim Walz's mouths would have sunk them in the polls. But the mainstream media has decided that the truth simply doesn't matter anymore, as exhibited by the false coverage of Walz being in China during the Tiananmen Square massacre by The New York Times, CBS News, and NPR. If the Harris-Walz campaign and the mainstream media can't tell the simple truth—a simple, verifiable truth—what else are they willing to lie about? We can't have these miscreants in power. They must be sent to the ash heap of political history in November. https://substack.com/profile/129788551-frank-salvato/note/c-71036255 #TimWalz #KamalaHarris #China #CCP #TiananmenSquare #Lies #Election2024

Legacy media dedicated far more coverage cheerleading Liberal programs than scrutinizing costs: study 🇨🇦 #NoMoreLiberalsAndNDP 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #SayingTheQuietPartOutLoud 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #resigntrudeau 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #JustSayNoMore 🇨🇦 https://tnc.news/2024/09/26/legacy-media-cheerleading-liberal-programs/ via @truenorthcentre

BREAKING: Infowars Received Over 14 Million Viewers On 𝕏 Alone During Our Trump-Harris Debate Coverage! https://www.infowars.com/posts/breaking-infowars-received-over-14-million-viewers-on-x-alone-during-our-trump-harris-debate-coverage