• https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/starbucks-sued-for-selling-chemical-soup-of-artificial-colors-and-flavors-disguised-as-food/
    https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/starbucks-sued-for-selling-chemical-soup-of-artificial-colors-and-flavors-disguised-as-food/
    THEPEOPLESVOICE.TV
    Starbucks Sued For Selling 'Chemical Soup' of Artificial Colors and Flavors Disguised as Food
    Starbucks is facing a class-action lawsuit for misleading customers by selling chemicals, colors, and artificial flavors disguised as healthy food.
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 13 Views
  • Washington Post admits subjecting children to ‘transgender medicine’ not based on ‘science’
    https://catholicvote.org/washington-post-admits-subjecting-children-to-transgender-medicine-not-based-on-science/

    The failure of scientists to “slowly and systematically” study prescribing children puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones is responsible for both a lack of medical clarity regarding their safety and effectiveness in treating gender dysphoria and the fact that the issue is now before the U.S. Supreme Court, the Washington Post editorial board wrote Sunday.

    The editors of the left-wing media outlet came to their astounding change of heart along with their acknowledgment that the state of Tennessee actually has a “colorable claim” before the High Court in United States v. Skrmetti, the Biden administration’s challenge to the state’s law that protects minors from a profitable and fast-growing “transgender” medical industry.

    The issue of experimental “trans” medical interventions on minors, the WaPo board asserted, “is subject to legal dispute in part because the medical questions have not been properly resolved.”
    Washington Post admits subjecting children to ‘transgender medicine’ not based on ‘science’ https://catholicvote.org/washington-post-admits-subjecting-children-to-transgender-medicine-not-based-on-science/ The failure of scientists to “slowly and systematically” study prescribing children puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones is responsible for both a lack of medical clarity regarding their safety and effectiveness in treating gender dysphoria and the fact that the issue is now before the U.S. Supreme Court, the Washington Post editorial board wrote Sunday. The editors of the left-wing media outlet came to their astounding change of heart along with their acknowledgment that the state of Tennessee actually has a “colorable claim” before the High Court in United States v. Skrmetti, the Biden administration’s challenge to the state’s law that protects minors from a profitable and fast-growing “transgender” medical industry. The issue of experimental “trans” medical interventions on minors, the WaPo board asserted, “is subject to legal dispute in part because the medical questions have not been properly resolved.”
    CATHOLICVOTE.ORG
    Washington Post admits subjecting children to ‘transgender medicine’ not based on ‘science’
    The failure of scientists to “slowly and systematically” study prescribing children puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones is responsible for both a lack
    Angry
    1
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 277 Views
  • There are reportedly hundreds of victims, including children, ready to come forward against Jay-Z.
    Former NFL player Larry Johnson recounted a disturbing memory of a party in the Colorado mountains with Jay-Z and Beyoncé, where young children mysteriously appeared late at night.
    There are reportedly hundreds of victims, including children, ready to come forward against Jay-Z. Former NFL player Larry Johnson recounted a disturbing memory of a party in the Colorado mountains with Jay-Z and Beyoncé, where young children mysteriously appeared late at night.
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 152 Views 2
  • DEAD MEN
    "Dead Men" unfolds in the rugged, untamed frontier of the Old West, where the line between justice and vengeance is as blurred as the desert horizon. The story centers on two brothers, Jacob and Levi, whose lives are irrevocably changed when their father is brutally murdered. Driven by a potent mix of grief and fury, they embark on a perilous quest to avenge his death.

    Their journey is not just one of retribution but also of protection and reclamation. The brothers have formed a deep bond with a nearby Apache tribe, sharing in their customs and becoming a part of their extended family. With the tribe facing constant threats from land-hungry settlers and ruthless outlaws, Jacob and Levi take it upon themselves to shield their newfound kin from the encroaching dangers.

    As they traverse the vast and unforgiving landscape, the brothers encounter a host of colorful and dangerous characters, each with their own stake in the deadly game of survival. From cunning gold prospectors to corrupt lawmen, the Old West's harsh reality tests their resolve and ingenuity at every turn.

    The quest to reclaim their father’s land and gold intertwines with the broader struggle to preserve the Apache way of life. This dual mission reveals the complexities of honor and loyalty in a world where betrayal lurks around every corner. Along the way, the brothers grapple with their own identities, the weight of their father's legacy, and the moral ambiguities of their actions.

    "Dead Men" is a gripping tale of brotherhood, survival, and the relentless pursuit of justice. Its rich tapestry of historical detail and vivid characterization brings the Old West to life, capturing the spirit of an era defined by both its brutality and its raw beauty. With sweeping landscapes, intense action sequences, and a heart-wrenching narrative, this film delves deep into the human spirit, exploring themes of family, honor, and the enduring struggle for what is rightfully one's own.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztx8zH1pWOU
    DEAD MEN "Dead Men" unfolds in the rugged, untamed frontier of the Old West, where the line between justice and vengeance is as blurred as the desert horizon. The story centers on two brothers, Jacob and Levi, whose lives are irrevocably changed when their father is brutally murdered. Driven by a potent mix of grief and fury, they embark on a perilous quest to avenge his death. Their journey is not just one of retribution but also of protection and reclamation. The brothers have formed a deep bond with a nearby Apache tribe, sharing in their customs and becoming a part of their extended family. With the tribe facing constant threats from land-hungry settlers and ruthless outlaws, Jacob and Levi take it upon themselves to shield their newfound kin from the encroaching dangers. As they traverse the vast and unforgiving landscape, the brothers encounter a host of colorful and dangerous characters, each with their own stake in the deadly game of survival. From cunning gold prospectors to corrupt lawmen, the Old West's harsh reality tests their resolve and ingenuity at every turn. The quest to reclaim their father’s land and gold intertwines with the broader struggle to preserve the Apache way of life. This dual mission reveals the complexities of honor and loyalty in a world where betrayal lurks around every corner. Along the way, the brothers grapple with their own identities, the weight of their father's legacy, and the moral ambiguities of their actions. "Dead Men" is a gripping tale of brotherhood, survival, and the relentless pursuit of justice. Its rich tapestry of historical detail and vivid characterization brings the Old West to life, capturing the spirit of an era defined by both its brutality and its raw beauty. With sweeping landscapes, intense action sequences, and a heart-wrenching narrative, this film delves deep into the human spirit, exploring themes of family, honor, and the enduring struggle for what is rightfully one's own. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztx8zH1pWOU
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 459 Views

  • Inadequate Litigant’s Cases Dismissed

    Plaintiff, by her Litigation Appears to Establish the Report for a Mental Health Evaluation Was Appropriate

    Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gECRyZ-f, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gs_4Bby9 and at https://lnkd.in/g67dDK8q, and https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4950 posts.

    Post 4950

    In Samreen Riaz v. State Of California, et al., F087504, California Court of Appeals, Fifth District (December 2, 2024) the California Court of Appeals found itself asked to resolve suits against an individual and the state of California from an inadequate but excessively litigious plaintiff.

    FACTS

    Samreen Riaz was a licensed dentist – she lost her license to practice because of the facts underlying this case. According to her, there is an elaborate conspiracy to harass, stalk, threaten, and ultimately prevent her from testifying in a separate “whistleblower” case involving “OSHA and HIPPA Violations” at a medical facility.

    Riaz sued raising numerous claims against numerous individuals and government entities. The opposing parties challenged the complaint’s viability through demurrer and anti-SLAPP proceedings. The trial court sustained the demurrers and granted the anti-SLAPP motion, leaving Riaz with no viable claim. Riaz appealed.

    BACKGROUND

    The facts underlying this case involve four discrete events.

    First: Riaz sued a medical facility and suffered an alleged eye injury while attempting to testify in that case.

    Second: She sought treatment for that eye injury but was refused service and then sued that doctor in small claims court.

    Third: That doctor reported Riaz to the Dental Board of California which, in turn, initiated mental health competence proceedings against Riaz.

    Fourth: Riaz’s license to practice dentistry was revoked, and she filed the complaint at issue in this case.
    Initial Lawsuit Against Medical Facility

    Acting as a “whistleblower,” Riaz “disclosed … OSHA, Hippa, recruited patient, potential insurance fraud and anti-competent activities in the market” at a medical facility.

    After filing a lawsuit on that basis, Riaz claimed she suffered “organized harassment,” culminating in “permanent eye damage” after a sheriff-department employee pointed a finger in her face while attempting to enter the courthouse in her “whistleblower” case.

    Visiting Doctor for Eye Injury

    Riaz visited Dr. Cantrell to treat an eye injury. She claimed Cantrell became combative, refused to answer Riaz’s questions, and declined to treat Riaz. The next day, Riaz filed a complaint with the Medical Board of California.

    Several days later, she filed a small claims case against Cantrell, essentially alleging discrimination, negligence, and retaliation. A small claims judgment was eventually entered in Cantrell’s favor.

    Report to Dental Board

    Cantrell reported Riaz to the Dental Board. The Dental Board issued an order to Riaz to comply with a mental health examination “to evaluate her fitness to practice safely ….” (See Bus. &Prof. Code, § 820.) Riaz failed to comply with the order. Since Riaz continued to disobey the order, her license to practice dentistry was ultimately revoked.

    Instant Complaint and Judgment

    Riaz sued Cantrell, various government entities, and several individuals working for those entities (collectively, the State). The complaint alleged an elaborate conspiracy among all the defendants to injure Riaz, to intimidate her to prevent her from testifying, and to retaliate against her for the “whistleblower” case.

    The trial court sustained the demurrers and granted the anti-SLAPP motion resulting in total dismissal.

    DISCUSSION

    Did the trial court err in granting the anti-SLAPP motion?

    Did it err in sustaining the demurrers?

    The California Court of Appeals concluded the trial court did not err.
    Anti-SLAPP Motion

    In the anti-SLAPP motion, Cantrell argued his furnishing information to the Dental Board was protected activity and defeated claims “for discrimination, fraud, defamation, retaliation[,] and intentional infliction of emotional distress[.]”

    In opposition to the anti-SLAPP motion, Riaz claimed again Cantrell “made inaccurate, knowingly misleading statements to the [D]ental [B]oard to defame and harm [Riaz] based on disclosing patient information.” The trial court concluded furnishing those documents to the board constituted protected activity.

    ANALYSIS

    Litigation of an anti-SLAPP motion involves a two-step process. First, the moving defendant bears the burden of establishing that the challenged allegations or claims that arise from protected activity in which the defendant has engaged. Second, for each claim that does arise from protected activity, the plaintiff must show the claim has at least minimal merit. If the plaintiff cannot make this showing, the court will, and did, strike the claim.

    If there is no merit, the claim is stricken. The Court of Appeals noted that Riaz failed to adduce any evidence-including exhibits, declarations, judicial notice, and testimony-to substantiate her allegation Cantrell reported her to the Dental Board for retribution. She failed to adduce admissible evidence on the point.

    DEMURRERS

    Both Cantrell and the State filed demurrers to Riaz’s complaint..

    Additional Background

    A small claims plaintiff is collaterally estopped from relitigating the same issue in superior court where the record is sufficiently clear to determine that the issue was litigated and decided against plaintiff in the small claims action.

    Governmental immunity is an affirmative defense properly raised by demurrer. Government Code section 821.6 immunizes public employees from liability for ‘instituting or prosecuting any judicial or administrative proceeding’ within the scope of their employment, even if the employees act ‘maliciously and without probable cause.

    Riaz alleged her claims arose in July 2022. Her written government claim was submitted in April 2023, more than six months later. Accordingly, the claims were barred, at least insofar as they stemmed from the section 820 order.
    CONCLUSION AND SUMMARY

    Riaz failed to allege colorable claims against either Cantrell or the State. The potential claims against Cantrell were either tried and resolved against her in small claims court or dismissed pursuant to the anti-SLAPP statute. The potential claims against the State were either barred for failure to timely present them under the Government Claims Act, or the State was immune under Government Code sections 821.6, 818.4, and 821.2.

    ZALMA OPINION

    It is axiomatic that a person who represents himself has a fool for a client. The litigation history, the multiple actions, and the lack of consistency and evidence, establish that Dr. Cantrell was correct when he advised the Dental Board that a mental health examination to evaluate her fitness to practice safely…” was correct. She refused to fulfill her obligation to the Dental Board to be evaluated because she was concerned she would not pass. This case is an abuse of Doctor Cantrell and the state and should have resulted in serious sanctions.

    (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.

    Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.

    Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe

    Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg

    Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk
    Inadequate Litigant’s Cases Dismissed Plaintiff, by her Litigation Appears to Establish the Report for a Mental Health Evaluation Was Appropriate Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gECRyZ-f, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gs_4Bby9 and at https://lnkd.in/g67dDK8q, and https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4950 posts. Post 4950 In Samreen Riaz v. State Of California, et al., F087504, California Court of Appeals, Fifth District (December 2, 2024) the California Court of Appeals found itself asked to resolve suits against an individual and the state of California from an inadequate but excessively litigious plaintiff. FACTS Samreen Riaz was a licensed dentist – she lost her license to practice because of the facts underlying this case. According to her, there is an elaborate conspiracy to harass, stalk, threaten, and ultimately prevent her from testifying in a separate “whistleblower” case involving “OSHA and HIPPA Violations” at a medical facility. Riaz sued raising numerous claims against numerous individuals and government entities. The opposing parties challenged the complaint’s viability through demurrer and anti-SLAPP proceedings. The trial court sustained the demurrers and granted the anti-SLAPP motion, leaving Riaz with no viable claim. Riaz appealed. BACKGROUND The facts underlying this case involve four discrete events. First: Riaz sued a medical facility and suffered an alleged eye injury while attempting to testify in that case. Second: She sought treatment for that eye injury but was refused service and then sued that doctor in small claims court. Third: That doctor reported Riaz to the Dental Board of California which, in turn, initiated mental health competence proceedings against Riaz. Fourth: Riaz’s license to practice dentistry was revoked, and she filed the complaint at issue in this case. Initial Lawsuit Against Medical Facility Acting as a “whistleblower,” Riaz “disclosed … OSHA, Hippa, recruited patient, potential insurance fraud and anti-competent activities in the market” at a medical facility. After filing a lawsuit on that basis, Riaz claimed she suffered “organized harassment,” culminating in “permanent eye damage” after a sheriff-department employee pointed a finger in her face while attempting to enter the courthouse in her “whistleblower” case. Visiting Doctor for Eye Injury Riaz visited Dr. Cantrell to treat an eye injury. She claimed Cantrell became combative, refused to answer Riaz’s questions, and declined to treat Riaz. The next day, Riaz filed a complaint with the Medical Board of California. Several days later, she filed a small claims case against Cantrell, essentially alleging discrimination, negligence, and retaliation. A small claims judgment was eventually entered in Cantrell’s favor. Report to Dental Board Cantrell reported Riaz to the Dental Board. The Dental Board issued an order to Riaz to comply with a mental health examination “to evaluate her fitness to practice safely ….” (See Bus. &Prof. Code, § 820.) Riaz failed to comply with the order. Since Riaz continued to disobey the order, her license to practice dentistry was ultimately revoked. Instant Complaint and Judgment Riaz sued Cantrell, various government entities, and several individuals working for those entities (collectively, the State). The complaint alleged an elaborate conspiracy among all the defendants to injure Riaz, to intimidate her to prevent her from testifying, and to retaliate against her for the “whistleblower” case. The trial court sustained the demurrers and granted the anti-SLAPP motion resulting in total dismissal. DISCUSSION Did the trial court err in granting the anti-SLAPP motion? Did it err in sustaining the demurrers? The California Court of Appeals concluded the trial court did not err. Anti-SLAPP Motion In the anti-SLAPP motion, Cantrell argued his furnishing information to the Dental Board was protected activity and defeated claims “for discrimination, fraud, defamation, retaliation[,] and intentional infliction of emotional distress[.]” In opposition to the anti-SLAPP motion, Riaz claimed again Cantrell “made inaccurate, knowingly misleading statements to the [D]ental [B]oard to defame and harm [Riaz] based on disclosing patient information.” The trial court concluded furnishing those documents to the board constituted protected activity. ANALYSIS Litigation of an anti-SLAPP motion involves a two-step process. First, the moving defendant bears the burden of establishing that the challenged allegations or claims that arise from protected activity in which the defendant has engaged. Second, for each claim that does arise from protected activity, the plaintiff must show the claim has at least minimal merit. If the plaintiff cannot make this showing, the court will, and did, strike the claim. If there is no merit, the claim is stricken. The Court of Appeals noted that Riaz failed to adduce any evidence-including exhibits, declarations, judicial notice, and testimony-to substantiate her allegation Cantrell reported her to the Dental Board for retribution. She failed to adduce admissible evidence on the point. DEMURRERS Both Cantrell and the State filed demurrers to Riaz’s complaint.. Additional Background A small claims plaintiff is collaterally estopped from relitigating the same issue in superior court where the record is sufficiently clear to determine that the issue was litigated and decided against plaintiff in the small claims action. Governmental immunity is an affirmative defense properly raised by demurrer. Government Code section 821.6 immunizes public employees from liability for ‘instituting or prosecuting any judicial or administrative proceeding’ within the scope of their employment, even if the employees act ‘maliciously and without probable cause. Riaz alleged her claims arose in July 2022. Her written government claim was submitted in April 2023, more than six months later. Accordingly, the claims were barred, at least insofar as they stemmed from the section 820 order. CONCLUSION AND SUMMARY Riaz failed to allege colorable claims against either Cantrell or the State. The potential claims against Cantrell were either tried and resolved against her in small claims court or dismissed pursuant to the anti-SLAPP statute. The potential claims against the State were either barred for failure to timely present them under the Government Claims Act, or the State was immune under Government Code sections 821.6, 818.4, and 821.2. ZALMA OPINION It is axiomatic that a person who represents himself has a fool for a client. The litigation history, the multiple actions, and the lack of consistency and evidence, establish that Dr. Cantrell was correct when he advised the Dental Board that a mental health examination to evaluate her fitness to practice safely…” was correct. She refused to fulfill her obligation to the Dental Board to be evaluated because she was concerned she would not pass. This case is an abuse of Doctor Cantrell and the state and should have resulted in serious sanctions. (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc. Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos. Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk
    LNKD.IN
    Inadequate Litigant’s Cases Dismissed
    Plaintiff, by her Litigation Appears to Establish the Report for a Mental Health Evaluation Was Appropriate Post 4950 Posted on December 18, 2024 by Barry Zalma See the full video at https://rumble.com/v607fvb-inadequate-litigants-cases-dismissed.
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 1K Views
  • https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/police-arrest-14-people-aurora-colorado-apartment-complex/
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/police-arrest-14-people-aurora-colorado-apartment-complex/
    WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM
    Police Arrest 14 People From Aurora, Colorado, Apartment Complex Taken Over By Tren de Aragua Gang - 'Tortured' Residents Found Tied Up and Stabbed | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
    A shocking incident has unfolded in Aurora, where a dozen arrests were made following a brutal attack on residents. Discover the details behind this alarming event.
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 103 Views
  • 14 Arrested In Violent Home Invasion At Colorado Apartment Complex Trump Warned About https://www.infowars.com/posts/14-arrested-in-violent-home-invasion-at-colorado-apartment-complex-trump-warned-about
    14 Arrested In Violent Home Invasion At Colorado Apartment Complex Trump Warned About https://www.infowars.com/posts/14-arrested-in-violent-home-invasion-at-colorado-apartment-complex-trump-warned-about
    Like
    1
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 146 Views
  • Twitter thread … “Do you know how much your State sends to Israel annually? In 2023 the US signed a MOU w/Israel to guarantee $3.8 Billion in Federal aid per year til 2028, but how much does each of the 50 States pay Israel every year??

    Alabama: $54.8M, Alaska: $972 K, Arizona $355 M, Arkansas $53.7 M, California: $1.68 B, Colorado: $54.4 M, Connecticut: $232 M, Delaware: $15.2 M

    Florida: $461.5 M, Georgia: $389.2 M, Hawaii: $11,950, Idaho: $11 M, Illinois: $216.4 M, Indiana: $171.4 M, Iowa: $42 M, Kansas: 23.1 M

    Kentucky: $103.1 M, Louisiana: $102.6, Maine: $8.5 M, Maryland: $52.9 M, Massachusetts: $197.3 M Michigan: $242 M, Minnesota: $119.5 M, Mississippi $47 M

    Missouri: $240.3 M, Montana: $7.4 M, Nebraska: $59 M, Nevada: $56.2 M, New Hampshire: $108 M, New Jersey: $403 M, New Mexico: $13.8 M, New York: $4.8 B

    North Carolina: $158 M, North Dakota: $6.9 M, Ohio: $241.9 M, Oklahoma $83.8 M, Oregon: $947.1 M, Pennsylvania: $263.6 M, Rhode Island: $13.5 M, South Carolina: $126 M

    South Dakota: $7.5 M, Tennessee: $81 M, Texas: $845 M, Utah: $56.8 M, Vermont: $17.5 M, Virginia: $76 M, Washington: $228 M, West Virginia: $126 M, Wisconsin: $115.3 M, Wyoming: $716 K

    Federally the US gives $3.8 Billion annually to Israel. The States' give a whopping $13.6 Billion annually sent to Israel. This means the grand total of funds coming from the US [Fed+States] is $17,400,000,000.00 [$17.4B]”

    More photos in comments

    https://x.com/dezzie_rezzie/status/182852273295212…

    _______________

    RECEIPTS/SOURCES/LINKS

    U.S.-Israel Relations: States-to-State Cooperation
    HTTPS:/http://WWW.JEWISHVIRTUALLIBRARY.ORG/U-S-ISRAEL-COO…

    U.S. Aid to Israel in Four Charts
    https://www.cfr.org/article/us-aid-israel-four-cha…

    What Every American Should Know About U.S. Aid to Israel
    http://http://http://http://http://HTTPS://WWW.AJC…

    R.I. opposes discrimination against Israel
    https://www.providencejournal.com/story/opinion/20…
    Twitter thread … “Do you know how much your State sends to Israel annually? In 2023 the US signed a MOU w/Israel to guarantee $3.8 Billion in Federal aid per year til 2028, but how much does each of the 50 States pay Israel every year?? Alabama: $54.8M, Alaska: $972 K, Arizona $355 M, Arkansas $53.7 M, California: $1.68 B, Colorado: $54.4 M, Connecticut: $232 M, Delaware: $15.2 M Florida: $461.5 M, Georgia: $389.2 M, Hawaii: $11,950, Idaho: $11 M, Illinois: $216.4 M, Indiana: $171.4 M, Iowa: $42 M, Kansas: 23.1 M Kentucky: $103.1 M, Louisiana: $102.6, Maine: $8.5 M, Maryland: $52.9 M, Massachusetts: $197.3 M Michigan: $242 M, Minnesota: $119.5 M, Mississippi $47 M Missouri: $240.3 M, Montana: $7.4 M, Nebraska: $59 M, Nevada: $56.2 M, New Hampshire: $108 M, New Jersey: $403 M, New Mexico: $13.8 M, New York: $4.8 B North Carolina: $158 M, North Dakota: $6.9 M, Ohio: $241.9 M, Oklahoma $83.8 M, Oregon: $947.1 M, Pennsylvania: $263.6 M, Rhode Island: $13.5 M, South Carolina: $126 M South Dakota: $7.5 M, Tennessee: $81 M, Texas: $845 M, Utah: $56.8 M, Vermont: $17.5 M, Virginia: $76 M, Washington: $228 M, West Virginia: $126 M, Wisconsin: $115.3 M, Wyoming: $716 K Federally the US gives $3.8 Billion annually to Israel. The States' give a whopping $13.6 Billion annually sent to Israel. This means the grand total of funds coming from the US [Fed+States] is $17,400,000,000.00 [$17.4B]” More photos in comments https://x.com/dezzie_rezzie/status/182852273295212… _______________ RECEIPTS/SOURCES/LINKS U.S.-Israel Relations: States-to-State Cooperation HTTPS:/http://WWW.JEWISHVIRTUALLIBRARY.ORG/U-S-ISRAEL-COO… U.S. Aid to Israel in Four Charts https://www.cfr.org/article/us-aid-israel-four-cha… What Every American Should Know About U.S. Aid to Israel http://http://http://http://http://HTTPS://WWW.AJC… R.I. opposes discrimination against Israel https://www.providencejournal.com/story/opinion/20…
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 868 Views
  • Ear Pops Nuevo
    $9.95
    In stock
    Lawrenceville Il
    As featured on NBC's "The Today Show"
    Named "Best Value" by The Wall Street Journal
    See EarPops at The Museum of Modern, NY, October 16, 2005 - January 2, 2006

    They're Bandless!
    They're Patented!
    They're Warm & Washable!
    They Fit In Your Pocket!
    They Just "Pop" On Your Ear!

    Enjoy some holiday savings as we *****liquidate the remainder of our ear pop manufacturing business.*******

    For Men, Women, Children
    They are great for people who do not like to wear hats as well as those whom are subject to ear problems. If you are not sure of sizes -- most women wear a medium, most men wear a large. Most petite adults and children wear a size small.
    For skiers, campers, bikers, joggers, construction workers, walkers, fishermen, ice skaters, snowboarders, or anyone who works or plays in the cold or wind. They're also great for anyone who doesn't like wearing hats or doesn't want their hair tousle

    Choose Your Size
    Simply measure your ear from the top of your ear to the bottom.
    For help in determining your size, go to: Size Chart
    SMALL (1 ½" - 2 ¼")
    MEDIUM (2 ¼" - 2 ¾")
    LARGE (2 ¾" - 3")

    Our Guarantee:
    If you are unhappy with your EarPops for any reason, we will be happy to exchange them for another pair or give you a refund within 30 days of purchase, minus a $1.00 per pair restocking fee. We will waive the restocking fee and pay the return postage if we sent you the wrong order, or the product is defective.

    Made of microfiber fleece, these ear muffs will keep your ears comfortably warm. They come in a wide variety of colors

    Merchant Accounts: If you are a retailer and are interested in carrying EarPops in your store, send us an email .
    Frequently Asked Questions
    I'm buying these as a gift. How do I know what size to order without measuring?
    If you're not sure, buy a medium for a woman and large for a man. If they don't fit you can return them within 30 days for an exchange or refund. For children, buy a small.

    Will I be able to hear with them on?
    Yes, your hearing is not affected.

    Are they comfortable?
    Most people think so. They are not elastic, so there is no constant pressure on your ear.

    Are they warm?
    EarPops are made of Microfiber fleece, the same material used in fleece parkas, jackets and vests. They provide excellent insulation from the cold.

    Can I wash them?
    All of our fleece products are machine washable. We recommend washing them on the medium heat setting, and drying on low. Bleach is not recommended.

    I measured my ear and it's on the border between a medium and a large. What size should I buy?
    If you're between sizes, go up in size. It's better to wear one which is slightly too large than one which is too tight.

    Do they stay on?
    Yes. Many people wear them while skiing. They actually fit completely over your ear, forming a pocket. They then "pop" shut (hence, the name). It takes some trying to get them to fall off.

    Are they easy to put on?
    They come with a handy diagram. Make sure you press them onto your ears by pushing the rim using only your fingertips, not your palm. Allow yourself a couple minutes the first time, to make sure they are securely on. After that, it's a breeze, like riding a bicycle.
    As featured on NBC's "The Today Show" Named "Best Value" by The Wall Street Journal See EarPops at The Museum of Modern, NY, October 16, 2005 - January 2, 2006 They're Bandless! They're Patented! They're Warm & Washable! They Fit In Your Pocket! They Just "Pop" On Your Ear! Enjoy some holiday savings as we *****liquidate the remainder of our ear pop manufacturing business.******* For Men, Women, Children They are great for people who do not like to wear hats as well as those whom are subject to ear problems. If you are not sure of sizes -- most women wear a medium, most men wear a large. Most petite adults and children wear a size small. For skiers, campers, bikers, joggers, construction workers, walkers, fishermen, ice skaters, snowboarders, or anyone who works or plays in the cold or wind. They're also great for anyone who doesn't like wearing hats or doesn't want their hair tousle Choose Your Size Simply measure your ear from the top of your ear to the bottom. For help in determining your size, go to: Size Chart SMALL (1 ½" - 2 ¼") MEDIUM (2 ¼" - 2 ¾") LARGE (2 ¾" - 3") Our Guarantee: If you are unhappy with your EarPops for any reason, we will be happy to exchange them for another pair or give you a refund within 30 days of purchase, minus a $1.00 per pair restocking fee. We will waive the restocking fee and pay the return postage if we sent you the wrong order, or the product is defective. Made of microfiber fleece, these ear muffs will keep your ears comfortably warm. They come in a wide variety of colors Merchant Accounts: If you are a retailer and are interested in carrying EarPops in your store, send us an email . Frequently Asked Questions I'm buying these as a gift. How do I know what size to order without measuring? If you're not sure, buy a medium for a woman and large for a man. If they don't fit you can return them within 30 days for an exchange or refund. For children, buy a small. Will I be able to hear with them on? Yes, your hearing is not affected. Are they comfortable? Most people think so. They are not elastic, so there is no constant pressure on your ear. Are they warm? EarPops are made of Microfiber fleece, the same material used in fleece parkas, jackets and vests. They provide excellent insulation from the cold. Can I wash them? All of our fleece products are machine washable. We recommend washing them on the medium heat setting, and drying on low. Bleach is not recommended. I measured my ear and it's on the border between a medium and a large. What size should I buy? If you're between sizes, go up in size. It's better to wear one which is slightly too large than one which is too tight. Do they stay on? Yes. Many people wear them while skiing. They actually fit completely over your ear, forming a pocket. They then "pop" shut (hence, the name). It takes some trying to get them to fall off. Are they easy to put on? They come with a handy diagram. Make sure you press them onto your ears by pushing the rim using only your fingertips, not your palm. Allow yourself a couple minutes the first time, to make sure they are securely on. After that, it's a breeze, like riding a bicycle.
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 1K Views
Patrocinados

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here