• scrap vehicle prices


    https://orangescrap.com/scrap-price-for-junk-cars-texas/


    Have junk auto cars in Orange County, TX? Get the top scrap car prices in Texas with our dedicated team of scrap car buyers.


    #junkcars #autoscrap #metal #recyclingcentre #texas #tx #USA
    scrap vehicle prices https://orangescrap.com/scrap-price-for-junk-cars-texas/ Have junk auto cars in Orange County, TX? Get the top scrap car prices in Texas with our dedicated team of scrap car buyers. #junkcars #autoscrap #metal #recyclingcentre #texas #tx #USA
    ORANGESCRAP.COM
    Scrap Price for Junk Cars in Orange County, Texas
    Have junk auto cars in Orange County, TX? Get the top scrap car prices in Texas with our dedicated team of scrap car buyers.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 111 Views
  • https://medforth.org/duisburg-nordafrikanischer-wiederholungstater-wirft-fahrrad-auf-befahrene-autobahn/
    https://medforth.org/duisburg-nordafrikanischer-wiederholungstater-wirft-fahrrad-auf-befahrene-autobahn/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 70 Views
  • KENTUCKY VOTING MACHINES ARE REFUSING TO SELECT TRUMP AND AUTOMATICALLY SELECTING KAMALA INSTEAD
    KENTUCKY VOTING MACHINES ARE REFUSING TO SELECT TRUMP AND AUTOMATICALLY SELECTING KAMALA INSTEAD
    Angry
    1
    0 Comments 2 Shares 143 Views 7
  • https://thewashingtonstandard.com/video-kentucky-voting-machines-refusing-to-let-voters-select-donald-trumps-name-automatically-selecting-kamala-harris-instead/
    https://thewashingtonstandard.com/video-kentucky-voting-machines-refusing-to-let-voters-select-donald-trumps-name-automatically-selecting-kamala-harris-instead/
    THEWASHINGTONSTANDARD.COM
    VIDEO: Kentucky Voting Machines REFUSING to Let Voters Select Donald Trump’s Name, Automatically Selecting Kamala Harris Instead - The Washington Standard
    Kentucky voting machines are REFUSING to let voters select Donald Trump’s name, automatically selecting Kamala Harris instead. Every day Democrat election crimes en masse. The good news? Reporting or posting these incidents would have gotten you banned from social media or imprisoned as in January 6th. Whether anything can me ...
    0 Comments 0 Shares 69 Views
  • Kentucky voting machines are REFUSING to let voters select Donald Trump’s name, automatically selecting Kamala Harris instead.
    Kentucky voting machines are REFUSING to let voters select Donald Trump’s name, automatically selecting Kamala Harris instead.
    Like
    1
    1 Comments 0 Shares 85 Views 0
  • BREAKING - Kentucky voting machines are REFUSING to let voters select Donald Trump’s name, automatically selecting Kamala Harris instead.
    They are trying to cheat because Democrats can’t win without cheating.
    BREAKING - Kentucky voting machines are REFUSING to let voters select Donald Trump’s name, automatically selecting Kamala Harris instead. They are trying to cheat because Democrats can’t win without cheating.
    Angry
    Like
    3
    0 Comments 0 Shares 97 Views 2
  • BREAKING: Germany in SHOCK as its Biggest Automaker Layoffs Thousands, Closes 3 Plants & Cuts Pay
    https://youtu.be/R-gP2ychcY4?si=tDLm9e7nBvnQeRgz
    🔴 BREAKING: Germany in SHOCK as its Biggest Automaker Layoffs Thousands, Closes 3 Plants & Cuts Pay https://youtu.be/R-gP2ychcY4?si=tDLm9e7nBvnQeRgz
    Sad
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 80 Views

  • Man Bites Dog Story: Fraudsters Arbitration Attempts Stopped

    Arbitration Stayed for Suspected Chiropractors’ Fraudulent No Fault Medical Claims

    Post 4921

    Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/man-bites-dog-story-fraudsters-arbitration-attempts-zalma-esq-cfe-5yw6c, see the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog.

    In Government Employees Insurance Company, (“GEICO”) v. Didier Demesmin, M.D., et al, No. 23-CV-6191 (ARR) (MMH), United States District Court, E.D. New York (October 23, 2024) GEICO sought to enjoin defendants Manuel A. Mendoza, D.C. and Mendoza Chiropractic Office PC (collectively the “Mendoza Defendants”) from pursuing certain “no-fault” insurance collection arbitrations or initiating new collections proceedings during the pendency of this lawsuit.

    BACKGROUND

    GEICO provides personal injury protection benefits on a “no-fault” basis, which means that, after an accident, insured drivers and their passengers are entitled to certain benefits for medically necessary healthcare services regardless of who was at fault.

    GEICO sued a group of healthcare providers who allegedly carried out an insurance scheme to obtain fraudulent no-fault benefit payments from GEICO. The USDC granted the motion based on its conclusion that (1) GEICO would experience irreparable harm absent a stay, (2) GEICO raised a serious question going to the merits, and (3) the balance of hardships tipped in GEICO’s favor.

    Subsequently, GEICO requested leave to file a second amended complaint to add allegations concerning the Mendoza defendants which was granted.

    In total, GEICO seeks recovery of more than $5.9 million in wrongfully obtained benefits payments from the three groups of defendants, as well as a declaration that it is not obligated to reimburse defendants for outstanding no-fault claims.

    After filing the second amended complaint, GEICO filed the present motion seeking an order staying all pending no-fault benefits arbitrations between GEICO and the Mendoza defendants and enjoining the Mendoza defendants from commencing new collections proceedings during the pendency of this action.

    DISCUSSION

    GEICO Will Experience Irreparable Harm Absent A Stay.

    Irreparable harm is certain and imminent harm for which a monetary award does not adequately compensate. the risk of inconsistent judgments in no-fault insurance disputes can constitute irreparable harm separate and apart from the expenditure of time and money spent on parallel proceedings. As with the parallel proceedings brought by the Demesmin and Khanan defendants, the risk of inconsistent outcomes is great enough to establish irreparable harm.

    GEICO established irreparable harm because permitting arbitrations to proceed will subject it to a risk of judgments that may be inconsistent with future judicial rulings.

    GEICO Has Shown At Least Some Serious Questions Going To The Merits, And The Balance Of Hardships Tips In Its Favor.

    GEICO’s amended complaint details a complex scheme of fraudulent billing and referrals among a network of chiropractic providers. GEICO’s allegations concerning the Mendoza defendants’ role are well developed through numerous examples of charges billed without proper documentation or under suspicious circumstances and a table of more than 45,000 suspect claims.

    The balance of hardships also tips in GEICO’s favor because the Mendoza defendants have not established any hardship, beyond a delay in reimbursement. Because the defendants will presumably be entitled to collect interest on their pending claims if they prevail, the delay does not outweigh the risk of inconsistent outcomes faced by GEICO.

    A Stay Does Not Violate The Anti-Injunction Act.

    The Anti-Injunction Act (“AIA”) prohibits federal courts from enjoining proceedings in state court “except as expressly authorized by Act of Congress, or where necessary in aid of its jurisdiction, or to protect or effectuate its judgments.” 28 U.S.C. § 2283. The AIA does not, however, limit the court’s authority to enjoin ongoing private arbitration proceedings or the court’s authority to enjoin defendants from initiating future state court proceedings.

    GEICO’s motion was granted and a preliminary injunction was issued: staying all pending no-fault insurance collection arbitrations that have been Commenced against GEICO by or on behalf of the Mendoza defendants, pending the disposition of GEICO’s claims in this action, and enjoining the Mendoza defendants and anyone acting on their behalf from commencing new no-fault arbitrations and litigations against GEICO pending the disposition of GEICO’s claims in this action.

    ZALMA OPINION

    The USDC, and other courts dealing with No-Fault auto insurance claims, has acted to help insurers defeat attempted insurance fraud – a crime in each state like New Jersey – which became necessary because state prosecutors seemed to ignore the crimes reported to them by insurers like GEICO. It is essential that insurers be proactive against fraud to shame the insurance fraud investigators in each state to do their job and prosecute the fraud perpetrators. Every insurer, faced with such fraud, should emulate GEICO.

    (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.

    Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.

    Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe

    Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg

    Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk
    Man Bites Dog Story: Fraudsters Arbitration Attempts Stopped Arbitration Stayed for Suspected Chiropractors’ Fraudulent No Fault Medical Claims Post 4921 Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/man-bites-dog-story-fraudsters-arbitration-attempts-zalma-esq-cfe-5yw6c, see the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog. In Government Employees Insurance Company, (“GEICO”) v. Didier Demesmin, M.D., et al, No. 23-CV-6191 (ARR) (MMH), United States District Court, E.D. New York (October 23, 2024) GEICO sought to enjoin defendants Manuel A. Mendoza, D.C. and Mendoza Chiropractic Office PC (collectively the “Mendoza Defendants”) from pursuing certain “no-fault” insurance collection arbitrations or initiating new collections proceedings during the pendency of this lawsuit. BACKGROUND GEICO provides personal injury protection benefits on a “no-fault” basis, which means that, after an accident, insured drivers and their passengers are entitled to certain benefits for medically necessary healthcare services regardless of who was at fault. GEICO sued a group of healthcare providers who allegedly carried out an insurance scheme to obtain fraudulent no-fault benefit payments from GEICO. The USDC granted the motion based on its conclusion that (1) GEICO would experience irreparable harm absent a stay, (2) GEICO raised a serious question going to the merits, and (3) the balance of hardships tipped in GEICO’s favor. Subsequently, GEICO requested leave to file a second amended complaint to add allegations concerning the Mendoza defendants which was granted. In total, GEICO seeks recovery of more than $5.9 million in wrongfully obtained benefits payments from the three groups of defendants, as well as a declaration that it is not obligated to reimburse defendants for outstanding no-fault claims. After filing the second amended complaint, GEICO filed the present motion seeking an order staying all pending no-fault benefits arbitrations between GEICO and the Mendoza defendants and enjoining the Mendoza defendants from commencing new collections proceedings during the pendency of this action. DISCUSSION GEICO Will Experience Irreparable Harm Absent A Stay. Irreparable harm is certain and imminent harm for which a monetary award does not adequately compensate. the risk of inconsistent judgments in no-fault insurance disputes can constitute irreparable harm separate and apart from the expenditure of time and money spent on parallel proceedings. As with the parallel proceedings brought by the Demesmin and Khanan defendants, the risk of inconsistent outcomes is great enough to establish irreparable harm. GEICO established irreparable harm because permitting arbitrations to proceed will subject it to a risk of judgments that may be inconsistent with future judicial rulings. GEICO Has Shown At Least Some Serious Questions Going To The Merits, And The Balance Of Hardships Tips In Its Favor. GEICO’s amended complaint details a complex scheme of fraudulent billing and referrals among a network of chiropractic providers. GEICO’s allegations concerning the Mendoza defendants’ role are well developed through numerous examples of charges billed without proper documentation or under suspicious circumstances and a table of more than 45,000 suspect claims. The balance of hardships also tips in GEICO’s favor because the Mendoza defendants have not established any hardship, beyond a delay in reimbursement. Because the defendants will presumably be entitled to collect interest on their pending claims if they prevail, the delay does not outweigh the risk of inconsistent outcomes faced by GEICO. A Stay Does Not Violate The Anti-Injunction Act. The Anti-Injunction Act (“AIA”) prohibits federal courts from enjoining proceedings in state court “except as expressly authorized by Act of Congress, or where necessary in aid of its jurisdiction, or to protect or effectuate its judgments.” 28 U.S.C. § 2283. The AIA does not, however, limit the court’s authority to enjoin ongoing private arbitration proceedings or the court’s authority to enjoin defendants from initiating future state court proceedings. GEICO’s motion was granted and a preliminary injunction was issued: staying all pending no-fault insurance collection arbitrations that have been Commenced against GEICO by or on behalf of the Mendoza defendants, pending the disposition of GEICO’s claims in this action, and enjoining the Mendoza defendants and anyone acting on their behalf from commencing new no-fault arbitrations and litigations against GEICO pending the disposition of GEICO’s claims in this action. ZALMA OPINION The USDC, and other courts dealing with No-Fault auto insurance claims, has acted to help insurers defeat attempted insurance fraud – a crime in each state like New Jersey – which became necessary because state prosecutors seemed to ignore the crimes reported to them by insurers like GEICO. It is essential that insurers be proactive against fraud to shame the insurance fraud investigators in each state to do their job and prosecute the fraud perpetrators. Every insurer, faced with such fraud, should emulate GEICO. (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc. Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos. Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk
    0 Comments 0 Shares 758 Views 0
  • In Deutschland soll bald jeder automatisch ein Organspende-Ersatzteillager werden, wenn es nach dem Willen der Regierung, oder nach dem Willen der Pharmakonzerne, geht (wobei man sich langsam fragt, ob das nicht merkwürdigerweise ein- und dasselbe ist), ich denke, die folgende Petition kann und sollte man unterschreiben:
    https://www.patriotpetition.org/2024/10/23/organraub-stoppen-nein-zur-organspende-reform/

    Wer nicht versteht, warum Organspenden gelinde gesagt "moralisch fragwürdig" sind, sollte sich vielleicht besser die folgende Dokumentation auf Youtube ansehen:
    Organspende: Die verheimlichte Wahrheit
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgGkuD0wUJE
    In Deutschland soll bald jeder automatisch ein Organspende-Ersatzteillager werden, wenn es nach dem Willen der Regierung, oder nach dem Willen der Pharmakonzerne, geht (wobei man sich langsam fragt, ob das nicht merkwürdigerweise ein- und dasselbe ist), ich denke, die folgende Petition kann und sollte man unterschreiben: https://www.patriotpetition.org/2024/10/23/organraub-stoppen-nein-zur-organspende-reform/ Wer nicht versteht, warum Organspenden gelinde gesagt "moralisch fragwürdig" sind, sollte sich vielleicht besser die folgende Dokumentation auf Youtube ansehen: Organspende: Die verheimlichte Wahrheit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgGkuD0wUJE
    WWW.PATRIOTPETITION.ORG
    Organraub stoppen – NEIN zur Organspende-Reform!
    Die Widerspruchslösung macht uns zu menschlichen Ersatzteillagern und Leibeigenen von Regierung und Pharmaindustrie. 10907 Unterzeichner
    0 Comments 0 Shares 121 Views
  • https://medforth.org/neureichenau-nach-absetzung-mehrerer-migranten-schleuser-rammt-polizeiauto/
    https://medforth.org/neureichenau-nach-absetzung-mehrerer-migranten-schleuser-rammt-polizeiauto/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 48 Views
More Results
Sponsored

We are 100% funded for October.

Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here