Feds Breached Attorney/Client Privilege to Strategize Against Political Prisoners, says Proud Boy Leader from the Gulag https://battleplan.news/watch?id=65023b97c5d54ea882232461

https://clashdaily.com/2022/04/durham-investigation-dems-rediscover-attorney-client-privilege-now-that-hillary-needs-to-invoke-it/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/03/totally-corrupt-federal-prosecutors-secretly-obtained-steve-bannons-attorneys-emails-communications-disregarding-attorney-client-privilege/?utm_source=Gab&utm_medium=PostTopSharingButtons&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons

Andrew Giuliani, the son of the former New York mayor and President Trump lawyer, said the raid on his father's home and office by federal agents show that the government can now target anyone. "When federal agents raided my father's home at dawn Thursday morning, the Biden Justice Department was sending a clear message to America: If it can happen to the former mayor who led New York City through 9/11, it can happen to you, too," he said in a Washington Examiner commentary. "During Joseph Stalin’s reign in the Soviet Union, the dictator staged the Moscow Trials, which put prominent members of his political opposition on trial. Denied any kind of due process, most of the defendants were charged with crimes against the Soviet government. Several were sentenced to death. These show trials, which often centered on the defendants' collusion with foreign powers, were a late step along the road to Stalin's mass purges, one of the most horrifying periods in Soviet history," he said. "This raid, like Stalin’s tactics, was conducted for the sake of imagery — intended to have a symbolic significance. While it is highly unusual for federal agents to target a client’s attorney, the Justice Department has come to rely on this tactic for attacking the Democrats’ political opposition. The ramifications for this are terrifying for the rule of law: One of its most fundamental pillars, attorney-client privilege, is being eroded amid highly theatrical displays of partisan warfare," he warned. The STATES need to organize and prevent the Federal Government #Criminals from harassing and intimidating citizens!!! #Government has a JOB! It's about time they START DOING IT!!!

Giuliani: DOJ Secretly Went into My iCloud Account in 2019, Invaded Attorney Client Privilege as We Were Defending Against Phony Impeachment https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/giuliani-doj-secretly-went-icloud-account-2019-invaded-attorney-client-privilege-defending-phony-impeachment/?utm_source=Gab&utm_medium=PostTopSharingButtons&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/attorney-client-privilege-federal-prosecutors-sdny-working-seize-rudy-giulianis-emails/?ff_source=Email&ff_medium=the-gateway-pundit&ff_campaign=dailyam&ff_content=daily

CLINTON ACCOUNTABILITY AT LAST! Tick tock......times up! Bombshell: Court Rules Hillary MUST Answer Additional Questions About Her Email Scandal Under Oath Beth BaumannBeth Baumann| @eb454|Posted: Nov 20, 2018 12:35 AM U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled on Thursday that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has 30 days to answer additional questions about her email scandal. The decision comes after Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit to obtain additional information from Clinton and Director of Information Resource Management of the Executive Secretariat John Bentel. The watchdog group also wanted top Clinton aides and State Department officials, including Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills', deposition videos made public. The lawsuit was part of a broader Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit that came about in October 2016 when Clinton refused to answer several of Judicial Watch's questions, saying she "does not recall." After a lengthy hearing, Clinton was told she must answer these two questions: 1. Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational. 2. During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts. The judge did not buy her assertion of attorney-client privilege on the question about the emails “in the State’s system.” “A federal court ordered Hillary Clinton to answer more questions about her illicit email system – which is good news,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement. “It is shameful that Judicial Watch attorneys must continue to battle the State and Justice Departments, which still defend Hillary Clinton, for basic answers to our questions about Clinton’s email misconduct.” Although Judicial Watch was successful in that aspect of the lawsuit, the judge refused to make the deposition tapes public. https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2018/11/20/bombshell-court-rules-hillary-must-answer-additional-questions-about-her-email-scandal-under-oath-n2536246