• https://www.inventiva.co.in/trends/high-court-filed/

    INDIA’S HIGH COURT FILED THE WORLD’S FIRST VACCINE MURDER CASE AGAINST BILL GATES, ADAR POONAWALLA.
    "Adar Poonawalla has launched a Vaccine Murder lawsuit in India’s High Court<http://delhihighcourt.nic.in/> against Bill Gates.

    A Criminal Writ Petition (St.) 18017 of 2021 was filed in the case of Kiran Yadav vs State and ors.

    As a result of the vaccination of a 23-year-old male, the Petitioner is suing AstraZeneca (Covishield) producer Bill Gates, his partner Adar Poonawall and other government authorities and leaders. The deceased injected themselves with the Covishield vaccine because they believed it was completely safe. The Railways had mandated that only people vaccinated twice were allowed to travel...."

    An Indian Supreme Court decision in the case of Kalpana Mehta, which found that Bill Gates had criminal antecedents in the death of eight female youngsters in India via a criminal trial of HPV vaccinations, was cited by the Petitioner as a piece of solid evidence against Gates and his vaccine syndicate.


    "...As evidence of Bill Gates’ evil plans, the Petitioner has also cited 4.5 million children in India who were left paralysed as a result of a new strain of polio. Furthermore, this serves as further evidence of Bill Gates’ perversion and criminality...."
    https://www.inventiva.co.in/trends/high-court-filed/ INDIA’S HIGH COURT FILED THE WORLD’S FIRST VACCINE MURDER CASE AGAINST BILL GATES, ADAR POONAWALLA. "Adar Poonawalla has launched a Vaccine Murder lawsuit in India’s High Court<http://delhihighcourt.nic.in/> against Bill Gates. A Criminal Writ Petition (St.) 18017 of 2021 was filed in the case of Kiran Yadav vs State and ors. As a result of the vaccination of a 23-year-old male, the Petitioner is suing AstraZeneca (Covishield) producer Bill Gates, his partner Adar Poonawall and other government authorities and leaders. The deceased injected themselves with the Covishield vaccine because they believed it was completely safe. The Railways had mandated that only people vaccinated twice were allowed to travel...." An Indian Supreme Court decision in the case of Kalpana Mehta, which found that Bill Gates had criminal antecedents in the death of eight female youngsters in India via a criminal trial of HPV vaccinations, was cited by the Petitioner as a piece of solid evidence against Gates and his vaccine syndicate. "...As evidence of Bill Gates’ evil plans, the Petitioner has also cited 4.5 million children in India who were left paralysed as a result of a new strain of polio. Furthermore, this serves as further evidence of Bill Gates’ perversion and criminality...."
    0 Comments 0 Shares 3023 Views
  • https://medforth.biz/uk-govt-data-young-women-who-took-astrazeneca-vax-had-3-5-times-higher-risk-of-heart-death/
    https://medforth.biz/uk-govt-data-young-women-who-took-astrazeneca-vax-had-3-5-times-higher-risk-of-heart-death/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 547 Views
  • https://medforth.biz/uk-govt-data-young-women-who-took-astrazeneca-vax-had-3-5-times-higher-risk-of-heart-death/
    https://medforth.biz/uk-govt-data-young-women-who-took-astrazeneca-vax-had-3-5-times-higher-risk-of-heart-death/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 569 Views
  • https://medforth.biz/uk-govt-data-young-women-who-took-astrazeneca-vax-had-3-5-times-higher-risk-of-heart-death/
    https://medforth.biz/uk-govt-data-young-women-who-took-astrazeneca-vax-had-3-5-times-higher-risk-of-heart-death/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 562 Views
  • https://medforth.biz/uk-govt-data-young-women-who-took-astrazeneca-vax-had-3-5-times-higher-risk-of-heart-death/
    https://medforth.biz/uk-govt-data-young-women-who-took-astrazeneca-vax-had-3-5-times-higher-risk-of-heart-death/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 557 Views
  • https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/risk-cardiac-death-tripled-young-women-following-astrazeneca-covid-19-vaccination-study
    https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/risk-cardiac-death-tripled-young-women-following-astrazeneca-covid-19-vaccination-study
    WWW.ZEROHEDGE.COM
    Risk Of Cardiac Death Tripled For Young Women Following AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccination: Study
    "Receiving a first dose of a non-mRNA vaccine was associated with an increased risk of cardiac death in young women..."
    0 Comments 0 Shares 574 Views
  • https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/adam-rowland-astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-injury/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=8474c056-42d3-4944-b25a-3a4eea3ab01f
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/adam-rowland-astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-injury/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=8474c056-42d3-4944-b25a-3a4eea3ab01f
    CHILDRENSHEALTHDEFENSE.ORG
    Exclusive: From the Peak of Fitness to Wanting to Die — How the COVID Vaccine Ruined One Man’s Life
    In his mid-40s, Adam Rowland was the fittest he’d ever been, with a promising career working with top professional athletes — until two doses of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine turned his life into “a living hell.”
    0 Comments 0 Shares 603 Views
  • The Government has responded to the petition you signed – “Remove indemnity from the manufacturers of covid-19 vaccines”.
    Government responded:
    As indemnities for manufacturers do not generally prevent individuals from pursuing a legal claim for compensation, the Government would not consider it necessary to seek to remove any such indemnity.
    The Government cannot comment on the terms on which COVID-19 vaccines were supplied as these are confidential.
    Even though the COVID-19 vaccines have been developed at pace, at no point and at no stage of development has safety been bypassed. These vaccines have satisfied, in full, all the necessary requirements for safety, effectiveness and quality.

    The speed of the vaccine rollout put the UK in a strong position. The UK was the first country in the world to grant a temporary authorisation for and deploy the Pfizer and Oxford / AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines. The UK was the first major European economy and first G20 member to vaccinate 50% of its population with at least one dose, and to provide boosters to 50% of the population.
    The benefits of the COVID-19 vaccines rollout have been demonstrated in terms of public health and allowing the gradual and safe removal of restrictions on everyday life over the past eighteen months.

    In general, indemnities given to manufacturers do not prevent individuals from pursuing a legal claim against a manufacturer for compensation. Rather, the indemnity determines who will pay the manufacturer’s losses arising from such a claim. The Government would therefore not consider that it is necessary to seek to remove any such indemnities given to manufacturers of COVID-19 vaccines for the purpose of allowing individuals to pursue claims for compensation against them.
    Although the details of indemnity schemes are commercially confidential, we understand that many governments entered into such arrangements to ensure ready access to COVID-19 vaccines.
    In August 2021, amendments to the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 were made to support the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines. Although the legislation provides partial immunity from civil liability for vaccines supplied under emergency authorisation, it preserves individuals’ right to sue the producers of the vaccine under Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987. This provides an important level of protection if the safety of the product is not such as people are generally entitled to expect, taking all circumstances into account, and if that defect causes personal injury.

    The Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) is a no-fault scheme that provides a one-off, tax-free payment of £120,000 to claimants who have been found, on the balance of probabilities, to have been seriously disabled as a result of a vaccine for a disease listed in the Vaccine Damage Payment Act 1979. The figure of £120,000 is a one-off lump-sum payment, not designed to cover lifetime costs for those impacted.

    It is in addition to the Government support package to those with a disability or long-term health condition, including Statutory Sick Pay, Universal Credit, Employment and Support Allowance, Attendance Allowance, and Personal Independence Payments.

    A successful claim to VDPS does not stop an individual from bringing litigation against the vaccine manufacturer for damages as the VDPS is not a compensation scheme.
    Department of Health and Social Care
    This is a revised response. The Petitions Committee requested a response which more directly addressed the request of the petition. You can find the original response towards the bottom of the petition page (https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/619190)

    Click this link to view the response online:
    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/619190?reveal_response=yes
    The Petitions Committee will take a look at this petition and its response. They can press the government for action and gather evidence. If this petition reaches 100,000 signatures, the Committee will consider it for a debate.
    The Committee is made up of 11 MPs, from political parties in government and in opposition. It is entirely independent of the Government. Find out more about the Committee: https://petition.parliament.uk/help#petitions-committee
    Thanks,
    The Petitions team
    UK Government and Parliament
    The Government has responded to the petition you signed – “Remove indemnity from the manufacturers of covid-19 vaccines”. Government responded: As indemnities for manufacturers do not generally prevent individuals from pursuing a legal claim for compensation, the Government would not consider it necessary to seek to remove any such indemnity. The Government cannot comment on the terms on which COVID-19 vaccines were supplied as these are confidential. Even though the COVID-19 vaccines have been developed at pace, at no point and at no stage of development has safety been bypassed. These vaccines have satisfied, in full, all the necessary requirements for safety, effectiveness and quality. The speed of the vaccine rollout put the UK in a strong position. The UK was the first country in the world to grant a temporary authorisation for and deploy the Pfizer and Oxford / AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines. The UK was the first major European economy and first G20 member to vaccinate 50% of its population with at least one dose, and to provide boosters to 50% of the population. The benefits of the COVID-19 vaccines rollout have been demonstrated in terms of public health and allowing the gradual and safe removal of restrictions on everyday life over the past eighteen months. In general, indemnities given to manufacturers do not prevent individuals from pursuing a legal claim against a manufacturer for compensation. Rather, the indemnity determines who will pay the manufacturer’s losses arising from such a claim. The Government would therefore not consider that it is necessary to seek to remove any such indemnities given to manufacturers of COVID-19 vaccines for the purpose of allowing individuals to pursue claims for compensation against them. Although the details of indemnity schemes are commercially confidential, we understand that many governments entered into such arrangements to ensure ready access to COVID-19 vaccines. In August 2021, amendments to the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 were made to support the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines. Although the legislation provides partial immunity from civil liability for vaccines supplied under emergency authorisation, it preserves individuals’ right to sue the producers of the vaccine under Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987. This provides an important level of protection if the safety of the product is not such as people are generally entitled to expect, taking all circumstances into account, and if that defect causes personal injury. The Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) is a no-fault scheme that provides a one-off, tax-free payment of £120,000 to claimants who have been found, on the balance of probabilities, to have been seriously disabled as a result of a vaccine for a disease listed in the Vaccine Damage Payment Act 1979. The figure of £120,000 is a one-off lump-sum payment, not designed to cover lifetime costs for those impacted. It is in addition to the Government support package to those with a disability or long-term health condition, including Statutory Sick Pay, Universal Credit, Employment and Support Allowance, Attendance Allowance, and Personal Independence Payments. A successful claim to VDPS does not stop an individual from bringing litigation against the vaccine manufacturer for damages as the VDPS is not a compensation scheme. Department of Health and Social Care This is a revised response. The Petitions Committee requested a response which more directly addressed the request of the petition. You can find the original response towards the bottom of the petition page (https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/619190) Click this link to view the response online: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/619190?reveal_response=yes The Petitions Committee will take a look at this petition and its response. They can press the government for action and gather evidence. If this petition reaches 100,000 signatures, the Committee will consider it for a debate. The Committee is made up of 11 MPs, from political parties in government and in opposition. It is entirely independent of the Government. Find out more about the Committee: https://petition.parliament.uk/help#petitions-committee Thanks, The Petitions team UK Government and Parliament
    0 Comments 0 Shares 672 Views
  • https://www.infowars.com/posts/coroner-fit-and-healthy-27-year-old-mans-death-from-blood-clot-direct-result-of-astrazeneca-covid-jab/
    https://www.infowars.com/posts/coroner-fit-and-healthy-27-year-old-mans-death-from-blood-clot-direct-result-of-astrazeneca-covid-jab/
    WWW.INFOWARS.COM
    Coroner: ‘Fit and Healthy’ 27-Year-Old Man’s Death from Blood Clot ‘Direct Result’ of AstraZeneca Covid Jab
    'In Jack’s case, I will record that Jack Last died of a blood clot to the brain as a direct result of his body’s reaction to the AstraZeneca vaccine given to him on March 30, 2021,' coroner told UK inquest.
    Angry
    Like
    Sad
    4
    0 Comments 0 Shares 544 Views
  • Coroner: ‘Fit and Healthy’ 27-Year-Old Man’s Death from Blood Clot ‘Direct Result’ of AstraZeneca Covid Jab https://www.infowars.com/posts/coroner-fit-and-healthy-27-year-old-mans-death-from-blood-clot-direct-result-of-astrazeneca-covid-jab/
    Coroner: ‘Fit and Healthy’ 27-Year-Old Man’s Death from Blood Clot ‘Direct Result’ of AstraZeneca Covid Jab https://www.infowars.com/posts/coroner-fit-and-healthy-27-year-old-mans-death-from-blood-clot-direct-result-of-astrazeneca-covid-jab/
    WWW.INFOWARS.COM
    Coroner: ‘Fit and Healthy’ 27-Year-Old Man’s Death from Blood Clot ‘Direct Result’ of AstraZeneca Covid Jab
    'In Jack’s case, I will record that Jack Last died of a blood clot to the brain as a direct result of his body’s reaction to the AstraZeneca vaccine given to him on March 30, 2021,' coroner told UK inquest.
    Angry
    Like
    3
    0 Comments 0 Shares 519 Views
More Results