• It's happening again, this time it's not just in Europe, but it's world-wide. Anti-Semitism is on the rise because of not just a left-wing ideology, but the entire left-wing. They just don't learn. They never do. The idiots opened Pandora's Box again with their racism.

    I say let war happen, but throw only the left-wing into the war, and let them kill each other. All our problems will be solved.

    https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/opposition-leader-compares-anti-semitism-to-major-gun-massacre-5627319
    It's happening again, this time it's not just in Europe, but it's world-wide. Anti-Semitism is on the rise because of not just a left-wing ideology, but the entire left-wing. They just don't learn. They never do. The idiots opened Pandora's Box again with their racism. I say let war happen, but throw only the left-wing into the war, and let them kill each other. All our problems will be solved. https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/opposition-leader-compares-anti-semitism-to-major-gun-massacre-5627319
    WWW.THEEPOCHTIMES.COM
    Opposition Leader Defends Comments Comparing Anti-Semitism to Major Gun Massacre
    The opposition leader claims he was comparing the response of Anthony Albanese to that of John Howard, and says the PM has failed to stem rising antisemitism.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 168 Views
  • https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/nebraska-state-senator-switching-from-democrat-to-republican-5621350?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=imctgm01
    Nebraska state Sen. Mike McDonnell has announced that he’s switching party affiliation from Democrat to Republican, citing his Christian faith and views on abortion.
    Mr. McDonnell made the announcement in an April 3 statement to local media outlets, citing the Democrat Party’s opposition to his pro-life stance.
    “When I ran for reelection in 2020 I was Pro-Life,” he said, adding that he’s Catholic and recalling that in 2016 he ran as a pro-life candidate for Nebraska’s legislative District 5.
    “I have asked the Democratic Party to respect my religious based Pro-Life position,” he continued. “Instead over the last year they have decided to punish me for being Pro-Life.” The Nebraska Democratic Party issued a statement in response to Mr. McDonnell’s party change, expressing “respect” for his work with the party while denying that the censure vote had anything to do with his pro-life views.
    Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen, a Republican, showed a willingness on April 2 to back legislation that would potentially prevent President Joe Biden from getting one of the state’s electoral votes. He did this by endorsing a statewide “winner-takes-all” system that is likely to boost former President Donald Trump.
    Unlike every other U.S. state, only Nebraska and Maine assign Electoral College votes by district. A congressional district that centers around Omaha, the largest city in the state, has sometimes gone in favor of Democratic presidential candidates, including in 2020.
    However, if the state switched to a more standard system, Nebraska’s three electoral votes would likely all go to President Trump as the former president easily won the GOP-dominated state by wide margins in both 2016 and 2020.
    https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/nebraska-state-senator-switching-from-democrat-to-republican-5621350?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=imctgm01 Nebraska state Sen. Mike McDonnell has announced that he’s switching party affiliation from Democrat to Republican, citing his Christian faith and views on abortion. Mr. McDonnell made the announcement in an April 3 statement to local media outlets, citing the Democrat Party’s opposition to his pro-life stance. “When I ran for reelection in 2020 I was Pro-Life,” he said, adding that he’s Catholic and recalling that in 2016 he ran as a pro-life candidate for Nebraska’s legislative District 5. “I have asked the Democratic Party to respect my religious based Pro-Life position,” he continued. “Instead over the last year they have decided to punish me for being Pro-Life.” The Nebraska Democratic Party issued a statement in response to Mr. McDonnell’s party change, expressing “respect” for his work with the party while denying that the censure vote had anything to do with his pro-life views. Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen, a Republican, showed a willingness on April 2 to back legislation that would potentially prevent President Joe Biden from getting one of the state’s electoral votes. He did this by endorsing a statewide “winner-takes-all” system that is likely to boost former President Donald Trump. Unlike every other U.S. state, only Nebraska and Maine assign Electoral College votes by district. A congressional district that centers around Omaha, the largest city in the state, has sometimes gone in favor of Democratic presidential candidates, including in 2020. However, if the state switched to a more standard system, Nebraska’s three electoral votes would likely all go to President Trump as the former president easily won the GOP-dominated state by wide margins in both 2016 and 2020.
    WWW.THEEPOCHTIMES.COM
    Nebraska State Senator Switching From Democrat to Republican
    ‘Being a Christian member of the Roman Catholic Church and pro-life is more important to me than being a registered Democrat.’
    0 Comments 0 Shares 922 Views
  • https://medforth.biz/the-globalist-french-regime-wants-to-destroy-the-oppositional-website-riposte-laique/
    https://medforth.biz/the-globalist-french-regime-wants-to-destroy-the-oppositional-website-riposte-laique/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 83 Views
  • https://medforth.biz/spains-amnesty-law-galvanizes-the-opposition/
    https://medforth.biz/spains-amnesty-law-galvanizes-the-opposition/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 130 Views
  • https://medforth.biz/uk-a-presenter-for-london-based-iran-international-which-is-affiliated-with-the-iranian-opposition-stabbed-outside-his-home-in-the-citys-south/
    https://medforth.biz/uk-a-presenter-for-london-based-iran-international-which-is-affiliated-with-the-iranian-opposition-stabbed-outside-his-home-in-the-citys-south/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 129 Views
  • https://medforth.biz/poland-lawfare-continues-against-opposition-conservatives-as-former-officials-homes-raided/
    https://medforth.biz/poland-lawfare-continues-against-opposition-conservatives-as-former-officials-homes-raided/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 150 Views
  • What Happens After Submitting Election Fraud Evidence? YOU GET ARRESTED!

    SUMMARY: Do you think Dem-Marxists & Coup-Installed Dementia Joe Administration are not politically persecuting their opposition? Perhaps say it slow to let America’s governing status sink in: “Dem-Marxist Tyranny with a splash of Corporatist-Fascism”…. TGP has one story…: https://bit.ly/3TJyWY6
    #BidenPoliticalPersecution #DemMarxistTyranny
    What Happens After Submitting Election Fraud Evidence? YOU GET ARRESTED! SUMMARY: Do you think Dem-Marxists & Coup-Installed Dementia Joe Administration are not politically persecuting their opposition? Perhaps say it slow to let America’s governing status sink in: “Dem-Marxist Tyranny with a splash of Corporatist-Fascism”…. TGP has one story…: https://bit.ly/3TJyWY6 #BidenPoliticalPersecution #DemMarxistTyranny
    BIT.LY
    What Happens After Submitting Election Fraud Evidence? YOU GET ARRESTED!
    Posted by John R. Houk, Blog Editor March 19, 2024 Do you think Dem-Marxists & Coup-Installed Dementia Joe Administration are not po...
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 730 Views
  • For all you naysayers out there, this should be your clue to get on the program and WITH the program.

    We’re now over halfway to the benchmark to call an Article V convention, and the closer we get, the stronger the opposition becomes.
    Just recently, we got word that Common Cause sent out yet another fundraising email to rally opposition to our efforts.
    In their own words…

    “Common Cause is sounding the alarm far and wide – bringing this dangerous event into the eyes of the public, and using grassroots power to stop it.”
    But they’re not just “sounding the alarm”, they’re sending lobbyists into the state legislatures to counter our efforts and they are spreading dangerous lies to foster fear in the hearts of the American people.

    They want the grassroots to reject the Constitution and view Article V as a “secret and sinister plot” that will “gut the First Amendment.”

    But there’s clearly nothing secret about what we’re doing. So why are they REALLY afraid? Because when we succeed in getting 34 states to pass our legislation, a convention will be called where the states can propose amendments to…
    ++ Get the federal government out of our healthcare system.
    ++ Impose term limits on Congress.
    ++ Balance the budget.
    ++ Take back our education systems.
    ++ Limit federal power.
    Congress won’t take these actions. But a Convention of States can.
    The Left understands that we could do away with Obamacare without Congress... and now they’re on the war path for COS.

    Now is our moment, but with the Left beginning to unite against us, it’ll be an uphill battle.

    Will you chip in $25 today and help us combat the Left and do what Congress doesn’t have the courage to do?

    We urgently need your support to fight George Soros’ anti-Convention of States campaign. Because sometimes soon just isn't soon enough!
    https://imgflip.com/i/485zgt

    Convention of States ACTION:
    https://conventionofstates.com/take_action
    For all you naysayers out there, this should be your clue to get on the program and WITH the program. We’re now over halfway to the benchmark to call an Article V convention, and the closer we get, the stronger the opposition becomes. Just recently, we got word that Common Cause sent out yet another fundraising email to rally opposition to our efforts. In their own words… “Common Cause is sounding the alarm far and wide – bringing this dangerous event into the eyes of the public, and using grassroots power to stop it.” But they’re not just “sounding the alarm”, they’re sending lobbyists into the state legislatures to counter our efforts and they are spreading dangerous lies to foster fear in the hearts of the American people. They want the grassroots to reject the Constitution and view Article V as a “secret and sinister plot” that will “gut the First Amendment.” But there’s clearly nothing secret about what we’re doing. So why are they REALLY afraid? Because when we succeed in getting 34 states to pass our legislation, a convention will be called where the states can propose amendments to… ++ Get the federal government out of our healthcare system. ++ Impose term limits on Congress. ++ Balance the budget. ++ Take back our education systems. ++ Limit federal power. Congress won’t take these actions. But a Convention of States can. The Left understands that we could do away with Obamacare without Congress... and now they’re on the war path for COS. Now is our moment, but with the Left beginning to unite against us, it’ll be an uphill battle. Will you chip in $25 today and help us combat the Left and do what Congress doesn’t have the courage to do? We urgently need your support to fight George Soros’ anti-Convention of States campaign. Because sometimes soon just isn't soon enough! https://imgflip.com/i/485zgt Convention of States ACTION: https://conventionofstates.com/take_action
    Haha
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1187 Views
  • Rules for Radicals recommends mostly working within the system—though in the twisted way Machiavelli is reputed to have done (whether or not he’s been interpreted fairly). Below, you’ll find Alinsky’s list of 13 “Rules for Radicals,” offered with his proviso that political activism cannot be a self-serving enterprise: “People cannot be free unless they are willing to sacrifice some of their interests to guarantee the freedom of others. The price of democracy is the ongoing pursuit of the common good by all of the people.”
    1. “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood.
    2. “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone.
    3. “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.
    4. “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.
    5. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.
    6. “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones.
    7. “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news.
    8. “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.
    9. “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist.
    10. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.” It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign.
    11. “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.
    12. “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem.
    13. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.
    Rules for Radicals recommends mostly working within the system—though in the twisted way Machiavelli is reputed to have done (whether or not he’s been interpreted fairly). Below, you’ll find Alinsky’s list of 13 “Rules for Radicals,” offered with his proviso that political activism cannot be a self-serving enterprise: “People cannot be free unless they are willing to sacrifice some of their interests to guarantee the freedom of others. The price of democracy is the ongoing pursuit of the common good by all of the people.” 1. “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood. 2. “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. 3. “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. 4. “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. 5. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. 6. “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. 7. “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news. 8. “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. 9. “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. 10. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.” It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign. 11. “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. 12. “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. 13. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1223 Views
  • "According to a recent Federal Reserve report, an international agreement reached in the 1990s mandates, need a new system banking regulations. These modifications aim to align national policies with globally established standards. Despite long-standing opposition from influential banking institutions, the proposed changes are expected to take effect by the end of the year. The reforms primarily focus on restricting banks' lending capabilities, ensuring they conform to universal guidelines. It is crucial for the Federal Reserve to have a strong leader who can resist pressure from powerful financial institutions and safeguard the stability of America's financial system."

    The integration of the international financial system has led to large, globally active firms operating within a system of national government and regulation. While there is no realistic prospect for a global banking regulator, the responsibility and authority for financial stability continue to rest with national or regional authorities. The challenge lies in effectively sharing oversight of these large firms among regulators. Varying forms of regulation across countries are reasonable, considering different economic circumstances, currencies, and levels of depth and development in banking and capital markets. Even between the United States and the European Union, legitimate differences exist within the broader convergence around minimum regulatory and supervisory standards developed at various forums.

    The financial crisis exposed vulnerabilities created by foreign banking operations, and the Basel Committee and national regulators were slow to respond to the expansion in scale and scope of the world’s largest banking organizations. Addressing these vulnerabilities requires thoughtful coordination and effective supervision of international activities by U.S. banking organizations.


    In summary, the Federal Reserve’s role in regulating international banking activities is critical, and strong leadership is essential to navigate the complexities of global financial systems and ensure stability.
    "According to a recent Federal Reserve report, an international agreement reached in the 1990s mandates, need a new system banking regulations. These modifications aim to align national policies with globally established standards. Despite long-standing opposition from influential banking institutions, the proposed changes are expected to take effect by the end of the year. The reforms primarily focus on restricting banks' lending capabilities, ensuring they conform to universal guidelines. It is crucial for the Federal Reserve to have a strong leader who can resist pressure from powerful financial institutions and safeguard the stability of America's financial system." The integration of the international financial system has led to large, globally active firms operating within a system of national government and regulation. While there is no realistic prospect for a global banking regulator, the responsibility and authority for financial stability continue to rest with national or regional authorities. The challenge lies in effectively sharing oversight of these large firms among regulators. Varying forms of regulation across countries are reasonable, considering different economic circumstances, currencies, and levels of depth and development in banking and capital markets. Even between the United States and the European Union, legitimate differences exist within the broader convergence around minimum regulatory and supervisory standards developed at various forums. The financial crisis exposed vulnerabilities created by foreign banking operations, and the Basel Committee and national regulators were slow to respond to the expansion in scale and scope of the world’s largest banking organizations. Addressing these vulnerabilities requires thoughtful coordination and effective supervision of international activities by U.S. banking organizations. In summary, the Federal Reserve’s role in regulating international banking activities is critical, and strong leadership is essential to navigate the complexities of global financial systems and ensure stability.
    1 Comments 0 Shares 1749 Views
More Results