• There was no insurrection and Donald Trump was not a participant.
    https://imgflip.com/i/8k1d03

    BTW #libtards, the United States is not now, nor has it ever been a democracy. We are a constitutional REPUBLIC, & have been since July 4th, 1776. Sorry most of you flunked U.S. History.

    As a matter of FACT President Trump called for a peaceful demonstration. Just because a few triggered, hateful democrats and Uniparty members (RINOS) called the demonstration an insurrection doesn't mean it was one.

    Patriots weren't the cause of destruction, the FBI and radical left-wing Antifa was. We all know it was a setup. There is PROOF of it, and the Capitol Police were co-conspirators in it.

    In the United States, insurrection against the authority of the federal government is a crime under 18 U.S. Code §2383, which provides that:

    Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

    The next question is why some protestors who were not even present on January 6 were sentenced to 17 years in prison?

    Federal law also grants to the president of the United States the authority to employ the armed forces of the United States and nationalized state militias to put down an insurrection against a state government upon the request of the state’s legislature or governor (10 U.S. Code §251) and to suppress or prevent civil disturbances—“unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion[s]”—that, in the president’s judgment, have interfered or would interfere with the enforcement of federal laws in any state (§252) or have effectively deprived citizens of their rights under the U.S. Constitution (§253). These and other provisions of Chapter 13 of the U.S. Code, entitled “Insurrection,” originated in two pieces of legislation from the late 18th and early 19th centuries: an act of Congress (1795) that extended to the president Congress’s constitutional authority “to provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions” (Article I, §8) and the Insurrection Act (1807), which additionally authorized the president to deploy the armed forces of the United States in the same circumstances and for the same purpose. During the subsequent two centuries, the Insurrection Act was amended numerous times and invoked by presidents including Abraham Lincoln (to enable the use of federal troops to defeat the secession of Confederate states in the American Civil War), Dwight D. Eisenhower (to assist efforts to desegregate public schools in the South), and George H.W. Bush (to quell riots in Los Angeles following the acquittal of police officers involved in the beating of Rodney King). In 2020, in response to sometimes violent demonstrations against police brutality and anti-Black racism in several U.S. cities (see United States: The killing of George Floyd and nationwide racial injustice protests).

    Then President Donald J. Trump threatened to use his authority under the Insurrection Act to unleash deadly force against lawbreaking protesters.
    https://www.britannica.com/topic/insurrection-politics
    There was no insurrection and Donald Trump was not a participant. https://imgflip.com/i/8k1d03 BTW #libtards, the United States is not now, nor has it ever been a democracy. We are a constitutional REPUBLIC, & have been since July 4th, 1776. Sorry most of you flunked U.S. History. As a matter of FACT President Trump called for a peaceful demonstration. Just because a few triggered, hateful democrats and Uniparty members (RINOS) called the demonstration an insurrection doesn't mean it was one. Patriots weren't the cause of destruction, the FBI and radical left-wing Antifa was. We all know it was a setup. There is PROOF of it, and the Capitol Police were co-conspirators in it. In the United States, insurrection against the authority of the federal government is a crime under 18 U.S. Code §2383, which provides that: Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. The next question is why some protestors who were not even present on January 6 were sentenced to 17 years in prison? Federal law also grants to the president of the United States the authority to employ the armed forces of the United States and nationalized state militias to put down an insurrection against a state government upon the request of the state’s legislature or governor (10 U.S. Code §251) and to suppress or prevent civil disturbances—“unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion[s]”—that, in the president’s judgment, have interfered or would interfere with the enforcement of federal laws in any state (§252) or have effectively deprived citizens of their rights under the U.S. Constitution (§253). These and other provisions of Chapter 13 of the U.S. Code, entitled “Insurrection,” originated in two pieces of legislation from the late 18th and early 19th centuries: an act of Congress (1795) that extended to the president Congress’s constitutional authority “to provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions” (Article I, §8) and the Insurrection Act (1807), which additionally authorized the president to deploy the armed forces of the United States in the same circumstances and for the same purpose. During the subsequent two centuries, the Insurrection Act was amended numerous times and invoked by presidents including Abraham Lincoln (to enable the use of federal troops to defeat the secession of Confederate states in the American Civil War), Dwight D. Eisenhower (to assist efforts to desegregate public schools in the South), and George H.W. Bush (to quell riots in Los Angeles following the acquittal of police officers involved in the beating of Rodney King). In 2020, in response to sometimes violent demonstrations against police brutality and anti-Black racism in several U.S. cities (see United States: The killing of George Floyd and nationwide racial injustice protests). Then President Donald J. Trump threatened to use his authority under the Insurrection Act to unleash deadly force against lawbreaking protesters. https://www.britannica.com/topic/insurrection-politics
    0 Comments 0 Shares 3233 Views
  • A Bill to ban citizens militias.
    Senate Bill 3589 (S.3589).
    Second Amendment. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
    https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/3589/text?s=1&r=6
    God Bless America, God Save The Republic
    A Bill to ban citizens militias. Senate Bill 3589 (S.3589). Second Amendment. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/3589/text?s=1&r=6 God Bless America, God Save The Republic
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1995 Views
  • Democrats Propose Bill to Effectively Ban Militias

    https://www.infowars.com/posts/democrats-propose-bill-to-prohibit-militia-activity/
    Democrats Propose Bill to Effectively Ban Militias https://www.infowars.com/posts/democrats-propose-bill-to-prohibit-militia-activity/
    WWW.INFOWARS.COM
    Democrats Propose Bill to Effectively Ban Militias
    "The forces of bigotry, hatred, and violent extremism must be stopped for the sake of our democracy," says Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.).
    Angry
    2
    2 Comments 0 Shares 1403 Views
  • Paranoid Dems Introduce Unconstitutional Bill Banning Militias

    https://www.infowars.com/posts/paranoid-dems-introduce-unconstitutional-bill-banning-militias/
    Paranoid Dems Introduce Unconstitutional Bill Banning Militias https://www.infowars.com/posts/paranoid-dems-introduce-unconstitutional-bill-banning-militias/
    WWW.INFOWARS.COM
    Paranoid Dems Introduce Unconstitutional Bill Banning Militias
    Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) and Congressman Jamie Raskin (MD-08) behind outrageous legislation
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1802 Views
  • America's Militias respond to the far left media. Read the narrative BELOW the video!
    https://rumble.com/v466bzf-journos-joke-about-trump-being-assassinated-like-jfk-on-hot-mic.html
    America's Militias respond to the far left media. Read the narrative BELOW the video! https://rumble.com/v466bzf-journos-joke-about-trump-being-assassinated-like-jfk-on-hot-mic.html
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2890 Views
  • US Carries Out Airstrikes in Syria in Response to Iran Militia Attacks

    The U.S. carried out airstrikes against two facilities in eastern Syria used by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and militias they support, the Pentagon announced Oct. 26.

    Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III said the “narrowly tailored” strikes were intended to respond to a series of attacks against American forces in Iraq and Syria by Iranian-backed militias. The strikes were carried out by two U.S. Air Force F-16s, a senior military official told reporters
    https://tinu.be/E8Ly2cmpH
    US Carries Out Airstrikes in Syria in Response to Iran Militia Attacks The U.S. carried out airstrikes against two facilities in eastern Syria used by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and militias they support, the Pentagon announced Oct. 26. Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III said the “narrowly tailored” strikes were intended to respond to a series of attacks against American forces in Iraq and Syria by Iranian-backed militias. The strikes were carried out by two U.S. Air Force F-16s, a senior military official told reporters https://tinu.be/E8Ly2cmpH
    TINU.BE
    US Carries Out Airstrikes in Syria in Response to Iran Militia Attacks
    Iranian-backed militias carried out at least 16 attacks on U.S. personnel in Iraq and Syria in the last 10 days, the Pentagon said Oct. 26
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2709 Views
  • H I S T O R Y
    SEP 16, 1982
    Israel-allied Christian militias enter the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps (housing Palestinian refugees) in Beirut and massacre about 2,000 unarmed Palestinians after PLO fighters are forced out of Lebanon by Israel. The Israeli army occupied the camps at the time. An official Israeli inquiry found Defense Minister Ariel Sharon indirectly responsible for the killings of these Palestinians.
    H I S T O R Y SEP 16, 1982 Israel-allied Christian militias enter the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps (housing Palestinian refugees) in Beirut and massacre about 2,000 unarmed Palestinians after PLO fighters are forced out of Lebanon by Israel. The Israeli army occupied the camps at the time. An official Israeli inquiry found Defense Minister Ariel Sharon indirectly responsible for the killings of these Palestinians.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2416 Views
  • For everyone from the Redoubt.

    https://www.peoplesrights.org/

    Militias are growing.
    For everyone from the Redoubt. https://www.peoplesrights.org/ Militias are growing.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2058 Views
  • FRONTLINE goes inside the battle between the Bundy ranching family in the West and the federal government, examining how a simmering fight over land in Nevada and Oregon became deadly and invigorated a wider armed militia movement. What began as one family’s dispute with the government over grazing fees reinvigorated a national movement of self-styled militias and “Patriots.” They call themselves Oath Keepers, Constitutional Sheriffs, Three Percenters, and sovereign citizens and while each group has its own cause, they rally under the same banner: opposition to what they see as federal overreach.

    This may be old news but I feel that before things get to a point of no return we may have to do something like this on a much larger scale. American Patriots will have to come together and unify.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYVROEECNtQ
    FRONTLINE goes inside the battle between the Bundy ranching family in the West and the federal government, examining how a simmering fight over land in Nevada and Oregon became deadly and invigorated a wider armed militia movement. What began as one family’s dispute with the government over grazing fees reinvigorated a national movement of self-styled militias and “Patriots.” They call themselves Oath Keepers, Constitutional Sheriffs, Three Percenters, and sovereign citizens and while each group has its own cause, they rally under the same banner: opposition to what they see as federal overreach. This may be old news but I feel that before things get to a point of no return we may have to do something like this on a much larger scale. American Patriots will have to come together and unify. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYVROEECNtQ
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1260 Views
Sponsored

We are, so far, 80% funded for April. I am matching donations dollar for dollar this month. Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰

Xephula Funding Meter

Please Donate Here