🇺🇸 United States House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner (pictured) on Tuesday highlighted the importance of passing legislation intended to provide additional funds for Ukraine "this week." "Today, in a classified briefing, our Committee was informed of the critical need to provide 🇺🇦Ukraine military aid this week. The United States must stand against Putin's war of aggression now as Ukraine's situation on the ground is critical," Turner said in the statement. ( The $96 billion security package hit a stalemate in the lower congressional chamber.)

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/nebraska-state-senator-switching-from-democrat-to-republican-5621350?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=imctgm01 Nebraska state Sen. Mike McDonnell has announced that he’s switching party affiliation from Democrat to Republican, citing his Christian faith and views on abortion. Mr. McDonnell made the announcement in an April 3 statement to local media outlets, citing the Democrat Party’s opposition to his pro-life stance. “When I ran for reelection in 2020 I was Pro-Life,” he said, adding that he’s Catholic and recalling that in 2016 he ran as a pro-life candidate for Nebraska’s legislative District 5. “I have asked the Democratic Party to respect my religious based Pro-Life position,” he continued. “Instead over the last year they have decided to punish me for being Pro-Life.” The Nebraska Democratic Party issued a statement in response to Mr. McDonnell’s party change, expressing “respect” for his work with the party while denying that the censure vote had anything to do with his pro-life views. Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen, a Republican, showed a willingness on April 2 to back legislation that would potentially prevent President Joe Biden from getting one of the state’s electoral votes. He did this by endorsing a statewide “winner-takes-all” system that is likely to boost former President Donald Trump. Unlike every other U.S. state, only Nebraska and Maine assign Electoral College votes by district. A congressional district that centers around Omaha, the largest city in the state, has sometimes gone in favor of Democratic presidential candidates, including in 2020. However, if the state switched to a more standard system, Nebraska’s three electoral votes would likely all go to President Trump as the former president easily won the GOP-dominated state by wide margins in both 2016 and 2020.

JK Rowling can be arrested for telling a man he’s a man Hate Crime legislation is merely a socially acceptable way to brand censorship. Now that reality is on the chopping block, maybe people will wake up.

There was no insurrection and Donald Trump was not a participant. https://imgflip.com/i/8k1d03 BTW #libtards, the United States is not now, nor has it ever been a democracy. We are a constitutional REPUBLIC, & have been since July 4th, 1776. Sorry most of you flunked U.S. History. As a matter of FACT President Trump called for a peaceful demonstration. Just because a few triggered, hateful democrats and Uniparty members (RINOS) called the demonstration an insurrection doesn't mean it was one. Patriots weren't the cause of destruction, the FBI and radical left-wing Antifa was. We all know it was a setup. There is PROOF of it, and the Capitol Police were co-conspirators in it. In the United States, insurrection against the authority of the federal government is a crime under 18 U.S. Code §2383, which provides that: Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. The next question is why some protestors who were not even present on January 6 were sentenced to 17 years in prison? Federal law also grants to the president of the United States the authority to employ the armed forces of the United States and nationalized state militias to put down an insurrection against a state government upon the request of the state’s legislature or governor (10 U.S. Code §251) and to suppress or prevent civil disturbances—“unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion[s]”—that, in the president’s judgment, have interfered or would interfere with the enforcement of federal laws in any state (§252) or have effectively deprived citizens of their rights under the U.S. Constitution (§253). These and other provisions of Chapter 13 of the U.S. Code, entitled “Insurrection,” originated in two pieces of legislation from the late 18th and early 19th centuries: an act of Congress (1795) that extended to the president Congress’s constitutional authority “to provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions” (Article I, §8) and the Insurrection Act (1807), which additionally authorized the president to deploy the armed forces of the United States in the same circumstances and for the same purpose. During the subsequent two centuries, the Insurrection Act was amended numerous times and invoked by presidents including Abraham Lincoln (to enable the use of federal troops to defeat the secession of Confederate states in the American Civil War), Dwight D. Eisenhower (to assist efforts to desegregate public schools in the South), and George H.W. Bush (to quell riots in Los Angeles following the acquittal of police officers involved in the beating of Rodney King). In 2020, in response to sometimes violent demonstrations against police brutality and anti-Black racism in several U.S. cities (see United States: The killing of George Floyd and nationwide racial injustice protests). Then President Donald J. Trump threatened to use his authority under the Insurrection Act to unleash deadly force against lawbreaking protesters. https://www.britannica.com/topic/insurrection-politics

For all you naysayers out there, this should be your clue to get on the program and WITH the program. We’re now over halfway to the benchmark to call an Article V convention, and the closer we get, the stronger the opposition becomes. Just recently, we got word that Common Cause sent out yet another fundraising email to rally opposition to our efforts. In their own words… “Common Cause is sounding the alarm far and wide – bringing this dangerous event into the eyes of the public, and using grassroots power to stop it.” But they’re not just “sounding the alarm”, they’re sending lobbyists into the state legislatures to counter our efforts and they are spreading dangerous lies to foster fear in the hearts of the American people. They want the grassroots to reject the Constitution and view Article V as a “secret and sinister plot” that will “gut the First Amendment.” But there’s clearly nothing secret about what we’re doing. So why are they REALLY afraid? Because when we succeed in getting 34 states to pass our legislation, a convention will be called where the states can propose amendments to… ++ Get the federal government out of our healthcare system. ++ Impose term limits on Congress. ++ Balance the budget. ++ Take back our education systems. ++ Limit federal power. Congress won’t take these actions. But a Convention of States can. The Left understands that we could do away with Obamacare without Congress... and now they’re on the war path for COS. Now is our moment, but with the Left beginning to unite against us, it’ll be an uphill battle. Will you chip in $25 today and help us combat the Left and do what Congress doesn’t have the courage to do? We urgently need your support to fight George Soros’ anti-Convention of States campaign. Because sometimes soon just isn't soon enough! https://imgflip.com/i/485zgt Convention of States ACTION: https://conventionofstates.com/take_action

https://medforth.biz/greek-church-bans-local-politicians-who-supported-sam-sex-marriage-legislation/

Watch: House Democrats to ‘Revive Legislation’ to Force Trump Off the Ballot in Wake of SCOTUS Ruling https://www.infowars.com/posts/watch-house-democrats-to-revive-legislation-to-force-trump-off-the-ballot-in-wake-of-scotus-ruling/

Why would a Bill have to be introduced to legislation that prohibits the consumption of human flesh and what does this mean for Pedo-Wood? THINK McDONALDS.

Silver and Gold! LIVE NEWS from State Capital -- Legal Tender Legislation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yg2Lj0O8XnY

German approve the partial legalization of cannabis in the country On February 23rd, 2024, German approve the partial legalization of cannabis in the country. The voting breakdown and the parties involved. If Germany passes in the parliament the cannabis bill, it would join the growing ranks of European countries 407 parliamentarians voted in favor of the legislation put forward by the ruling. On February 23rd, 2024, the German Bundestag took a significant step by approving the partial legalization of cannabis in the country. Here’s a breakdown of the voting and the parties involved: 407 parliamentarians voted in favor of the legislation, which was put forward by the ruling coalition. This coalition comprises the following parties: Social Democratic Party (SPD): is a center-left party. Free Democratic Party (FDP): A business-focused liberal party. Greens: An environmentalist party. 226 lawmakers rejected the bill, while four MPs abstained from voting. The new law aims to facilitate the responsible use of cannabis by allowing limited legal possession and cultivation of the drug, subject to numerous rules and restrictions. However, opinions in Germany remain divided, with approximately 47% of respondents expressing some level of support for the legislation, while 42% are somewhat or completely against it. If Germany successfully passes this cannabis bill in parliament, it will join other European countries that have either legalized or decriminalized cannabis usage. For instance: The Netherlands is well-known for its cannabis-tolerant approach, with coffee shops allowing possession of up to 5 grams of cannabis (though cultivation, sale, and possession remain illegal). Malta has relatively tolerant laws, permitting adults to carry up to 7 grams of cannabis and grow up to four plants at home. Luxembourg allows public possession of cannabis and cultivation of up to four plants. Portugal treats cannabis consumption and small amounts as an administrative offense. Spain permits private consumption of up to 100 grams but prohibits public use. Several EU countries allow medical use of marijuana and related products.