Come join us at: Awake - Canada https://www.facebook.com/groups/awakecanada

Come join us at: 🇨🇦 Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms 🇨🇦 https://www.facebook.com/groups/442781380068348

Release the names: 🇨🇦 #NoMoreLiberalsAndNDP 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #SayingTheQuietPartOutLoud 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #resigntrudeau 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 #JustSayNoMore 🇨🇦 https://www.facebook.com/reel/1225480375508453

Dr. Group on the weapons used by the new world order. This video managed to escape the censorship and went viral on Facebook and Instagram. (2 min 11 seconds) How can anyone listen to this and not acknowledge that the level of evil is so high that this must be the time of the antiChrist? https://t.me/davidavocadowolfe/143244

Trump working at McDonalds....lol. Never be another one... 🤣 https://www.facebook.com/share/v/b5efQgXzuYYefmAc/

Interesting, but Immanuel Velikovsky had already offered an alternative that might explain this in the 1950s. That, he suggested, may have been an eruption from Saturn which led to a great rain on Earth... but if this were the case, would there not be more frozen water on the surface of the Moon? Surely it could not all have fallen on the Earth... or does this suggest that, at that moment in time, there was no Moon? Any hypothesis such as this (it is not a theory) tells us more about the limitations on (or indoctrination of) the thinking of the speaker than it does about a past reality. Astronomers seem to be obsessed with a surprisingly small repertoire of possible physical phenomena which do not take full account of what is actually available in the wider cosmos. Plus, if the Moon had already been orbiting the Earth when this alleged "collision" took place, it would have gone careering through the Solar System once Earth's gravitation field was disrupted... so, are they suggesting that afterwards, the Moon was somehow magically "recaptured"? Or was it simply not there yet, being captured during a later epoch? No matter how hard they try, the reformulation of hypotheses usually leads only to more contradictions down the line. The worst part, however, is that videos such as this function only as uncritical "repeaters" of pseudo-information - "pseudo" precisely because the "evidence" can only be indirect. These things are largely based on supposition, limited information and a pre-formed notion of how the universe works; the big surprise seems to be that, when you stand back and look at it, it seems to be based upon a surprisingly Newtonian, gravity-based model... and real "science" would be served better if they instead challenged the hypothesis. If "science" is merely a collection of unsupported hypotheses, we should not be surprised if the whole enterprise eventually collapses under the weight of contradictory evidence. Unfortunately, as I have said before, the trouble with this kind of hypothesis is that in our experience, time travels in only one direction, and we are not able to jump into a convenient time machine to travel back and confirm anything. What we have is only an "interpretation" through the rose-tinted lenses of the current dominant paradigm. https://www.facebook.com/reel/1779950362746428

GOOD MORNING FRIENDS AND FOLLOWERS: THE FIRST VIDEO FOR TODAY IS A FRAGMENT OF A LONGER VIDEO CALLED "THE META TAPES". IT'S A COLLECTION OF VIDEO CLIPS, TAKEN BY HIDDEN CAMERA TO HIGH LEVEL EMPLOYEES OF 'META' (THE PARENT COMPANY OF FACEBOOK). IN THEIR EXPRESSIONS, THEY CANDIDLY DESCRIBE HOW THE CENSORSHIP WORKS IN THOSE 'MAINSTREAM' SOCIAL MEDIA SITES, USUALLY TAKING DOWN, SHADOWBANNING, ADDING FACT CHECHING OR ADDED COMMENTS TO DEBUNK OR TAKE AWAY THE CREDIBILITY OF MATERIAL. THEY USUALLY DO THAT TO CONSERVATIVE OR RIGHT WING MATERIAL OR POSTS BY USERS. AS PRIVATE COMPANIES, THEY ARE ALLOWED TO HAVE THEIR OWN EDITORIAL POLICIES AND NOT NECESSARILY HAVE TO ABIDE BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT. I'M NOT A LAWYER BUT, IN MY OPINION, THE FIRST AMENDMENT GRANTS TOTAL FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE, NOT INSIDE PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS LIKE CHURCHES, MEDIA COMPANIES, etc. HOWEVER, IF A PRIVATE COMPANY RUNS A SOCIAL MEDIA SITE, FREELY PERMITTING ANYBODY TO OPEN AN ACCOUNT WITH THE PURPOSE OF OPINING, DISCUSSING AND SHARING AUDIO-VISUAL MATERIAL WITH OTHER PEOPLE, THAT SITE BECOMES THE 'PUBLIC SQUARE' AND SHOULD ABIDE BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT. IN MANY CASES, THEY EVEN CANCEL AND CLOSE ACCOUNTS OF CERTAIN PEOPLE, BASED SOLELY ON OPINIONS EXPRESSED AND IDEOLOGY. I KNOW BY MY OWN EXPERIENCES. IN THE NEXT VIDEO (AFTER THIS ONE) I'LL EXPLAIN MORE ABOUT THE NEW TRICKS USE FOR CENSORSHIP IN SITES LIKE 'X' (FORMERLY TWITTER), WHERE THE OWNER (ELON MUSK) PERMITS A MAXIMUM OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION.

IT'S CALLED ELECTION INTERFERENCE... Facebook engineer admits site 'automatically demotes' anti-Kamala posts to 'help the Democrats'... https://youtu.be/Emu-3p_fcNw?si=oCZC6-_8NBtTUIw9

I am getting blocked on Facebook from posting in the group I am an Admin in for no reason. I got nothing in my support inbox about any violations or that I am restricted for a reason. Facebook is so predictable right before an election! 😂 Within 3 to 6 days, I bet they suspend me and ask for an ID. 😂

Senior Meta Engineer Reveals Facebook & Instagram Engaged In Pro-Kamala Election Meddling https://www.infowars.com/posts/senior-meta-engineer-reveals-facebook-instagram-engaged-in-pro-kamala-election-meddling