Appear for a Scheduled EUO or Lose Failure to Honor Conditions Precedent Voids Coverage in New York Post 4937 Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/appear-scheduled-euo-lose-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-gvkec/, see the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4900 posts. State Farm contended that it is entitled to summary judgment because of the failure to appear for examination under oath (EUO) by multiple defendants. State Farm contended that timely notices were properly mailed to the Claimants who failed to appear. In State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Alford A. Smith, M.D., et al, 2024 NY Slip Op 33802(U), Index No. 155607/2020, Motion Seq. No. 003, Supreme Court, New York County, Appellate Division (October 24, 2024) court ruled in favor of State Farm. The Supreme Court of New York County ORDERED that the plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s (“State Farm/Plaintiff’), motion for summary judgment was GRANTED against defendants, Alford A. Smith, M.D., P.C., and the multiple other defendants who are doctors, chiropractors and other health services, (hereinafter collectively (“The Defendants”). FACTS The Supreme Court found that the EUO scheduling letters were timely requested and claimants failed to appear at that EUO. The documentary evidence showed that plaintiff sent the EUO scheduling letters to the claimants within 15 business days of receiving the prescribed verification forms as required by New York statute. FRAUD, FAILURE TO APPEAR FOR EUO & FAILURE TO SIGN TRANSCRIPT ARE BREACHES OF MATERIAL CONDITION PRECEDENT The Appellate Division upheld the Supreme Court’s ruling that the failure to appear for an EUO that was requested in a timely fashion by the insurer is a breach of a condition precedent to coverage and voids the policy ab initio. In addition, although claimant Griselda Torres unlike the other defendants, appeared for her EUO, Torres failed to return a subscribed copy of her EUO transcript. State Farm properly and effectively argued that appearing for and testifying at EUO and returning the transcripts of the EUO are conditions precedent to coverage and failure to sign and return the transcript warranted a denial of the claims. State Farm demonstrated in its motion and supporting evidence that multiple claimants breached a condition precedent to coverage by failing to appear for properly noticed EUOs on two separate occasions. Furthermore, claimant Griselda Torres’ failure to subscribe and return the transcript of her EUOsviolated a condition precedent to coverage and warranted denial of the claims. Moreover, there was nothing on the Court’s record to suggest that the scheduled EUOs were not justified, nor held at a place and time that was not reasonably convenient to the defendants. CONCLUSION State Farm’s motion seeking summary judgment in its favor was GRANTED as to THE multiple defendants and it was further ORDERED that any requested relief sought not expressly addressed herein has nonetheless been considered; and it was further ORDERED that the case shall continue against the remaining defendants; and it was further ORDERED that within 30 days of entry, plaintiff shall serve a copy of this decision/order upon the defendants with notice of entry. ZALMA OPINION The defendants in this case were doctors, physicians, chiropractors and other health care providers who billed State Farm for services provided to people who were injured in automobile accidents and assigned their rights to the providers who tried to collect their billings without complying with the EUO condition. They all lost their claims because they refused to appear except one defendant who appeared but failed to sign the transcript of the EUO and return it to State Farm. They all lost their claims and State Farm will continue its actions against many more defendants not subject to the motion. (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc. Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos. Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk

Stephen Miller goes absolute BEASTMODE...

ENCORE - Jonathan Otto's “Cancer Secrets” – Episode 1 Available Now Through Thursday, November 21st at 5 pm Pacific Time https://terrylclark.substack.com/p/encore-jonathan-ottos-cancer-secrets

I'm on bsky.app https://bsky.app/profile/brainymango.bsky.social

EUO is a Material Condition Precedent Claim Properly Denied for Refusal to Testify at EUO Post 4936 Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/euo-material-condition-precedent-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-exccc, see the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4900 posts. See the full video at and at Erin Hughes appealed from the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant and respondent Farmers Insurance Exchange (Farmers) on her causes of action for breach of contract and bad faith arising after Farmers’ denial of Hughes’s property insurance claim because she refused to testify at a second examination under oath (EUO). In Erin Hughes v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, B331168, California Court of Appeals (November 8, 2024) the condition precedent was enforced. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Hughes is the owner of real property in Malibu (the property). In December 2020, Hughes obtained an insurance policy to cover the property for fire loss through the California FAIR Plan Association (FAIR Plan). Also in December 2020, Hughes obtained a homeowner’s insurance policy from Farmers to cover perils other than fire, including losses due to theft (the policy). One month later, in January 2021, the property sustained significant fire damage. Hughes contacted Farmers, which advised her that fire loss was not covered by her Farmers policy, and she would have to pursue any such claim through her FAIR Plan policy. Unhappy, on January 21, 2021, Hughes tendered a theft claim under the Farmers policy, asserting in excess of $2 million worth of personal property was stolen from the property. Farmers ultimately denied the claim on January 5, 2022, on the ground that Hughes failed to cooperate with Farmers’ investigation, including by failing to participate in a second examination under oath as required by the policy. Hughes’s Complaint Against Farmers One week after the denial of her claim, Hughes sued Farmers and alleged Farmers demanded “duplicative, onerous and/or unnecessary” documentation of stolen items. Further, she alleged Farmers subjected her to “two confrontational, accusatory and grueling examinations under oath.” Hughes alleged her second examination under oath had been “suspended due to [her] medical condition,” but Farmers disregarded her condition and demanded a third examination. Farmers’ Motion for Summary Judgment Farmers moved for summary judgment contending it properly denied Hughes’s theft claim based on her failure to cooperate with Farmers’ investigation of her claim as well as her material misrepresentations in obtaining the Farmers policy. In May 2021, as part of Farmers’ theft claim investigation, Hughes participated in an examination under oath. During the examination, Hughes’s counsel informed the Farmers attorney he had just sent more than 40 additional receipts that the attorney would be receiving shortly. Recognizing they would not have time to go through the new items that day and the examination would need to continue on a future date, the Farmers attorney proposed “continu[ing] to work with one another to identify what’s missing.” In response, Hughes and her counsel agreed, with Hughes stating she would be happy to get “every single thing that you need and I’ll send it to my attorney right away.” In October 2021, a second session of the examination under oath was held regarding documentation Hughes had produced during and after the first session. Hughes appeared remotely with counsel and before any questions were asked of her, she objected to a further examination. Hughes accused the Farmers attorney of interrogating her “like a fucking criminal” and stated, “if you want to take my deposition . . . you are going to take a second deposition in court, and that’s going to be a formal deposition.” Hughes’s remote connection then cut out, and her counsel indicated she would not proceed with the examination. Farmers informed Hughes that it was denying coverage based on her failure to cooperate with Farmers’ investigation and particularly her refusal to proceed with the second examination under oath. Trial Court’s Grant of Summary Judgment and Denial of Hughes’s Continuance Request and Motion for New Trial The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Farmers. Noting an insurer has “an absolute right” to require the insured to submit to an examination under oath “as long as the insurer exercises the right reasonably,” the court determined Hughes had not shown Farmers acted unreasonably. The court concluded summary judgment was appropriate “based solely on failure to cooperate.” DISCUSSION The trial court properly concluded there was no genuine dispute that Hughes’s failure to participate in an examination under oath constituted a material breach of the policy; accordingly, Farmers was excused from having to pay on Hughes’s claim. The right to require the insured to submit to an examination under oath concerning all proper subjects of inquiry is reasonable as a matter of law. An insured’s compliance with a policy requirement to submit to an examination under oath is a prerequisite to the right to receive benefits under the policy. Because Hughes refused to cooperate with Farmers’ investigation by participating in and completing her examination under oath, she cannot establish her own performance under the policy. Breach of Implied Covenant Claim The implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is based on general contract law and the long-standing rule that neither party will do anything which will injure the right of the other to receive the benefits of the agreement. Hughes’s claim for bad faith fails as a matter of law. ZALMA OPINION Wildfires tend to destroy everything. That is why insurers are unwilling to write fire insurance in Malibu and other areas prone to wildfires and obtain fire insurance from the Fair Plan, an organization designed to cover uninsurable risks. Because of the destruction done by a wildfire or a dwelling fire a $2 million dollar theft loss after a fire is questionable and a good reason to take a thorough EUO. Farmers tried to do so and Hughes refused without reason after admitting she left open much investigation elements at the agreed conclusion of the first session and an agreement to a second only to refuse. (c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc. Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos. Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg

White Fang https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKSiwwYsiMA Disabled from embedding on other websites, but you can watch the full video on YouTube for FREE by clicking on the link above. Jack London's immortal tale of courage and survival comes to glorious life amid the breathtaking beauty of the great Alaskan frontier! Ethan Hawke stars as a young man trying to fulfill his father's dying wish to find gold in the treacherous Yukon valley. His incredible journey begins when he meets a veteran gold miner (Klaus Maria Brandauer), who guides young Jack to his father's claim. Along the way, Jack discovers a kindred spirit who will change his life forever -- a magnificent wolf-dog named White Fang. From the taming of a wolf, to the taming of the wild, he must find the courage to conquer his fears and become a man in this spectacular outdoor adventure!

Bird on a Wire Mel Gibson and Goldie Hawn team up in this non-stop action-comedy directed by John Badham. Hiding under the FBI Witness Protection Program, Rick Jarmin (Gibson) get nervous when old fame Marianne Graves (Hawn) recognizes him. But before he can assume a new identity, the man he put in jail (David Carradine) is released and comes to pay his respects. Rick and Marianne find themselves thrown together on an exhilarating cross-county scramble, barely evading the gangsters, police and an amorous veterinarian (Joan Severance). Their whirlwind travels eventually lead to an unforgettable climax in an elaborate zoo exhibit. A rollercoaster of a movie which will keep you on the edge elaborate zoo exhibit of your seat.

It is TIME to expose the QTard Phenomena. Now you know why most of us affectionately refer to Q followers as QTards. It amazes me that they still have so many devoted followers, when there was no "Plan" to begin with. It was nothing more than a psyop to placate millions of disgruntled Trump supporters who the radical left feared would oust them violently. The same can be said of the X-22 Report. Both are and always were psyops sponsored by the left. Via The Right Side with Doug Billings: Now that we’re basking in the glow of President Trump’s victory… the most significant political comeback in the history of Earth… It’s time to put away, once-and-for-all, the ridiculous theories, nonsense and grifters who put the most significant BS and nonsense forward: 1. Devolution. I called it ridiculous and fiction when it was first put forth by Patel Patriot. Reporting that Trump would return to the presidency before 2024. He scored lots of money from a lot of people on that BS. 2. Anything from “Q.” It’s fantasy of the wildest proportions. Many of the people who got suckered into this fantasy are good-intending Patriots. But many people (Matrix, X22, O’Savin, etc.) made a living grifting from it and many items on this list. Shameful. 3. “The military is running the country.” An abject lie and another wave of clickbait. Derek Johnson is one of the members of the hierarchy of Kooks. Nothing he has put forth on this topic is true. 4. “President Trump is still the president and calling the shots.” Those who put this forth are not only kooks, but crooks. 4. “You can’t vote yourself out of a rigged system.” These people discredited the will of We The People and our Determined Patriotism to correct voter registration rolls and curb cheating at polling stations throughout the country. 5. “Joe Biden can’t fly on Air Force One!” Another BS story designed to get clicks. (Clickbait for the gullible) 6. People who claimed wild and ridiculous stories (such as Damar Hamlin was dead and the person in his place was an actor) that were put forth by the “Jerry Springer” of podcasters - Mr. Peters. 7. The real Joe Biden is dead. Everyone from X22, Stew Peters, Juan O’Savin, Charlie Ward, Nino, Matrix, and the rest of the Jerry Springer class of podcasters. (I had Charlie Ward and Simon Parkes on my show in 2021 when I was starting. Once they made wild claims, they weren’t back on. I have cordial relationships with them, but can’t have them on my show). https://imgflip.com/i/9ays9h

It is TIME to expose the QTard Phenomena. Now you know why most of us affectionately refer to Q followers as QTards. It amazes me that they still have so many devoted followers, when there was no "Plan" to begin with. It was nothing more than a psyop to placate millions of disgruntled Trump supporters who the radical left feared would oust them violently. The same can be said of the X-22 Report. Both are and always were psyops sponsored by the left. Via The Right Side with Doug Billings: Now that we’re basking in the glow of President Trump’s victory… the most significant political comeback in the history of Earth… It’s time to put away, once-and-for-all, the ridiculous theories, nonsense and grifters who put the most significant BS and nonsense forward: 1. Devolution. I called it ridiculous and fiction when it was first put forth by Patel Patriot. Reporting that Trump would return to the presidency before 2024. He scored lots of money from a lot of people on that BS. 2. Anything from “Q.” It’s fantasy of the wildest proportions. Many of the people who got suckered into this fantasy are good-intending Patriots. But many people (Matrix, X22, O’Savin, etc.) made a living grifting from it and many items on this list. Shameful. 3. “The military is running the country.” An abject lie and another wave of clickbait. Derek Johnson is one of the members of the hierarchy of Kooks. Nothing he has put forth on this topic is true. 4. “President Trump is still the president and calling the shots.” Those who put this forth are not only kooks, but crooks. 4. “You can’t vote yourself out of a rigged system.” These people discredited the will of We The People and our Determined Patriotism to correct voter registration rolls and curb cheating at polling stations throughout the country. 5. “Joe Biden can’t fly on Air Force One!” Another BS story designed to get clicks. (Clickbait for the gullible) 6. People who claimed wild and ridiculous stories (such as Damar Hamlin was dead and the person in his place was an actor) that were put forth by the “Jerry Springer” of podcasters - Mr. Peters. 7. The real Joe Biden is dead. Everyone from X22, Stew Peters, Juan O’Savin, Charlie Ward, Nino, Matrix, and the rest of the Jerry Springer class of podcasters. (I had Charlie Ward and Simon Parkes on my show in 2021 when I was starting. Once they made wild claims, they weren’t back on. I have cordial relationships with them, but can’t have them on my show). https://imgflip.com/i/9ays9h

Great, I love it. Smile Democrats #iloveyou #RobSchneider https://youtube.com/shorts/mCPd8hJ_0Ec?si=IOyqXqHhhe5MSfcI via @YouTube God Bless America, God Save The Republic.