• Just hours after the bridge collapsed.
    FBI - accident
    Mayor - accident
    Governor- accident
    Biden regime - accident.
    Me - thanks, now I’m positive it wasn’t an accident.
    Just hours after the bridge collapsed. FBI - accident Mayor - accident Governor- accident Biden regime - accident. Me - thanks, now I’m positive it wasn’t an accident.
    Like
    2
    0 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 66 Views
  • IMHO: EACH STATE GOVERNOR, OUGHT TO DECLARE THAT THEIR "INDIVIDUAL CITIZENS" ARE NOW EXEMPTED FROM, AND BARRED FROM PAYING ANY MORE "FEDERAL INCOME TAXES" TO THE FEDERAL IRS, AND, TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. THIS WILL PROVIDE TREMENDOUS ECONOMIC RELIEVE TO ALL TAX PAYERS, AND, SEND A MESSAGE TO WASHINGTON THAT WE WILL NOT BE INTIMIDATED, EXTORTED, ROBBED, AND RIDICULED, BY THE "FEDERAL GOVERNMENT! FORCE ALL "FEDERAL EMPLOYEES TO LEAVE THE STATE, AND, NOT COME OVER THEIR STATE BORDERS, OR THEY WILL BE ARRESTED AND TRIED FOR TREASON.
    ...THEN, STATES WILL SOON WIN, AND THE TYRANTS IN WASHINGTON WILL BE FINISHED!! SOON, WE CAN ARREST, TRY, AND EXECUTE ALL OF THOSE TRAITORS, TYRANTS, AND THEIR HENCHMEN!! NO DELAYS, NO EXCUSES. NO EXCEPTIONS, NO "AMNESTY", NO MERCY!!!
    IMHO: EACH STATE GOVERNOR, OUGHT TO DECLARE THAT THEIR "INDIVIDUAL CITIZENS" ARE NOW EXEMPTED FROM, AND BARRED FROM PAYING ANY MORE "FEDERAL INCOME TAXES" TO THE FEDERAL IRS, AND, TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. THIS WILL PROVIDE TREMENDOUS ECONOMIC RELIEVE TO ALL TAX PAYERS, AND, SEND A MESSAGE TO WASHINGTON THAT WE WILL NOT BE INTIMIDATED, EXTORTED, ROBBED, AND RIDICULED, BY THE "FEDERAL GOVERNMENT! FORCE ALL "FEDERAL EMPLOYEES TO LEAVE THE STATE, AND, NOT COME OVER THEIR STATE BORDERS, OR THEY WILL BE ARRESTED AND TRIED FOR TREASON. ...THEN, STATES WILL SOON WIN, AND THE TYRANTS IN WASHINGTON WILL BE FINISHED!! SOON, WE CAN ARREST, TRY, AND EXECUTE ALL OF THOSE TRAITORS, TYRANTS, AND THEIR HENCHMEN!! NO DELAYS, NO EXCUSES. NO EXCEPTIONS, NO "AMNESTY", NO MERCY!!!
    Love
    2
    1 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 214 Views
  • IMHO: GOVERNORS OF MOST STATES, OUGHT TO IMMEDIATELY SUSPEND ANY PAYMENTS, TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, AND, MAKE IT ILLEGAL FOR ANY OF THOSE STATE'S CITIZENS, TO PAY ANY MORE "FEDERAL INCOME TAXES!!!....AND KICK ALL "FEDERAL EMPLOYEES" OUT OF THESE STATES.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4jPcvraW20
    IMHO: GOVERNORS OF MOST STATES, OUGHT TO IMMEDIATELY SUSPEND ANY PAYMENTS, TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, AND, MAKE IT ILLEGAL FOR ANY OF THOSE STATE'S CITIZENS, TO PAY ANY MORE "FEDERAL INCOME TAXES!!!....AND KICK ALL "FEDERAL EMPLOYEES" OUT OF THESE STATES.💩💥 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4jPcvraW20
    Like
    1
    0 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 227 Views
  • IMHO: GOVERNORS OF MOST STATES, OUGHT TO IMMEDIATELY SUSPEND ANY PAYMENTS, TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, AND, MAKE IT ILLEGAL FOR ANY OF THOSE STATE'S CITIZENS, TO PAY ANY MORE "FEDERAL INCOME TAXES!!!....AND KICK ALL "FEDERAL EMPLOYEES" OUT OF THESE STATES.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4jPcvraW20
    IMHO: GOVERNORS OF MOST STATES, OUGHT TO IMMEDIATELY SUSPEND ANY PAYMENTS, TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, AND, MAKE IT ILLEGAL FOR ANY OF THOSE STATE'S CITIZENS, TO PAY ANY MORE "FEDERAL INCOME TAXES!!!....AND KICK ALL "FEDERAL EMPLOYEES" OUT OF THESE STATES.💩💥 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4jPcvraW20
    Like
    1
    0 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 215 Views
  • There was no insurrection and Donald Trump was not a participant.
    https://imgflip.com/i/8k1d03

    BTW #libtards, the United States is not now, nor has it ever been a democracy. We are a constitutional REPUBLIC, & have been since July 4th, 1776. Sorry most of you flunked U.S. History.

    As a matter of FACT President Trump called for a peaceful demonstration. Just because a few triggered, hateful democrats and Uniparty members (RINOS) called the demonstration an insurrection doesn't mean it was one.

    Patriots weren't the cause of destruction, the FBI and radical left-wing Antifa was. We all know it was a setup. There is PROOF of it, and the Capitol Police were co-conspirators in it.

    In the United States, insurrection against the authority of the federal government is a crime under 18 U.S. Code §2383, which provides that:

    Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

    The next question is why some protestors who were not even present on January 6 were sentenced to 17 years in prison?

    Federal law also grants to the president of the United States the authority to employ the armed forces of the United States and nationalized state militias to put down an insurrection against a state government upon the request of the state’s legislature or governor (10 U.S. Code §251) and to suppress or prevent civil disturbances—“unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion[s]”—that, in the president’s judgment, have interfered or would interfere with the enforcement of federal laws in any state (§252) or have effectively deprived citizens of their rights under the U.S. Constitution (§253). These and other provisions of Chapter 13 of the U.S. Code, entitled “Insurrection,” originated in two pieces of legislation from the late 18th and early 19th centuries: an act of Congress (1795) that extended to the president Congress’s constitutional authority “to provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions” (Article I, §8) and the Insurrection Act (1807), which additionally authorized the president to deploy the armed forces of the United States in the same circumstances and for the same purpose. During the subsequent two centuries, the Insurrection Act was amended numerous times and invoked by presidents including Abraham Lincoln (to enable the use of federal troops to defeat the secession of Confederate states in the American Civil War), Dwight D. Eisenhower (to assist efforts to desegregate public schools in the South), and George H.W. Bush (to quell riots in Los Angeles following the acquittal of police officers involved in the beating of Rodney King). In 2020, in response to sometimes violent demonstrations against police brutality and anti-Black racism in several U.S. cities (see United States: The killing of George Floyd and nationwide racial injustice protests).

    Then President Donald J. Trump threatened to use his authority under the Insurrection Act to unleash deadly force against lawbreaking protesters.
    https://www.britannica.com/topic/insurrection-politics
    There was no insurrection and Donald Trump was not a participant. https://imgflip.com/i/8k1d03 BTW #libtards, the United States is not now, nor has it ever been a democracy. We are a constitutional REPUBLIC, & have been since July 4th, 1776. Sorry most of you flunked U.S. History. As a matter of FACT President Trump called for a peaceful demonstration. Just because a few triggered, hateful democrats and Uniparty members (RINOS) called the demonstration an insurrection doesn't mean it was one. Patriots weren't the cause of destruction, the FBI and radical left-wing Antifa was. We all know it was a setup. There is PROOF of it, and the Capitol Police were co-conspirators in it. In the United States, insurrection against the authority of the federal government is a crime under 18 U.S. Code §2383, which provides that: Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. The next question is why some protestors who were not even present on January 6 were sentenced to 17 years in prison? Federal law also grants to the president of the United States the authority to employ the armed forces of the United States and nationalized state militias to put down an insurrection against a state government upon the request of the state’s legislature or governor (10 U.S. Code §251) and to suppress or prevent civil disturbances—“unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion[s]”—that, in the president’s judgment, have interfered or would interfere with the enforcement of federal laws in any state (§252) or have effectively deprived citizens of their rights under the U.S. Constitution (§253). These and other provisions of Chapter 13 of the U.S. Code, entitled “Insurrection,” originated in two pieces of legislation from the late 18th and early 19th centuries: an act of Congress (1795) that extended to the president Congress’s constitutional authority “to provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions” (Article I, §8) and the Insurrection Act (1807), which additionally authorized the president to deploy the armed forces of the United States in the same circumstances and for the same purpose. During the subsequent two centuries, the Insurrection Act was amended numerous times and invoked by presidents including Abraham Lincoln (to enable the use of federal troops to defeat the secession of Confederate states in the American Civil War), Dwight D. Eisenhower (to assist efforts to desegregate public schools in the South), and George H.W. Bush (to quell riots in Los Angeles following the acquittal of police officers involved in the beating of Rodney King). In 2020, in response to sometimes violent demonstrations against police brutality and anti-Black racism in several U.S. cities (see United States: The killing of George Floyd and nationwide racial injustice protests). Then President Donald J. Trump threatened to use his authority under the Insurrection Act to unleash deadly force against lawbreaking protesters. https://www.britannica.com/topic/insurrection-politics
    0 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 1480 Views
  • Stop All Nanoparticle CV19 Vax Injections Now – Karen Kingston
    https://rumble.com/v4jit9h-stop-all-nanoparticle-cv19-vax-injections-now-karen-kingston.html

    Karen Kingston is a biotech analyst and former Pfizer employee who has been reporting on the nightmare of the CV19 mRNA nanoparticle vax. Kingston proved the CV19 vax was a bioweapon from the very beginning and is now on a team pushing to stop using it in Florida. Kingston says, “We know the mRNA injections never provided any benefit, and because of that, they actually meet the definition of a biological weapon under 18 U.S. Code 175. It’s also a weapon of mass destruction under Florida law 790.166. The statement of facts that was submitted (to the Florida Supreme Court) goes through all the evidence. . . . There was 1.5 million adverse events. The definition of a weapon is any biological agent or device that doesn’t prevent against infection, doesn’t prevent any kind of disease . . . and was not done under bona fide research. We know that research that was done with the Phase 1, 2 and 3 trials, the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) that was given to Americans and the FDA approved product, none of that was legitimate. There was no informed consent. That is criminal biological human experimentation. That, by definition, is biowarfare. There is no benefit . . . . It actually harms people. If you look at Pfizer’s documents, Moderna’s documents and the government’s documents, they knew all along that harms outweighed the benefits of this product in any population.”

    Dr. Joe Sansone in Florida has been the driving force to get these CV19 mRNA nanoparticle shots banned in that state. A recent post on Kingston’s Substack says, “Dr. Sansone is seeking for the Florida Supreme Court to issue an order to Governor DeSantis and Attorney General Moody to uphold their duties of enforcing federal and Florida laws by prohibiting the unlawful and criminal distribution, promotion and administration of the engineered mRNA nanoparticle injections on Floridians and to protect Floridians by seizing the injections.”

    (Read the entire “Order to Prohibit the Use Of and Seize the mRNA Injections” here.)

    Dr. Sansone is not the only one who thinks these CV19 injections should be “banned.” Kingston says, “The Florida Surgeon General and the Florida Department of Health have said these mRNA (CV19) injections should be used in NO human beings. They said these are gene editing technologies that can disrupt the human genome and make permanent changes. . . . According to the DOD, our own government and national security agencies say if you change the genome of any species, including human beings, that is the extermination of that species. This makes it a weapon of mass destruction. . . . The evidence is put together in such a damning way you cannot argue to keep the (CV19 mRNA nanoparticle) shots.”

    In closing, Kingston reminds us, “States have the right to block any drug or medical device even if the FDA approves it.” In the not-so-distant future, let’s hope many states follow Florida’s lead and ban the CV19 bioweapon shots.
    Stop All Nanoparticle CV19 Vax Injections Now – Karen Kingston https://rumble.com/v4jit9h-stop-all-nanoparticle-cv19-vax-injections-now-karen-kingston.html Karen Kingston is a biotech analyst and former Pfizer employee who has been reporting on the nightmare of the CV19 mRNA nanoparticle vax. Kingston proved the CV19 vax was a bioweapon from the very beginning and is now on a team pushing to stop using it in Florida. Kingston says, “We know the mRNA injections never provided any benefit, and because of that, they actually meet the definition of a biological weapon under 18 U.S. Code 175. It’s also a weapon of mass destruction under Florida law 790.166. The statement of facts that was submitted (to the Florida Supreme Court) goes through all the evidence. . . . There was 1.5 million adverse events. The definition of a weapon is any biological agent or device that doesn’t prevent against infection, doesn’t prevent any kind of disease . . . and was not done under bona fide research. We know that research that was done with the Phase 1, 2 and 3 trials, the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) that was given to Americans and the FDA approved product, none of that was legitimate. There was no informed consent. That is criminal biological human experimentation. That, by definition, is biowarfare. There is no benefit . . . . It actually harms people. If you look at Pfizer’s documents, Moderna’s documents and the government’s documents, they knew all along that harms outweighed the benefits of this product in any population.” Dr. Joe Sansone in Florida has been the driving force to get these CV19 mRNA nanoparticle shots banned in that state. A recent post on Kingston’s Substack says, “Dr. Sansone is seeking for the Florida Supreme Court to issue an order to Governor DeSantis and Attorney General Moody to uphold their duties of enforcing federal and Florida laws by prohibiting the unlawful and criminal distribution, promotion and administration of the engineered mRNA nanoparticle injections on Floridians and to protect Floridians by seizing the injections.” (Read the entire “Order to Prohibit the Use Of and Seize the mRNA Injections” here.) Dr. Sansone is not the only one who thinks these CV19 injections should be “banned.” Kingston says, “The Florida Surgeon General and the Florida Department of Health have said these mRNA (CV19) injections should be used in NO human beings. They said these are gene editing technologies that can disrupt the human genome and make permanent changes. . . . According to the DOD, our own government and national security agencies say if you change the genome of any species, including human beings, that is the extermination of that species. This makes it a weapon of mass destruction. . . . The evidence is put together in such a damning way you cannot argue to keep the (CV19 mRNA nanoparticle) shots.” In closing, Kingston reminds us, “States have the right to block any drug or medical device even if the FDA approves it.” In the not-so-distant future, let’s hope many states follow Florida’s lead and ban the CV19 bioweapon shots.
    1 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 1203 Views
  • New Yorkers take cover and beg for the NYPD to come and save them after man is shot in the head. The incident happened inside the Hoyt-Schermerhorn subway station in #Brooklyn. According to ABC 7, the shooter, 36, pulled out a gun after provoking the fight with another man. The other man successfully wrestled the gun from the aggressor and shot him in the head. According to the report, the man who pulled out the gun is in critical condition. The shooting comes just days after New York Governor Kathy Hochul deployed the National Guard and state police troops into the subway to check bags.
    New Yorkers take cover and beg for the NYPD to come and save them after man is shot in the head. The incident happened inside the Hoyt-Schermerhorn subway station in #Brooklyn. According to ABC 7, the shooter, 36, pulled out a gun after provoking the fight with another man. The other man successfully wrestled the gun from the aggressor and shot him in the head. According to the report, the man who pulled out the gun is in critical condition. The shooting comes just days after New York Governor Kathy Hochul deployed the National Guard and state police troops into the subway to check bags.
    0 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 344 Views 0
  • South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem Hosts Town Hall in Spearfish, SD

    LIVE 3 hours ago on Facebook, South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem hosts Town Hall meeting in Spearfish, SD.

    "The federal government SUCKS, and they are failing us..." — Governor Kristi Noem

    South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem Hosts Town Hall in Spearfish, SD LIVE 3 hours ago on Facebook, South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem hosts Town Hall meeting in Spearfish, SD. "The federal government SUCKS, and they are failing us..." — Governor Kristi Noem
    0 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 244 Views
  • https://rumble.com/v4ivt5r-zionist-kristi-noem-destroys-free-speech-south-dakota-governor-bows-to-jewi.html
    https://rumble.com/v4ivt5r-zionist-kristi-noem-destroys-free-speech-south-dakota-governor-bows-to-jewi.html
    Angry
    2
    0 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 219 Views
  • The Globalists In Plain Sight - Colorado Representative Scott Bottoms 3/10/24
    https://rumble.com/v4icy7i-live-12pm-est-the-globalists-in-plain-sight-colorado-representative-scott-b.html
    CDM's Globalists In Plain Sight Host Christine Dolan interviews Colorado Representative Scott Bottoms who is new to politics and he says the Centennial State's House he enters every day is "dark" and what the representatives are voting for does not protect trafficked children, but rather child rapists. Parental rights are being taken away and the force behind it is Biden's policies in Washington, D.C. and Colorado's present governor is being groomed by Davos for the US presidency in the future. Colorado democrats want to their state to be more liberal than California.
    The Globalists In Plain Sight - Colorado Representative Scott Bottoms 3/10/24 https://rumble.com/v4icy7i-live-12pm-est-the-globalists-in-plain-sight-colorado-representative-scott-b.html CDM's Globalists In Plain Sight Host Christine Dolan interviews Colorado Representative Scott Bottoms who is new to politics and he says the Centennial State's House he enters every day is "dark" and what the representatives are voting for does not protect trafficked children, but rather child rapists. Parental rights are being taken away and the force behind it is Biden's policies in Washington, D.C. and Colorado's present governor is being groomed by Davos for the US presidency in the future. Colorado democrats want to their state to be more liberal than California.
    0 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 618 Views
Sponsorizeaza Paginile