It's unconstitutional for non-violent offenders? That's discriminatory. That ruling is unconstitutional in itself. Anything that is discriminatory against any group of people is unconstitutional at its very basis. Then there's the very basis of the line in the Second Amendment that states "shall not be infringed".
It's unconstitutional for non-violent offenders? That's discriminatory. That ruling is unconstitutional in itself. Anything that is discriminatory against any group of people is unconstitutional at its very basis. Then there's the very basis of the line in the Second Amendment that states "shall not be infringed".
THERELOAD.COM
Federal Appeals Court Rules Second Amendment Protects Non-Violent Felon’s Gun Rights
The federal government can not bar a Pennsylvania man from owning guns for life over his food stamp fraud conviction.
0 Comments 0 Shares 436 Views