WebMD Propaganda: The New War on Science: 4 Reasons People Reject Good Data
The deception is built right into the article title. https://wb.md/3zAz7JU
If you reject the approved "science" narrative, you are at war with it. You can't have a difference of opinion. Your only position is as a combatant rejecting real "science" if you disagree with the "experts".
If you reject the "experts" (like Fauci et al), not only are you at war with science, you are also rejecting "good data".
What does WebMD mean by "good data"?
First, they denigrate by evoking flat earthers, those who believe the earth revolves about the sun and anyone who doesn't accept that microbes cause disease (germ theory), which implies those who reject "science" are in this group.
Aviva Philipp-Muller, PhD, one of the authors of the paper this post is based upon is quoted as saying:
- “If you come to conclusions through gut instincts or listening to people that have no knowledge on a topic, you can come to believe just about anything,”
- "And sometimes it can be dangerous for society when people believe things that are wrong. We’ve seen this in real time, as some people have rejected COVID-19 vaccines not for any scientific reason, but through nonscientific means.”
The article then states:
- "Backing up Philipp-Muller’s point: A recent analysis by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that about 234,000 COVID deaths could have been prevented if vaccination rates were higher."
Is that why the CDC data based VAERS under reporting admits to nearly 30,000 deaths (29,981) because the vaccine is so effective? https://bit.ly/38Li5fi
VAERS is under reported by a factor of 40 to 100 times. No one really knows because so few of the reports are actually submitted even though required by law. Multiply the above by 40 to 100 to come closer to the real totals.
However, if you dare question the "science" that never states the VAERS data report totals, you are anti-science.
- But if you bend to their will, you are acceptable in their eyes.
Granted, you may end up dead from the shot, but at least it will be a "righteous" death.
WebMD, just another source of Big Pharma propaganda.
#science #covid19 #covidvaccines #coviddeaths #anti-science #science #vaccinepropaganda
The deception is built right into the article title. https://wb.md/3zAz7JU
If you reject the approved "science" narrative, you are at war with it. You can't have a difference of opinion. Your only position is as a combatant rejecting real "science" if you disagree with the "experts".
If you reject the "experts" (like Fauci et al), not only are you at war with science, you are also rejecting "good data".
What does WebMD mean by "good data"?
First, they denigrate by evoking flat earthers, those who believe the earth revolves about the sun and anyone who doesn't accept that microbes cause disease (germ theory), which implies those who reject "science" are in this group.
Aviva Philipp-Muller, PhD, one of the authors of the paper this post is based upon is quoted as saying:
- “If you come to conclusions through gut instincts or listening to people that have no knowledge on a topic, you can come to believe just about anything,”
- "And sometimes it can be dangerous for society when people believe things that are wrong. We’ve seen this in real time, as some people have rejected COVID-19 vaccines not for any scientific reason, but through nonscientific means.”
The article then states:
- "Backing up Philipp-Muller’s point: A recent analysis by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that about 234,000 COVID deaths could have been prevented if vaccination rates were higher."
Is that why the CDC data based VAERS under reporting admits to nearly 30,000 deaths (29,981) because the vaccine is so effective? https://bit.ly/38Li5fi
VAERS is under reported by a factor of 40 to 100 times. No one really knows because so few of the reports are actually submitted even though required by law. Multiply the above by 40 to 100 to come closer to the real totals.
However, if you dare question the "science" that never states the VAERS data report totals, you are anti-science.
- But if you bend to their will, you are acceptable in their eyes.
Granted, you may end up dead from the shot, but at least it will be a "righteous" death.
WebMD, just another source of Big Pharma propaganda.
#science #covid19 #covidvaccines #coviddeaths #anti-science #science #vaccinepropaganda
WebMD Propaganda: The New War on Science: 4 Reasons People Reject Good Data
The deception is built right into the article title. https://wb.md/3zAz7JU
If you reject the approved "science" narrative, you are at war with it. You can't have a difference of opinion. Your only position is as a combatant rejecting real "science" if you disagree with the "experts".
If you reject the "experts" (like Fauci et al), not only are you at war with science, you are also rejecting "good data".
What does WebMD mean by "good data"?
First, they denigrate by evoking flat earthers, those who believe the earth revolves about the sun and anyone who doesn't accept that microbes cause disease (germ theory), which implies those who reject "science" are in this group.
Aviva Philipp-Muller, PhD, one of the authors of the paper this post is based upon is quoted as saying:
- “If you come to conclusions through gut instincts or listening to people that have no knowledge on a topic, you can come to believe just about anything,”
- "And sometimes it can be dangerous for society when people believe things that are wrong. We’ve seen this in real time, as some people have rejected COVID-19 vaccines not for any scientific reason, but through nonscientific means.”
The article then states:
- "Backing up Philipp-Muller’s point: A recent analysis by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that about 234,000 COVID deaths could have been prevented if vaccination rates were higher."
Is that why the CDC data based VAERS under reporting admits to nearly 30,000 deaths (29,981) because the vaccine is so effective? https://bit.ly/38Li5fi
VAERS is under reported by a factor of 40 to 100 times. No one really knows because so few of the reports are actually submitted even though required by law. Multiply the above by 40 to 100 to come closer to the real totals.
However, if you dare question the "science" that never states the VAERS data report totals, you are anti-science.
- But if you bend to their will, you are acceptable in their eyes.
Granted, you may end up dead from the shot, but at least it will be a "righteous" death.
WebMD, just another source of Big Pharma propaganda.
#science #covid19 #covidvaccines #coviddeaths #anti-science #science #vaccinepropaganda
0 Comments
0 Shares
3K Views
Arabic
French
Spanish
Portuguese
Deutsch
Turkish
Dutch
Italiano
Russian
Romaian
Portuguese (Brazil)
Greek