Ya ever notice how people who push for CRT will hit you with several lines of abstract theoretical nonsense as if it's some sort of time tested, trite and true scientific method of solving for racism, then always finish it off with 'and if you don't like/agree with all of that, there must be something wrong with you that your hiding' or some smugly presumptuous bullshit like that?

Firstly, your theory is just that: a THEORY... meaning, "Theoretical," as in NOT PROVEN TO WORK in a practical sense, nor with reproducible results in the tangible reality. In fact, with regard to the "critical race THEORY," all data and anecdotal evidence thus far points to it having the opposite effect of it's stated intention.

Here's an article from Harvard to help explain why: https://hbr.org/2016/07/why-diversity-programs-fail

K? so take the preachy preachy down a notch until you learn the difference between proven methods and abstract theories...

I'm starting to notice a trend lately of people pushing theories and experimental measures on everyone by forcefully asserting them as proven methods... Sup with that?

And then... 'What's wrong with me that I'm attempting to hide, why, because I can pick apart the logical fallacies and contradictions in a Marxist theory that seeds racial division and discrimination in the name of eradicating it?

What's wrong with me, why, because I point out that it probably won't work to get rid of racism if your purposed method involves profiling and characterizing broad groups of people in aggregated categories determined by race, and altering the treatment of each based on race to achieve a predetermined, artificial outcome to suit malleable, arbitrary notions of what is popular or politically acceptable?

Psh. Nothing. Your problem with people like me is precisely that I don't need to be told how to think by tonedef armchair intellectuals in their ivory towers, and I am NOT hiding that fact or censoring my thoughts... because I'm not afraid to speak against my tribe when they are just flat out wrong.

"You must be damaged because you don't agree with shit that actually makes zero sense in practical reality?" Really?

That's the kinda shit people say to try and scare you into hiding what's RIGHT with you, because they are just repeating some shit they read, don't actually know what they are talking about, wouldn't actually be able to defend their professed beliefs in any meaningful or original way, and know that if their premise gets dragged out into an ACTUAL debate, their whole attempt to appear smart and virtuous will melt all over the floor like ice cream on a summer day in Vegas.'

Go head... Try and get these people to actually defend their theory in debate... I give it one, two, three exchanges at most before they dodge the topic with insults, blocking, or silence. That's been my experience every time so far

Ask me what I REALLY think though.
Ya ever notice how people who push for CRT will hit you with several lines of abstract theoretical nonsense as if it's some sort of time tested, trite and true scientific method of solving for racism, then always finish it off with 'and if you don't like/agree with all of that, there must be something wrong with you that your hiding' or some smugly presumptuous bullshit like that? Firstly, your theory is just that: a THEORY... meaning, "Theoretical," as in NOT PROVEN TO WORK in a practical sense, nor with reproducible results in the tangible reality. In fact, with regard to the "critical race THEORY," all data and anecdotal evidence thus far points to it having the opposite effect of it's stated intention. Here's an article from Harvard to help explain why: https://hbr.org/2016/07/why-diversity-programs-fail K? so take the preachy preachy down a notch until you learn the difference between proven methods and abstract theories... I'm starting to notice a trend lately of people pushing theories and experimental measures on everyone by forcefully asserting them as proven methods... Sup with that? And then... 'What's wrong with me that I'm attempting to hide, why, because I can pick apart the logical fallacies and contradictions in a Marxist theory that seeds racial division and discrimination in the name of eradicating it? What's wrong with me, why, because I point out that it probably won't work to get rid of racism if your purposed method involves profiling and characterizing broad groups of people in aggregated categories determined by race, and altering the treatment of each based on race to achieve a predetermined, artificial outcome to suit malleable, arbitrary notions of what is popular or politically acceptable? Psh. Nothing. Your problem with people like me is precisely that I don't need to be told how to think by tonedef armchair intellectuals in their ivory towers, and I am NOT hiding that fact or censoring my thoughts... because I'm not afraid to speak against my tribe when they are just flat out wrong. "You must be damaged because you don't agree with shit that actually makes zero sense in practical reality?" Really? That's the kinda shit people say to try and scare you into hiding what's RIGHT with you, because they are just repeating some shit they read, don't actually know what they are talking about, wouldn't actually be able to defend their professed beliefs in any meaningful or original way, and know that if their premise gets dragged out into an ACTUAL debate, their whole attempt to appear smart and virtuous will melt all over the floor like ice cream on a summer day in Vegas.' Go head... Try and get these people to actually defend their theory in debate... I give it one, two, three exchanges at most before they dodge the topic with insults, blocking, or silence. That's been my experience every time so far Ask me what I REALLY think though.
Like
2
0 Comments 1 Shares 37 Views