President Obama proudly showed off the number of people receiving Medicaid, the state's health insurance for the poor, and people receiving food stamps, reaching an all-time high. Strange records. The responsibility of the leader is to make the people rich and the country strong, but why make as many people poor and living off the State as possible? Subsidies are basically necessary, for humanitarian reasons, to help the less fortunate and avoid social unrest. There are people who really need subsidies, the State has the responsibility to help them, no one blames them. But if subsidies are abused, many people can be self-sufficient but still abuse benefits, those are difficult cases to understand. Subsidies also have a downside: enslaving people. Once caught in the subsidy loop, it is difficult to get out, and increasingly dependent on the subsidy, dependent on the party that provided the subsidy. Falling out of dependence on subsidies, gradually losing the will to be independent, being born lazy. And once you depend on subsidies, you will forever have to struggle with the level of spending in the subsidy cycle, which means you will be poor for thousands of lives, never having a better chance because the subsidy only helps you get through the day , never helped climb the social ladder. Is it the most ideal remedy to help the poor? Absolutely not! The best way to help the poor is to help them get out of poverty, not confine them to a large and long subsidy circle. But the most effective way to help is to create jobs through economic growth, not through redistribution of income, redistribution of what is, based on increasing taxes on the rich and redistributed to the poor. In other words, it is necessary to make the cake bigger, everyone has a large portion, instead of keeping the cake the same and then worrying about dividing it more evenly, each time it is divided, each portion will be smaller. The responsibility of the State is to ensure that when the cake grows, each person's share, especially the poor's share, will also grow, and not be taken away by the rich or powerful. Subsidies up to a certain limit are necessary and justifiable. But today's political reality, the DC party thanks to President Obama and Biden, has turned subsidies into a form of bribery, buying votes. The basic difference between CH and DC is very clear: CH believes in the spirit of progress and personal achievement, helping the poor to rise up on their own to get out of poverty, DC helps the poor by take from the rich and give it back to the poor so that they will forever live in poverty, forever dependent on subsidies and forever have to vote for DC. DC believes that the stupid people of the black area are forever dark, only DC leaders and civil servants know how to save the world.
President Obama proudly showed off the number of people receiving Medicaid, the state's health insurance for the poor, and people receiving food stamps, reaching an all-time high. Strange records. The responsibility of the leader is to make the people rich and the country strong, but why make as many people poor and living off the State as possible? Subsidies are basically necessary, for humanitarian reasons, to help the less fortunate and avoid social unrest. There are people who really need subsidies, the State has the responsibility to help them, no one blames them. But if subsidies are abused, many people can be self-sufficient but still abuse benefits, those are difficult cases to understand. Subsidies also have a downside: enslaving people. Once caught in the subsidy loop, it is difficult to get out, and increasingly dependent on the subsidy, dependent on the party that provided the subsidy. Falling out of dependence on subsidies, gradually losing the will to be independent, being born lazy. And once you depend on subsidies, you will forever have to struggle with the level of spending in the subsidy cycle, which means you will be poor for thousands of lives, never having a better chance because the subsidy only helps you get through the day , never helped climb the social ladder. Is it the most ideal remedy to help the poor? Absolutely not! The best way to help the poor is to help them get out of poverty, not confine them to a large and long subsidy circle. But the most effective way to help is to create jobs through economic growth, not through redistribution of income, redistribution of what is, based on increasing taxes on the rich and redistributed to the poor. In other words, it is necessary to make the cake bigger, everyone has a large portion, instead of keeping the cake the same and then worrying about dividing it more evenly, each time it is divided, each portion will be smaller. The responsibility of the State is to ensure that when the cake grows, each person's share, especially the poor's share, will also grow, and not be taken away by the rich or powerful. Subsidies up to a certain limit are necessary and justifiable. But today's political reality, the DC party thanks to President Obama and Biden, has turned subsidies into a form of bribery, buying votes. The basic difference between CH and DC is very clear: CH believes in the spirit of progress and personal achievement, helping the poor to rise up on their own to get out of poverty, DC helps the poor by take from the rich and give it back to the poor so that they will forever live in poverty, forever dependent on subsidies and forever have to vote for DC. DC believes that the stupid people of the black area are forever dark, only DC leaders and civil servants know how to save the world.
0 Comments 0 Shares 5 Views