A Video Explaining the Union or Standard Mortgage Clause

Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/rights-mortgagees-barry-zalma-esq-cfe and see the full video at https://youtu.be/fnta0i2LMYQ  and at https://rumble.com/vp0rmu-the-rights-of-mortgagees.html and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 3950 posts.

Since properties are frequently encumbered by mortgages, most first party property policies contain provisions that protect the mortgagee’s interest in the event the insured property is damaged or destroyed.

Historically there have been two types of mortgage clauses:

    a loss payable or open mortgage clause, which only provides that loss shall be payable to the mortgagee as interest may appear. Most courts have construed the phrase, “as interest may appear” as referring not to the mortgagee’s interest in the insured property, but rather to the amount of debt owed to it secured by the mortgage or deed of trust.
    the standard or union mortgage clause (Form 438 BFU NS), which states, in addition to the loss payable provision, that the mortgagee’s interest in the proceeds of the policy shall not be invalidated by any act or neglect of the mortgagor.

Where an insurer issues a policy knowing that the property is subject to a mortgage, and in fact the policy itself contains a standard mortgage clause extending coverage to mortgage holders, there is no added risk. At the time the policy was issued, it was foreseeable that a mortgagee could take possession and control of the property in the event of default.

The union mortgage clause in an insurance policy creates a separate contract between the mortgagee and the insurer. [Vargas v. Nautilus Ins. Co., 248 Kan. 881, 887, 811 P.2d 868 (1991); see also Neises v. Solomon State Bank, 236 Kan. 767, 778, 696 P.2d 372 (1985); Iron Horse Auto v. Lititz Mut. Ins. Co., 156 P.3d 1221, 283 Kan. 834 (Kan. 2007)

A standard mortgage clause creates an independent contract between the insurer and the mortgagee that prevents the mortgagee’s interest from being invalidated by the conduct of the mortgagor. [Allen, 167 Minn. at 149–50, 208 N.W. at 817–18 (quoting Syndicate Ins. Co. v. Bohn, 65 F. 165, 178 (8th Cir.1894)); Magoun v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 86 Minn. 486, 490, 91 N.W. 5, 7 (Minn. 1902).]
ZALMA OPINION

Every first party property adjuster must understand the effect a standard mortgage clause has on claims handling and that, even if it is proved that the insured intentionally committed the crime of arson-for-profit and burned down his house the mortgagee may still recover from the insurer up to its security interest.