-
- EXPLORE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sponsored
We are 100% funded for October.
Thanks to everyone who helped out. 🥰
Xephula monthly operating expenses for 2024 - Server: $143/month - Backup Software: $6/month - Object Storage: $6/month - SMTP Service: $10/month - Stripe Processing Fees: ~$10/month - Total: $175/month
Search
Categories
- Art
- Causes
- Crafts
- Crime
- Dance
- Drinks
- Film
- Finance
- Fitness
- Food
- Games
- Gardening
- Health
- Home
- Literature
- Music
- Networking
- Paranormal
- Other
- Politics
- History
- News
- Party
- Science
- Religion
- Shopping
- Sports
- SyFy
- Politically Incorrect
- Philosophy
- Theater
- Technology
- Wellness
Read More
VOTER FRAUD "COLLUSION" Biggest Story! Diane Feinstein’s husband Richard Blum owns vote counting machine company!
FEINSTEIN/PELOSI FAMILIES HAVE OWNERSHIP IN SOFTWARE CO THAT COUNTS VOTES
The...
New Books for the Insurance Professional
New Books for Insurance Professionals Now Available at Amazon.com
Read the full article at...
"THE 1918 “SPANISH FLU”: ONLY THE VACCINATED DIED "
Do you read? Do you buy books or go to the library?
I'm asking because this video suggests...
Discovering Wellness with Okinawa Flat Belly Tonic: A Personal Journey to Health
Discovering Wellness with Okinawa Flat Belly Tonic: A Personal Journey to Health
It was early...
Insurer Must Report Suspected Fraud
Insurer Must Report Suspected Fraud
Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gkAGjcRS, see the...
Read the full video at https://lnkd.in/gTeJAzP and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 3800 posts.
uis Montano, sued seeking a declaratory judgment that he was entitled to underinsured motorist coverage under an insurance policy issued to his father and stepmother by Erie Insurance Exchange. The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of plaintiff. In Luis Montano v. Erie Insurance Exchange, No. 1-20-1306, 2021 IL App (1st) 201306-U, Appellate Court Of Illinois First Judicial District First District Fifth Division (June 11, 2021) the Court of Appeal was asked to conclude that a relative who had his own apartment was still a regular resident of his parents home and entitled to UIM coverage.
ZALMA OPINION
Plaintiff was able to establish that his domicile was his parents home. He also often lived in his parents home even when he was away at college and when he maintained an apartment when he worked in a factory. Since he lived in his parents home “often” that fact was sufficient for the Illinois Court of Appeal to conclude he was a “regular” resident of the parents household and could tap into the $250,000 available UIM coverage that, since he spent two months in hospital, could easily take the limits. It appears that the insurer needs a definition of “regular” in its UIM coverage.