The Property Damage Trigger of Coverage

Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/video-explaining-trigger-coverage-property-damage-zalma-esq-cfe and see the full video at https://rumble.com/vf2fn5-a-video-explaining-the-trigger-of-coverage-for-property-damage.html and at https://youtu.be/6UDMJHAZL5U and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 3650 posts.

The term “trigger of coverage” means “what event must occur for potential coverage to commence under the terms of the insurance policy” and “what must take place within the policy’s effective dates for the potential of coverage to be ‘triggered.'” [In Re Feature Realty Litig., 468 F. Supp.2d 1287, 1295, n.2 (E.D. Wash. 2006)]

After the California Supreme Court adopted a continuous trigger in Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral Ins. Co. (1995) 10 Cal.4th 645, 685, 42 Cal.Rptr.2d 324, 913 P.2d 878 (Montrose). Insurers, trying to limit their coverage, revised the policy wording.

The “continuous injury” trigger has been applied mostly in cases involving gradual release of pollutants and other environmental harms. After Montrose, the insurer revised its policies to use the language for the very purpose of “obviat[ing] the application of the ‘progressive damage-continuous trigger’ articulated in Montrose.”