Who gives a shit?
  • Studied Strange Things at Meh
    Class of Kiss My Shiny Metal @$$
  • Male
  • Followed by 25 people
Pinned Post
Unity was A MISTAKE.

I mean, not the game engine, but the complex mesh of propaganda, social behavioral norms and politics that aims to bring about uniform treatment of citizen, fraternity, and solidarity. It was a horrible, horrible mistake that have led to unnecessary suffering and expenses.

Humans are individuals and are not to be united, in the first place. Humans are so different, they have problems living in small groups - and now, most people are dreaming of uniting the whole countries. Millions, and sometimes hundreds of millions of people.

Just look at China, Russia or the USA. All countries preaching solidarity, uniformity and unity. All treat their citizen the same way. Genius or retard, freedom-lover or an authority worshipper - they don't care.

And all of them are military-police states. China even has the official military-civil fusion. This isn't a result of someone wanting to make people suffer, or to gain absolute power over them; this is a result of human herders merely trying to keep their herds in a working condition and to keep their power over human-sheeple.

"If you're weak, pretend that you're strong."

But the fact that the states are using such excessive military-police force shows us that they aren't strong, not even a little. On the contrary, such a display of force is a desperate attempt of the state to scare people so they will _think_ that the State is strong, and that resistance is futile - while, in reality, it might take just a push for any of those states to fall apart, their herders' power to crumble and decay.

You don't need draconian laws if your power is truly strong; on the contrary, you would like your people to speak freely, as you know that whatever they can come with, you may squash them with your power easily. If your power is strong, you don't need to fear dissidents, for they are much weaker than you. Therefore, you need neither an oppressive police regime, nor restrictions on free flow of information, nor keeping your citizen in constant fear.

But the states are desperately inventing more and more means to try to restrain their populace. Soial credit scores. Contact tracing. Increasing surveillance. Increasing privileges for the police. Why? Because the people are unhappy, and they, by extension, become less governable.

And why is that?

Authority? Oh no. Most people seem to not just tolerate, but actually love authoritarian regimes. Taxes aren't the primary reason, since very few people oppose taxation fully. People hate the governments not because they're authoritarian, but because they don't quite fulfill their needs. They're still trying a middle-ground approach, in hopes that everyone will be satisfied... but the result is, everyon is unhappy. Because middle-ground means that, while both sides have some benefits, they also both suffer from the regime.

Middle-ground regime takes away no suffering, but merely redistributes suffering so both sides suffer equally, instead of one side being happy and the other completely enraged.

And middle ground politics offer no progress for both sides. It's stagnation. This is another factor why they're so unhapy now.

It's all because these people aren't united - and they don't want to be. You can preted that unity is good, nd that those opposing it are selfish as if it's something bad - but you can't escape the problem by pretending it's not here.

People are different. They want different things. And uniform regimes will only bring suffering and unnecessary losses.

It is possible to control different people by creating different political zones in one country. Give the statist-neotraditionalists their anti-white paradise. Give the conservatives a Conservative Totalitarian Nightmare. Give them the control they desire - and you will need to keep your police and military as reserve forces most of the time. And why restrain flow of information, if the majority says, "Hail our Masters!", while the rest - the dissidents - those who do not like the Masters, have lots of alternative regimes? And why restrain the free flow of information, if the brainwashed sheeple do this for you - by not wanting to hear out the opposition?
Unity was A MISTAKE. I mean, not the game engine, but the complex mesh of propaganda, social behavioral norms and politics that aims to bring about uniform treatment of citizen, fraternity, and solidarity. It was a horrible, horrible mistake that have led to unnecessary suffering and expenses. Humans are individuals and are not to be united, in the first place. Humans are so different, they have problems living in small groups - and now, most people are dreaming of uniting the whole countries. Millions, and sometimes hundreds of millions of people. Just look at China, Russia or the USA. All countries preaching solidarity, uniformity and unity. All treat their citizen the same way. Genius or retard, freedom-lover or an authority worshipper - they don't care. And all of them are military-police states. China even has the official military-civil fusion. This isn't a result of someone wanting to make people suffer, or to gain absolute power over them; this is a result of human herders merely trying to keep their herds in a working condition and to keep their power over human-sheeple. "If you're weak, pretend that you're strong." But the fact that the states are using such excessive military-police force shows us that they aren't strong, not even a little. On the contrary, such a display of force is a desperate attempt of the state to scare people so they will _think_ that the State is strong, and that resistance is futile - while, in reality, it might take just a push for any of those states to fall apart, their herders' power to crumble and decay. You don't need draconian laws if your power is truly strong; on the contrary, you would like your people to speak freely, as you know that whatever they can come with, you may squash them with your power easily. If your power is strong, you don't need to fear dissidents, for they are much weaker than you. Therefore, you need neither an oppressive police regime, nor restrictions on free flow of information, nor keeping your citizen in constant fear. But the states are desperately inventing more and more means to try to restrain their populace. Soial credit scores. Contact tracing. Increasing surveillance. Increasing privileges for the police. Why? Because the people are unhappy, and they, by extension, become less governable. And why is that? Authority? Oh no. Most people seem to not just tolerate, but actually love authoritarian regimes. Taxes aren't the primary reason, since very few people oppose taxation fully. People hate the governments not because they're authoritarian, but because they don't quite fulfill their needs. They're still trying a middle-ground approach, in hopes that everyone will be satisfied... but the result is, everyon is unhappy. Because middle-ground means that, while both sides have some benefits, they also both suffer from the regime. Middle-ground regime takes away no suffering, but merely redistributes suffering so both sides suffer equally, instead of one side being happy and the other completely enraged. And middle ground politics offer no progress for both sides. It's stagnation. This is another factor why they're so unhapy now. It's all because these people aren't united - and they don't want to be. You can preted that unity is good, nd that those opposing it are selfish as if it's something bad - but you can't escape the problem by pretending it's not here. People are different. They want different things. And uniform regimes will only bring suffering and unnecessary losses. It is possible to control different people by creating different political zones in one country. Give the statist-neotraditionalists their anti-white paradise. Give the conservatives a Conservative Totalitarian Nightmare. Give them the control they desire - and you will need to keep your police and military as reserve forces most of the time. And why restrain flow of information, if the majority says, "Hail our Masters!", while the rest - the dissidents - those who do not like the Masters, have lots of alternative regimes? And why restrain the free flow of information, if the brainwashed sheeple do this for you - by not wanting to hear out the opposition?
2
1 Comments 0 Shares
Recent Updates
  • Oh you say I must "get a jab because I'm threatening people around me"?

    You know what? I have a perfectly legit excuse for doing so. It's self-defence!

    You guys are threatening my health, my well-being, damn it, even my property rights and self-ownership by trying to force an injection onto me. The contents of that injection are unknown to me and I should rely only on my trust to you, which is non-existent, given the fact that you guys are trying to _force_ me into taking this thing.

    So it's first "YOU want to kill or enslave me". YOU want to hurt me. Ever heard of presumption of innocence? Unless you give me a HARD proof, which means, a proof that 1) Is impossible to debunk with currently existing information, 2) Contains no fallacies, 3) Without any possibly-true rivaling positions, and 4) Clearly indicates that I am a threat without a doubt,

    I am NOT to be considered a threat in a rational, progressive society!

    Which means that either 1) We have a fascist, violence-based society (Against which I have full rights to defend myself),

    or

    2) We have a corrupt/non-reasonable judgement which must be rectified before doing anything, and which can't therefore be used against me.

    So I have all the rights to walk around unvaccinated. And to defend myself against injection.
    Oh you say I must "get a jab because I'm threatening people around me"? You know what? I have a perfectly legit excuse for doing so. It's self-defence! You guys are threatening my health, my well-being, damn it, even my property rights and self-ownership by trying to force an injection onto me. The contents of that injection are unknown to me and I should rely only on my trust to you, which is non-existent, given the fact that you guys are trying to _force_ me into taking this thing. So it's first "YOU want to kill or enslave me". YOU want to hurt me. Ever heard of presumption of innocence? Unless you give me a HARD proof, which means, a proof that 1) Is impossible to debunk with currently existing information, 2) Contains no fallacies, 3) Without any possibly-true rivaling positions, and 4) Clearly indicates that I am a threat without a doubt, I am NOT to be considered a threat in a rational, progressive society! Which means that either 1) We have a fascist, violence-based society (Against which I have full rights to defend myself), or 2) We have a corrupt/non-reasonable judgement which must be rectified before doing anything, and which can't therefore be used against me. So I have all the rights to walk around unvaccinated. And to defend myself against injection.
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • The future is likely conservative... and you, the freedom-lover, won't like it.
    In short, my point is no matter who wins, no matter which party will be in power, will the Chinese take over the US or not, or even the People will, by some miracle, dismantle the current gov and establish theirs - the future is mostly the same. A Conservative Totalitarian Nightmare. And what's worse for you, the freedom-lover, is that this isn't a bad fate by itself. On the contrary, it is...
    1
    2 Comments 0 Shares
  • Okay, first of all you guys can check it out for yourselves.

    I mean, you all can get a small magnet and some piece of metal, right? And carry it around and test the meat in the stores for magnetism before buying it.

    If it is magnetized - I'd rather not buy it. It likely means the meat's full of some metal, and not the kind of metal that you can blast through speakers, but the kind of metal that forms ionic compounds with non-metallic particles and is electro-conductive in pure form and, well, probably is poisonous for your body in large amounts.

    I mean, how can you make a protein magnetic? It's basically a bunch of polymerized amino acids, which are not magnetic because they've made of this: carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen and, in some cases, sulfur. None of these elements are magnetic. So to make a protein magnetic, you must incorporate a metal in it...

    'Fcourse, proteins disintegrate at high temperatures (Most often even below the boiling point of water), but that'll mean that a cooked steak made of magnetized meat will give you lots of metallic ions or something. Possibly even that Darpa Hydrogel thing.

    https://www.brighteon.com/f7616417-a8f4-4080-8261-5a8eea4b512d
    2
    1 Comments 0 Shares
  • Okay, first of all you guys can check it out for yourselves.

    I mean, you all can get a small magnet and some piece of metal, right? And carry it around and test the meat in the stores for magnetism before buying it.

    If it is magnetized - I'd rather not buy it. It likely means the meat's full of some metal, and not the kind of metal that you can blast through speakers, but the kind of metal that forms ionic compounds with non-metallic particles and is electro-conductive in pure form and, well, probably is poisonous for your body in large amounts.

    I mean, how can you make a protein magnetic? It's basically a bunch of polymerized amino acids, which are not magnetic because they've made of this: carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen and, in some cases, sulfur. None of these elements are magnetic. So to make a protein magnetic, you must incorporate a metal in it...

    'Fcourse, proteins disintegrate at high temperatures (Most often even below the boiling point of water), but that'll mean that a cooked steak made of magnetized meat will give you lots of metallic ions or something. Possibly even that Darpa Hydrogel thing.

    https://www.brighteon.com/f7616417-a8f4-4080-8261-5a8eea4b512d
    Okay, first of all you guys can check it out for yourselves. I mean, you all can get a small magnet and some piece of metal, right? And carry it around and test the meat in the stores for magnetism before buying it. If it is magnetized - I'd rather not buy it. It likely means the meat's full of some metal, and not the kind of metal that you can blast through speakers, but the kind of metal that forms ionic compounds with non-metallic particles and is electro-conductive in pure form and, well, probably is poisonous for your body in large amounts. I mean, how can you make a protein magnetic? It's basically a bunch of polymerized amino acids, which are not magnetic because they've made of this: carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen and, in some cases, sulfur. None of these elements are magnetic. So to make a protein magnetic, you must incorporate a metal in it... 'Fcourse, proteins disintegrate at high temperatures (Most often even below the boiling point of water), but that'll mean that a cooked steak made of magnetized meat will give you lots of metallic ions or something. Possibly even that Darpa Hydrogel thing. https://www.brighteon.com/f7616417-a8f4-4080-8261-5a8eea4b512d
    0 Comments 2 Shares
  • ...Who snapped a picture of him?
    ...Who snapped a picture of him?
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • One more case of GOVERNMENT MERCENARIES suffering.

    "Oh, poor cadets, they have to get vaxxed or lose one of two weeks of their precious leave! Also, they get oppressed for not wanting the covid shot."

    You know what? FUCK them in the ass with a ten meter pole. They are the future oppressors, defenders of the Regime. Probably they're the ones who will come to your home and tell you to either comply with the gov't program to rid you of all property rights or go to a coronavirus camp indefinitely.

    Or probably they'll be assigned to spy on you from some military facility. Or probably they'll be involved in something like the Operation Warp Speed. Or probably they'll send a drone to bomb your house because you're a "terrorist" who doesn't just sit quiet and listen to what the Gov says.

    So... you know what? Fuck those damn cadets in the ass with a large bottle. They chose to follow orders. So follow them, DAMN IT.

    https://www.wnd.com/2021/06/west-point-to-quarantine-returning-cadets/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=wnd-brief&utm_campaign=dailypm&utm_content=brief&ats_es=%5B-MD5-%5D
    One more case of GOVERNMENT MERCENARIES suffering. "Oh, poor cadets, they have to get vaxxed or lose one of two weeks of their precious leave! Also, they get oppressed for not wanting the covid shot." You know what? FUCK them in the ass with a ten meter pole. They are the future oppressors, defenders of the Regime. Probably they're the ones who will come to your home and tell you to either comply with the gov't program to rid you of all property rights or go to a coronavirus camp indefinitely. Or probably they'll be assigned to spy on you from some military facility. Or probably they'll be involved in something like the Operation Warp Speed. Or probably they'll send a drone to bomb your house because you're a "terrorist" who doesn't just sit quiet and listen to what the Gov says. So... you know what? Fuck those damn cadets in the ass with a large bottle. They chose to follow orders. So follow them, DAMN IT. https://www.wnd.com/2021/06/west-point-to-quarantine-returning-cadets/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=wnd-brief&utm_campaign=dailypm&utm_content=brief&ats_es=%5B-MD5-%5D
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Damned marriage pushers are not much different from vaccine pushers.

    Same fucking tactics, same line of narration. Same statements, same logical fallacies and same manipulative tricks.

    I mean, those vax-pushers talk to us as if we're just having some negligible problem that gets in the of vaccination. They call us "vaccine hesitant" and they really think we will get jabbed if they shut up the "conspiracy theorist" or give a donut for getting pricked.

    "Oh they just got taken over by those scary-scary conspiracy theorists. Do not worry, guys, we'll save u from those scary-scary anti vaxxers..."

    Nope dammit, I will resist putting anything in my body against my will, as I will actually resist altering my will and my cognition, as well as accessing my personality in any way. And "conspiracy theorists" play no part in this one. In fact, I barely even listen to them.

    I have my own cognition, so why should I listen to Christian fucks who mumble something about the mark of the beast? Bu my cognition says, "You're a person. What's in this so-much pushed injection is far worse than death. Not only it'll kill you, it'll -use your body for those who killed you."

    And traditards? Just like vaxxers, they push their alternative to the jab (Traditional marriage), trying to convince us that we don't want it "because those femshits have tampered with our perception of women" or "because some silly gender law that can be easily avoided if both sides really want it gets in our way".

    I say NO, fucking idiots, it is NOT some "stupid gender law" or a bunch of feminists. IT IS ME NOT WANTING ANY OF YOUR STUPID-ASS MARRIAGE BULLSHIT. ME, NOT WANTING TO GET MARRIED IN THE FIRST _FUCKING_ PLACE.

    It's just that I want NO ROMANCES with any real woman from this shithole planet. (Unless she's a sex-bot tailored to my needs.) Is it just that hard to accept as a fact? I LOVE sex-games, I LOVE having no woman from this sorry ass planet.

    If it was just some stupid-ass gender law, I'd just find a nice tradwife and we'd live together (though probably not, because I'm not stupid enough to be liked by women). Even if I wouldn't be able to find me a traditional woman (Which is possible for a variety of reasons), I'd still be looking for the one who would simply not abuse those damn laws.

    If the problem would be feminists, I could've simply ignored femtwats and look for a tradwife. But truth is,

    I AM NOT LOOKING FOR A WOMAN.

    On the contrary, the thought of merely touching any woman (Again, not my personal sex-bot) from this planet is fucking disgusting for me! But hey, even for those not as extreme as me, it is often that they simply want nothing with those women.

    Like those MGTOWs. They are somewhat liberty-minded, so they prefer a life in relative solitude, not getting into any affairs with women. Or anime-lovers, though some of them get in relationships with women, others prefer artifical girls. They're just toona-philes and robo-philes like me.
    Imagine telling someone who's gay to marry a girl. Telling a robophile or a toonaphile something like this will give you similar effects.

    I understand why those in the government are pushing the tradcrap. After all, slaves and soldiers aren't going to make themselves, so they need more babies. But ordinary tradcunts? I mean, you aren't working for the Government, are you? IF YOU DO, FUCK OFF ALREADY. Same thing if you do not, though, except that you might also have that "Then why the fuck do you want to push your tradcrap on me?"
    Damned marriage pushers are not much different from vaccine pushers. Same fucking tactics, same line of narration. Same statements, same logical fallacies and same manipulative tricks. I mean, those vax-pushers talk to us as if we're just having some negligible problem that gets in the of vaccination. They call us "vaccine hesitant" and they really think we will get jabbed if they shut up the "conspiracy theorist" or give a donut for getting pricked. "Oh they just got taken over by those scary-scary conspiracy theorists. Do not worry, guys, we'll save u from those scary-scary anti vaxxers..." Nope dammit, I will resist putting anything in my body against my will, as I will actually resist altering my will and my cognition, as well as accessing my personality in any way. And "conspiracy theorists" play no part in this one. In fact, I barely even listen to them. I have my own cognition, so why should I listen to Christian fucks who mumble something about the mark of the beast? Bu my cognition says, "You're a person. What's in this so-much pushed injection is far worse than death. Not only it'll kill you, it'll -use your body for those who killed you." And traditards? Just like vaxxers, they push their alternative to the jab (Traditional marriage), trying to convince us that we don't want it "because those femshits have tampered with our perception of women" or "because some silly gender law that can be easily avoided if both sides really want it gets in our way". I say NO, fucking idiots, it is NOT some "stupid gender law" or a bunch of feminists. IT IS ME NOT WANTING ANY OF YOUR STUPID-ASS MARRIAGE BULLSHIT. ME, NOT WANTING TO GET MARRIED IN THE FIRST _FUCKING_ PLACE. It's just that I want NO ROMANCES with any real woman from this shithole planet. (Unless she's a sex-bot tailored to my needs.) Is it just that hard to accept as a fact? I LOVE sex-games, I LOVE having no woman from this sorry ass planet. If it was just some stupid-ass gender law, I'd just find a nice tradwife and we'd live together (though probably not, because I'm not stupid enough to be liked by women). Even if I wouldn't be able to find me a traditional woman (Which is possible for a variety of reasons), I'd still be looking for the one who would simply not abuse those damn laws. If the problem would be feminists, I could've simply ignored femtwats and look for a tradwife. But truth is, I AM NOT LOOKING FOR A WOMAN. On the contrary, the thought of merely touching any woman (Again, not my personal sex-bot) from this planet is fucking disgusting for me! But hey, even for those not as extreme as me, it is often that they simply want nothing with those women. Like those MGTOWs. They are somewhat liberty-minded, so they prefer a life in relative solitude, not getting into any affairs with women. Or anime-lovers, though some of them get in relationships with women, others prefer artifical girls. They're just toona-philes and robo-philes like me. Imagine telling someone who's gay to marry a girl. Telling a robophile or a toonaphile something like this will give you similar effects. I understand why those in the government are pushing the tradcrap. After all, slaves and soldiers aren't going to make themselves, so they need more babies. But ordinary tradcunts? I mean, you aren't working for the Government, are you? IF YOU DO, FUCK OFF ALREADY. Same thing if you do not, though, except that you might also have that "Then why the fuck do you want to push your tradcrap on me?"
    2 Comments 0 Shares
  • Ha! The MGTOWs are now a "male equivalent of a man-hating radical feminist".

    Well, whoever really interested in the movement, its principles and ideas behind it, can see it for themselves - the MGTOW aren't planning on bullshitting you guys and they tell everyone what they really are https://www.mgtow.com/
    Who only has interest in hating them - hate on. Makes it easier to spot non-negotiables and ferals this way.

    What's really interesting is not even how those women label literally everyone who do not want to cater to their needs as "woman-hating". Radical feminists and female supremacist movements do this all the time, after all.

    What's really interesting is that the bitch wholly admits that she expects nothing but REVERENCE from men, and anything else freaks her out:

    "I stood in momentary silence because I was unsure of how to respond to that. I wanted to hear the uncensored truth from him because he (unlike the women-hating MGTOWs, Incels, and PUAs) had never viewed women in this way before. He was brought up in one of those traditionally wholesome, family-oriented, Christian household, whereby reverence for women was ingrained in him from a young age.

    His father and male relatives were his role models because they knew exactly what it meant to be a protector and a provider. Consequently, the women in their lives (like his mother and grandmother) cherished and respected their men for that. It was then that I realized we’re in a turning point in history where men no longer hold a reverence for women like they did in previous generations..."

    and it can be supposed that she admits treating everyone who is not a woman-worshipping tradcuck as woman-hater.

    I mean, come on. Propagandists are usually far more subtle and intricate than THIS. Even Chinese propagandists do not state their true goals openly, like, "We want your weapons b gone because we want to conquer the USA". No, they instead say something about "everyone having a right to life" and "guns taking away those lives". Yes, it is nearly obvious what are their goals - they can be figured out with NO extra knowledge in just a few logical operations.

    BUT THEY AREN'T THIS FUCKING OPEN ABOUT THEIR TRUE VIEWS ON AMERICAN SOCIETY!

    And this woman is literally saying that 1) The fact that men no longer _revere_ cunts is "frustrating" (notice this. Not just respect. Not even have a sympathy. REVERE! Like a fucking deity!) and 2) that, in her eyes, those who do not revere women are "woman-haters".

    Notice HOW FAR ORDINARY MEN HAVE GONE IN THEIR REVERENCE OF WOMEN? A conservative twat openly states that "the fact that men no longer revere women is a problem" and "all who do not revere them are woman-haters". And I'm probably the first male reader to freak out while reading this!

    That's why I will protect my right to own and store sex-games on my data-carriers, and play them as I desire. Want to revere women? Go on, no one is stopping you, but never try to involve me in your fuckin' cult.

    https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/how-feminism-is-driving-the-growing-trend-of-anti-women-subcultures
    Ha! The MGTOWs are now a "male equivalent of a man-hating radical feminist". Well, whoever really interested in the movement, its principles and ideas behind it, can see it for themselves - the MGTOW aren't planning on bullshitting you guys and they tell everyone what they really are https://www.mgtow.com/ Who only has interest in hating them - hate on. Makes it easier to spot non-negotiables and ferals this way. What's really interesting is not even how those women label literally everyone who do not want to cater to their needs as "woman-hating". Radical feminists and female supremacist movements do this all the time, after all. What's really interesting is that the bitch wholly admits that she expects nothing but REVERENCE from men, and anything else freaks her out: "I stood in momentary silence because I was unsure of how to respond to that. I wanted to hear the uncensored truth from him because he (unlike the women-hating MGTOWs, Incels, and PUAs) had never viewed women in this way before. He was brought up in one of those traditionally wholesome, family-oriented, Christian household, whereby reverence for women was ingrained in him from a young age. His father and male relatives were his role models because they knew exactly what it meant to be a protector and a provider. Consequently, the women in their lives (like his mother and grandmother) cherished and respected their men for that. It was then that I realized we’re in a turning point in history where men no longer hold a reverence for women like they did in previous generations..." and it can be supposed that she admits treating everyone who is not a woman-worshipping tradcuck as woman-hater. I mean, come on. Propagandists are usually far more subtle and intricate than THIS. Even Chinese propagandists do not state their true goals openly, like, "We want your weapons b gone because we want to conquer the USA". No, they instead say something about "everyone having a right to life" and "guns taking away those lives". Yes, it is nearly obvious what are their goals - they can be figured out with NO extra knowledge in just a few logical operations. BUT THEY AREN'T THIS FUCKING OPEN ABOUT THEIR TRUE VIEWS ON AMERICAN SOCIETY! And this woman is literally saying that 1) The fact that men no longer _revere_ cunts is "frustrating" (notice this. Not just respect. Not even have a sympathy. REVERE! Like a fucking deity!) and 2) that, in her eyes, those who do not revere women are "woman-haters". Notice HOW FAR ORDINARY MEN HAVE GONE IN THEIR REVERENCE OF WOMEN? A conservative twat openly states that "the fact that men no longer revere women is a problem" and "all who do not revere them are woman-haters". And I'm probably the first male reader to freak out while reading this! That's why I will protect my right to own and store sex-games on my data-carriers, and play them as I desire. Want to revere women? Go on, no one is stopping you, but never try to involve me in your fuckin' cult. https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/how-feminism-is-driving-the-growing-trend-of-anti-women-subcultures
    How Feminism Is Driving The Growing Trend Of Anti-Women Subcultures
    “Men are disgusted by women in almost every way today.” These were the words of a distressing, yet eye-opening conversation I recently had with a long time…
    WWW.EVIEMAGAZINE.COM
    1
    5 Comments 0 Shares
  • Look, bitches are now openly admitting that for a man, marriage is an undesirable affair.

    And they openly admit that men refusing to marry is a "scary trend". They're even willing to get rid of some "unfair gender laws", look!

    How fuckin' generous.

    How about LOWERING YOUR STANDARDS so those men who ARE interested in marriage and family will have a chance? I mean, those of poor and intermediate wealth, with conservative/traditional views, low-to-average intelligence, without any specific social statuses or fame.

    A rich dude simply buys sex services from nice-looking gals. And someone who is strong-willed will NOT be a goddamn simp no matter what.

    Bitches got to face it, either they're agreeing to marry a more moderate man, or they're gong to write articles like this one for eternity... Or at least until feminism finally win and turns all compliant men into livestock. Because no-one wants your risky & expensive deal called "marriage". No one but traditional men.

    https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/millions-of-men-no-longer-want-to-get-married-and-you-can-thank-the/
    Look, bitches are now openly admitting that for a man, marriage is an undesirable affair. And they openly admit that men refusing to marry is a "scary trend". They're even willing to get rid of some "unfair gender laws", look! How fuckin' generous. How about LOWERING YOUR STANDARDS so those men who ARE interested in marriage and family will have a chance? I mean, those of poor and intermediate wealth, with conservative/traditional views, low-to-average intelligence, without any specific social statuses or fame. A rich dude simply buys sex services from nice-looking gals. And someone who is strong-willed will NOT be a goddamn simp no matter what. Bitches got to face it, either they're agreeing to marry a more moderate man, or they're gong to write articles like this one for eternity... Or at least until feminism finally win and turns all compliant men into livestock. Because no-one wants your risky & expensive deal called "marriage". No one but traditional men. https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/millions-of-men-no-longer-want-to-get-married-and-you-can-thank-the/
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • I was almost always saying that Biden is a temporary actor, and he's here to discredit he rival Democratic Party and convert Democratic voters to Republicans (Or whatever it'll be called. I guess Patriot Party?)

    Because, hey, just winning isn't enough for Trump. Libertarians won't want him to be in charge, and so are socialists, anarchists, syndicalists, liberals, and others. Basically, save for traditional conservatives and neo-reactionaries, no one wants this dude as president. They just accept him as a "better alternative" or something.

    But that's not enough for the State. The State saw the failure of that effort to vaccinate _everyone_, so they're apparently rolling back to trying to win popular sympathy. And they need that sympathy so to ensure absolute or near-absolute obedience of citizen of the United States.

    It's not enough for Trump to win. Trump needs everyone to _want_ him, to want his policy. Not just to "accept as a better alternative to Great Douche/Turd Sandwich".

    https://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2021/06/former-navy-seal-michael-jaco-update-trump-is-going-public-again-maricopa-county-sheriff-finally-held-accountable-video-3752224.html
    I was almost always saying that Biden is a temporary actor, and he's here to discredit he rival Democratic Party and convert Democratic voters to Republicans (Or whatever it'll be called. I guess Patriot Party?) Because, hey, just winning isn't enough for Trump. Libertarians won't want him to be in charge, and so are socialists, anarchists, syndicalists, liberals, and others. Basically, save for traditional conservatives and neo-reactionaries, no one wants this dude as president. They just accept him as a "better alternative" or something. But that's not enough for the State. The State saw the failure of that effort to vaccinate _everyone_, so they're apparently rolling back to trying to win popular sympathy. And they need that sympathy so to ensure absolute or near-absolute obedience of citizen of the United States. It's not enough for Trump to win. Trump needs everyone to _want_ him, to want his policy. Not just to "accept as a better alternative to Great Douche/Turd Sandwich". https://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2021/06/former-navy-seal-michael-jaco-update-trump-is-going-public-again-maricopa-county-sheriff-finally-held-accountable-video-3752224.html
    Former Navy Seal Michael Jaco Update: Trump Is Going Public Again & Maricopa County Sheriff Finally Held Accountable (Video) | Alternative | Before It's News
      by N.Morgan   Another mysterious event has taken place and in his latest video, Michael discusses it. Former President Trump is signing military retirement letters now, only current presidents sign those letters. So what does this mean?   The slow trickle reveals will go heavy soon! This summer may be more explosive...
    BEFOREITSNEWS.COM
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
More Stories